Has integrated 18F FDG PET/CT improved staging, reduced early recurrence or increased survival in oesophageal cancer?

Propensity score analysis of 18-FDG PET/CT-enhanced staging in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

PET/CT is now integral to the staging pathway for potentially curable esophageal cancer (EC), primarily to identify distant metastases undetected by computed tomography. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of PET/CT introduction on survival and assess patterns of recurrence after esophagectomy.

METHODS

A longitudinal cohort of EC patients staged between 1998 and 2016 were considered for inclusion. After co-variate adjustment using propensity scoring, a cohort of 496 patients (273 pre-PET/CT and 223 post-PET/CT) who underwent esophagectomy [median age 63 years (31-80), 395 males, 425 adenocarcinomas, 71 squamous cell carcinomas, 325 neoadjuvant therapy] were included. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS) based on intention to treat.

RESULTS

Three-year OS pre-PET/CT was 42.5% compared with 57.8% post-PET/CT (Chi² 6.571, df 1, p = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, pT stage (HR 1.496 [95% CI 1.28-1.75], p < 0.0001), pN stage (HR 1.114 [95% CI 1.04-1.19], p = 0.001) and PET/CT staging (HR 0.688 [95% CI 0.53-0.89] p = 0.004) were independently associated with OS. Recurrent cancer was observed in 125 patients (51.4%) pre-PET/CT, compared with 74 patients post-PET/CT (37.8%, p = 0.004), and was less likely to be distant recurrence after PET/CT introduction (39.5 vs. 27.0%, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced PET/CT staging is an important modality and independent factor associated with improved survival in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer.

Mediastinal node staging by positron emission tomography-computed tomography and selective endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration for patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer: Results from a regional centre

AIM

To investigate the impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in the nodal staging of upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in a tertiary referral centre.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of prospectively recorded data held on all patients with a diagnosis of upper GI cancer made between January 2009 and December 2015. Only those patients who had both a PET-CT and EUS with FNA sampling of a mediastinal node distant from the primary tumour were included. Using a positive EUS-FNA result as the gold standard for lymph node involvement, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) and accuracy of PET-CT in the staging of mediastinal lymph nodes were calculated. The impact on therapeutic strategy of adding EUS-FNA to PET-CT was assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty one patients were included. Sixty nine patients had a diagnosis of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (Thirty one of whom were junctional), forty eight had oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and four had gastric adenocarcinoma. The FNA results were inadequate in eleven cases and the PET-CT findings were indeterminate in two cases, therefore thirteen patients (10.7%) were excluded from further analysis. There was concordance between PET-CT and EUS-FNA findings in seventy one of the remaining one hundred and eight patients (65.7%). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values of PET-CT were 92.5%, 50%, 52.1% and 91.9% respectively. There was discordance between PET-CT and EUS-FNA findings in thirty seven out of one hundred and eight patients (34.3%). MDT discussion led to a radical treatment pathway in twenty seven of these cases, after the final tumour stage was altered as a direct consequence of the EUS-FNA findings. Of these patients, fourteen (51.9%) experienced clinical remission of a median of nine months (range three to forty two months).

CONCLUSION

EUS-FNA leads to altered staging of upper GI cancer, resulting in more patients receiving radical treatment that would have been the case using PET-CT staging alone.

Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative 18F-FDG PET/CT scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer

Objectives

To investigate the additional value of cervical ultrasonography over ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer.

Methods

Between January 2013 and January 2016, 163 patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer underwent both cervical ultrasonography and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT at a tertiary referral centre in the Netherlands. Retrospective clinical data analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic value of cervical ultrasonography and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases. Fine needle aspiration or clinical follow-up was used as reference standard.

Results

The overall incidence of patients with cervical lymph node metastases was 14%. The sensitivity of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT to detect cervical lymph node metastases was 82% (95% CI 59–94%) and specificity was 91% (95% CI 85–95%). The sensitivity and specificity of cervical ultrasonography were 73% (95% CI 50–88%) and 84% (95% CI 77–90%), respectively. In patients with a negative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, 12 of 133 (9%) patients had suspicious nodes on cervical ultrasonography. In all these 12 patients the nodes were confirmed benign.

Conclusions

Cervical ultrasonography has no additional diagnostic value to a negative integrated ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer.

Key Points

• Cervical ultrasonography has no value over PET/CT in evaluating cervical node metastases.

• PET/CT provides greater diagnostic confidence compared to cervical ultrasonography.

• Cervical ultrasonography during standard diagnostic work-up may be considered unnecessary.

• Cervical lesions on PET/CT require cytopathological confirmation by FNA.

A study about different findings of PET-CT between neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant therapy: SUVmax is not a reliable predictor of lymphatic involvement after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

No definitive findings or established guidelines have been published for the evaluation of esophageal tumors (tumor) and regional lymph nodes (LN) using positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) in patients with esophageal cancer. In addition, it remains unclear whether PET-CT findings vary between neoadjuvant (NT) and non-neoadjuvant (non-NT) therapy cases. Therefore, preoperative evaluation using PET-CT might provide unreliable information and influence the management plan for esophageal cancer. The purpose of the present study is to clarify the different findings of PET-CT between NT and non-NT in surgical esophageal cancer cases and to predict LN metastasis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 192 consecutive cases that met this study's inclusion criteria from January 2009 to December 2014. All patients underwent curative and complete esophagectomy for intra-thoracic esophageal cancer at the department of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in a single tertiary Korean hospital. We compiled and analyzed maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax) of tumor and LNs with other clinical information (chronic lung disease, history of previous other primary cancer, sex, pathological findings, NT, and other clinical data).

