Is routine 24-hour urine calcium measurement useful during the evaluation of primary hyperparathyroidism?

Clinical and outcome comparison of genetically positive vs. negative patients in a large cohort of suspected familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia

OBJECTIVE

Biochemical suspicion of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (FHH) might provide with a negative (FHH-negative) or positive (FHH-positive) genetic result. Understanding the differences between both groups may refine the identification of those with a positive genetic evaluation, aid management decisions and prospective surveillance. We aimed to compare FHH-positive and FHH-negative patients, and to identify predictive variables for FHH-positive cases.

DESIGN

Retrospective, national multi-centre study of patients with suspected FHH and genetic testing of the CASR, AP2S1 and GNA11 genes.

METHODS

Clinical, biochemical, radiological and treatment data were collected. We established a prediction model for the identification of FHH-positive cases by logistic regression analysis and area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was estimated.

RESULTS

We included 66 index cases, of which 30 (45.5%) had a pathogenic variant. FHH-positive cases were younger (p = 0.029), reported more frequently a positive family history (p < 0.001), presented higher magnesium (p < 0.001) and lower parathormone levels (p < 0.001) and were less often treated for hypercalcemia (p = 0.017) in comparison to FHH-negative cases. Magnesium levels showed the highest AUROC (0.825, 95%CI: 0.709-0.941). The multivariate analysis revealed that family history and magnesium levels were independent predictors of a positive genetic result. The predictive model showed an AUROC of 0.909 (95%CI: 0.826-0.991).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of magnesium and a positive family history offered a good diagnostic accuracy to predict a positive genetic result. Therefore, the inclusion of magnesium measurement in the routine evaluation of patients with suspected FHH might provide insight into the identification of a positive genetic result of any of the CaSR-related genes.

[Special features of the diagnostics and treatment of hereditary primary hyperparathyroidism]

Between 2% and 10% of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) are diagnosed with hereditary forms of primary hyperparathyroidism (hpHPT). They are more prevalent in younger patients before the age of 40 years, in patients with persistence or recurrence of pHPT and pHPT patients with multi-glandular disease (MGD). The various forms of hpHPT diseases can be classified into four syndromes, i.e., hpHPT associated with diseases of other organ systems, and four diseases that are confined to the parathyroid glands. Approximately 40% of patients with hpHPT suffer from multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) or show germline mutations of the MEN‑1 gene. Currently, germline mutations that lead to a specific diagnosis in patients with hpHPT have currently been described in 13 different genes, which enables a clear diagnosis of the disease; however, a clear genotype-phenotype correlation does not exist, even though the complete loss of a coded protein (e.g. due to frame-shift mutations in the calcium sensing receptor, CASR) often leads to more severe clinical consequences than merely a reduced function of the protein (e.g. due to point mutation). As the various hpHPT diseases require different treatment approaches, which do not correspond to that of sporadic pHPT, a clear definition of the specific form of hpHPT must always be strived for. Therefore, before surgery of a pHPT with clinical, imaging or biochemical suspicion of hpHPT, genetic proof or exclusion of hpHPT is necessary. The differentiated treatment approach for hpHTP can only be defined by taking the clinical and diagnostic results of all the abovenamed findings into account.

Persistent and Recurrent Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Etiological Factors and Pre-Operative Evaluation

Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) is the most common cause of hypercalcemia and currently the only definitive treatment is surgery. Although the success rate of parathyroidectomy is over 95% in experienced centers, surgical failure is the most common complication today. Persistent HPT (perHPT) is defined as persistence of hypercalcemia after parathyroidectomy or recurrence of hypercalcemia within the first 6 months, and recurrence of hypercalcemia after a normocalcemic period of more than 6 months is defined as recurrent HPT (recHPT). In the literature, perHPT is reported to be 2-22%, and the rate of recHPT is 1-15%. perHPT is often associated with misdiagnosed pathology or inadequate resection of hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue, recHPT is associated with newly developing pathology from potentially pathologically natural tissue left in situ at the initial surgery. In the pre-operative evaluation, the initial diagnosis of pHPT and the diagnosis of perHPT or rec HPT should be confirmed in patients who are evaluated with a pre-diagnosis (suspect) of perHPT and recHPT. Surgery is recommended if it meets any of the recommendations in surgical guidelines, as in patients with pHPT, and there are no surgical contraindications. The first preoperative localization studies, surgical notes, operation drawings, if any, intraoperative PTH results, pathological results, and post-operative biochemical results of these patients should be examined. Localization studies with preoperative imaging methods should be performed in all patients with perHPT and recHPT with a confirmed diagnosis and surgical indication. The first-stage imaging methods are ultrasonography and Tc99m sestamibi single photon tomography Tc99mMIBI SPECT or hybrid imaging method, which is combined with both single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography (SPECT/CT). The combination of USG and sestamibi scintigraphy increases the localization of the pathological gland. In the secondary stage, Four-Dimensional computer tomography (4D-CT) or dynamic 4-dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (4D-MRI) can be applied. It is focused on as a secondary stage imaging method, especially when the lesion cannot be detected by conventional methods. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and PET/CT examinations with 11C-choline or 18F-fluorocholine are promising imaging modalities. Invasive examinations can rarely be performed in patients in whom suspicious, incompatible or pathological lesion cannot be detected in noninvasive imaging methods. Bilateral jugular vein sampling, selective venous sampling, parathyroid arteriography, imaging-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy, and parathormone washout are invasive methods.

A novel missense CASR gene mutation resulting in familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia

Background/Objective

Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (FHH) is an uncommon cause of hypercalcemia; however, it is important to consider and rule out in patients with suspected primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), ideally, before proceeding with surgery. Herein, we present a patient where this process identified a calcium-sensing receptor gene (CASR) sequence variant currently labeled as a variant of unknown significance (VUS), yet the patient’s family pedigree suggests that it is in fact a pathogenic CASR sequence variant.

Case Report

A 35-year-old woman was referred to the Endocrine Surgery clinic for evaluation of “recurrent PHPT” and need for reoperative parathyroidectomy. Before referral, she was treated with subtotal parathyroidectomy for the presumed diagnosis of PHPT-related symptomatic hypercalcemia. Postoperatively, she had persistent symptoms. Upon referral, additional relevant information was elicited that suspected FHH instead of PHPT, including a family history of hypercalcemia with CASR VUS in multiple family members and hypocalciuria in the patient. She underwent genetic testing revealing a missense CASR VUS in exon 3 c.392C>A (p.Ala110Asp), the same as in her mother. Medical management instead of reoperation was advised for the diagnosis of FHH.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this CASR sequence variation has not been previously reported in the literature. Reporting newly discovered sequence variations with the context of a family’s medical history is important because it allows for the recognition of new pathogenic variants. This expands the registry of already known sequence variations and their associated clinical pathology for future patients undergoing genetic testing.

Conclusion

This CASR variant represents a novel pathogenic sequence variation causing FHH.