Intermediate-thickness melanoma: A population-based study of surgical quality metrics

An Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Guideline Adherence in Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Regional lymph nodes are a common first site of metastasis in patients diagnosed with invasive melanoma. Knowledge of sentinel lymph node status provides strong prognostic information in melanoma and is important for staging and treatment decisions. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN) recommends performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for melanoma patients with a T category of ≥T2a. This study aims to assess our academic institution's guideline adherence to improve quality of care.

METHODS

Retrospective review of medical records from 2017 to 2023 identified 628 patients referred to our institution for invasive melanoma treatment. Adherence to guidelines was assessed using Chi-square analyses and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

In total, 8.2% of cases did not follow the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for SLNB. When justification provided within the medical record was considered adherent to guidelines, our rate of discordance was 1.6%. Head and neck melanomas were more likely to have guideline-discordant SLNB management, regardless of whether or not a justification was provided.

CONCLUSION

Greater than 98% of melanoma cases at our institution aligned with the SLNB NCCN Guidelines®. We outlined the complex justifications physicians and patients may use to pursue care that is nonadherent to guidelines. Employment of SLNB may be limited by medical comorbidities, surgical risks, and when the management would not change based on the result. Our study provides a blueprint for institutional assessment of guideline adherence and highlights the importance of documentation and guideline dissemination.

[Translated article] Melanoma Registry of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (REGESMEL): Description and Data in its First Year of Operation

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of melanoma is rising in Spain. The prognostic stages of patients with melanoma are determined by various biological factors, such as tumor thickness, ulceration, or the presence of regional or distant metastases. The Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) has encouraged the creation of a Spanish Melanoma Registry (REGESMEL) to evaluate other individual and health system-related factors that may impact the prognosis of patients with melanoma. The aim of this article is to introduce REGESMEL and provide basic descriptive data for its first year of operation.

METHODS

REGESMEL is a prospective, multicentre cohort of consecutive patients with invasive cutaneous melanoma that collects demographic and staging data as well as individual and healthcare-related baseline data. It also records the medical and surgical treatment received by patients.

RESULTS

A total of 450 cases of invasive cutaneous melanoma from 19 participant centres were included, with a predominance of thin melanomas≤1mm thick (54.7%), mainly located on the posterior trunk (35.2%). Selective sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 40.7% of cases. Most cases of melanoma were suspected by the patient (30.4%), or his/her dermatologist (29.6%). Patients received care mainly in public health centers (85.2%), with tele-dermatology resources being used in 21.6% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution of the pathological and demographic variables of melanoma cases is consistent with data from former studies. REGESMEL has already recruited patients from 15 Spanish provinces and given its potential representativeness, it renders the Registry as an important tool to address a wide range of research questions.

Melanoma Registry of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (REGESMEL): Description and Data in its First Year of Operation

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of melanoma is rising in Spain. The prognostic stages of patients with melanoma are determined by various biological factors, such as tumor thickness, ulceration, or the presence of regional or distant metastases. The Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) has encouraged the creation of a Spanish Melanoma Registry (REGESMEL) to evaluate other individual and health system-related factors that may impact the prognosis of patients with melanoma. The aim of this article is to introduce REGESMEL and provide basic descriptive data for its first year of operation.

METHODS

REGESMEL is a prospective, multicentre cohort of consecutive patients with invasive cutaneous melanoma that collects demographic and staging data as well as individual and healthcare-related baseline data. It also records the medical and surgical treatment received by patients.

RESULTS

A total of 450 cases of invasive cutaneous melanoma from 19 participant centres were included, with a predominance of thin melanomas≤1mm thick (54.7%), mainly located on the posterior trunk (35.2%). Selective sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 40.7% of cases. Most cases of melanoma were suspected by the patient (30.4%), or his/her dermatologist (29.6%). Patients received care mainly in public health centers (85.2%), with tele-dermatology resources being used in 21.6% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution of the pathological and demographic variables of melanoma cases is consistent with data from former studies. REGESMEL has already recruited patients from 15 Spanish provinces and given its potential representativeness, it renders the Registry as an important tool to address a wide range of research questions.

Distinct presentation of melanoma in Black patients may inform strategies to improve outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Melanoma guidelines stem largely from data on non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients. We aimed to identify features of melanoma within non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients to inform strategies for earlier detection and treatment.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, we identified nonmetastatic melanoma patients with known TN category and race. Kaplan-Meier cancer-specific survival (CSS) estimates and multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 492 597 patients, 1499 (0.3%) were NHB, who were younger (21% vs. 17% age <50) and more commonly female (54% vs. 41%) than NHW, both p < 0.0005. For NHBs, lower extremity was the most common site (52% vs. 15% for NHWs, p < 0.0001), T category was higher (55% Tis-T1 vs. 82%; 27% T3-T4 vs. 8%, p < 0.0001) and stage at presentation was higher (19% Stage III, vs. 6%, p < 0.0001). Within the NHB cohort, males were older, and more often node-positive than females. Five-year Stage III CSS was 42% for NHB males versus 71% for females, adjusting for age and clinical nodal status (hazard ratio 2.48).

CONCLUSIONS

NHB melanoma patients presented with distinct tumor characteristics. NHB males with Stage III disease had inferior CSS. Focus on this high-risk patient cohort to promote earlier detection and treatment may improve outcomes.