|
1
|
Nießen A, Bechtiger FA, Hinz U, Lewosinska M, Billmann F, Hackert T, Büchler MW, Schimmack S. Enucleation Is a Feasible Procedure for Well-Differentiated pNEN-A Matched Pair Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102570. [PMID: 35626174 PMCID: PMC9139922 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The extent of surgical resection in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN) is still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of enucleation for well-differentiated non-functional (nf) pNEN. Patients undergoing enucleation (2001−2020) were analyzed. Clinicopathological parameters, perioperative outcomes and survival were assessed. The analysis was performed as a nested case-control study and matched-pair analysis with formal resection. Sixty-one patients undergoing enucleation were identified. Compared to patients undergoing formal resection, enucleation was associated with a significantly shorter median length of operative time (128 (IQR 95−170) versus 263 (172−337) minutes, p < 0.0001) and a significantly lower rate of postoperative diabetes (2% versus 21%, p = 0.0020). There was no significant difference in postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (18% versus 16% type B/C, p = 1.0), Clavien−Dindo ≥ III complications (20% versus 26%, p = 0.5189), readmission rate (12% versus 15%, p = 0.6022) or length of hospital stay (8 (7−11) versus 10 (8−17) days, p = 0.0652). There was no 30-day mortality after enucleation compared to 1.6% (n = 1) after formal resection. 10-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was similar between the two groups (OS: 89% versus 77%, p = 0.2756; DFS: 98% versus 91%, p = 0.0873). Enucleation presents a safe surgical approach for well-differentiated nf-pNEN with good long-term outcomes for selected patients.
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Merola E, Pascher A, Rinke A, Bartsch DK, Zerbi A, Nappo G, Carnaghi C, Ciola M, McNamara MG, Zandee W, Bertani E, Marcucci S, Modica R, Grützmann R, Fazio N, de Herder W, Valle JW, Gress TM, Fave GD, de Pretis G, Perren A, Wiedenmann B, Pavel ME. Radical Resection in Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Recurrence-Free Survival Rate and Definition of a Risk Score for Recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5568-5577. [PMID: 35583694 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11837-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery with radical intent is the only potentially curative option for entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (EP-NETs) but many patients develop recurrence even after many years. The subset of patients at high risk of disease recurrence has not been clearly defined to date. OBJECTIVE The aim of this retrospective study was to define, in a series of completely resected EP-NETs, the recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate and a risk score for disease recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of sporadic pancreatic NETs (PanNETs) or small intestine NETs (SiNETs) [G1/G2] that underwent R0/R1 surgery (years 2000-2016) with at least a 24-month follow-up. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factor analysis was performed using the Cox regression model. RESULTS Overall, 441 patients (224 PanNETs and 217 SiNETs) were included, with a median Ki67 of 2% in tumor tissue and 8.2% stage IV disease. Median RFS was 101 months (5-year rate 67.9%). The derived prognostic score defined by multivariable analysis included prognostic parameters, such as TNM stage, lymph node ratio, margin status, and grading. The score distinguished three risk categories with a significantly different RFS (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Approximately 30% of patients with EP-NETs recurred within 5 years after radical surgery. Risk factors for recurrence were disease stage, lymph node ratio, margin status, and grading. The definition of risk categories may help in selecting patients who might benefit from adjuvant treatments and more intensive follow-up programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Merola
- Department of Medicine 1, Division of Endocrinology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. .,Department of Gastroenterology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy.
