The effect of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic on sphincter preserving surgery for rectal cancer: A single referral center experience

The impact of COVID-19 on inflammatory bowel disease surgery: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant disruption to the delivery of surgical services. Guidance prioritising life-saving and cancer surgery was issued. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often requires considered, timely surgery, which may have not been feasible under the conditions imposed by the pandemic. This systematic review aims to quantify the impact of COVID-19 on IBD surgery and assess the safety of performing such surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science was performed. Studies that included a prepandemic and a pandemic cohort for comparison and reported on numbers of IBD surgeries or postoperative outcomes following IBD surgery were included. Heterogeneity of included studies precluded any meta-analyses.

FINDINGS

In total, 1,220 titles were screened and 13 were included in the final review. All were cohort studies other than one case-control study. A total of 1,673,282 and 1,445,971 patients were included in the prepandemic and pandemic cohorts, respectively. Rates of elective surgery during the pandemic varied from a 66% reduction to a 9.66% increase and emergency surgery varied from no difference to an 18% reduction. Urgent surgery in IBD inpatients appears to be unaffected. Postoperative outcomes were not shown to be negatively impacted by resource limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic affected IBD surgical services considerably; however, those who did undergo surgery during this period do not appear to have been at an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Further work is required to describe the long-term impacts of these cancellations on IBD services and patient morbidity.

Journey through the Decades: The Evolution in Treatment and Shared Decision Making for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

The management of locally advanced rectal cancer has undergone significant transformations over the decades and optimal treatment approaches continue to evolve. There have been numerous advances in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy from the first description of the abdominoperineal resection in 1908, timing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the late 20th and early 21st century, and most recently, the introduction of organ preservation or nonoperative management in 2004. Alongside these advancements, the concept of shared decision making in medicine has evolved, prompting a focus on patient-centered care. This evolution in practice has been fueled by a growing recognition of the importance of patient autonomy and the alignment of treatment options with patients' values and preferences. With the growing number of possible treatment options, variability in patient counseling exists, highlighting the need for a standardized approach to shared decision making in locally advanced rectal cancer. This narrative review will describe the evolution of treatment options of locally advanced rectal cancer as well as the concept of shared decision making and decision aids, and will introduce a decision aid for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have achieved a complete clinical response and are eligible for watch and wait.

The exploration of surgery and survival prediction in patients with peritoneal metastasis from gastric adenocarcinoma based on the SEER database

Background

As one of the most common diseases in terms of cancer-related mortality worldwide, gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) frequently develops peritoneal metastases (PMs) in advanced stages. Systemic therapy or optimal supportive care are recommended for advanced GA; however, patients frequently develop drug resistance. Surgical resection is not recommended for stage IV patients, and there have been some controversies regarding the role of it in GA patients with PMs. The aim of the study was to preliminarily evaluate the possible effect of surgical treatments on patients with only PMs from GA.

Methods

Data were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (year 2000-2022). A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the influence of selection bias and confounding variables on comparisons. Then Cox proportional hazard regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and log-rank test were performed to assess the efficacy of surgical treatment in patients with PMs from GA.

Results

A total of 399 patients diagnosed with PMs from GA were enrolled for our analysis, of which, 180 (45.1%) patients did not receive surgery and 219 (54.9%) patients received surgery. Multivariate Cox regression analysis before PSM indicated higher rates of overall survival (OS) outcome for patients who had received surgery [hazard ratio (HR) =0.4342, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3283-0.5742, P<0.001]. After PSM, a total of 172 patients were enrolled, with 86 in each group. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that surgery was the independent factor reflecting patients' survival (HR =0.4382, 95% CI: 0.3037-0.6324, P<0.001). Subgroup survival analysis revealed that surgery may bring advantages to patients with grades I-IV, stages T1-T4, stage N0, and tumor size less than 71 mm (P<0.05). We also found that the OS of chemotherapy patients who had undergone surgery was better than that of chemotherapy patients who had not undergone surgery (P<0.01).

Conclusions

Based on the SEER database, surgery has better OS for patients only with PMs from GA. Patients without lymph node metastasis and those who received chemotherapy before may benefit from surgery. These specific groups of patients may have surgery as an option to improve the prognosis.

Trends in adoption of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Total neoadjuvant chemoradiation (TNT), an accepted strategy for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), was first included in guidelines in 2018. We aimed to describe trends in, and factors associated with TNT receipt.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of adult patients with LARC was performed using the national cancer database (2012-2020). TNT status was determined, and temporal trends analyzed. Factors associated with TNT receipt were identified by stage.

RESULTS

A total of 51,407 patients were identified; 57.3 ​% received TNT. Increasing age and comorbidities were associated with higher rates of TNT receipt. Patients with stage III disease were more likely to receive TNT (stage II OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.88-0.96). Patients were 38 ​% more likely to get TNT after guideline inclusion (OR1.38, 95%CI 1.31-1.46).

CONCLUSION

Rates of TNT were consistently above 50 ​% and rose after inclusion in the NCCN guidelines. This study establishes baseline patterns in rates of TNT for future benchmarking.

Methylated Septin9 identified patients with colorectal carcinoma and showed higher sensitivity than conventional biomarkers in detecting tumor

INTRODUCTION

It is worth noting the limitations in sensitivity of the existing biomarkers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) in detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). In our study, we address the performance of the liquid biopsy biomarker "methylated septin 9" (mSEPT9) in the detection and disease surveillance of CRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The monocentric prospective survey encompassed 120 patients diagnosed with CRC who underwent planned curative resection between December 2018 and December 2020. Blood samples were collected from the participants preoperatively as well as at 7 days, 6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively. The presence of mSEPT9, CEA, and CA 19-9 was detected using the pro Epi Colon® 2.0 CE test, Elecsys® CEA, and Elecsys® CA19-9 electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, respectively.

