Resectable intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Is margin status associated with survival?

[Frozen sections in hepatobiliary surgery]

Complete removal of the tumor (R0 resection) is one of the most important prognostic factors for overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies. Accordingly, the intraoperative confirmation of tumor-free resection margins is of central importance. At the same time, despite extensive preoperative diagnostics intraoperative findings can arise that require immediate histological clarification. For example, the discovery of peritoneal carcinomatosis or previously unknown intrahepatic metastases often leads to the termination of the operation and thus to a change in the oncological concept. In addition, the estimation of the local tumor spread, particularly in the case of biliary tumors related to the liver hilum, is sometimes difficult based on preoperative imaging, so that a timely intraoperative assessment of tissue samples is necessary to confirm the resectability. The possibility of intraoperative frozen section diagnostics is, therefore, of particular importance, especially in complex surgical interventions in the hepatobiliary area.

Prognostic value of resection margin and lymph node status in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The impact of resection margin and lymph node status on survival in patients undergoing resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of nodal and resection margin status on long-term survival after resection for pCCA.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients resected for pCCA at the University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany between 1999 and 2022. The patients were categorized in four groups according to resection margin (R) and nodal status (N). Survival was analyzed with univariable and multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

Out of 123 patients, 100 with long-term survival were included in the survival analysis. In the univariable analysis, negative resection margin (p = 0.02) and lower grade (p = 0.004) were the only significant positive prognostic factors, while the difference between N0 and N+ was not statistically significant (p = 0.062). Median survival in the groups R0N0, R0N+, R + N0 and R+N+ groups was 40.1, 29.9, 18.4 and 18.9 months, respectively (p = 0.03). In the multivariable analysis, after adjusting for grade, nodal and resection margin status, only grade and resection margin had prognostic significance.

CONCLUSION

Patients with negative resection margin after resection for pCCA have a better prognosis, regardless of the presence of lymph node metastases.

Improving postoperative survival in cholangiocarcinoma: development of surgical strategies with a screening program in the epidemic region

BACKGROUND

The Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP) has been launched since 2013 to detect early-stage cholangiocarcinoma and reduce the disease death. However, the clinical utility of the CASCAP remains unclear. To compare survival outcomes between two time periods: before and after 2013, when significant changes in treatment strategies were implemented, and to evaluate the efficacy of the ultrasound-based screening program, in an Asian region endemic for cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review was conducted in curative-intended resection cholangiocarcinoma from 2002 to 2021. Patents characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between 2002 and 2013 (early period) and 2014 to 2021 (later period).

RESULTS

A total of 1091 patients with intrahepatic (n = 624) or perihilar (n = 467) cholangiocarcinoma was included (early period, n = 658; later period, n = 433). Of 66 (15.2%) patients in the later period were referred by the CASCAP. The incidence of early-staged disease (Stage 0 and 1) was lower in early period compared to later period 16.0% versus 29.1% (p < 0.001); that of positive surgical margin was higher in early period 53.7% versus 40.0% (p < 0.001). A median survival time (MST) was 14 months in early and 40 months in later period (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by tumor location, the MST was 13 versus 60 months in early and late periods for intrahepatic tumor (p < 0.001), respectively. While MST in perihilar tumor was 18 versus 31 months in early and late periods(p < 0.001), respectively. By presentation, the MST was 51 vs. 38 months, respectively, with screening and usual presentation (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative survival in CCA patients improved more than doubled during the study period. Moreover, the late period demonstrated enhanced early-stage detection, a higher rate of negative surgical margins, and improved survival outcomes.

Research progress and prospect of postoperative adjuvant therapy for resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary malignancy of the liver, following hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment for ICC. However, due to its high malignancy and propensity for postoperative recurrence, the prognosis for ICC is generally poor, and there is currently little standardized approach for adjuvant therapy following curative surgery. This article aims to explore adjuvant treatment strategies for ICC post-curative surgery by reviewing retrospective studies and clinical trials conducted in recent years. The analysis focuses on the effectiveness, challenges, and potential developments in the management of ICC post-surgery, considering the high recurrence rates and the need for improved therapeutic approaches to enhance patient outcomes. Additionally, we discuss the various types of adjuvant treatments that have been explored, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and targeted therapies. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current landscape and highlight promising directions for future research to improve survival and quality of life for ICC patients.

