The intraoperative use of aortic balloon occlusion technique for sacral and pelvic tumor resections: A case-control study

The clinical effectiveness and safety of Zone III REBOA for resection of sacropelvic tumors in patients older than 70 years

BACKGROUND

REBOA is a method used to manage bleeding during surgery involving sacropelvic tumors. Nevertheless, studies on the use of REBOA among elderly people are lacking. The aim of this research was to investigate the efficacy and safety of Zone III REBOA in patients aged more than 70 years.

METHODS

A comparative study was conducted using case-control methods. A group of patients, referred to as Group A, who were younger than 70 years was identified and paired with a comparable group of patients, known as Group B, who were older than 70 years. Continuous monitoring of physiological parameters was conducted, and blood samples were collected at consistent intervals.

RESULTS

Totally, 188 participants were enrolled and received REBOA. Among the 188 patients, seventeen were aged more than 70 years. By implementing REBOA, the average amount of blood loss was only 1427 ml. Experiments were also conducted to compare Group A and Group B. No notable differences were observed in terms of demographic variables, systolic blood pressure (SBP), arterial pH, lactate levels, blood creatinine levels, potassium levels, or calcium levels at baseline. Additionally, after the deflation of the REBOA, laboratory test results, which included arterial pH, lactate, potassium concentration, calcium concentration, and blood creatinine concentration, were not significantly different (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that in selected patients aged more than 70 years can achieve satisfactory hemodynamic and metabolic stability with Zone III REBOA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level III.

Editor's Choice - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Lower Extremity Vascular Complications after Arterial Access for Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA): An Inevitable Concern?

OBJECTIVE

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is used to temporise non-compressible torso haemorrhage. Recent data have suggested that vascular access complications secondary to REBOA placement are higher than initially anticipated. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled incidence rate of lower extremity arterial complications after REBOA.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, Embase, conference abstract listings, and clinical trial registries.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies including more than five adults undergoing emergency REBOA for exsanguinating haemorrhage that reported access site complications were eligible for inclusion. A pooled meta-analysis of vascular complications was performed using the DerSimonian-Laird weights for the random effects model, presented as a Forest plot. Further meta-analyses compared the relative risk of access complications between different sheath sizes, percutaneous access techniques, and indications for REBOA. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) tool.

RESULTS

No randomised controlled trials were identified, and the overall study quality was poor. Twenty-eight studies including 887 adults were identified. REBOA was performed for trauma in 713 cases. The pooled proportion rate of vascular access complications was 8.6% (95% confidence interval 4.97 - 12.97), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 67.6%). There was no significant difference in the relative risk of access complications between 7 and > 10 F sheaths (p = .54), or between ultrasound guided and landmark guided access (p = .081). However, traumatic haemorrhage was associated with a significantly higher risk of complications compared with non-traumatic haemorrhage (p = .034).

CONCLUSION

This updated meta-analysis aimed to be as comprehensive as possible considering the poor quality of source data and high risk of bias. It suggested that lower extremity vascular complications were higher than originally suspected after REBOA. While the technical aspects did not appear to impact the safety profile, a cautious association could be drawn between REBOA use for traumatic haemorrhage and a higher risk of arterial complications.

A clinical study of the hemodynamic and metabolic effects of Zone 3 REBOA for sacral and pelvic tumor resections

Background

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a key procedure in sacral and pelvic tumor resection that provides hemorrhage control. However, few studies have been performed to capture the effects of REBOA in a nonshock condition and provide a detailed description of the changes occurring with prolonged occlusion time. This study aimed to examine the hemodynamic and metabolic effects of Zone 3 REBOA for sacral and pelvic tumor resections following different periods of REBOA.

Methods

In total, 121 patients who underwent surgical tumor resections of the pelvis and/or the sacrum with the use of aortic balloon occlusion were prospectively enrolled from October 2020 to December 2021. All cases were divided into Group A (occlusion time ≤ 60 min, n = 57) and Group B (occlusion time ≥ 90 min, n = 64). Physiologic parameters were continuously recorded, and laboratory specimens were obtained at regular intervals.

Results

Balloon inflation resulted in a significant increase in SBP from 106 to 120 mmHg and decreased to 96 mmHg immediately following balloon deflation. With the application of REBOA, the median blood loss was only 1200 ml (range, 400–7900). When deflating the REBOA, the arterial pH was lower than baseline (7.36 vs. 7.41, p < 0.01), the arterial lactate concentration increased from 0.9 to 1.4 mmol/L (p < 0.01), serum potassium measurements increased from 3.99 to 4.12 mmol/L, serum calcium measurements decreased from 2.31 to 2.04 mmol/L, and blood creatinine decreased from 64 to 60 µmol/L. The operating time of Group B was longer than that of patients in Group A, and the patients in Group B needed more blood units to be transfused. Although laboratory measurements, including pH, potassium, calcium, and blood creatinine, were at the same level in two groups comparison, the lactate was significantly higher in Group B after deflation (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that acceptable hemodynamic and metabolic stability can be attained when the occlusion time of REBOA is more than 90 min, although the long duration of occlusion caused relatively higher lactate levels.

New adjustable modular hemipelvic prosthesis replacement with 3D-print osteotomy guide plate used in periacetabular malignant tumors: a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Periacetabular malignant tumor seriously endangers the life and health of patients. Hemipelvic replacement provides a good method for patients who want complete resection of the tumor while retaining or restoring the function of the affected limb.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the performance and clinical application of the new adjustable modular hemipelvic prosthesis and to compare the effects of three kinds of hemipelvic prosthesis.

