1
|
Yang JH, Huynh V, Leonard LD, Kovar A, Bronsert M, Ludwigson A, Wolverton D, Hampanda K, Christian N, Kim SP, Ahrendt G, Mathes DW, Tevis SE. Are Diagnostic Delays Associated with Distress in Breast Cancer Patients? Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:240-248. [PMID: 37900555 PMCID: PMC10601706 DOI: 10.1159/000529586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Receiving a new breast cancer diagnosis can cause anxiety and distress, which can lead to psychologic morbidity, decreased treatment adherence, and worse clinical outcomes. Understanding sources of distress is crucial in providing comprehensive care. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between delays in breast cancer diagnosis and patient-reported distress. Secondary outcomes include assessing patient characteristics associated with delay. Methods Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who completed a distress screening tool at their initial evaluation at an academic institution between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. The tool captured distress levels in the emotional, social, health, and practical domains with scores of "high distress" defined by current clinical practice guidelines. Delay from mammogram to biopsy, whether diagnostic or screening mammogram, was defined as >30 days. Result 745 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients met inclusion criteria. Median time from abnormal mammogram to core biopsy was 12 days, and 11% of patients experienced a delay in diagnosis. The non-delayed group had higher emotional (p = 0.04) and health (p = 0.03) distress than the delayed group. No statistically significant differences in social distress were found between groups. Additionally, patients with higher practical distress had longer time interval between mammogram and surgical intervention compared to those with lower practical distress. Older age, diagnoses of invasive lobular carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ, and clinical anatomic stages 0-I were associated with diagnostic delay. Conclusion Patients with higher emotional or health-related distress were more likely to have timely diagnoses of breast cancer, suggesting that patients with higher distress may seek healthcare interventions more promptly. Improved understanding of sources of distress will permit early intervention regarding the devastating impact of breast cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerry H. Yang
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Victoria Huynh
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Laura D. Leonard
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Alexandra Kovar
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Michael Bronsert
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Dulcy Wolverton
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Karen Hampanda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Nicole Christian
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Simon P. Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Gretchen Ahrendt
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - David W. Mathes
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sarah E. Tevis
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lagattolla F, Zanchi B, Pietro M, Cormio C, Lorusso V, Diotaiuti S, Fanizzi A, Massafra R, Costanzo S, Caporale F, Rieti E, Romito F. Receptive music therapy versus group music therapy with breast cancer patients hospitalized for surgery. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:162. [PMID: 36781543 PMCID: PMC9924845 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07624-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
Hospitalization for breast surgery is a distressing experience for women. This study investigated the impact of music therapy (MT), an integrative approach that is characterized by the establishment of a therapeutic relationship between patients and a certified music therapist, through different musical interventions targeted to the specific needs of the patients. The impact of two different MT experiences was compared on anxiety and distressing emotions. METHODS One hundred fifty-one patients during hospitalization for breast surgery were randomly assigned to two music therapy treatment arms: individual/receptive (MTri) vs. group/active-receptive integrated (MTiGrp). Stress, depression, anger, and need for help were measured with the emotion thermometers (ET) and State Trait Anxiety Inventory Y-1 form (STAY-Y1). Data were collected before and after the MT intervention. RESULTS Both types of MT interventions were effective in reducing all the variables: stress, depression, anger, and anxiety (T Student p‹0.01). Patients' perception of help received was correlated with a significant reduction in anxiety and distressing emotions during hospitalization for breast surgery. CONCLUSION Considerations regarding the implementation of MT interventions in clinical practice are discussed. In individual receptive MT, there was a significant decrease in anxiety levels, whereas in the integrated MT group, there was a higher perception of help received and use of inter-individual resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fulvia Lagattolla
- Servizio Di Psiconcologia, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Barbara Zanchi
- Department of Music Therapy, Conservatorio Di Musica “Bruno Maderna”, Cesena, Italy
| | - Milella Pietro
- Servizio Di Psiconcologia, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy
- Direzione Sanitaria, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Claudia Cormio
- Servizio Di Psiconcologia, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Vito Lorusso
- Unità Operativa Complessa Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Sergio Diotaiuti
- Unità Operativa Complessa Di Chirurgica Senologica Plastica E Ricostruttiva, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Annarita Fanizzi
- Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale Di Fisica Sanitaria, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Raffaella Massafra
- Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale Di Fisica Sanitaria, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Silvia Costanzo