| | - A Pascher
- Department of Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.,Klinik für Allgemein, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - A Rinke
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - D K Bartsch
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - A Zerbi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - G Nappo
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - C Carnaghi
- Oncology Unit, Bolzano Central Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
| | - M Ciola
- Department of Surgery, Bolzano Central Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
| | - M G McNamara
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - W Zandee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sector of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - E Bertani
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - S Marcucci
- Department of Surgery 2, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - R Modica
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Endocrinology Unit, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - R Grützmann
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - N Fazio
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumours, European Institute of Oncology IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - W de Herder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sector of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W Valle
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - T M Gress
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - G Delle Fave
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - G de Pretis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - A Perren
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - B Wiedenmann
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - M E Pavel
- Department of Medicine 1, Division of Endocrinology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Takikawa T, Kikuta K, Hamada S, Kume K, Miura S, Yoshida N, Tanaka Y, Matsumoto R, Ikeda M, Kataoka F, Sasaki A, Hayashi H, Hatta W, Ogata Y, Nakagawa K, Unno M, Masamune A. A New Preoperative Scoring System for Predicting Aggressiveness of Non-Functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12020397. [PMID: 35204488 PMCID: PMC8870938 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NF-PanNENs) is still controversial. This study aimed to develop a new scoring system for treatment decisions at initial diagnosis based on the identification of the predictive factors for aggressive NF-PanNENs. Seventy-seven patients who had been pathologically diagnosed with NF-PanNENs were enrolled. We retrospectively reviewed 13 variables that could be assessed preoperatively. Univariate and multivariate stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors for the aggressiveness of NF-PanNENs, and a scoring system was developed by assigning weighted points proportional to their β regression coefficient. Tumor size > 20 mm on contrast-enhanced computed tomography, tumor non-vascularity, and Ki-67 labeling index ≥5% on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens were identified as independent factors for predicting the aggressiveness of NF-PanNENs. The new scoring system, developed using the identified factors, had an excellent discrimination ability, with area under the curve of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85–0.99), and good calibration (p = 0.72, Hosmer-Lemeshow test). Ten-year overall survival rates in low-risk (0 point), intermediate-risk (1 to 2 points), and high-risk (3 to 4 points) groups were 100%, 90.9%, and 24.3%, respectively. This new scoring system would be useful for treatment decisions and prognostic prediction at initial diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuya Takikawa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
| | - Kazuhiro Kikuta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
| | - Shin Hamada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
| | - Kiyoshi Kume
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
| | - Shin Miura
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
| | - Naoki Yoshida
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
| | - Yu Tanaka
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
| | - Ryotaro Matsumoto
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
| | - Mio Ikeda
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
| | - Fumiya Kataoka
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
| | - Akira Sasaki
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
| | - Hidehiro Hayashi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
| | - Waku Hatta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
| | - Yohei Ogata
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
| | - Kei Nakagawa
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (K.N.); (M.U.)
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (K.N.); (M.U.)
| | - Atsushi Masamune
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; (T.T.); (K.K.); (S.H.); (K.K.); (S.M.); (N.Y.); (Y.T.); (R.M.); (M.I.); (F.K.); (A.S.); (H.H.); (W.H.); (Y.O.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.:+81-22-717-7171; Fax: +81-22-717-7177
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Heidsma CM, Tsilimigras DI, Rocha F, Abbott DE, Fields R, Poultsides GA, Cho CS, Lopez-Aguiar AG, Kanji Z, Fisher AV, Krasnick BA, Idrees K, Makris E, Beems M, van Eijck CHJ, Nieveen van Dijkum EJM, Maithel SK, Pawlik TM. Identifying Risk Factors and Patterns for Early Recurrence of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13092242. [PMID: 34067017 PMCID: PMC8124896 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Approximately 30% of patients with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) will develop metastases. Curative-intent treatment largely involves resection. Identifying patients with early recurrence (ER) following resection might help tailor adjuvant therapies and the surveillance intensity. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine an evidence-based cut-off value for ER, and to explore risk factors associated with ER. ER was identified 18 months after surgery. Tumor size (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.05–1.37, p = 0.007) and positive lymph nodes (OR 4.69, 95%CI 1.41–15.58, p = 0.01) were independently associated with ER. Patients with ER had lower post-recurrence free survival and overall survival than patients with late recurrence. These data support intensive follow-up shortly after surgery, and adjuvant therapy may help improve survival in pNET patients with ER after surgery. Abstract Background: Identifying patients at risk for early recurrence (ER) following resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) might help to tailor adjuvant therapies and surveillance intensity in the post-operative setting. Methods: Patients undergoing surgical resection for pNETs between 1998–2018 were identified using a multi-institutional database. Using a minimum p-value approach, optimal cut-off value of recurrence-free survival (RFS) was determined based on the difference in post-recurrence survival (PRS). Risk factors for early recurrence were identified. Results: Among 807 patients who underwent curative-intent resection for pNETs, the optimal length of RFS to define ER was identified at 18 months (lowest p-value of 0.019). Median RFS was 11.0 months (95% 8.5–12.60) among ER patients (n = 49) versus 41.0 months (95% CI: 35.0–45.9) among non-ER patients (n = 77). Median PRS was worse among ER patients compared with non-ER patients (42.6 months vs. 81.5 months, p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, tumor size (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05–1.37, p = 0.007) and positive lymph nodes (OR: 4.69, 95% CI: 1.41–15.58, p = 0.01) were independently associated with ER. Conclusion: An evidence-based cut-off value for ER after surgery for pNET was defined at 18 months. These data emphasized the importance of close follow-up in the first two years after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte M. Heidsma
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (C.M.H.); (D.I.T.)