RESULTS

(I) In NT, a positive correlation between T stage and SUVmax was found (tumor SUVmax P<0.001, LN SUVmax P=0.010); however, no relationship between N stage and SUVmax was found. In non-NT, a positive correlation between pathological stage (T and N stage) and SUVmax was found (T stage, tumor SUVmax P<0.001, LN SUVmax P=0.001; N stage, tumor SUVmax P=0.003, LN SUVmax P=0.021); (II) In NT, the low SUVmax group had higher disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) than the high SUVmax group (DFS, tumor SUVmax P<0.001, LN SUVmax P=0.142; OS, tumor SUVmax P<0.001, LN SUVmax P=0.002). In non-NT, the low SUVmax group also had higher DFS and OS than the high SUVmax group (DFS, tumor SUVmax P<0.001, LN SUVmax P=0.008; OS, tumor SUVmax P=0.029, LN SUVmax P=0.016). SUVmax values being equal, non-NT had significantly higher DFS and OS than NT (P=0.011, P=0.009, respectively), despite the absence of significant differences in pathological stage; (III) Tumor SUVmax had a positive correlation with LN SUVmax in both NT and non-NT (P=0.006, P<0.001, respectively); (IV) In NT, there were no diagnostic findings of LN metastases using SUVmax. However, in non-NT, significant cutoff values for diagnosis of LN metastases using both tumor and LN SUVmax were found (tumor SUVmax cutoff value 4.9, P=0.008; LN SUVmax cutoff value 2.5, P=0.045); (V) In NT, there was no significant difference in LN SUVmax between pathologically negative and positive LNs. However, in non-NT, the LN SUVmax of pathologically positive LNs was significantly higher than that of pathologically negative LNs (P=0.042); (VI) There were no significant differences in tumor and LN SUVmax according to various factors, including chronic lung disease (COPD, bronchiectasis), age, previous cancers, and sex, regardless of NT.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that there were some different findings of PET-CT using SUVmax between NT and non-NT. These findings should be clarified for further evaluation and management, especially of surgery, which should not be withheld out of ignorance of these different PET-CT findings and should be considered carefully in conjunction with other conditions. In addition, further studies about the effects of NT on PET-CT findings are required to improve the utility of PET-CT to evaluate the LNs in esophageal cancer.

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oesophageal cancer staging: a tailored approach

BACKGROUND

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scanning is used routinely in the staging of oesophageal cancer to identify occult metastases not apparent on CT and changes the management in typically 3-18% patients. The authors aim to re-evaluate its role in the management of oesophageal cancer, investigating whether it is possible to identify a group of patients that will not benefit and can safely be spared from this investigation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing PET-CT staging between 2010 and 2013 were identified from a specialist modern multidisciplinary team database. Without knowledge of the PET-CT result, patients were stratified into low-risk or high-risk groups according to the likelihood of identifying metastatic disease on PET-CT based on specified criteria routinely available from endoscopy and CT reports. Clinical outcomes in the two groups were investigated.

RESULTS

In 383 undergoing PET-CT, metastatic disease was identified in 52 (13.6%) patients. Eighty-three patients were stratified as low risk and 300 as high risk. None of the low-risk patients went on to have metastatic disease identified on PET-CT. Of the high-risk patients, 17% had metastatic disease identified on PET-CT.

CONCLUSIONS

In one of the largest studies to date investigating the influence of staging PET-CT on management of patients with oesophageal cancer, the authors report a classification based on endoscopy/CT criteria is able to accurately stratify patients according to the risk of having metastatic disease. This could be used to avoid unnecessary PET-CT 22% of patients, saving cost, inconvenience and reducing potential delay to definitive treatment in this group.

Usefulness of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in pre-operative evaluation of intra-thoracic esophageal cancer

Background

The purpose of the study was to clarify the usefulness of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for pre-operative evaluation of intra-thoracic esophageal cancer, especially in terms of regional lymph node status.

Methods

Medical records of 93 consecutive cases from July 2007 to October 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent curative and complete esophagectomies for intra-thoracic esophageal cancer. We compared pre-operative maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax) of esophageal tumors and regional lymph nodes (LN) with other variables (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of previous other primary cancer, gender, differentiation, and neoadjuvant therapy). In addition, the SUVmax of tumors and LNs were analyzed with pathologic findings.

Results

There was no significant difference of each tumor and LN SUVmax according to factors including chronic lung disease, age, history of previous other cancer, differentiation, and gender. Pre-operative evaluations by PET-CT were not accurate (tumor sensitivity 76.4%, specificity 25%; LN sensitivity 45.2%, specificity 54.8%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that LN metastasis could not be appropriately diagnosed with SUVmax (P = 0.871). There was no difference in SUVmax between pathologically positive and negative LN subgroups. Tumor SUVmax correlated with the progression of esophageal cancer in patients without neoadjuvant therapy (P < 0.001). However, LN SUVmax had no correlation with overall pathologic stage. After neoadjuvant therapy, there were significant decreases in SUVmax in both pathologically positive and negative LN subgroups (P = 0.043, P = 0.008).

Conclusion

 Surgery should not be withheld in N-stage according to PET-CT findings and carefully considered in conjunction with other conditions.