RESULTS

In the preoperative setting, mSEPT9 demonstrated superior capability in identifying patients with CRC compared to CEA and CA 19-9, with detection rates of 57%, 32%, and 18% respectively. Combining all three biomarkers increased the overall sensitivity to 66% preoperatively. In considering UICC stage and T-status, mSEPT9 exhibited higher sensitivity across all stages in comparison with conventional tumor markers, and 65% of patients with metastases were identified postoperatively through mSEPT9. Tumor recognition after surgery was achieved with the sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend using mSEPT9 as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for the ongoing monitoring of patients with CRC. The sensitivity and specificity exhibited by mSEPT9 in recognition of tumor after surgery, highlights its particular potential for monitoring of CRC patients.

Patterns of Care for Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy at Predominately Academic Centers between 2016-2020: An NCDB Analysis

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged as the preferred approach for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), defined as T3/4 or any T with N+ disease. Our objective was to (1) determine the proportion of patients with LARC receiving TNT over time, (2) determine the most common method in which TNT is being delivered, and (3) determine what factors are associated with a greater likelihood of receiving TNT in the United States. Retrospective data was obtained from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients diagnosed with rectal cancer between 2016 and 2020. Patients were excluded if they had M1 disease, T1-2 N0 disease, incomplete staging information, nonadenocarcinoma histology, received RT to a nonrectum site, or received a nondefinitive RT dose. Data were analyzed using linear regression, χ2 test, and binary logistic regression. Of the 26,375 patients included, most patients were treated at an academic facility (94.6%). Five thousand three (19.0%) patients received TNT, and 21,372 (81.0%) patients did not receive TNT. The proportion of patients receiving TNT increased significantly over time, from 6.1% in 2016 to 34.6% in 2020 (slope = 7.36, 95% CI 4.58-10.15, R2 = 0.96, P = .040). The most common TNT regimen was multiagent chemotherapy followed by long-course chemoradiation (73.2% of cases from 2016-2020). There was a significant increase in utilization of short-course RT as part of TNT from 2.8% in 2016 to 13.7% in 2020 (slope = 2.74, 95% CI 0.37-5.11, R2 = 0.82, P = .035). Factors associated with a lower likelihood of TNT usage included age >65, female gender, Black race, and T3 N0 disease. TNT use in the United States has increased significantly from 2016-2020, with approximately 34.6% of patients with LARC receiving TNT in 2020. The observed trend appears to be in line with the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommending TNT as the preferred approach.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Is a Predictor for Complete Pathological Response in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Rectal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is a new therapeutic strategy in patients with rectal cancer. We examined the role of TNT, in addition to other pre-operative factors, as a predictor for pathologic complete response (pCR).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2021 was conducted. Patients were classified into two groups-pCR group and residual tumor group. Patient data were reviewed and entered into univariate and multivariate analyses to determine predictors of pCR.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients were treated with neoadjuvant therapy and underwent surgery during the study period. Sixty patients (34.9%) were treated with TNT while 112 (65.1%) were treated with traditional neoadjuvant chemoradiation. The overall pCR rate was 25.6% (44 patients), with 31.6% (19 patients) in patients who received TNT compared to 22.3% (25 patients) in patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT). Univariate analysis of clinical and radiological factors correlated with pCR demonstrated no significant differences between the two groups in cT stage (p = 0.46), cN stage (p = 0.52), positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) (p = 0.72), tumor location (p = 0.35), symptomatic presentation (p = 0.09), and anal sphincter involvement (p = 0.68). Multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that only pre-operative TNT (OR:2.35; 95% CI 1.06-5.25; p = 0.03) was predictive of pCR, while extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) was a predictor for lower rates of pCR (OR: 0.28; 95% CI 0.09-0.9; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Rectal cancer patients undergoing TNT prior to surgery have a higher chance of developing a complete pathologic response. Evaluation of this therapy should be continued and extended to larger numbers of patients to see if the differences we observed are real.

Impact of Covid-19 on gastrointestinal cancer surgery: A National Survey

PURPOSE

To understand the actual impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and frame the future strategies, we conducted a pan India survey to study the impact on the surgical management of gastrointestinal cancers.

METHODS

A national multicentre survey in the form of a questionnaire from 16 tertiary care gastrointestinal oncology centres across India was conducted from January 2019 to June 2021 that was divided into a 15-month pre-Covid era and a similar period of active Covid pandemic era.

RESULTS

There was significant disruption of services; 13 (81%) centres worked as dedicated Covid care centres and 43% reported suspension of essential care for more than 6 months. In active Covid phase, there was a 14.5% decrease in registrations and proportion of decrease was highest in the centres from South zone (22%). There was decrease in resections across all organ systems; maximum reduction was noted in hepatic resections (33%) followed by oesophageal and gastric resections (31 and 25% respectively). There was minimal decrease in colorectal resections (5%). A total of 584 (7.1%) patients had either active Covid-19 infection or developed infection in the post-operative period or had recovered from Covid-19 infection. Only 3 (18%) centres reported higher morbidity, while the rest of the centres reported similar or lower morbidity rates when compared to pre-Covid phase; however, 6 (37%) centres reported slightly higher mortality in the active Covid phase.

CONCLUSION

Covid-19 pandemic resulted in significant reduction in new cancer registrations and elective gastrointestinal cancer surgeries. Perioperative morbidity remained similar despite 7.1% perioperative Covid 19 exposure.