Clinical practice guidelines in severe traumatic brain injury in Taiwan

Critical Assessment of the Guidelines-Based Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II

BACKGROUND

Severe traumatic brain injury constitutes a clinical entity with complex underlying pathophysiology. Management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury is guided by Clinical Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements (CPG and CS). The published CPG and CS vary in quality, comprehensiveness, and clinical applicability. The value of critically assessing CPG and CS cannot be overemphasized. The aim of our study was to assess the quality of the published CPG and CS, based on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science focusing on guidelines and consensi about severe traumatic brain injury . The search terms used were "traumatic brain injury," "TBI," "brain injury," "cerebral trauma," "head trauma," "closed head injury," "head injury," "guidelines," "recommendations," "consensus" in any possible combination. The search period extended from 1964 to 2021 and was limited to literature published in English. The eligible studies were scored by 4 raters, using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. The inter-rater agreement was assessed using the Cronbach's alpha.

RESULTS

Twelve CPG and CS were assessed. Overall, the study by Carney et al. was the most Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II compliant study. In general, the domains of clarity of presentation, and scope and purpose, achieved the highest scores. The lowest inter-rater agreement in our analysis was "fair."

CONCLUSIONS

The purpose of our study for assessing the quality of CPG and CS was served. We present the strong and weak points of CPG and CS. Our findings support the idea of periodically updating guidelines and improving their rigor of development.

A critical review to traumatic brain injury clinical practice guidelines

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and investigate the evidence grading systems.A systematic search of relevant guideline websites and literature databases (including PubMed, NGC, SIGN, NICE, GIN, and Google) was undertaken from inception to May 2018 to identify and select TBI guidelines. Four independent reviewers assessed the eligible guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. The degree of agreement was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).From 1802 records retrieved, 12 TBI guidelines were included. The mean scores for each AGREE II domain were as follows: scope and purpose (mean ± SD= 74.2 ± 9.09); stakeholder involvement (mean± SD= 54.6 ± 11.6); rigor of development (mean ± SD=70.1 ± 13.6); clarity and presentation (mean ± SD=78.4 ± 11.5); applicability (mean ± SD= 60.5 ± 13.6); and editorial independence (mean ± SD=61.7 ± 14.8). Ten guidelines were rated as "recommended." The ICC values ranged from 0.73 to 0.95. Seven grading systems were used by TBI guidelines to rate the level of evidence and the strength of recommendation.Most TBI guidelines got a high-quality rating, whereas a standardized grading system should be adopted to provide clear information about the level of evidence and strength of recommendation in TBI guidelines.

Nursing Management of Adults with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review

Effective nursing management strategies for adults with severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) are still a remarkable issue and a difficult task for neurologists, neurosurgeons, and neuronurses. A list of justified indications and scientific rationale for nursing management of these patients are continuously evolving. The objectives of the study are to analyze the pertinently available research and clinical studies that demonstrate the nursing management strategies for adults with STBI and to synthesize the available evidence based on the review. A comprehensive literature search was made in following databases such as Google Scholar, Cochrane, J-Gate, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect for retrieving the related studies. In the included studies, data were extracted and evaluated according to the objective. Narrative analysis was adopted to write this review. Patients with STBI have poor prognosis and require quality care for maximizing patients' survival. With a thorough knowledge and discernment of care of such patients, nurses can improve these patients' neurological outcomes.

