The Role for Radiation Therapy in the Management of Sarcoma

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the uterine cervix: A case report and literature review

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are rare high-grade sarcomas arising from the peripheral nerves or peripheral nerve sheath cells. MPNSTs rarely occur in the soft tissue, especially in the uterine cervix. Few cases of cervical MPNST have been reported in the literature. The present study reports the case of a 36-year-old female patient who presented with vaginal bleeding. A cervical mass was detected by vaginal ultrasonography and the patient was diagnosed with MPNST via assessment of the morphological and immunohistochemical features of the tumor after surgery. The patient received chemotherapy and radiotherapy following surgery, and at 8 months post-treatment, had no recurrence or metastasis. Furthermore, the present study summarizes the characteristics of all reported cases of cervical MPNST and their potential differential diagnosis with other spindle cell tumors.

The role of radiotherapy in the management of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: a single-center retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

This study sought to investigate the role of radiotherapy (RT) in addition to surgery for oncological outcomes in patients with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST).

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, histopathologically confirmed MPNST were analyzed. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with LC, OS, and DMFS.

RESULTS

We included 57 patients with a median follow-up of 20.0 months. Most MPNSTs were located deeply (87.5%), were larger than 5 cm (55.8%), and had high-grade histology (78.7%). Seventeen patients received surgery only, and 25 patients received surgery and pre- or postoperative RT. Median LC, OS, and DMFS after surgery only were 8.7, 25.5, and 22.0 months; after surgery with RT, the median LC was not reached, while the median OS and DMFS were 111.5 and 69.9 months. Multivariable Cox regression of LC revealed a negative influence of patients presenting with local disease recurrence compared to patients presenting with an initial primary diagnosis of localized MPNST (hazard ratio: 8.86, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of RT to wide surgical excision appears to have a beneficial effect on LC. Local disease recurrence at presentation is an adverse prognostic factor for developing subsequent local recurrences. Future clinical and translational studies are warranted to identify molecular targets and find effective perioperative combination therapies with RT to improve patient outcomes.

Endoprosthetic Reconstruction in Ewing's Sarcoma Patients: A Systematic Review of Postoperative Complications and Functional Outcomes

Ewing's sarcoma (ES) is a rare primary bone cancer managed by radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgical resection. The existing literature on limb salvage surgery with endoprostheses combines data for ES patients with osteosarcoma. This review aimed to evaluate surgical and functional outcomes of endoprosthetic reconstruction in exclusively Ewing's patients. We believe that this is the first comprehensive review to evaluate the outcomes of limb salvage surgery with endoprostheses exclusively in Ewing's sarcoma patients. Clinical data and outcomes were collected from PubMed, Embase, Medline and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were studies on limb salvage surgery in ES patients, where individual patient data was available. Seventeen studies with a total of 57 Ewing's patients were included in this review. Fifty-three of the ES patients preserved the limb after limb salvage with endoprostheses. The average five-year implant survivorship was 85.9% based on four studies in this review. Postoperative complications were categorised by Henderson's failure modes. Soft tissue failure was the most common, occurring in 35.1% of patients, followed by deep infection in 15.7% of patients. There was a suggestion of 'good' functional outcomes with limb salvage surgery. The salient limitation of this review is the variability and rarity of the patient population. Homogenous data in a larger population is necessary to provide more insight into outcomes of limb reconstruction in ES.

The baseline neutrophil lymphocyte ratio predicts survival in soft-tissue sarcoma: A 17-year cohort study

BACKGROUND

Abnormal ratios of peripheral blood cells, e.g. neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), are strongly associated with poor outcomes in numerous cancers. In soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), the NLR has been studied in populations outside the UK although many have major methodological flaws, which represents the rationale for this study.

METHODS

Over 17 years old (2002-2019) adults with extremity STS were included. The baseline NLR (at the time of diagnosis) was calculated. The association between NLR, disease recurrence and survival was explored using cubic splines and a threshold of 3 selected, which is in keeping with the literature. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate overall survival, disease-free survival and recurrence with Hazard Ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Overall, 401 patients were included. The median follow-up was 3 years 8 months (interquartile range 1 years 7 months to 5 years 2 months). During surveillance 148 died (37%), of which 123 (76%) were attributable to sarcoma. At the time of diagnosis, an NLR≥3 was independently associated with worse overall survival (adjusted HR 1.44 [95% 1.01, 2.03]). However, the baseline NLR was not associated with the risk of recurrence (adjusted HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.62, 1.57]) or disease-free survival (adjusted HR 1.11 [95% CI 0.79, 1.56]).