- Oncologia sperimentale - Centro Studi Tumori Eredo-Familiari, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Caporale
- Servizio Di Psiconcologia, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Erika Rieti
- Servizio Di Psiconcologia, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Romito
- Servizio Di Psiconcologia, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kritzik R, Usoro E, Peshkin BN, Isaacs C, Valdimarsdottir HB, Willey S, O’Neill S, DeMarco T, Nusbaum R, Jandorf L, Kelleher S, Schwartz MD. Psychosocial impact of proactive rapid genetic counseling following breast cancer diagnosis. Psychooncology 2022; 31:788-797. [PMID: 34921700 PMCID: PMC9920729 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As germline genetic referral becomes increasingly routine as part of the care of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, it is important to understand the psychosocial impact of genetic counseling at the time of diagnosis. We examined the psychosocial and quality of life (QOL) impact of providing proactive rapid genetic counseling and testing (RGCT) in the immediate aftermath of a breast cancer diagnosis. METHODS We randomized 330 patients in a 2:1 ratio to proactive rapid genetic counseling (RGCT; N = 222) versus usual care (UC; N = 108). Participants completed a baseline telephone survey before randomization and definitive surgery and a follow-up survey at 1-month post-randomization. We evaluated the impact of RGCT versus UC on breast cancer genetic knowledge, distress, QOL, and decisional conflict. Given that 43% of UC participants and 86% of RGCT participants completed genetic counseling prior to the 1-month assessment, we also evaluated the impact of genetic counseling participation over and above group assignment. RESULTS The RGCT intervention led to increased breast cancer genetic knowledge relative to UC but did not differentially impact other study outcomes. Across groups patients who participated in genetic counseling had significantly increased knowledge and improved QOL compared to those who did not participate in genetic counseling. CONCLUSIONS While prior research has documented the impact of genetic counseling and testing on surgical decisions, these results confirm that participation in genetic counseling at the time of diagnosis can yield improvements in knowledge and QOL in the short-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Kritzik
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Edidiong Usoro
- Department of Biology, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Beth N. Peshkin
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Center for Behavioral Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shawna Willey
- Breast Cancer Program, Schar Cancer Institute, INOVA Health System, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Suzanne O’Neill
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tiffani DeMarco
- Cancer Genetics Program, INOVA Health System, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Rachel Nusbaum
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lina Jandorf
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Center for Behavioral Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah Kelleher
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Marc D. Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huynh V, Yang J, Bronsert M, Ludwigson A, Ahrendt G, Kim S, Matlock DD, Cohen J, Hampanda K, Tevis SE. Choosing Between Mastectomy and Breast-Conserving Therapy: Is Patient Distress an Influencing Factor? Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8679-8687. [PMID: 34160707 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10323-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) offers oncologic outcomes similar to those of mastectomy, yet many patients, when provided the option, choose mastectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between patient-reported distress and surgical decisions and to determine factors predictive of choosing BCT versus mastectomy. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer deemed candidates for BCT who completed a distress screen at their initial visit to an academic institution between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. This screening tool captures distress in emotional, social, health, and practical domains on a scale of 0 to 10. The distress scores were compared against surgical decisions using nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Patient factors associated with surgical choice were analyzed using chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Student's t tests. A two-sided p value lower than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Of 506 patients deemed eligible for BCT, 430 (85%) chose BCT and 76 (15%) pursued mastectomy. The distress levels did not differ significantly between the surgical options. The patients who underwent mastectomy were on the average younger (50.7 vs 60.4 years; p < 0.0001), presented with palpable masses (p < 0.0001), had stage 0, 2, or 3 versus stage 1 disease (p < 0.0001), sought consultation for second opinions (19.7% vs 8.6%; p = 0.0032), received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (31.6% vs 16.3%; p = 0.0016), or had deleterious gene mutations (21.1% vs 5.1%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Distress was not associated with the pursuit of surgical treatment. Rather, younger age, search for a second opinion, and a palpable mass present at presentation were associated with more aggressive surgical decisions. Understanding factors that influence surgical decision-making is critical in guiding informed decisions that reflect patient values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Huynh
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jerry Yang
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Michael Bronsert
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Gretchen Ahrendt
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Simon Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Daniel D Matlock
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Justin Cohen
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Karen Hampanda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sarah E Tevis
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|