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Diamantis I. Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (C.M.H.); (D.I.T.)
| | - Flavio Rocha
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 9th Ave, Seattle, WA 98101, USA; (F.R.); (Z.K.)
| | - Daniel E. Abbott
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53726, USA; (D.E.A.); (A.V.F.)
| | - Ryan Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (R.F.); (B.A.K.)
| | - George A. Poultsides
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-2200, USA; (G.A.P.); (E.M.)
| | - Clifford S. Cho
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (C.S.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Alexandra G. Lopez-Aguiar
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; (A.G.L.-A.); (S.K.M.)
| | - Zaheer Kanji
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 9th Ave, Seattle, WA 98101, USA; (F.R.); (Z.K.)
| | - Alexander V. Fisher
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53726, USA; (D.E.A.); (A.V.F.)
| | - Bradley A. Krasnick
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (R.F.); (B.A.K.)
| | - Kamran Idrees
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University, 1211 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN 37232, USA;
| | - Eleftherios Makris
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-2200, USA; (G.A.P.); (E.M.)
| | - Megan Beems
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (C.S.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Casper H. J. van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Elisabeth J. M. Nieveen van Dijkum
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Shishir K. Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; (A.G.L.-A.); (S.K.M.)
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (C.M.H.); (D.I.T.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Evers M, Rinke A, Rütz J, Ramaswamy A, Maurer E, Bartsch DK. Prognostic Factors in Curative Resected Locoregional Small Intestine Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. World J Surg 2021; 45:1109-1117. [PMID: 33416940 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05884-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SI-NEN) are rare, and only about 40% of patients are diagnosed without distant metastases. Aim of the study was to identify prognostic factors in patients with potentially curative resected locoregional SI-NEN. METHODS Patients with curative resected locoregional SI-NEN (ENETS stages I-III) were retrieved from a prospective data base. Demographic, surgical and pathological data of patients with and without disease recurrence were retrospectively analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS In a 20-year period, 65 of 203 (32%) patients with SI-NEN were operated for stages I-III disease. Thirty-eight (58.5%) patients were men, and the median age at surgery was 59 (range 37-87) years. After median follow-up of 65 months, 14 patients experienced disease relapse median 28.5 (range 6-122) months after initial surgery, of which 2 died due to their disease. Multivariate analysis revealed age ≥ 60 years (HR = 6.41, 95% CI 1.38-29.67, p = 0.017), tumor size ≥ 2 cm (HR = 26.54, 95% CI 4.46-157.62, p < 0.001), lymph node ratio > 0.5 (HR 7.18, 95% CI 1.74-29.74, p = 0.007) and multifocal tumor growth (HR = 6.98, 95% CI 1.66-29.39, p = 0.008) as independent negative prognostic factors and right hemicolectomy compared to segmental small bowel resection (HR = 0.04, 95% CI 0.01-0.24, p < 0.001) as independent protector against recurrence. CONCLUSION Patients with locoregional SI-NEN with an age ≥ 60 years, tumor size ≥ 2 cm, lymph node ratio > 0.5 and multiple small bowel tumor foci have an increased risk for recurrence and might benefit from adjuvant treatment. In contrast, right hemicolectomy of ileal SI-NEN seems to reduce the risk of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Evers
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043, Baldingerstrasse Marburg, Germany
| | - Anja Rinke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Rütz
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043, Baldingerstrasse Marburg, Germany
| | - Annette Ramaswamy
- Department of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Maurer
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043, Baldingerstrasse Marburg, Germany
| | - Detlef K Bartsch
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, 35043, Baldingerstrasse Marburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Dong DH, Zhang XF, Lopez-Aguiar AG, Poultsides G, Makris E, Rocha F, Kanji Z, Weber S, Fisher A, Fields R, Krasnick BA, Idrees K, Smith PM, Cho C, Beems M, Schmidt CR, Dillhoff M, Maithel SK, Pawlik TM. Tumor burden score predicts tumor recurrence of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after curative resection. HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22:1149-1157. [PMID: 31822386 PMCID: PMC10182413 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the feasibility of Tumor Burden Score (TBS) to predict tumor recurrence following curative-intent resection of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs). METHOD The TBS cut-off values were determined by a statistical tool, X-tile. The influence of TBS on recurrence-free survival (RFS) was examined. RESULTS Among 842 NF-pNETs patients, there was an incremental worsening of RFS as the TBS increased (5-year RFS, low, medium, and high TBS: 92.0%, 73.3%, and 59.3%, respectively; P < 0.001). TBS (AUC 0.74) out-performed