Differential repression of Otx2 underlies the capacity of NANOG and ESRRB to induce germline entry

Scalable and Efficient Generation of Mouse Primordial Germ Cell-like Cells

Primordial germ cells (PGCs) are the founder cells of the germline. The ability to generate PGC-like cells (PGCLCs) from pluripotent stem cells has advanced our knowledge of gametogenesis and holds promise for developing infertility treatments. However, generating an ample supply of PGCLCs for demanding applications such as high-throughput genetic screens has been a limitation. Here, we demonstrated that simultaneous overexpressing 4 transcriptional factors - Nanog and three PGC master regulators Prdm1, Prdm14 and Tfap2c - in suspended mouse epiblast like cells (EpiLCs) and formative embryonic stem cells (ESCs) results in efficient and cost-effective production of PGCLCs. The overexpression of Nanog enhances the PGC regulatory network and suppresses differentiation of somatic lineages, enabling a significant improvement in the efficiency of PGCLC production. Transcriptomic analysis reveals that differentiated PGCLCs exhibit similarities to in vivo PGCs and are more advanced compared to cytokine-induced PGCLCs. These differentiated PGCLCs could be sustained over prolonged periods of culture and could differentiate into spermatogonia-like cells in vitro. Importantly, the ability to produce PGCLCs at scale, without using costly cytokines, enables biochemical and functional genomic screens to dissect mechanisms of germ cell development and infertility.

Rhox6 regulates the expression of distinct target genes to mediate mouse PGCLC formation and ESC self-renewal

BACKGROUND

Mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) not only retain the property of self-renewal but also have the ability to develop into primordial germ cell-like cells (PGCLCs). However, knowledge about the mechanisms of transcriptional regulation is still limited. Rhox6, a member of the homeobox family that is located on the X chromosome, is highly expressed within PGCLCs in vivo and in vitro. However, the detailed effects of Rhox6 on PGCLC specification and mESC maintenance remain unclear.

RESULTS

In this study, we found that overexpression of Rhox6 favors the formation of PGCLCs, while depletion of Rhox6 inhibits the generation of PGCLCs. Mechanistically, Rhox6 directly induces the expression of Nanos3 during the specification of PGCLCs. Subsequently, downregulation of Nanos3 expression is sufficient to decrease the ability of Rhox6 to induce PGCLC formation. Moreover, we found that depletion of Rhox6 expression facilitates the self-renewal of mESCs. High-throughput sequencing revealed that suppression of Rhox6 transcription significantly increases the expression of pluripotency genes. Functional studies further demonstrated that Rhox6 directly represses the transcription of Tbx3. Therefore, knockdown of the expression of the latter impairs the self-renewal of mESCs promoted by Rhox6 downregulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals that overexpression of Rhox6 is beneficial for PGCLC generation through induction of Nanos3, while downregulation of Rhox6 contributes to mESC self-renewal by increasing Tbx3. These findings help elucidate the early development of mouse embryos.

Plasma membrane depolarization reveals endosomal escape incapacity of cell-penetrating peptides

Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are short (<30 amino acids), generally cationic, peptides that deliver diverse cargos into cells. CPPs access the cytosol either by direct translocation through the plasma membrane or via endocytosis followed by endosomal escape. Both direct translocation and endosomal escape can occur simultaneously, making it non-trivial to specifically study endosomal escape alone. Here we depolarize the plasma membrane and showed that it inhibits the direct translocation of several CPPs but does not affect their uptake into endosomes. Despite good endocytic uptake many CPPs previously considered to access the cytosol via endosomal escape, failed to access the cytosol once direct translocation was abrogated. Even CPPs designed for enhanced endosomal escape actually showed negligible endosomal escape into the cytosol. Our data reveal that cytosolic localization of CPPs occurs mainly by direct translocation across the plasma membrane. Cell depolarization represents a simple manipulation to stringently test the endosomal escape capacity of CPPs.