1
|
Binda C, Secco M, Tuccillo L, Coluccio C, Liverani E, Jung CFM, Fabbri C, Gibiino G. Early Rectal Cancer and Local Excision: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2292. [PMID: 38673565 PMCID: PMC11051053 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
A rise in the incidence of early rectal cancer consequent to bowel-screening programs around the world and an increase in the incidence in young adults has led to a growing interest in organ-sparing treatment options. The rectum, being the most distal portion of the large intestine, is a fertile ground for local excision techniques performed with endoscopic or surgical techniques. Moreover, the advancement in endoscopic optical evaluation and the better definition of imaging techniques allow for a more precise local staging of early rectal cancer. Although the local treatment of early rectal cancer seems promising, in clinical practice, a significant number of patients who could benefit from local excision techniques undergo total mesorectal excision (TME) as the first approach. All relevant prospective clinical trials were identified through a computer-assisted search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline databases until January 2024. This review is dedicated to endoscopic and surgical local excision in the treatment of early rectal cancer and highlights its possible role in current and future clinical practice, taking into account surgical completion techniques and chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy; (C.B.); (M.S.); (L.T.); (C.C.); (E.L.); (C.F.M.J.); (G.G.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Freund MR, Horesh N, Emile SH, Garoufalia Z, Gefen R, Wexner SD. Predictors and outcomes of positive surgical margins after local excision of clinical T1 rectal cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis. Surgery 2023; 173:1359-1366. [PMID: 36959073 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal local excision and the use of specialized platforms has become increasingly popular for early-stage rectal cancer. Predictors and outcomes of positive resection margins following transanal local excision for early-stage rectal cancer have yet to be explored. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database of all patients with clinical nonmetastatic node negative T1 rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent transanal local excision from 2004 to 2017. Patients with positive surgical margins were compared to those with negative resection margins to determine factors associated with predictors and outcomes of positive surgical margins after transanal local excision. The main outcome measure was overall survival. RESULTS Of 318,548 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma in the National Cancer Database, 9,078 (2.8%) met the inclusion criteria. The positive surgical margins rate was 7.4%. Predictors of positive surgical margins were older age (odds ratio, 1.03; P < .001), higher Charlson comorbidity index (odds ratio, 1.24; P = .004), poorly differentiated carcinomas (odds ratio, 1.89; P < .001), mucinous (odds ratio, 2.36; P = .003) and signet-ring cell carcinomas (odds ratio, 4.7; P = .048). Independent predictors of reduced survival were older age (hazard ratio, 1.062; P < .001), male sex (hazard ratio, 1.214; P = .011), Charlson comorbidity index 3 (hazard ratio, 1.94; P < .001), pathologic T2 (hazard ratio, 1.27; P = .036) and T3 stages (hazard ratio, 1.77; P = .006), poorly differentiated carcinomas (hazard ratio, 1.47; P = .008), and positive surgical margins (hazard ratio, 1.374; P = .018). The positive surgical margins group's median overall survival was significantly shorter (88 vs 159.3 months, P < .001). CONCLUSION Positive surgical margins after transanal local excision for early-stage node-negative rectal cancer adversely affects prognosis. Older male patients with higher Charlson comorbidity index scores and poorly differentiated mucinous or signet cell histology tumors are at risk for positive surgical margins. Patient selection according to these suggested criteria may help avoid positive surgical margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Freund
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL; Department of General Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, the Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel. https://twitter.com/mikifreund
| | - Nir Horesh
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL; Department of Surgery and Transplantations, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel. https://twitter.com/Nirhoresh1
| | - Sameh Hany Emile
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL; Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura University, Faculty of Medicine, Egypt. https://twitter.com/dr_samehhany81
| | - Zoe Garoufalia
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL. https://twitter.com/ZGaroufalia
