Traitement chirurgical des fractures du condyle mandibulaire de l'adulte en France en 2005

Mandibular subcondylar fracture accessibility with transparotid approach by rhytidectomy and modified Risdon approach: An anatomical comparative study

PURPOSE

The purpose of our anatomical study was to compare the accessibility of the area at the level of the neck of the condyle and the condylar head by two different approaches: the modified Risdon approach and a transparotid approach by rhytidectomy (TPAR).

METHODS

An anatomical study was performed on 12 heads of cadavers preserved with a solution rich in glycerin and ethanol, but very low in formalin. A modified Risdon approach and a TPAR were each performed on a hemiface of the same head. The bone surface was rendered digitally accessible on an anatomical diagram using Image J software. The software was used to determine a concordance score between the area of accessibility and the area of interest necessary for osteosynthesis of a high subcondylar fracture. This score was presented as a numerical scale from 0 to 100. We measured the total number of pixels in our area of interest and assigned it a score of 100. We then compared the area of accessibility with the area of interest necessary for osteosynthesis of a high subcondylar fracture.

RESULTS

Using the modified Risdon approach, an average score of 55.88 (SD = 18.96) was found, or 55.88% of the accessible area of interest. Using TPAR, we found a score of 91.05 (SD = 7.95) or 91.05% of the accessible area of interest. This difference in score between the two techniques was significantly different (p < 0.001), taking into account intra-hemiface and intra-individual correlation.

CONCLUSION

TPAR seems to be more effective in treating high condylar process fractures of the mandible.

Surgical Treatment for Extracapsular Condylar Fractures of the Mandible

BACKGROUND

Condylar fractures are considered the most controversial mandibular fractures, regarding both the diagnosis and the treatment. With the increase in surgical indications for handling this type of fracture, it is important to discuss about the advantages and disadvantages of the several surgical approaches available. This article describes the surgical details and postoperative results of the mini-retromandibular transparotid approach for treating extracapsular condylar fractures of the mandible.

METHODS

In a 1-year period, 16 patients affected by extracapsular condylar fractures with surgical indication were treated with the mini-retromandibular transparotid approach. All the surgeries were executed by the same surgeon. Preoperative and postoperative details of each patient were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the postoperatory, only 2 patients had purulent drainage in the associated fractures area and only 1 patient had paresis of the buccal branch of the facial nerve. No scar issues concerning the surgical wound were observed and reintervention was not necessary in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The mini-retromandibular transparotid approach offers advantages and should be included as an option for the open treatment of extracapsular condylar fractures of the mandible.