Assessing outcomes after adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism

Primary Aldosteronism: A Pragmatic Approach to Diagnosis and Management

Primary aldosteronism is a prevalent but underdiagnosed cause of hypertension, contributing to increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and end-organ damage independent of blood pressure. Prompt diagnosis and treatment with targeted surgical or medical therapy reduce the risk of complications and improve prognosis. This review outlines a practical approach to diagnosis and management of primary aldosteronism for global practitioners.

Prognosis of adrenalectomy guided by computed tomography versus adrenal vein sampling in patients with primary aldosteronism: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is recommended to be the gold standard for patients with unilateral subtypes of primary aldosteronism to clinical diagnosis and surgery therapy. However, it is uncertain whether AVS is better for prognosis than computed tomography (CT), which is the most widely used. Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for articles with no start date restriction. The last search was conducted on Jun 15, 2021. Eligible studies compared the distinct subtypes of primary aldosteronism by AVS with CT (as a control group) and reported the prognosis at follow‐up. Evaluation of cohort studies referred to Newcastle ‐ Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and randomized controlled trials referred to Updated Cochrane Collaboration tool. A random‐effect model or fixed‐effect model was chosen according to the heterogeneity test. All processes were performed following the PRISMA 2020 statement. Eleven studies were identified, including 1325 patients based on AVS and 907 patients based on CT. Compared with patients guided by CT, patients who underwent AVS had an increased possibility of complete biochemical success (odds ratio [OR] 2.78, 95% CI 1.88–4.12) and a decreased chance of absent biochemical success (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.13–0.40) at follow‐up. Nevertheless, the rate of complete clinical success (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.89–1.35) and absent clinical success (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.68–1.33) had no significant difference. Therefore, distinguishing subtypes by AVS for early treatment may be crucial since it can promote biochemical improvement.

Minimally Invasive Partial Versus Total Adrenalectomy for the Treatment of Primary Aldosteronism: Results of a Multicenter Series According to the PASO Criteria

BACKGROUND

Determination of success after adrenal-sparing surgery for primary aldosteronism (PA) is limited by the lack of standardized definitions of outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive partial adrenalectomy (MIPA) for PA by comparing perioperative and functional outcomes with minimally invasive total adrenalectomy (MITA) according to the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) criteria.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Between March 2011 and April 2020, a multicenter adrenalectomy dataset was queried for "unilateral adrenal mass, PA, MIPA (n = 29), or MITA (n = 61)"at four participating Institutions.

INTERVENTION

MITA and MIPA for PA.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Differences between continuous variables were assessed with the Wilcoxon rank sum test, while Pearson's χ² test was used for categorical data. Complete, partial, and absent clinical success rates were assessed for the overall cohort and compared between groups.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The median tumor size was significantly higher in the MITA group (4.2 vs 2.7 cm; p = 0.001), while preoperative hypertension rate was significantly higher in the MIPA series (82.8% vs 57.4%, p = 0.01). The median length of hospital stay was increased in the MITA cohort (4 vs 3 d; p = 0.038). Overall, at a median follow-up of 42 mo (interquartile range 27-54 mo), complete, partial, and absent clinical success was observed in 60%, 17.7%, and 22.3% of cases, respectively. The complete clinical success rate was higher in the MIPA group (72.4% vs 54.1%), while a partial clinical success was higher in the MITA series (23% vs 6.8%). The absence of clinical success was comparable between groups (MITA 23% vs MIPA 20.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

MIPA showed excellent perioperative results with a complete clinical success rate of 72.4%. Owing to the heterogeneity of the PASO criteria in the assessment of partial or absent success, the quest for a univocal definition of satisfactory clinical outcomes in the treatment of PA remains open.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We compared minimally invasive partial adrenalectomy (MIPA) and minimally invasive total adrenalectomy for the treatment of unilateral primary aldosteronism, assessing the outcomes with the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) criteria. MIPA seems to provide comparable perioperative outcomes and midterm clinical success rates.