Minor hepatectomy combined with cholangioplasty and cholangiojejunostomy for Bismuth II hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical approach for Bismuth II hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) remains controversial. This study compared perioperative and oncological outcomes between minor and major hepatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and seventeen patients with Bismuth II HCCA who underwent hepatectomy and cholangiojejunostomy between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively investigated. Propensity score matching created a cohort of 62 patients who underwent minor (n = 31) or major (n = 31) hepatectomy. Perioperative outcomes, complications, quality of life, and survival outcomes were compared between the groups. Continuous data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, categorical variables are presented as n (%).

RESULTS

Minor hepatectomy had a significantly shorter operation time (245.42 ± 54.31 vs. 282.16 ± 66.65 min; P = 0.023), less intraoperative blood loss (194.19 ± 149.17 vs. 315.81 ± 256.80 mL; P = 0.022), a lower transfusion rate (4 vs. 11 patients; P = 0.038), more rapid bowel recovery (17.77 ± 10.00 vs. 24.94 ± 9.82 h; P = 0.005), and a lower incidence of liver failure (1 vs. 6 patients; P = 0.045). There were no significant between-group differences in wound infection, bile leak, bleeding, pulmonary infection, intra-abdominal fluid collection, and complication rates. Postoperative laboratory values, length of hospital stay, quality of life scores, 3-year overall survival (25.8 % vs. 22.6 %; P = 0.648), and 3-year disease-free survival (12.9 % vs. 16.1 %; P = 0.989) were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In this propensity score-matched analysis, overall survival and disease-free survival were comparable between minor and major hepatectomy in selected patients with Bismuth II HCCA. Minor hepatectomy was associated with a shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less need for transfusion, more rapid bowel recovery, and a lower incidence of liver failure. Besides, this findings need confirmation in a large-scale, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial with longer-term follow-up.

Preoperative MRI features predicting very early recurrence of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma after R0 resection: a comparison with the AJCC 8th edition staging system

PURPOSE

This study aimed to establish a nomogram based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features to predict the very early recurrence (VER, less than 6 months) of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) after R0 resection.

METHODS

This study enrolled a group of 193 IMCC patients from our institution between March 2010 and January 2022. Patients were allocated into the development cohort (n = 137) and the validation cohort (n = 56), randomly, and the preoperative clinical and MRI features were collected. Univariate and multivariate stepwise logistic regression assessments were adopted to assess predictors of VER. Nomogram was constructed and certificated in the validation cohort. The performance of the prediction nomogram was evaluated by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. The performance of the nomogram was compared with the T stage of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (27.5%) experienced VER of the tumor and 140 patients (72.5%) with non-VER, during the follow-up period. After multivariate stepwise logistic regression, number of lesions, diffuse hypoenhancement on arterial phase, necorsis and suspicious lymph nodes were independently associated with VER. The nomogram demonstrated significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) of 0.813 than T stage (AUC = 0.666, P = 0.006) in the development cohort, whereas in the validation cohort, the nomogram showed better discrimination performance, with an AUC of 0.808 than T stage (0.705) with no significantly difference (P = 0.230). Decision curve analysis reflected the clinical net benefit of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram based on preoperative MRI features is a reliable tool to predict VER for patients with IMCC after R0 resection. This nomogram will be helpful to improve survival prediction and individualized treatment.

Prognostic Impact of Margin Status in Distal Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

A positive ductal margin is strongly associated with poor survival in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma. However, the significance of the radial margin status and its effect on survival are not fully clarified.

METHODS

All patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy between January 2000 and December 2018 at Tokai University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Positive margins were divided into positive ductal margin and positive radial margin.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight consecutive patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Margin-negative R0 resection was performed in 85 patients (79%). Twenty-three patients (21%) had a positive resection margin (R1 resection). The 5-year survival rate and median overall survival for patients with R0 resection and those with R1 resection was 64%, 98 months and 25%, 26 months, respectively. There was a significant difference in survival between patients with R0 resection and those with R1 resection (p < 0.001). Patients with positive radial margin (n = 10) had a significantly worse outcome than those with positive ductal margin (n = 13) (p = 0.016). Univariate analysis showed that R1 resection, lymph node metastasis, tumor depth, portal vein invasion, pancreatic invasion, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion were significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis confirmed that R1 resection and nodal involvement were significant independent prognostic indicators after surgical resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive surgical margin and nodal involvement were the strongest predictors of poor survival in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma. Patients with a positive radial margin had a significantly worse outcome than those with a positive ductal margin.