CONCLUSIONS

At the time of diagnosis of STS, the NLR is strongly associated with survival and may serve as a cheap and readily available biomarker to personalise treatment plans for patients.

The Role of Radiotherapy in Soft Tissue Sarcoma on Extremities With Lymph Nodes Metastasis: An IPTW Propensity Score Analysis of the SEER Database

Background

Soft tissue sarcomas on extremities with regional lymph nodes metastasis (STSE-RLNM) is a devastating situation. Optimizing therapeutic approaches is vital but hampered by a shortage of randomized trials. We used a population-level database to evaluate radiotherapy’s impact on sarcoma-specific survival (SSS) and overall survival (OS) for surgery for STSE-RLNM.

Methods

We retrospectively screened data from the SEER database (2004–2015), and 265 patients with STSE-RLNM who received surgery, with (134) or without (131) radiotherapy, were enrolled in this study. A propensity-score-matched analysis with the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) Kaplan–Meier curve was created. The log-rank test and Cox regression analysis were performed to compare SSS and OS in patients with and without radiotherapy. Further analysis of radiotherapy time was conducted, and the Kaplan–Meier curve and the log-rank test were done. Landmark analysis was introduced to attenuate the immortal bias.

Results

In the original unadjusted cohort, the radiotherapy + surgery group is associated with improved SSS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47–0.91; p = 0.011] and OS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47–0.88; p = 0.006). This significant treatment effect was also noted in IPTW-adjusted Cox regression either on SSS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45–0.93; p = 0.020) or on OS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46–0.91; p = 0.013). The Kaplan–Meier curve and log-rank test showed that pre- and postoperative radiotherapy was not related to SSS (p = 0.980 or OS (p = 0.890).

Conclusion

Radiotherapy and surgery has a significant benefit on the prognosis of patients with STSE-RLNM compared to surgery alone. These findings should be considered when making treatment decisions for them.

The Interval Between Preoperative Radiation and Surgery Is Not Associated with Overall Survival for Soft-tissue Sarcomas: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Most cancer centers prefer preoperative radiation therapy (preRT) over postoperative therapy to treat soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) to limit long-term fibrosis, joint stiffness, and edema. Surgery is often delayed after preRT to allow for tissue recovery and to reduce wound complications. However, the association between the time interval between preRT and surgery and survival is unknown.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What factors are associated with the preRT-surgery interval in patients with STS? (2) Is the preRT-surgery interval associated with overall survival?

METHODS

The National Cancer Database, a nationwide registry that includes 70% of all new cancers in the United States with 90% follow-up, was reviewed to identify 6378 patients who underwent preRT and surgical resection for a localized extremity or pelvic STS from 2004 to 2014. Patients were excluded if they had lymphatic or metastatic disease at diagnosis (23%; n = 1438), underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (24%; 1531), were missing vital status (8%; 487), had chemosensitive histologies (9%; 603), underwent radiation other than external beam (1%; 92), were missing preRT-surgery interval (1%; 45), or had a preRT-surgery interval greater than 120 days (< 1%; 6). A total of 2176 patients were included for analysis, with a mean preRT-surgery interval of 35 ± 16 days. A multiple linear regression model was generated to assess demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment characteristics associated with the preRT-surgery interval. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was then conducted, stratified by the preRT-surgery interval, to assess survival over 10 years. Finally, a multivariate Cox regression analysis model was constructed to further evaluate the association between the preRT-surgery interval and overall survival, adjusted for demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment characteristics.

RESULTS

A longer preRT-surgery interval was associated with higher age (β = 0.002 per year [95% CI 0.0 to 0.004]; p = 0.026), tumor location in the pelvis (compared with the lower extremity; β = 0.15 [95% CI 0.082 to 0.22]; p < 0.001), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor subtype (compared with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma; β = 0.17 [95% CI 0.044 to 0.29]; p = 0.008). A shorter preRT-surgery interval was associated with higher facility volume (β = -0.002 per case [95% CI -0.003 to -0.002]; p = 0.026) and higher tumor stage (compared with Stage I; β = -0.066 [95% CI -0.13 to -0.006]; p = 0.03 for Stage II; β = -0.12 [95% CI -0.17 to -0.065]; p < 0.001 for Stage III). The 5-year overall survival rates were similar across all preRT-surgery interval groups: less than 3 weeks (66% [95% CI 60 to 72]), 3 to 4 weeks (65% [95% CI 60 to 71]), 4 to 5 weeks (65% [95% CI 60 to 71]), 5 to 6 weeks (66% [95% CI 60 to 72]), 6 to 7 weeks (63% [95% CI 54 to 72]), 7 to 9 weeks (66% [95% CI 58 to 74]), and more than 9 weeks (59% [95% CI 48 to 69]). Over 10 years, no difference in overall survival was observed when stratified by the preRT-surgery interval (p = 0.74). After controlling for potentially confounding variables, including age, sex, Charlson/Deyo comorbidity score, histology, tumor size, stage and surgery type, the preRT-surgery interval was not associated with survival (hazard ratio = 1 per day [95% CI 1 to 1]; p = 0.88).