both maximum tumor size (AUC 0.65) and number of tumors (AUC 0.5) to predict RFS (TBS vs. maximum tumor size, p = 0.05; TBS vs. number of tumors, p < 0.01). The impact of margin (low TBS: R0 80.4% vs. R1 71.9%, p = 0.01 vs. medium TBS: R0 55.8% vs. R1 37.5%, p = 0.67 vs. high TBS: R0 31.9% vs. R1 12.0%, p = 0.11) and nodal (5-year RFS, low TBS: N0 94.9% vs. N1 68.4%, p < 0.01 vs. medium TBS: N0 81.8% vs. N1 55.4%, p < 0.01 vs. high TBS: N0 58.0% vs. N1 54.2%, p = 0.15) status on 5-year RFS outcomes disappeared among patients who had higher TBS. CONCLUSIONS TBS was strongly associated with risk of recurrence and outperformed both tumor size and number alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ding-Hui Dong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Institute of Advanced Surgical Technology and Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xu-Feng Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Institute of Advanced Surgical Technology and Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | - Flavio Rocha
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Zaheer Kanji
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sharon Weber
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Alexander Fisher
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Ryan Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, WI, USA
| | - Bradley A Krasnick
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, WI, USA
| | - Kamran Idrees
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Paula M Smith
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Cliff Cho
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Megan Beems
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Carl R Schmidt
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mary Dillhoff
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Chen HY, Zhou YL, Chen YH, Wang X, Zhang H, Ke NW, Liu XB, Tan CL. Functionality is not an independent prognostic factor for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:3638-3649. [PMID: 32742132 PMCID: PMC7366052 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i25.3638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) that produce hormones leading to symptoms are classified as functional tumors, while others are classified as nonfunctional tumors. The traditional view is that functionality is a factor that affects the prognosis of pNEN patients. However, as the sample sizes of studies have increased, researches in recent years have proposed new viewpoints.
AIM To assess whether functionality is an independent factor for predicting the prognosis of pNEN patients.
METHODS From January 2004 to December 2016, data of patients who underwent surgery at the primary site for the treatment of pNENs from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and West China Hospital database were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS Contemporaneous data from the two databases were analyzed separately as two cohorts and then merged as the third cohort to create a large sample that was suitable for multivariate analysis. From the SEER database, age (P = 0.006) and T stage (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors affecting the survival. From the West China Hospital database, independent prognostic factors were age (P = 0.034), sex (P = 0.032), and grade (P = 0.039). The result of the cohort consisting of the combined populations from the two databases showed that race (P = 0.015), age (P = 0.002), sex (P = 0.032) and T stage (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. In the West China Hospital database and in the total population, nonfunctional pNETs and other functional pNETs tended to have poorer prognoses than insulinoma. However, functionality was not associated with the survival time of patients with pNETs in the multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION Functionality is not associated with prognosis. Race, age, sex, and T stage are independent factors for predicting the survival of patients with pNETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Yu Chen
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Ya-Liang Zhou
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yong-Hua Chen
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xing Wang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Neng-Wen Ke
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xu-Bao Liu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Chun-Lu Tan
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Chiramel J, Almond R, Slagter A, Khan A, Wang X, Lim KHJ, Frizziero M, Chakrabarty B, Minicozzi A, Lamarca A, Mansoor W, Hubner RA, Valle JW, McNamara MG. Prognostic importance of lymph node yield after curative resection of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:205-216. [PMID: 32355642 PMCID: PMC7186236 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i4.205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Revised: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic significance of lymph nodes (LNs) metastases and the optimum number of LN yield in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs) undergoing curative resection is still debatable. Many studies have demonstrated that cure rate for patients with GEP NETs can be improved by the resection of the primary tumour and regional lymphadenectomy
AIM To evaluate the effect of lymph node (LN) status and yield on relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with resected GEP NETs.