| | - Rachel Gefen
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL; Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. https://twitter.com/RachellGefen
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roat-Shumway S, Tonelli C, Singer M, Cohn T, Luchette FA, Abdelsattar Z, Baker MS. Is local excision an appropriate treatment modality in patients presenting with early-stage (cT1 N0 M0) rectal adenocarcinoma? Surgery 2023; 173:665-673. [PMID: 36273975 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.08.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of local excision relative to surgical resection in early-stage rectal adenocarcinoma have primarily included low rectal cancers treated with abdominoperineal resection as control comparison cohorts. The role of local excision in early-stage rectal adenocarcinoma is incompletely defined. METHODS We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients with cT1 N0 M0 rectal adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2019. Patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection were excluded. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with use of local excision instead of low anterior resection. Patients undergoing local excision were propensity score matched for age, sex, demographic characteristics, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity class score, and tumor grade and size to those undergoing low anterior resection. Short-term clinical outcomes and 5-year overall survival for matched cohorts were compared by standard methods. RESULTS A total of 5,693 patients met inclusion criteria; 1,973 patients underwent local excision and 3,720 low anterior resection. Age (adjusted odds ratio 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.37), tumor histology (poorly differentiated histology: adjusted odds ratio 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.86), and size (>4 cm: adjusted odds ratio 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.25) were associated with choice of intervention. On comparison of matched cohorts, patients undergoing LE demonstrated shorter hospital stay (2.4 ±9.8 vs 5.6 ±8.1 days; P < .001) and lower readmission rate (4% vs 7%; P = .002) but higher margin-positive resection rates (8% vs 2%; P < .001). Overall survival profiles for patients undergoing local excision were comparable with those for low anterior resection. CONCLUSION In patients with cT1 N0 M0 rectal adenocarcinoma, local excision is associated with a higher margin-positive resection rate than low anterior resection but affords accelerated postprocedure recovery and comparable rates of overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siena Roat-Shumway
- Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL. https://twitter.com/sroatshumway
| | - Celsa Tonelli
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Marc Singer
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Tyler Cohn
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Fred A Luchette
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Edward Hines, Jr. Veterans Administration Hospital, Maywood, IL
| | - Zaid Abdelsattar
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Edward Hines, Jr. Veterans Administration Hospital, Maywood, IL
| | - Marshall S Baker
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Edward Hines, Jr. Veterans Administration Hospital, Maywood, IL.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041489. [PMID: 36836024 PMCID: PMC9966470 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer (RC) is one of the deadliest malignancies worldwide. Surgery is the most common treatment for RC, performed in 63.2% of patients. The type of surgical approach chosen aims to achieve maximum residual function with the lowest risk of recurrence. The selection is made by a multidisciplinary team that assesses the characteristics of the patient and the tumor. Total mesorectal excision (TME), including both low anterior resection (LAR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR), is still the standard of care for RC. Radical surgery is burdened by a 31% rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4), such as anastomotic leaks and a risk of a permanent stoma. In recent years, less-invasive techniques, such as local excision, have been tested. These additional procedures could mitigate the morbidity of rectal resection, while providing acceptable oncologic results. The "watch and wait" approach is not a globally accepted model of care but encouraging results on selected groups of patients make it a promising strategy. In this plethora of treatments, the radiologist is called upon to distinguish a physiological from a pathological postoperative finding. The aim of this narrative review is to identify the main post-surgical complications and the most effective imaging techniques.