METHODS

In this study, 23 patients, with an average age of 44.6 years (21-75 years), were collected, who received hemipelvic replacement with new adjustable, modular, and screw-rod system hemipelvic prosthesis. Preoperative preparation was conducted on them, and operative complications were recorded. Postoperative functional follow-up was performed regularly.

RESULTS

The average operation time was 319 min (170-480 min), and the average blood loss was 2813 ml (1000 mL-8000 ml). The incidence of complications was 47.8%, and type A (wound-related complications) had the highest incidence (34.8%). Postoperative dislocation occurred in 3 cases (13.0%), and no dislocation occurred in the new adjustable modular hemipelvic prosthesis group. The average MSTS score of the patients was 18.6 (10-23), and the average Harris score was 73.7 (53-87).

CONCLUSIONS

The new adjustable modular hemipelvic prosthesis has the feasibility of reconstruction and good functional outcome, making it ideal for periacetabular tumors. Furthermore, preoperative tumor-feeding artery embolization and abdominal aortic balloon implantation may be an effective choice to reduce intraoperative blood loss and facilitate the operation of tumor resection.

Total sacrectomy with a combined antero-posterior surgical approach for malignant sacral tumours

Purpose

To investigate the indications, approaches, resection methods, and complications of total sacrectomy with a combined antero-posterior approach for malignant sacral tumours.

Methods

Fourteen cases of primary malignant sacral tumours treated with total sacrectomy between January 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. All patients presented with pre-operative lumbosacral pain or constipation. A combined antero-posterior approach was used for tumour resection, and the spinal pedicle screw rod system was used to achieve ilio-lumbar stability. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores were used to assess pain and lower limb function, respectively. The mean operative time and intra-operative blood loss were 6.54 hours and 2935 mL, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 62 months.

Results

None of the patients died peri-operatively. At the last follow-up, ten patients were continuously disease-free, three were alive with disease, and one died of disease from lung metastasis. Tumour recurrence occurred in three patients. The MSTS scores ranged from 6 to 28 (20.00–93.33%, 6/30–28/30) with an average of 20 (66.67%, 20/30). Seven patients could walk independently in public, five could only walk at home using a walking aid, and two could only lie down and stand for a short time. Thirteen patients developed post-operative complications such as skin necrosis, screw loosening, connecting rod fracture, neuropathic pain, sciatic nerve injury, dysuria, and urinary incontinence.

Conclusion

Total sacrectomy can effectively treat malignant sacral tumours with good resection boundaries and prognosis. However, the high incidence of post-operative complications may impact post-operative neurological function.

Prolonged balloon occlusion of the lower abdominal aorta during pelvic or sacral tumor resection

Background

To explore the efficacy of lower abdominal aorta balloon occlusion technology in pelvis and sacral tumor surgery and to assess the safety of prolonged balloon occlusion.

Methods

From January 2008 to January 2017, 81 patients were diagnosed with sacrum or pelvic tumor and underwent surgery in our institution. Balloon catheters were placed through the femoral artery to occlude the abdominal aorta of the pelvic tumor and sacrum region undergoing tumor resection. These patients were divided into two group based on single balloon blocking time. Group A had a balloon blocking time of 60 minutes or less, and group B had a balloon occlusion time greater than 60 minutes. The patients in the two groups were compared with regards to operation time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion volume, average length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications.

Results

No balloon displacement or leakage of the abdominal aorta occurred during the operations. The difference in operation time between the two groups was statistically significant (P≤0.05), and the differences in intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion volume, and average hospital stay between groups A and B were not significant (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was 12% in group A, and 22.6% in group B, with no statistically significant differences (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Prolonged balloon occlusion was safe and effective in the surgical treatment of complicated pelvic and sacral tumors. It did not increase the incidence of postoperative complications such as distal limb paralysis, arterial thrombosis, or ischemic necrosis.

Intraoperative balloon occlusion of the aorta for blood management in sacral and pelvic tumor resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoplasms of the sacrum and pelvis are challenging to manage due to their complex vascularity and size and are at high risk of bleeding during resection. Intra-aortic balloon occlusion (IABO) has been used in trauma to control massive blood loss, but its efficacy and safety in oncologic sacral and pelvic surgery are unknown. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of IABO in providing hemorrhage control during resection of sacral and pelvic tumors.

METHODS

This PROSPERO pre-registered study meta-analyzed all studies reporting on the use of IABO in the setting of pelvic and sacral tumour resection, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome of the meta-analysis was intraoperative blood loss, with secondary outcomes consisting of transfusion volume, post-operative blood loss, operative time, complication rate, and mortality.

RESULTS

Across studies, IABO was associated with a large, significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (SMD -0.81, 95% CI -1.01 to -0.60, P < 0.0001) and transfused red blood cell volume (SMD 0.92, 95% CI -1.30 to -0.53, P < 0.0001). Two studies reported that complication rates were comparable between patients receiving IABO and patient receiving conventional surgery (Odds ratio = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.59 to 2.83, P = 0.52). All studies descriptively reported improved visualization of the operative field with IABO.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrated that IABO is an effective technique to decrease blood loss and transfusion requirements during sacral and pelvic tumor surgery. Future clinical trials should be conducted to establish the safety of this method and explore potential contraindications.