METHODS Data on patients who underwent curative resection for GEP NETs between January 2002 and March 2017 were analysed retrospectively. Grade 3 tumours (Ki67 > 20%) were excluded. Univariate Cox proportional hazard models were computed for RFS and OS and assessed alongside cut-point analysis to distinguish a suitable binary categorisation of total LNs retrieved associated with RFS.
RESULTS A total of 217 patients were included in the study. The median age was 59 years (21-97 years) and 51% (n = 111) were male. Primary tumour sites were small bowel (42%), pancreas (25%), appendix (18%), rectum (7%), colon (3%), gastric (2%), others (2%). Median follow up times for all patients were 41 mo (95%CI: 36-51) and 71 mo (95%CI: 63–76) for RFS and OS respectively; 50 relapses and 35 deaths were reported. LNs were retrieved in 151 patients. Eight or more LNs were harvested in 106 patients and LN positivity reported in 114 patients. Three or more positive LNs were detected in 62 cases. The result of univariate analysis suggested perineural invasion (P = 0.0023), LN positivity (P = 0.033), LN retrieval of ≥ 8 (P = 0.047) and localisation (P = 0.0049) have a statistically significant association with shorter RFS, but there was no effect of LN ratio on RFS: P = 0.1 or OS: P = 0.75. Tumour necrosis (P = 0.021) and perineural invasion (P = 0.016) were the only two variables significantly associated with worse OS. In the final multivariable analysis, localisation (pancreas HR = 27.33, P = 0.006, small bowel HR = 32.44, P = 0.005), and retrieval of ≥ 8 LNs (HR = 2.7, P = 0.036) were independent prognostic factors for worse RFS.
CONCLUSION An outcome-oriented approach to cut-point analysis can suggest a minimum number of adequate LNs to be harvested in patients with GEP NETs undergoing curative surgery. Removal of ≥ 8 LNs is associated with increased risk of relapse, which could be due to high rates of LN positivity at the time of surgery. Given that localisation had a significant association with RFS, a prospective multicentre study is warranted with a clear direction on recommended surgical practice and follow-up guidance for GEP NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaseela Chiramel
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
| | - Rose Almond
- Statistics Group, Digital Services, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Astrid Slagter
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066 Cx, Netherlands
| | - Adeel Khan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Xin Wang
- Statistics Group, Digital Services, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Kok Haw Jonathan Lim
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa Frizziero
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Bipasha Chakrabarty
- Department of Pathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Annamaria Minicozzi
- Department of Surgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom
| | - Angela Lamarca
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Wasat Mansoor
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Richard A Hubner
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Juan William Valle
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Mairéad Geraldine McNamara
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Intratumoral Fibrosis and Tumor Growth Pattern as Prognostic Factors in Optimally Resected Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An Analysis of 168 Cases. Pancreas 2020; 49:255-260. [PMID: 32011527 PMCID: PMC7021221 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) can recur after curative resection. We sought to establish the significance of tumor fibrosis and tumor growth pattern as predictors of recurrence-free survival and overall survival. METHODS A retrospective query of an institutional surgical database was performed from 2000 to 2018 to identify optimally resected PanNENs. All eligible slides were reviewed by an experienced gastrointestinal pathologist for established histopathologic prognostic factors, as well as fibrosis and tumor growth pattern. We evaluated the effect of the interested variables through Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS One hundred sixty-eight cases were considered. The majority of patients (90%) had grade 1 or 2 tumors, 46% showed significant fibrosis, and 22% demonstrated an infiltrative growth pattern. Twenty-one percent of patients had a recurrence. In multivariable analysis, lymphovascular invasion with a hazard ratio (HR) of 5.1 and infiltrative growth pattern (HR, 2.8) were significantly associated with increased risk of recurrence and increased risk of death (HR, 3.6 and 2.7, respectively). There was a significant decrease in recurrence-free survival and overall survival for fibrosis and infiltrative growth pattern. CONCLUSIONS In optimally resected PanNENs, the presence of fibrosis and infiltrative growth pattern are significant risk factors for recurrence and/or decreased survival.