Quality of the Development of Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death worldwide and is increasing exponentially particularly in low and middle income countries (LMIC). To inform the development of a standard Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for the acute management of TBI that can be implemented specifically for limited resource settings, we conducted a systematic review to identify and assess the quality of all currently available CPGs on acute TBI using the AGREE II instrument. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, from April 2013 to December 2015 we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar and the Duke University Medical Center Library Guidelines for peer-reviewed published Clinical Practice Guidelines on the acute management of TBI (less than 24 hours), for any level of traumatic brain injury in both high and low income settings. A comprehensive reference and citation analysis was performed. CPGs found were assessed using the AGREE II instrument by five independent reviewers and scores were aggregated and reported in percentage of total possible score. An initial 2742 articles were evaluated with an additional 98 articles from the citation and reference analysis, yielding 273 full texts examined. A total of 24 final CPGs were included, of which 23 were from high income countries (HIC) and 1 from LMIC. Based on the AGREE II instrument, the best score on overall assessment was 100.0 for the CPG from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NIHCE, 2007), followed by the New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZ, 2006) and the National Clinical Guideline (SIGN, 2009) both with a score of 96.7. The CPG from a LMIC had lower scores than CPGs from higher income settings. Our study identified and evaluated 24 CPGs with the highest scores in clarity and presentation, scope and purpose, and rigor of development. Most of these CPGs were developed in HICs, with limited applicability or utility for resource limited settings. Stakeholder involvement, Applicability, and Editorial independence remain weak and insufficiently described specifically with piloting, addressing potential costs and implementation barriers, and auditing for quality improvement.

Assessment of medical resource utilization for Taiwanese children hospitalized for intracranial injuries

BACKGROUND

Compared to adults, children and adolescents are at greater risk for traumatic brain injury (TBI), with increased severity and prolonged recovery when compared to adults. It is a challenge to provide care for those children who are at risk for complications of TBI under health care resource constraints.

AIM

To investigate hospitalization among children with intracranial injuries in terms of incidence and factors related to length of stay (LOS) and medical cost.

METHODS

Data from the National Health Insurance Research Database from 2007-2009 were used. In total 8632 children aged <=18 years with acute traumatic intracranial injuries caused by accidents were discharged from hospitals in Taiwan. The associations between patient and hospital covariates (e.g., age, gender, accreditation level of hospital, surgical intervention, and number of comorbid conditions) and log-transferred hospitalization cost and length of stay (LOS) were examined with multivariable regression analysis and mediation analyses.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of hospitalization for acute intracranial injury was 63.3/100,000 per year. Motor vehicle crashes and falls accounted for 63.5% and 23.8% of intracranial injuries, respectively. The mean LOS for children was 5.0 days (median, 3 days), incurring a mean direct medical cost of $US 916.70 (median, $356.2). Boy sustained more injury (64.1%) and greater medicals cost ($965) occurred in boys. Patients with subarachnoid subdural and extradural haemorrhage tended to have a longer LOS and incur greater medical costs. Surgical intervention and type of healthcare institution were also significant predictors for medical costs. Additionally, LOS was the dominant mediator for the relationship between predictor and medical cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute intracranial injuries among children incur a substantial health care burden. Therefore, health authorities need to optimally allocate medical resources in care.

Brain abscess: Current management

Brain abscess (BA) is defined as a focal infection within the brain parenchyma, which starts as a localized area of cerebritis, which is subsequently converted into a collection of pus within a well-vascularized capsule. BA must be differentiated from parameningeal infections, including epidural abscess and subdural empyema. The BA is a challenge for the neurosurgeon because it is needed good clinical, pharmacological, and surgical skills for providing good clinical outcomes and prognosis to BA patients. Considered an infrequent brain infection, BA could be a devastator entity that easily left the patient into dead. The aim of this work is to review the current concepts regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of BA.

[Nutritional therapy in traumatic brain injury : Update 2012]

Severe traumatic brain injury ranks among the most common causes of death in young adults in western countries. Severe traumatic brain injury is typically followed by a pronounced pathophysiological cascade that accounts for many deaths. The aim of intensive care medicine after traumatic brain injury is to minimize and to control the consequences of this potentially fatal cascade. The avoidance of hypoxemia, arterial hypotension, intracranial hypertension, hyperthermia, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia and thromboembolic complications is essential in preventing this cascade. The effect of nutrition has been rather underestimated as a means of improving the outcome after traumatic brain injury. Nutrition should be started within the first 24 h after trauma. Enteral, wherever applicable, should be the route of administration of nutrition. Enteral administration of the whole calculated calorie requirement on day 1 after trauma, if possible, lowers the infection and overall complication rates. The present review gives an update of a practical approach to nutrition in traumatic brain injury.