Collapse
|
5
|
Pangeni A, Imtiaz MR, Rai S, Shrestha AK, Basnyat PS. Transanal minimally invasive surgery - A single-center experience. J Minim Access Surg 2023; 19:35-41. [PMID: 36722528 PMCID: PMC10034814 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_390_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) was described in the literature 10 years ago. This procedure requires laparoscopic technical skills. It has been well accepted widely worldwide. TAMIS has been applied to multiple procedures, including excision for rectal polyps and cancer, with acceptable outcomes. The study aimed to assess the outcomes of TAMIS in a large district general hospital. Methodology A retrospective study on prospectively collected data on 52 consecutive patients of TAMIS performed in a single unit was conducted between May 2014 and February 2020. Data were collected on patient demographics, clinical diagnosis, peri-operative findings, pathological findings, adequacy of excision and complications. Patients were followed up as per the trust and national post-polypectomy guidelines. Results Among the 52 patients, TAMIS procedures were completed in 50 patients, of which 31 were female. The procedure was successful in 96.5% but had to abandon in two cases. There was no conversion to another procedure. Pre-operative indications were rectal polyps and one case was an emergency TAMIS in a patient who was bleeding following incomplete colonoscopic polypectomy. The final histology reported that the majority were benign polyps (46), and only 11 cases were malignant. The median distance of the lesion from the anal verge was 6 cm (3-10 cm). The median operative time was 55 min (8-175 min). A total of 45 (77.5%) lesions were completely excised and had negative microscopic margins. Most patients (64%) were discharged home the same day. No complications were observed at a median follow-up of 20 months (6-48 months). There was no mortality. Conclusions Our data suggest that TAMIS can be safely performed in a district general hospital for both benign and early rectal cancer. TAMIS was also able to control post-polypectomy bleeding and completion of rectal polypectomy. In selected cases, day-case TAMIS is safe and feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anang Pangeni
- Department of General Surgery, William Harvey Hospital, East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Trust, Ashford, Kent, UK
| | - Mohammad Rafiz Imtiaz
- Department of General Surgery, William Harvey Hospital, East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Trust, Ashford, Kent, UK
| | - Sujata Rai
- Department of General Surgery, William Harvey Hospital, East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Trust, Ashford, Kent, UK
| | - Ashish K Shrestha
- Department of General Surgery, William Harvey Hospital, East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Trust, Ashford, Kent, UK
| | - Pradeep Singh Basnyat
- Department of General Surgery, William Harvey Hospital, East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Trust, Ashford, Kent, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gómez-Cortés JC, Díaz-Carmona JJ, Padilla-Medina JA, Calderon AE, Gutiérrez AIB, Gutiérrez-López M, Prado-Olivarez J. Electrical Impedance Tomography Technical Contributions for Detection and 3D Geometric Localization of Breast Tumors: A Systematic Review. MICROMACHINES 2022; 13:mi13040496. [PMID: 35457801 PMCID: PMC9025021 DOI: 10.3390/mi13040496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Impedance measuring acquisition systems focused on breast tumor detection, as well as image processing techniques for 3D imaging, are reviewed in this paper in order to define potential opportunity areas for future research. The description of reported works using electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-based techniques and methodologies for 3D bioimpedance imaging of breast tissues with tumors is presented. The review is based on searching and analyzing related works reported in the most important research databases and is structured according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) parameters and statements. Nineteen papers reporting breast tumor detection and location using EIT were systematically selected and analyzed in this review. Clinical trials in the experimental stage did not produce results in most of analyzed proposals (about 80%), wherein statistical criteria comparison was not possible, such as specificity, sensitivity and predictive values. A 3D representation of bioimpedance is a potential tool for medical applications in malignant breast tumors detection being capable to estimate an ap-proximate the tumor volume and geometric location, in contrast with a tumor area computing capacity, but not the tumor extension depth, in a 2D representation.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Transanal surgery has gained in popularity during the latter part of the last decade for both rectal cancer and benign disease. The current role for local excision of early rectal neoplastic lesions has expanded due to better understanding of risk factors for lymph node metastasis and heightened awareness for the long-term sequelae of radical surgery. Transanal resection of the rectum (both for cancer or inflammatory bowel diseases) has now been established as a successful procedure that overcomes some of the limitations of the abdominal approaches. Once the feasibility, safety, and the oncologic results of transanal minimally invasive approaches for patients with rectal cancer have been acknowledged, quality of life and functional outcomes have become increasingly important issues. This article provides an overview of the different techniques currently available for the minimally invasive transanal treatment of rectal lesions, particularly focusing on functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Foppa