CONCLUSION

With the numbers available, this study demonstrates that a delay in surgery up to 120 days after radiation is not associated with poorer survival. Therefore, clinicians may be able to delay surgery to minimize the risks of wound complications and modifiable comorbidities without affecting overall survival.Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

Six-Week Interval Between Preoperative Radiation and Surgery Is Associated With Fewer Major Wound Complications in Soft Tissue Sarcoma

OBJECTIVES

A total of 30% to 40% of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients develop major wound complications (MWCs) after preoperative radiation (preRT). The optimal preRT-surgery interval and its association with MWCs is unknown. This study investigated whether a longer preRT-surgery interval is associated with fewer MWCs compared with historical controls.

METHODS

All patients treated by a single surgeon after preRT with limb-sparing wide resection for extremity and trunk STS were retrospectively reviewed from 2004 to 2014. The primary outcome was MWCs defined as a secondary operation, invasive procedure, wound packing, or readmission for wound care. Secondary outcomes of local recurrence and survival were followed and independent variables were analyzed for an association with MWCs.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were included with a median follow-up of 32 months and age of 61 years. The majority of tumors were deep (91%), large (median size of 11 cm), high grade (78%) and within the lower extremity (78%). The median preRT-surgery interval was 43 days and 80% of patients received surgery 35 to 49 days after radiation. MWCs were observed in 15% of patients and 88% occurred within 40 days. Predictors for MWCs on multivariate analysis were peripheral vascular disease (P=0.03), location in the medial compartment of the thigh (P=0.03), and neurovascular involvement (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents a cohort of STS patients with an extended preRT-surgery interval of ~6 weeks. MWCs in this population occurred at a lower rate than historical controls. Overall these findings support the exploration of a longer interval to reduce MWCs and their associated morbidity.

Do Indomethacin or Radiation for Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis Increase the Rates of Infection or Wound Complications After Acetabular Fracture Surgery?

OBJECTIVES

To compare the rates of infection and wound complications in patients undergoing operative fixation (ORIF) of acetabular fractures receiving heterotopic ossification (HO) prophylaxis using indomethacin or external beam radiation therapy (XRT) versus no prophylaxis.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS

We reviewed 473 patients undergoing ORIF of acetabular fractures through posterior, combined, or extensile surgical approaches from 2012 to 2017, with a median follow-up of 13 months (0.5-77 months).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

Rates of infection and wound complications were stratified according to their HO prophylaxis method into three groups as indomethacin, XRT, and no prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Overall, 167 patients (35.3%) received indomethacin, 104 patients (22.0%) received postoperative XRT, and 202 patients (42.7%) received no prophylactic treatment. There was no difference between the 3 groups for the risk of surgical site infection (P = 0.280). The XRT group had a significantly increased risk of noninfectious wound complications (20.2%) compared with the indomethacin group (6.6%, P = 0.002) and the no prophylaxis group (5.0%, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed XRT remained a significant risk factor for noninfectious wound complications compared with no prophylaxis (odds ratio 5.39; 95% confidence interval 2.37-12.22; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is no difference between XRT, indomethacin, and no HO prophylaxis for the risk of surgical site infection, the use of XRT results in more than 5 times increased risk of noninfectious wound complications compared with no prophylaxis. This increased risk should be considered when contemplating XRT for HO prophylaxis in acetabular fracture patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical features, prognostic factors and outcome in a series of 29 extra-skeletal Ewing Sarcoma. Adequate margins and surgery-radiotherapy association improve overall survival

Objective

Authors review a series of 29 extra-skeletal Ewing Sarcoma (EES).

Methods

They analyzed characteristics, prognostic factors and outcome of EES.

Results

Authors report 60% Overall Survival (OS) and 56% of Event Free Survival (EFS) at 5 years. Better 5 years EFS was found in patients with localized disease (68.8%) compared to metastatic EES (33.3%) (p = 0.042). Radiotherapy + surgery offered the best local treatment (p=0.017). Volume (p = 0.032), Surgical margins (p = 0.01), metastatic disease (p = 0.0013) were a significant prognostic factor for OS at 5-yrs.

