Let the right one in: High admission rate for low-acuity pediatric burns

Burn Injuries Associated with At-Home Hair Braiding

Hair braiding that incorporates synthetic extensions has increased in popularity across all age groups. As part of the styling process, the ends of the braid are commonly dipped in scalding water; an increasing number of patients have presented to our center after containers of recently boiled water are accidentally tipped over and spilled onto patients. A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who sustained burn injuries related to at-home hair braiding presenting to an ABA-verified burn center between January 1, 2006 and July 31, 2020. A total of 41 patients presented over the study period, and the frequency of this type of burn increased over time, with 54% of injuries occurring in the past 3 years (2018-2020). The mean patient age was 7.5 years, and the majority of patients were under 18 years of age (97%), female (95%), and African-American (98%). Seventy-three percent of injuries occurred in the home and 88% involved another person in the hair braiding process. The mean TBSA burned was 5% (range 1-20%). The most commonly involved areas were the back (54%), thigh/leg (37%), and neck (24%). Ninety percent were partial-thickness injuries only, with 10% having some degree of full-thickness injury. Ninety percent of patients required inpatient admission, and 34% of patients required at least one operative procedure. Hair braiding, with the use of scalding water to seal and set the ends of braids, can lead to burn injuries that require hospitalization and the need for surgical intervention.

Length of Stay per Total Body Surface Area Burn Relative to Mechanism: A Pediatric Injury Quality Improvement Collaborative (PIQIC) Study

Studies on length of stay (LOS) per total body surface area (TBSA) burn in pediatric patients are often limited to single institutions and are grouped in ranges of TBSA burn which lacks specific detail to counsel patients and families. A LOS to TBSA burn ratio of 1 has been widely accepted but not validated with multi-institution data. The objective of this study is to describe the current relationship of LOS per TBSA burn and LOS per TBSA burn relative to burn mechanism with the use of multi-institutional data. Data from the Pediatric Injury Quality Improvement Collaborative (PIQIC) were obtained for patients across five pediatric burn centers from July 2018-September 2020. LOS per TBSA burn ratios were calculated. Descriptive statistics and generalized linear regression which modeled characteristics associated with LOS per TBSA ratio are described. Among the 1267 pediatric burn patients, the most common mechanism was scald (64%), followed by contact (17%) and flame (13%). The average LOS/TBSA burn ratio across all cases was 1.2 (SD 2.1). In adjusted models, scald burns and chemical burns had similar LOS/TBSA burn ratios of 0.8 and 0.9, respectively, while all other burns had a significantly higher LOS/TBSA burn ratio (p<0.0001). LOS/TBSA burn ratios were similar across races, although Hispanics had a slightly higher ratio at 1.4 days. These data establish a multi-institution LOS per TBSA ratio across PIQIC centers and demonstrate significant variation in the LOS per TBSA burn relative to the burn mechanism sustained.

Interhospital variation of inpatient versus outpatient pediatric burn treatment after emergency department evaluation

BACKGROUND

Approaches to burn care in the pediatric population are highly variable and can be targeted as a potential measure in cost-reduction. We hypothesized that institutions vary significantly in treatment allocation of nonsevere burns to either inpatient or outpatient care.

METHODS

We queried the PHIS database for fiscal year 2017 to quantify small pediatric burn admissions and Emergency Department visits (ED). The ICD-10 code T31.0 was used to identify burns involving <10% of total body surface area (TBSA). Centers were categorized by burn center status and length of stay, readmissions, and charges were compared.

RESULTS

Inpatient versus outpatient management distribution was significantly different across the included pediatric children's hospitals (n = 34, p < 0.00001). When data were analyzed with respect to outpatient care, a bimodal distribution distinguished two groups: high hospital utilizers with an average of 30% outpatient burn care and low-utilizers averaging 87%. Median inpatient charge per patient was greater than 31-fold compared to ED burn management (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Variability of inpatient versus outpatient pediatric burn management in small burns was significant. Compared to outpatient burn care, inpatient care is significantly more costly. Implementing protocols and personnel to provide adequate attention to small burns in the ED could be an important cost-saving measure.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective analysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Pediatric burn-trauma patients have increased length of stay compared to trauma-only patients: A propensity matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Trauma is the leading cause of mortality in children. Burn injury involves intensive resources, especially in pediatric patients. We hypothesized that among pediatric trauma patients, combined burn-trauma (BT) patients have increased length of stay (LOS) and mortality compared to trauma-only (T) patients.

METHODS

The Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2014-2016) was queried and BT patients were 1:2 propensity-score-matched to T patients based on age, gender, hypotension on admission, injury type and severity.

RESULTS

93 BT patients were matched to 186 T patients. There were no differences in matched characteristics. BT patients had a longer median LOS (4 vs 2 days, p<0.001) with no difference in mortality (1.1% vs 1.1%, p=1.00), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS (3 vs 3 days, p=0.55), or complications including decubitus ulcer (0% vs 1.1%, p=0.32), deep vein thrombosis (0% vs 0.5%, p=0.48), extremity compartment syndrome (1.1% vs 0%, p=0.16), and urinary tract infection (1.1% vs 1.1%, p=1.00).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric BT patients had twice the LOS compared to a matched group of pediatric T patients. There was no difference between the cohorts in ICU LOS, complications or mortality rate. When evaluating risk-stratified quality metrics such as LOS, concomitant burn injury should be incorporated.