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Maria Carrano
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy,Address for correspondence Antonino Spinelli, MD, PhD Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research CenterIRCCS, Building 2, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milano 20089Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Choi MS, Huh JW, Shin JK, Park YA, Cho YB, Kim HC, Yun SH, Lee WY. Prognostic Factors and Treatment of Recurrence after Local Excision of Rectal Cancer. Yonsei Med J 2021; 62:1107-1116. [PMID: 34816641 PMCID: PMC8612863 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.12.1107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Indications for local excision in patients with rectal cancer remain controversial. We reviewed factors affecting survival rate and treatment effectiveness in cancer recurrence after local excision among patients with rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 831 patients was enrolled. Of these, 391 patients were diagnosed with primary rectal cancer and underwent local excision. A retrospective observational study was performed on patients who underwent full-thickness local excision for rectal cancer. RESULTS The median duration of follow-up was 61 months. The overall recurrence rate was 11.5%. The rate of local recurrence was 5.1%. Five-year overall survival rate among recurrent patients was 66.8%; the rate among patients who underwent salvage operation due to recurrence was 84.7%, compared with 44.2% among patients treated with non-operative management (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis of disease-free survival identified distance from the anal verge (p=0.038) and histologic grade (p=0.047) as factors predicting poor prognosis. Multivariate analysis of overall survival showed that age (p<0.001), serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (p=0.001), and histologic grade (p=0.013) also affected poor prognosis. In subgroup analysis of patients with recurrence, 25 patients underwent reoperation, while 20 patients did not. For 5-year overall survival rate, there was a significant difference between 84.7% of the reoperation group and 44.2% of the non-operation group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION The risk factors affecting overall survival rate after local excision were age 65 years or older, preoperative CEA level 5 or higher, and high histologic grade. In cases of recurrence after local excision of rectal cancer, salvage operation might improve overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moon Suk Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Wook Huh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Jung Kyong Shin
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon Ah Park
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Beom Cho
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Cheol Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Hyeon Yun
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Yong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
A 59-year-old man underwent screening colonoscopy that identified a 2-cm rectal polyp in the posterior midline, 7 cm from the anal verge. Biopsy revealed a tubular adenoma with high-grade dysplasia. The patient underwent a robotic-assisted transanal minimally invasive surgery with full-thickness excision (Fig. 1). Final pathology confirmed a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma extending into the submucosa (sm2). There was no lymphovascular or perineural invasion, and the radial margin was 5 mm.
Collapse
|
10
|
Baker EJ, Waters PS, Peacock O, Narasimhan V, Larach T, McCormick J, Heriot AG, Warrier S, Lynch C. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery - technical, oncological and patient outcomes from a single institution. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1422-1428. [PMID: 32198787 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIM Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) is gaining traction around the globe as an alternative to laparoscopic conventional TAMIS for local excision of benign and early malignant rectal lesions. The aim was to analyse patient and oncological outcomes of R-TAMIS for consecutive cases in a single centre. METHODS A prospective analysis of consecutive R-TAMIS procedures over a 12-month period was performed. Data were collated from hospital databases and theatre registers. RESULTS Eleven patients (six men, five women), mean age 69.81 years (51-92 years), underwent R-TAMIS over 12 months utilizing a da Vinci Xi platform. The mean lesion size was 36 mm (20-60 mm) with a mean distance from the anal verge of 7.5 cm (3-14 cm). Five lesions were posterior in anatomical location, four anterior, one right lateral and one left lateral. All procedures were performed in the lithotomy position using a GelPOINT Path Platform. Mean operative time was 64 min (40-100 min). Complete resection was achieved in 10/11 patients with two patients being upgraded to a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Nine patients were diagnosed with dysplastic lesions. Four patients had a false positive diagnosis of an invasive tumour on MRI. Six patients required suturing for full-thickness resections. One patient had a postoperative bleed requiring repeat endoscopy and clipping. One patient (full-thickness resection of T3 tumour) proceeded to a formal resection without difficulty with no residual disease (T0N0, 0/22). One patient with a fully resected T2 tumour is undergoing a surveillance protocol. The mean length of stay was 1 day with two patients having a length of stay of 2 days and one patient of 4 days. CONCLUSION R-TAMIS could potentially represent a safe novel approach for local resection of rectal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Baker