Conclusion

Adequate margins and surgery+radiotherapy improve Overall Survival.

Role of Radiation Therapy in Adult Extraskeletal Ewing's Sarcoma Patients Treated with Chemotherapy and Surgery

Radiation therapy (RT) is advocated in the multimodal treatment of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS), but its role may be less clear in chemotherapy-sensitive STS such as extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma (EES). The purpose of this study was to determine the role of RT on overall survival (OS) in localized EES adult patients treated with chemotherapy and surgery. Adult patients diagnosed with EES and reported to the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014 were evaluated. All patients were treated with surgical resection. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatments received, resection margins, and survival were examined for the 232 patients identified. Using multivariate analysis and Cox proportional hazard analysis, predictors of OS were determined. In the overall cohort, 40 percent of patients received RT and 78 percent received chemotherapy, with 31 percent receiving both. The addition of RT to the patients receiving surgery + chemotherapy did not improve OS (p < 0.05). Twenty-four percent of patients who achieved R0 resection after surgery still received RT without any improvement in OS. Patients treated at community cancer centers were more likely to receive additional RT compared with Comprehensive Cancer Centers (p < 0.05). In adult EES patients with localized disease treated with chemotherapy and surgery, the addition of RT does not improve overall survival.

Enhancement of Soft Tissue Sarcoma Cell Radiosensitivity by Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 Inhibitors

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are aggressive tumors with a poor prognosis. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1 inhibitors (PARPi) enhance the cytotoxic effects of radiation. In this study, we evaluated the effect of PARPi on survival and DNA damage of irradiated STS cells. For clonogenic assays, STS cell lines were irradiated with or without olaparib, iniparib or veliparib pretreatment. The effect of PARP inhibition on γ-H2AX and Rad51 foci formation, on PARP-1, phospho-ERK and cleaved caspase-3 protein expression and on cell cycle progression was evaluated on irradiated rhabdomyosarcoma cells pretreated with olaparib. The results from this work showed that PARPi induced significant radiosensitization in STS cells. Rhabdomyosarcoma cells showed the highest increase in radiosensitivity, with a radiosensitization enhancement ratio at 50% survival (ER50) of 3.41 with veliparib. All PARPi exerted a synergistic effect when combined with radiation. Fibrosarcoma cells showed an ER50 of 2.29 with olaparib. Leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma cells showed their highest ER50 with veliparib (1.71 and 1.84, respectively). In rhabdomyosarcoma, olaparib enhanced the formation of radiation-induced γ-H2AX/Rad51 foci and PARP-1 cleavage, induced slightly increased expression of cleaved caspase-3 and reduced phospho-ERK expression. Moreover, the combination of olaparib and radiation resulted in a significantly enhanced cell cycle arrest in the G₂/M phase compared to the two treatments alone. In conclusion, we have shown that PARPi are potent radiosensitizers of human STS cells. These results support the pursuit of further investigations into the effects of PARPi combined with radiation on STS.

Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy is Associated with R0 Resection and Improved Survival for Patients with Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Undergoing Surgery: A National Cancer Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is increasingly advocated for the management of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Therefore, this study sought to characterize the impact of neoadjuvant RT on rates of R0 resection and overall survival (OS) in extremity STS patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

From January 2003 to December 2012, the study identified patients with a diagnosis of extremity STS from the National Cancer Database. After exclusion of patients younger than 18 years, not treated by surgery, who had metastases at diagnosis, intraoperative RT, and missing or unknown data, 27,969 patients were identified. Logistic regression and Cox-proportional hazard analysis were used to compare rates of R0 resection among preoperative, postoperative, and no-RT cohorts and to determine predictors of R0 resection and OS.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 59.5 ± 17.1 years, and 45.9% were female. The median tumor size was 10.5 cm. The data showed that 51% of the patients did not receive RT, 11.8% received preoperative RT, and 37.2% received postoperative RT. The rates of R0 resection were 90.1% for the preoperative RT cohort, 74.9% for the postoperative RT cohort, and 79.9% for the no-RT cohort (P < 0.001). The independent predictors for achievement of R0 resection included academic facility type (odds ratio [OR] 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.55), histologic subtype, tumor size (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.99-0.99), Charlson score (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-0.99), and preoperative RT (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.61-2.07). Both R0 resection and RT (pre- or post-operative) were associated with increased OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative RT independently predicts higher rates of R0 resection for patients with extremity STS undergoing surgical resection. Negative surgical margins and pre- or postoperative RT are associated with improved OS.