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Lamarca A, Clouston H, Barriuso J, McNamara MG, Frizziero M, Mansoor W, Hubner RA, Manoharan P, O'Dwyer S, Valle JW. Follow-Up Recommendations after Curative Resection of Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumours: Review of Current Evidence and Clinical Practice. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8101630. [PMID: 31590343 PMCID: PMC6833016 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8101630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Revised: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is increasing, especially for patients with early stages and grade 1 tumours. Current evidence also shows increased prevalence, probably reflecting earlier stage diagnosis and improvement of treatment options. Definition of adequate postsurgical follow-up for NENs is a current challenge. There are limited guidelines, and heterogeneity in adherence to those available is notable. Unfortunately, the population of patients at greatest risk of recurrence has not been defined clearly. Some studies support that for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs), factors such as primary tumour (T), stage, grade (Ki-67), tumour size, and lymph node metastases (N) are of relevance. For bronchial neuroendocrine tumours (LungNETs) and small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (siNETs), similar factors have been identified. This review summarises the evidence supporting the rationale behind follow-up after curative resection in well-differentiated PanNETs, siNETs, and LungNETS. Published evidence informing relapse rate, disease-free survival, and relapse patterns are discussed, together with an overview of current guidelines informing postsurgical investigations and duration of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Lamarca
- Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Hamish Clouston
- Surgery Department, Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christe NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
| | - Jorge Barriuso
- Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Mairéad G McNamara
- Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Melissa Frizziero
- Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Was Mansoor
- Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Richard A Hubner
- Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Prakash Manoharan
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
| | - Sarah O'Dwyer
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. Sarah.O'
- Surgery Department, Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christe NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK. Sarah.O'
| | - Juan W Valle
- Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Fisher AV, Lopez-Aguiar AG, Rendell VR, Pokrzywa C, Rocha FG, Kanji ZS, Poultsides GA, Makris EA, Dillhoff ME, Beal EW, Fields RC, Panni RZ, Idrees K, Smith PM, Cho CS, Beems MV, Maithel SK, Winslow ER, Abbott DE, Weber SM. Predictive Value of Chromogranin A and a Pre-Operative Risk Score to Predict Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:651-658. [PMID: 30659439 PMCID: PMC7723064 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-04080-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRO Chromogranin A (CgA) may be prognostic for patients with neuroendocrine tumors; however, the clinical utility of this test is unclear. METHODS Patients undergoing resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) were selected from the eight institutions of the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group database. Cox regression was used to identify pre-operative variables that predicted recurrence-free survival (RFS), and those with p < 0.1 were included in a risk score. The risk score was tested in a unique subset of the overall cohort. RESULTS In the entire cohort of 287 patients, median follow-up time was 37 months, and 5-year RFS was 73%. Cox regression analysis identified four variables for inclusion in the risk score: CgA > 5x ULN (HR 4.3, p = 0.01), tumor grade 2/3 (HR 3.7, p = 0.01), resection for recurrent disease (HR 6.2, p < 0.01), and tumor size > 4 cm (HR 4.5, p = 0.1). Each variable was assigned 1 point. Risk-score testing in the unique validation cohort of 63 patients revealed a 95% negative predictive value for recurrence in patients with zero points. DISCUSSION This simple pre-operative risk scoring system resulted in a high degree of specificity for identifying patients at low-risk for tumor recurrence. This test can be utilized pre-operatively to aid informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander V. Fisher
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, BX7375 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792-3284, USA
| | - Alexandra G. Lopez-Aguiar
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Victoria R. Rendell
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, BX7375 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792-3284, USA
| | - Courtney Pokrzywa
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, BX7375 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792-3284, USA
| | - Flavio G. Rocha
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Zaheer S. Kanji
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Mary E. Dillhoff
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Eliza W. Beal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ryan C. Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Roheena Z. Panni
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kamran Idrees
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Paula Marincola Smith