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - P S Waters
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - O Peacock
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - V Narasimhan
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - T Larach
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - J McCormick
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - A G Heriot
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - S Warrier
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - C Lynch
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pathiraja AA, Weerakkody RA, von Roon AC, Ziprin P, Bayford R. The clinical application of electrical impedance technology in the detection of malignant neoplasms: a systematic review. J Transl Med 2020; 18:227. [PMID: 32513179 PMCID: PMC7282098 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-020-02395-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electrical impedance technology has been well established for the last 20 years. Recently research has begun to emerge into its potential uses in the detection and diagnosis of pre-malignant and malignant conditions. The aim of this study was to systematically review the clinical application of electrical impedance technology in the detection of malignant neoplasms. METHODS A search of Embase Classic, Embase and Medline databases was conducted from 1980 to 22/02/2018 to identify studies reporting on the use of bioimpedance technology in the detection of pre-malignant and malignant conditions. The ability to distinguish between tissue types was defined as the primary endpoint, and other points of interest were also reported. RESULTS 731 articles were identified, of which 51 reported sufficient data for analysis. These studies covered 16 different cancer subtypes in a total of 7035 patients. As the studies took various formats, a qualitative analysis of each cancer subtype's data was undertaken. All the studies were able to show differences in electrical impedance and/or related metrics between malignant and normal tissue. CONCLUSIONS Electrical impedance technology provides a novel method for the detection of malignant tissue, with large studies of cervical, prostate, skin and breast cancers showing encouraging results. Whilst these studies provide promising insights into the potential of this technology as an adjunct in screening, diagnosis and intra-operative margin assessment, customised development as well as multi-centre clinical trials need to be conducted before it can be reliably employed in the clinical detection of malignant tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela A. Pathiraja
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- St Mary’s Hospital, 10th Floor QEQM Building, Paddington, London, W2 1NY UK
| | - Ruwan A. Weerakkody
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- St Mary’s Hospital, 10th Floor QEQM Building, Paddington, London, W2 1NY UK
| | - Alexander C. von Roon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- St Mary’s Hospital, 10th Floor QEQM Building, Paddington, London, W2 1NY UK
| | - Paul Ziprin
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- St Mary’s Hospital, 10th Floor QEQM Building, Paddington, London, W2 1NY UK
| | - Richard Bayford
- Department of Natural Sciences, Middlesex University, London, UK
- School of Science and Technology, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Hendon, London, NW4 4BT UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bisogni D, Manetti R, Talamucci L, Coratti F, Naspetti R, Valeri A, Martellucci J, Cianchi F. Comparison among different techniques for en-bloc resection of rectal lesions: transanal endoscopic surgery vs. endoscopic submucosal dissection vs. full-thickness resection device with Over-The-Scope Clip® System. MINERVA CHIR 2020; 75:234-243. [PMID: 32456395 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4733.20.08298-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of our retrospective study is to compare the efficacy and indications of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and endoscopic full-thickness resection device (FTRD) with Over-The-Scope Clip (OTSC<sup>®</sup>) System for en-bloc resection of rectal lesions. METHODS This study collected 76 cases of rectal neoplasms from a single hospital institution. Primary endpoints were complete en-bloc resection, intraprocedural adverse events, R0 en-bloc resection and an early discharge of the patient. Secondary endpoints included procedure-related adverse events. RESULTS Mean tumor sizes were statistically significant smaller among patients treated with FTRD rather than TEM and ESD. TEO and FTRD treated patients experienced a higher en-bloc resection rate, with a shorter procedure time and hospital stay. No significant difference concerning the R0 resection was found. TEO and FTRD recorded lower perforation rates as compared to ESD, whereas no difference emerged concerning the bleeding rate and the post-polypectomy syndrome rate. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that each technique has specific features, so that each one offers advantages and disadvantages. Nevertheless, all of them ensure high en-bloc resection rates, whereas no difference exists for R0 resection rate. TEO provides the possibility to remove low rectal large lesions as compared to ESD and FTRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damiano Bisogni
