Uni-vs. bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction - A multicenter outcome analysis

Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes in Unilateral Versus Bilateral DIEP Flap Reconstructions: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Background/Objectives: The DIEP flap is among the preferred techniques in autologous breast reconstruction due to better long-term outcomes, including higher satisfaction and more natural breast shape compared to implant-based breast reconstruction. With the rise in genetic testing, bilateral DIEP reconstructions are becoming more common, though they carry a higher risk of complications. This study aims to compare the risks between unilateral and bilateral procedures to improve surgical decision-making. Methods: A retrospective, single-center review was conducted on female patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between January 2018 and May 2024. The study included patients with complete medical records and follow-up data, excluding those with incomplete records. Patient characteristics, operative details, and complications were thoroughly analyzed, with donor site complications assessed per patient and recipient site complications per breast. Results: During the study, 141 DIEP flaps were performed on 114 women, with 87 unilateral and 27 bilateral reconstructions. Age and BMI were similar between groups. However, chemotherapy was more common in the bilateral group (85% vs. 47%, p = 0.0011). Operative time was significantly longer in bilateral procedures (650 vs. 460 min, p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in recipient and donor site complications across groups. The hospital stay was significantly longer in the bilateral group (11 vs. 8.8 days, p = 0.024). Conclusions: Bilateral and unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions have similar complication and early take-back rates.

Unilateral Versus Bilateral Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Previous studies have shown a higher complication rate in bilateral (BL) compared to unilateral (UL) deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to offer an update by including recent studies to thoroughly assess the complication rates in UL versus BL DIEP flap reconstructions and provide clear guidance for clinicians and their patients.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature and comparative meta-analysis were performed to assess the differences in complication rates between UL and BL procedures. Only comparative studies that reported on postoperative complications after UL and BL DIEP flap breast reconstructions were included. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model.

Results

Five studies representing 5120 patients who underwent either UL or BL DIEP flap breast reconstructions were included. BL DIEP flap reconstructions were associated with a higher risk of total flap loss, with an OR of 1.48 (95% CI, 1.02-2.14) and a P value of 0.04. Conversely, the risk of reexploration surgery was reduced, with an OR of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55- 0.84) and a P value of 0.0002.

Conclusions

BL DIEP flap breast reconstruction carries a higher risk of complete flap loss compared with UL reconstructions, with a moderate risk increase. Despite this increased risk, the significant benefits of BL reconstruction make it a viable and recommended option for women requiring this type of surgery.

Predictors of Complications in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using DIEP Flaps: Implications for Management

BACKGROUND

Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps are the standard for autologous breast reconstruction. This study investigated risk factors for DIEP complications in a large, contemporary cohort to optimize surgical evaluation and planning.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent DIEP breast reconstruction between 2016 and 2020 at an academic institution. Demographics, treatment, and outcomes were evaluated in univariable and multivariable regression models for postoperative complications.

RESULTS

In total, 802 DIEP flaps were performed in 524 patients (mean age, 51.2 ± 9.6 years; mean body mass index, 29.3 ± 4.5). Most patients (87%) had breast cancer; 15% were BRCA -positive. There were 282 (53%) delayed and 242 (46%) immediate reconstructions and 278 (53%) bilateral and 246 (47%) unilateral reconstructions. Overall complications occurred in 81 patients (15.5%), including venous congestion (3.4%), breast hematoma (3.6%), infection (3.6%), partial flap loss (3.2%), total flap loss (2.3%), and arterial thrombosis (1.3%). Longer operative time was significantly associated with bilateral immediate reconstructions and higher body mass index. Prolonged operative time (OR, 1.16; P = 0.001) and immediate reconstruction (OR, 1.92; P = 0.013) were significant predictors of overall complications. Partial flap loss was associated with bilateral immediate reconstructions, higher body mass index, current smoking status, and longer operative time.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged operative time is a significant risk factor for overall complications and partial flap loss in DIEP breast reconstruction. For each additional hour of surgical time, the risk of developing overall complications increases by 16%. These findings suggest that reducing operative time through co-surgeon approaches, consistency in surgical teams, and counseling patients with more risk factors toward delayed reconstructions may mitigate complications.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

"Spin" in Observational Studies in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is widely used in autologous breast reconstruction. However, the technique relies heavily on nonrandomized observational research, which has been found to have high risk of bias. "Spin" can be used to inappropriately present study findings to exaggerate benefits or minimize harms. The primary objective was to assess the prevalence of spin in nonrandomized observational studies on DIEP reconstruction. The secondary objectives were to determine the prevalence of each spin category and strategy.

Methods

MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 2015, to November 15, 2022. Spin was assessed in abstracts and full-texts of included studies according to criteria proposed by Lazarus et al.

Results

There were 77 studies included for review. The overall prevalence of spin was 87.0%. Studies used a median of two spin strategies (interquartile range: 1-3). The most common strategies identified were causal language or claims (n = 41/77, 53.2%), inadequate extrapolation to larger population, intervention, or outcome (n = 27/77, 35.1%), inadequate implication for clinical practice (n = 25/77, 32.5%), use of linguistic spin (n = 22/77, 28.6%), and no consideration of the limitations (n = 21/77, 27.3%). There were no significant associations between selected study characteristics and the presence of spin.

Conclusions

The prevalence of spin is high in nonrandomized observational studies on DIEP reconstruction. Causal language or claims are the most common strategy. Investigators, reviewers, and readers should familiarize themselves with spin strategies to avoid misinterpretation of research in DIEP reconstruction.

[Change of Gaze Pattern depending on the Stage of DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: a Preliminary Eye-Tracking Investigation]

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction using autologous tissue is an integral part of breast cancer treatment. While many studies have elucidated the impact of breast reconstruction on patients' quality of life, self-esteem, sexuality and more, there is a lack of objective data regarding the effects on external observers. Aim of this study was to investigate the change in gaze pattern of independent observers depending on the stage of DIEP-flap breast reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eye-tracking technology was utilized to analyze the eye movements of 58 study participants while viewing 2 D photographs of a patient after mastectomy and different stages of DIEP-flap breast reconstruction. Time until first fixation and total time of fixation were recorded and con- secutively analyzed for the right and left breast on each image.

RESULTS

Overall, the total time of fixation of the operated breast decreased significantly over the different stages of breast reconstruction, with p<0.001. At the same time, there was no statistically significant change in total time of fixation of the non-operated breast, with p=0.174. The time until first fixation showed a significant increase over the different stages of reconstruction for the reconstructed breast, with p<0.001, while no significant differences were found for the opposite breast, with p=0.344.

CONCLUSION

Mastectomy and the individual steps of breast reconstruction alter the perception of breast cancer patients. Over the course of breast reconstruction, the deviation of gaze in the direction of the affected breast is reversed.