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Clifford S. Cho
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Megan V. Beems
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Shishir K. Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Emily R. Winslow
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, BX7375 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792-3284, USA
| | - Daniel E. Abbott
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, BX7375 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792-3284, USA
| | - Sharon M. Weber
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, BX7375 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792-3284, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Is radical surgery always curative in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors? A cure model survival analysis. Pancreatology 2018; 18:313-317. [PMID: 29487026 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2018.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2017] [Revised: 01/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant therapy after curative surgery for sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNETs) is not currently recommended, assuming that all patients could be cured by a radical resection. The aim of our study is to establish how many and which kind of patients remained uncured after radical resection of pNET. METHODS Retrospective study involving 143 resected sporadic pNETs. The survival analysis was carried out using the cure model, describing the cure fraction and the excess of risk recurrence. Multivariate analyses were made in order to evaluate the non negligible effect of demographics, clinical and pathological factors on survival parameters. The results were reported as percentages, fractions, ORs and HRs with 95% confidence interval (95 CI %). RESULTS The cure fraction and the excess of hazard rate of the whole population were 57.1% (37.4-74.6, 95% CI) and 0.06 (0.03-0.07, 95% CI), respectively. Two independent factors were related to the cure fraction: TNM stage (OR 0.27 ± 0.17; P = 0.002) and grading (OR 0.11 ± 0.18; P = 0.004). Considering the excess of hazard rate, only two independent factors were related to an increased risk of recurrence: TNM stage (HR 3.49 ± 1.12; P = 0.004) and grading (HR 4.93 ± 1.82; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The radical surgery has a high probability of cure in stages I-II or in grading 1 while, in stages III-IV or in grading 3 tumors, surgery alone failed to achieve a "cure". A multimodal treatment should be employed in order to avoid a recurrence of the disease.
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Merath K, Bagante F, Beal EW, Lopez-Aguiar AG, Poultsides G, Makris E, Rocha F, Kanji Z, Weber S, Fisher A, Fields R, Krasnick BA, Idrees K, Smith PM, Cho C, Beems M, Schmidt CR, Dillhoff M, Maithel SK, Pawlik TM. Nomogram predicting the risk of recurrence after curative-intent resection of primary non-metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: An analysis of the U.S. Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group. J Surg Oncol 2018; 117:868-878. [PMID: 29448303 PMCID: PMC5992105 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 01/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of recurrence after resection of non-metastatic gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) is poorly defined. We developed/validated a nomogram to predict risk of recurrence after curative-intent resection. METHODS A training set to develop the nomogram and test set for validation were identified. The predictive ability of the nomogram was assessed using c-indices. RESULTS Among 1477 patients, 673 (46%) were included in the training set and 804 (54%) in y the test set. On multivariable analysis, Ki-67, tumor size, nodal status, and invasion of adjacent organs were independent predictors of DFS. The risk of death increased by 8% for each percentage increase in the Ki-67 index (HR 1.08, 95% CI, 1.05-1.10; P < 0.001). GEP-NET invading adjacent organs had a HR of 1.65 (95% CI, 1.03-2.65; P = 0.038), similar to tumors ≥3 cm (HR 1.67, 95% CI, 1.11-2.51; P = 0.014). Patients with 1-3 positive nodes and patients with >3 positive nodes had a HR of 1.81 (95% CI, 1.12-2.87; P = 0.014) and 2.51 (95% CI, 1.50-4.24; P < 0.001), respectively. The nomogram demonstrated good ability to predict risk of recurrence (c-index: training set, 0.739; test set, 0.718). CONCLUSION The nomogram was able to predict the risk of recurrence and can be easily applied in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katiuscha Merath
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Fabio Bagante
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
- Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Eliza W Beal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Flavio Rocha
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Zaheer Kanji
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sharon Weber
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Alexander Fisher
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Ryan Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Wisconsin
| | - Bradley A Krasnick
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Wisconsin
| | - Kamran Idrees
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Paula M Smith
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Cliff Cho
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Wisconsin
| | - Megan Beems
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Wisconsin
| | - Carl R Schmidt
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mary Dillhoff
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|