- Unit of Interventional Endoscopy, Department of Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy -
| | - Roberto Manetti
- Unit of Interventional Endoscopy, Department of Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Talamucci
- Unit of Interventional Endoscopy, Department of Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Coratti
- Unit of Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Naspetti
- Unit of Interventional Endoscopy, Department of Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Valeri
- Unit of Emergency Surgery, Department of Emergency Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Jacopo Martellucci
- Unit of Emergency Surgery, Department of Emergency Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Fabio Cianchi
- Unit of Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sevak S, Gregoir T, Wolthuis A, Albert M. How can we utilize local excision to help, not harm, geriatric patients with rectal cancer? Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:344-348. [PMID: 31983488 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2019] [Revised: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
A majority of the morbidity and mortality burden of rectal cancer is distributed within the geriatric age group. Current surgical and medical treatment modalities pose significant challenges in treating complications specifically in the already pre-disposed senior population with baseline dysfunction. This chapter reviews the work-up, management, current data and oncologic outcomes of treating rectal cancer in the senior adult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shruti Sevak
- Center for Colon and Rectal Surgery, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, USA.
| | - Tine Gregoir
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 48, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Albert Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 48, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matthew Albert
- Center for Colon and Rectal Surgery, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Le DM, Ahmed S, Ahmed S, Brunet B, Davies J, Doll C, Ferguson M, Ginther N, Gordon V, Hamilton T, Hebbard P, Helewa R, Kim CA, Lee-Ying R, Lim H, Loree JM, McGhie JP, Mulder K, Park J, Renouf D, Wong RPW, Zaidi A, Asif T. Report from the 20th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference; Saskatoon, Saskatchewan; 28-29 September 2018. Curr Oncol 2019; 26:e773-e784. [PMID: 31896948 PMCID: PMC6927778 DOI: 10.3747/co.26.5517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The 20th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference was held in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 28-29 September 2018. This interactive multidisciplinary conference is attended by health care professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) who are involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. In addition, invited speakers from other provinces participate. Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists, and allied health care professionals participated in presentations and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses current issues in the management of colorectal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M Le
- Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK
| | - S Ahmed
- Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK
| | - S Ahmed
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - B Brunet
- Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK
| | | | - C Doll
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, AB
| | - M Ferguson
- Allan Blair Cancer Centre, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Regina, SK
| | - N Ginther
- University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
| | - V Gordon
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - T Hamilton
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | | | - R Helewa
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - C A Kim
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - R Lee-Ying
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, AB
| | | | | | | | - K Mulder
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB
| | - J Park
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | | | | | - A Zaidi
- Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK
| | - T Asif
- Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Maguire LH, Hawkins AT. Surgical Resection for Primary Rectal Lymphoma: Support for Local Excision? J Surg Res 2019; 244:189-195. [PMID: 31299435 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Revised: 05/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary rectal lymphoma is an uncommon and heterogeneous malignancy. Because of its rarity, few data exist to guide treatment or counsel patients. We present the largest series to date of patients undergoing nonpalliative surgery for rectal lymphoma. We hypothesize that there will be no difference in overall survival between patients undergoing local resection (LR) or radical resection (RR). MATERIALS AND METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was queried for all cases of resected primary rectal lymphoma between years 2004 and 2014. Exclusion criteria included patients with stage IV disease and those operated on for palliation. Patients were categorized by resection approach-LR or RR. Approach along with demographic, histologic, and hospital-level factors were analyzed with a Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS A total of 233 patients were identified. Mean age was 63 y (interquartile range 53-73), and 57% of the population was female. The most common histologic subtypes were marginal (44%), diffuse large B-cell (20%), and follicular lymphoma (17%). Eighty-seven percent underwent LR. There was no significant difference in R0 resection (LR: 38% versus RR: 58%; P = 0.07), adjuvant chemotherapy (LR: 18% versus RR: 29%; P = 0.22), or adjuvant radiation (LR: 21% versus RR: 16%; P = 0.63) between the groups. Five-year overall survival was 79%, and there was no significant difference in approach (LR: 81% versus RR: 56%, P = 0.06). Multivariable analysis did not identify an association between approach and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Surgical resection of rectal lymphoma is rare. Our data support consideration of LR when possible, given the lack of convincing survival benefit of radical surgery or R0 resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lillias H Maguire
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Alexander T Hawkins
- Division of General Surgery, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tang Z, Zhang XY, Liu Z, Li XT, Shi YJ, Wang S, Fang M, Shen C, Dong E, Sun YS, Tian J. Quantitative analysis of diffusion weighted imaging to predict pathological good response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2019; 132:100-108. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2018] [Revised: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
17
|
The Influence of 3D in Single-port Laparoscopy Surgery: An Experimental Study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2018; 28:261-266. [DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
18
|
Abstract
PUPRPOSE Benign polyps that are technically challenging and unsafe to remove via polypectomy are known as complex polyps. Concerns regarding safety and completeness of resection dictate they undergo advanced endoscopic techniques, such as endoscopic mucosal resection or surgery. We provide a comprehensive overview of complex polyps and current treatment options. METHODS A review of the English literature was conducted to identifyarticles describing the management of complex polyps of the colon and rectum. RESULTS Endoscopic mucosal resection is the standard of care for the majority of complex polyps. Only polyps that fail endoscopic mucosal resection or are highly suspicious of invasive cancer but which cannot be removed endoscopically warrant surgery. CONCLUSION Several factors influence the treatment of a complex polyp; therefore, there cannot be a "one-size-fitsall" approach. Treatment should be tailored to the lesion's characteristics, the risk of adverse events, and the resources available to the treating physician.
Collapse
|
19
|
Wu X, Lin G, Qiu H, Zhou J. Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Patients with Rare Rectal Tumors. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2017; 28:546-552. [PMID: 29237142 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2017.0606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) has been accepted worldwide for the treatment of local rectal lesions. Rare rectal tumors consist of several different types of malignant or benign tumors. Surgical management is considered to be the only curative option. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of TEM in the treatment of rare rectal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 147 patients with rare rectal tumors underwent TEM in our center from April 2006 to May 2017. Clinical data were collected and a retrospective accurate database was constructed. Demographic characteristics, operative details, tumor details, complications, and follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients were male. Mean tumor diameter was 1.2 ± 0.7 cm and mean distance from the anal verge was 6.6 ± 2.3 cm. Full-thickness and complete resection with negative margins was achieved in all patients. Complications occurred in 3 patients during surgery and in 20 patients after surgery. Histopathologic results were neuroendocrine tumors in 104 patients; gastrointestinal stromal tumors in 35; melanoma, lymphoma, and leiomyoma each in 2; lipoma, and squamous carcinoma each in 1. One hundred thirty-five patients were followed up for 49.3 ± 33.2 months. Two patients died, 1 had local recurrence and 1 had a rectovaginal fistula 1 month after surgery. No local recurrence or metastasis, or fecal incontinence was observed in the remaining patients. CONCLUSION TEM is an optimal treatment option for selected rare rectal tumors. The complication rate is low and the therapeutic effect is satisfactory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital , Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Guole Lin
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital , Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Huizhong Qiu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital , Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiaolin Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital , Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|