Hybrid transgastric appendectomy is feasible but does not offer advantages compared with laparoscopic appendectomy: Results from the transgastric appendectomy study

Acute appendicitis and its treatment: a historical overview

PURPOSE

Acute appendicitis (AA) is the leading cause of acute abdomen worldwide, with an incidence of 90-100 cases per 100,000 individuals annually and a lifetime risk of 7-12%. Despite its prevalence, historical accounts of AA are limited, particularly when compared to conditions like haemorrhoids, likely due to the appendix's internal location. This article traces the historical evolution of AA treatment from ancient times to the present, highlighting key contributions.

METHODS

A review of common research databases and relevant literature on AA was conducted.

RESULTS

Evidence from ancient Egypt suggests early recognition of the appendix, referring to it as the "worm of the bowel." However, detailed anatomical descriptions and treatment approaches for AA did not emerge until the Renaissance, particularly with contributions from Leonardo da Vinci and Berengario da Carpi. The article traces the progression of AA management, including the first autopsies and surgeries, the development of surgical techniques predating anaesthesia and antisepsis, and advancements achieved from the nineteenth to the twenty-first century. The shift from conservative to surgical approaches is discussed, alongside innovations such as laparoscopic appendicectomy, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), and endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on AA treatment, including adaptations in medical practices, is also explored.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the significant historical developments in AA treatment and its pivotal role in advancing abdominal surgery.

[NOTES in visceral surgery : Current status]

The idea to use natural orifices as an access route for operations in the body has inspired many clinicians and researchers worldwide. Some of these expected a continuation of the development from open surgery to laparoscopic surgery finally to a less invasive modality. Others hoped for economic benefits for endoscopists to take over previous surgical patients into gastroenterological departments. The first experimental studies demonstrated that the initial expectations could not be implemented in a short period of time. The available endoscopes could not be proved for advanced procedures. Key problems like sterility, infection control, tissue manipulation, safety of access closure, and specimen retrieval manifested to be too large for routine clinical use. However, the attraction of the natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) philosophy has resulted in a reduction of the number and diameters of trocars in laparoscopic surgery. Hybrid NOTES as a combination of classical laparoscopic access with natural orifice instrumentations (mostly transvaginal) have become clinical reality in many hospitals. This development fits into the long-term trend towards less invasive surgery and more effective interventional methods in endolumenal endoscopy.