2
|
Fuchs ACD, Alva V, Lupas AN. An astonishing wealth of new proteasome homologs. Bioinformatics 2021; 37:4694-4703. [PMID: 34323935 PMCID: PMC8665760 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Motivation The proteasome is the main proteolytic machine for targeted protein degradation in archaea and eukaryotes. While some bacteria also possess the proteasome, most of them contain a simpler and more specialized homolog, the heat shock locus V protease. In recent years, three further homologs of the proteasome core subunits have been characterized in prokaryotes: Anbu, BPH and connectase. With the inclusion of these members, the family of proteasome-like proteins now exhibits a range of architectural and functional forms, from the canonical proteasome, a barrel-shaped protease without pronounced intrinsic substrate specificity, to the monomeric connectase, a highly specific protein ligase. Results We employed systematic sequence searches to show that we have only seen the tip of the iceberg so far and that beyond the hitherto known proteasome homologs lies a wealth of distantly related, uncharacterized homologs. We describe a total of 22 novel proteasome homologs in bacteria and archaea. Using sequence and structure analysis, we analyze their evolutionary history and assess structural differences that may modulate their function. With this initial description, we aim to stimulate the experimental investigation of these novel proteasome-like family members. Availability and implementation The protein sequences in this study are searchable in the MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit (https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de) with ProtBLAST/PSI-BLAST and with HHpred (database ‘proteasome_homologs’). The following data are available at https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/t48yhff7hs/3: (i) sequence alignments for each proteasome-like homolog, (ii) the coordinates for their structural models and (iii) a cluster-map file, which can be navigated interactively in CLANS and gives direct access to all the sequences in this study. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian C D Fuchs
- Department of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Vikram Alva
- Department of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andrei N Lupas
- Department of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fuchs ACD, Ammelburg M, Martin J, Schmitz RA, Hartmann MD, Lupas AN. Archaeal Connectase is a specific and efficient protein ligase related to proteasome β subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:e2017871118. [PMID: 33688044 PMCID: PMC7980362 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2017871118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Sequence-specific protein ligations are widely used to produce customized proteins "on demand." Such chimeric, immobilized, fluorophore-conjugated or segmentally labeled proteins are generated using a range of chemical, (split) intein, split domain, or enzymatic methods. Where short ligation motifs and good chemoselectivity are required, ligase enzymes are often chosen, although they have a number of disadvantages, for example poor catalytic efficiency, low substrate specificity, and side reactions. Here, we describe a sequence-specific protein ligase with more favorable characteristics. This ligase, Connectase, is a monomeric homolog of 20S proteasome subunits in methanogenic archaea. In pulldown experiments with Methanosarcina mazei cell extract, we identify a physiological substrate in methyltransferase A (MtrA), a key enzyme of archaeal methanogenesis. Using microscale thermophoresis and X-ray crystallography, we show that only a short sequence of about 20 residues derived from MtrA and containing a highly conserved KDPGA motif is required for this high-affinity interaction. Finally, in quantitative activity assays, we demonstrate that this recognition tag can be repurposed to allow the ligation of two unrelated proteins. Connectase catalyzes such ligations at substantially higher rates, with higher yields, but without detectable side reactions when compared with a reference enzyme. It thus presents an attractive tool for the development of new methods, for example in the preparation of selectively labeled proteins for NMR, the covalent and geometrically defined attachment of proteins on surfaces for cryo-electron microscopy, or the generation of multispecific antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian C D Fuchs
- Department of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Moritz Ammelburg
- Department of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jörg Martin
- Department of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ruth A Schmitz
- Institute for General Microbiology, Christian Albrecht University of Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany
| | - Marcus D Hartmann
- Department of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andrei N Lupas
- Department of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Majumder P, Baumeister W. Proteasomes: unfoldase-assisted protein degradation machines. Biol Chem 2020; 401:183-199. [PMID: 31665105 DOI: 10.1515/hsz-2019-0344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Proteasomes are the principal molecular machines for the regulated degradation of intracellular proteins. These self-compartmentalized macromolecular assemblies selectively degrade misfolded, mistranslated, damaged or otherwise unwanted proteins, and play a pivotal role in the maintenance of cellular proteostasis, in stress response, and numerous other processes of vital importance. Whereas the molecular architecture of the proteasome core particle (CP) is universally conserved, the unfoldase modules vary in overall structure, subunit complexity, and regulatory principles. Proteasomal unfoldases are AAA+ ATPases (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities) that unfold protein substrates, and translocate them into the CP for degradation. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge about proteasome - unfoldase systems in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, the three domains of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parijat Majumder
- Department of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Baumeister
- Department of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lepore R, Kryshtafovych A, Alahuhta M, Veraszto HA, Bomble YJ, Bufton JC, Bullock AN, Caba C, Cao H, Davies OR, Desfosses A, Dunne M, Fidelis K, Goulding CW, Gurusaran M, Gutsche I, Harding CJ, Hartmann MD, Hayes CS, Joachimiak A, Leiman PG, Loppnau P, Lovering AL, Lunin VV, Michalska K, Mir-Sanchis I, Mitra AK, Moult J, Phillips GN, Pinkas DM, Rice PA, Tong Y, Topf M, Walton JD, Schwede T. Target highlights in CASP13: Experimental target structures through the eyes of their authors. Proteins 2019; 87:1037-1057. [PMID: 31442339 PMCID: PMC6851490 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The functional and biological significance of selected CASP13 targets are described by the authors of the structures. The structural biologists discuss the most interesting structural features of the target proteins and assess whether these features were correctly reproduced in the predictions submitted to the CASP13 experiment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalba Lepore
- BSC-CNS Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Markus Alahuhta
- Biosciences Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado
| | - Harshul A Veraszto
- Department of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Yannick J Bomble
- Biosciences Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado
| | - Joshua C Bufton
- Nuffield Department of Medicine; Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alex N Bullock
- Nuffield Department of Medicine; Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Cody Caba
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hongnan Cao
- Department of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas.,Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Owen R Davies
- Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ambroise Desfosses
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Institut de Biologie Structurale, Université Grenoble Alpes, CEA, CNRS, Grenoble, France
| | - Matthew Dunne
- Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Celia W Goulding
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry; Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Manickam Gurusaran
- Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Irina Gutsche
- Institut de Biologie Structurale, Université Grenoble Alpes, CEA, CNRS, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Marcus D Hartmann
- Department of Protein Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christopher S Hayes
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Biomolecular Science and Engineering Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, California
| | - Andrzej Joachimiak
- Structural Biology Center, Biosciences Division, Midwest Center for Structural Genomics, Argonne.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Petr G Leiman
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Peter Loppnau
- Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Vladimir V Lunin
- Biosciences Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado
| | - Karolina Michalska
- Structural Biology Center, Biosciences Division, Midwest Center for Structural Genomics, Argonne
| | - Ignacio Mir-Sanchis
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - A K Mitra
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - John Moult
- Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Department of Cell Biology and Molecular genetics, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - George N Phillips
- Department of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas.,Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Daniel M Pinkas
- Nuffield Department of Medicine; Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Phoebe A Rice
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Yufeng Tong
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.,Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maya Topf
- Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan D Walton
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center and Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
| | - Torsten Schwede
- Biozentrum University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Biozentrum University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A High-Content Screening Assay for the Discovery of Novel Proteasome Inhibitors from Formosan Soft Corals. Mar Drugs 2018; 16:md16100395. [PMID: 30347865 PMCID: PMC6213913 DOI: 10.3390/md16100395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Revised: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is a major proteolytic pathway that safeguards protein homeostasis. The main 26S proteasome consists of a 20S catalytic core proteasome and a 19S substrate recognition proteasome. UPS dysfunction underlies many important clinical diseases involving inflammation, tumors, and neurodegeneration. Currently, three 20S proteasome inhibitors, bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib, have been approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. We aim to screen UPS inhibitors for biomedical purposes. The protein interaction network of human cytomegalovirus UL76 targets UPS, resulting in aggregations of ubiquitinated proteins termed aggresomes. In this study, we demonstrated that cell-based high-content measurements of EGFP-UL76 aggresomes responded to bortezomib and MG132 treatment in a dose-dependent manner. Employing this high-content screening (HCS) assay, we screened natural compounds purified from Formosan soft corals. Four cembrane-based compounds, sarcophytonin A (1), sarcophytoxide (2), sarcophine (3), and laevigatol A (4), were found to enhance the high-content profiles of EGFP-UL76 aggresomes with relative ratios of 0.2. By comparison to the mechanistic action of proteasome inhibitors, compounds 1 and 3 modulated the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins, with a unique pattern likely targeting 19S proteasome. We confirmed that the EGFP-UL76 aggresome-based HCS system greatly improves the efficacy and sensitivity of the identification of proteasome inhibitors.
Collapse
|
10
|
Fuchs ACD, Maldoner L, Hipp K, Hartmann MD, Martin J. Structural characterization of the bacterial proteasome homolog BPH reveals a tetradecameric double-ring complex with unique inner cavity properties. J Biol Chem 2017; 293:920-930. [PMID: 29183996 PMCID: PMC5777263 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m117.815258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Revised: 11/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Eukaryotic and archaeal proteasomes are paradigms for self-compartmentalizing proteases. To a large extent, their function requires interplay with hexameric ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities (AAA+) that act as substrate unfoldases. Bacteria have various types of self-compartmentalizing proteases; in addition to the proteasome itself, these include the proteasome homolog HslV, which functions together with the AAA+ HslU; the ClpP protease with its partner AAA+ ClpX; and Anbu, a recently characterized ancestral proteasome variant. Previous bioinformatic analysis has revealed a novel bacterial member of the proteasome family Betaproteobacteria proteasome homolog (BPH). Using cluster analysis, we here affirmed that BPH evolutionarily descends from HslV. Crystal structures of the Thiobacillus denitrificans and Cupriavidus metallidurans BPHs disclosed a homo-oligomeric double-ring architecture in which the active sites face the interior of the cylinder. Using small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and electron microscopy averaging, we found that BPH forms tetradecamers in solution, unlike the dodecamers seen in HslV. Although the highly acidic inner surface of BPH was in striking contrast to the cavity characteristics of the proteasome and HslV, a classical proteasomal reaction mechanism could be inferred from the covalent binding of the proteasome-specific inhibitor epoxomicin to BPH. A ligand-bound structure implied that the elongated BPH inner pore loop may be involved in substrate recognition. The apparent lack of a partner unfoldase and other unique features, such as Ser replacing Thr as the catalytic residue in certain BPH subfamilies, suggest a proteolytic function for BPH distinct from those of known bacterial self-compartmentalizing proteases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Katharina Hipp
- Electron Microscopy Facility, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Spemannstraße 35, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Jörg Martin
- From the Department of Protein Evolution and
| |
Collapse
|