Integrative countercurrent chromatography for the target isolation of lysine-specific demethylase 1 inhibitors from the roots of Salvia miltiorrhiza

Natural products modulating epigenetic mechanisms by affecting histone methylation/demethylation: Targeting cancer cells

Many natural products can exert anticancer or chemopreventive activity by interfering with the cellular epigenetic machinery. Many studies indicate the relevance of affecting DNA methylation and histone acetylation, however the influence on the mechanisms related to histone methylation are often overlooked. This may be associated with the lagging evidence that changes in the action of histone methylation writers and erasers, and subsequent alterations in the profile of histone methylation are causally related with carcinogenesis. Recent animal studies have shown that targeting histone methylation/demethylation affects the course of experimentally induced carcinogenesis. Existing data suggest that numerous natural compounds from different chemical groups, including green tea polyphenols and other flavonoids, curcuminoids, stilbene derivatives, phenolic acids, isothiocyanates, alkaloids and terpenes, can affect the expression and activity of crucial enzymes involved in the methylation and demethylation of histone lysine and arginine residues. These activities have been associated with the modulation of cancer-related gene expression and functional changes, including reduced cell proliferation and migration, and enhanced apoptosis in various cancer models. Most studies focused on the modulation of the expression and/or activity of two proteins - EZH2 (a H3K27 methyltransferase) and LSD1 (lysine demethylase 1A - a H3K4/9 demethylase), or the effects on the global levels of histone methylation caused by the phytochemicals, but data regarding other histone methyltransferases or demethylases are scarce. While the field remains relatively unexplored, this review aims to explore the impact of natural products on the enzymes related to histone methylation/demethylation, showing their relevance to carcinogenesis and cancer progression. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue Natural Products and Cancer: From Drug Discovery to Prevention and Therapy. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v182.10/issuetoc.

Tanshinone IIA destabilizes SLC7A11 by regulating PIAS4-mediated SUMOylation of SLC7A11 through KDM1A, and promotes ferroptosis in breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women with unfavorite prognosis.

OBJECTIVES

Tanshinone IIA (Tan IIA) inhibits BC progression, however, the underlying mechanism remains largely undefined.

METHODS

The cytotoxicity of Tan IIA was assessed by CCK-8 and LDH assays. Ferroptosis was monitored by the level of MDA, Fe2+, lipid ROS and GSH. IHC and western blot were employed to detect the localization and expression of SLC7A11, PIAS4, KDM1A and other key molecules. The SUMOylation of SLC7A11 was detected by Ni-beads pull-down assay and Co-IP. Luciferase and ChIP assays were employed to detect the direct association between KDM1A and PIAS4 promoter. The proliferative and metastatic properties of BC cells were assessed by colony formation, CCK-8 and Transwell assays, respectively. The in vitro findings were verified in xenograft and lung metastasis models.

RESULTS

Tan IIA promoted ferroptosis by suppressing SLC7A11 in BC cells. Silencing of PIAS4 or KDM1A inhibited cell growth and metastasis in BC. Mechanistically, PIAS4 facilitated the SUMOylation of SLC7A11 via direct binding to SLC7A11, and KDM1A acted as a transcriptional activator of PIAS4. Functional studies further revealed that Tan IIA decreased KDM1A expression, thus suppressing PIAS4 expression transcriptionally. The inhibition of PIAS4-dependent SUMOylation of SLC7A11 further induced ferroptosis, thereby inhibiting proliferation and metastasis in BC.

CONCLUSION

Tan IIA promoted ferroptosis and inhibited tumor growth and metastasis via suppressing KDM1A/PIAS4/SLC7A11 axis.

Recent trends in multidimensional countercurrent chromatography

Countercurrent chromatography (CCC) is a potent separation approach known for its remarkable efficiency and capacity in preparation. It's applied as a substitute or combined with different chromatographic techniques, resulting in its rebranding as multidimensional CCC (MDCCC). Numerous essential mixtures from natural products contain hundreds or thousands of distinct components of importance. These mix types are too complicated to separate in any reasonable time using a single CCC dimension. However, if a multidimensional technique is utilized, where a complex mixture is separated by an initial dimension, smaller fractions of that separation are gathered. Each fraction is studied individually; complex mixes can be resolved relatively quickly. Thus, several MDCCC separation features have been studied to demonstrate their advantages, limitations, and prospective capacity to separate exceedingly complex mixtures. In this review, MDCCC aspects, including principles, multiple columns system, multilayer coil J-type, on-line monitoring system, and applications, have been thoroughly_explored.

A Quinquennial Review of Potent LSD1 Inhibitors Explored for the Treatment of Different Cancers, with Special Focus on SAR Studies

Cancer bears a significant share of global mortality. The enzyme Lysine Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1, also known as KDM1A), since its discovery in 2004, has captured the attention of cancer researchers due to its overexpression in several cancers like acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), solid tumours, etc. The Lysine Specific Demethylase (LSD1) downregulation is reported to have an effect on cancer proliferation, migration, and invasion. Therefore, research to discover safer and more potent LSD1 inhibitors can pave the way for the development of better cancer therapeutics. These efforts have resulted in the synthesis of many types of derivatives containing diverse structural nuclei. The present manuscript describes the role of Lysine Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1) in carcinogenesis, reviews the LSD1 inhibitors explored in the past five years and discusses their comprehensive structural activity characteristics apart from the thorough description of LSD1. Besides, the potential challenges, opportunities, and future perspectives in the development of LSD1 inhibitors are also discussed. The review suggests that tranylcypromine derivatives are the most promising potent LSD1 inhibitors, followed by triazole and pyrimidine derivatives with IC₅₀ values in the nanomolar and sub-micromolar range. A number of potent LSD1 inhibitors derived from natural sources like resveratrol, protoberberine alkaloids, curcumin, etc. are also discussed. The structural-activity relationships discussed in the manuscript can be exploited to design potent and relatively safer LSD1 inhibitors as anticancer agents.

6-Heterocyclic carboxylic ester derivatives of gliotoxin lead to LSD1 inhibitors in gastric cancer cells

Gliotoxin is a representative compound of the epipolythiodioxopiperazine (ETP) class of fungal metabolites. Histone Lysine Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1) is highly expressed in a variety of cancers. Herein, a series of 6-heterocyclic carboxylic ester derivatives of gliotoxin was designed and synthesized as new LSD1 inhibitors and their biological evaluations in human gastric MGC-803 and HGC-27 cells were carried out. All of the derivatives effectively suppressed the enzymatic activities of LSD1. In particular, compound 4e exhibited excellent LSD1 inhibition with IC₅₀ = 62.40 nM, as well as anti-proliferation against MGC-803 and HGC-27 cells with IC₅₀ values of 0.31 μM and 0.29 μM, respectively. 4e also had a remarkable capacity to inhibit the colony formation, suppress migration and induce the apoptosis of these two cancer cell lines. In sum, our findings identified and characterized the 6-heterocyclic carboxylic ester derivatives of gliotoxin as potent and cellular active LSD1 inhibitors, which may provide a novel chemotype of LSD1 inhibitors for gastric cancer treatment.

Epigenetic compounds targeting pharmacological target lysine specific demethylase 1 and its impact on immunotherapy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy for treatment of tumor recurrence and resistance

It has been proven that metastatic recurrence and therapeutic resistance are linked. Due to the variability of individuals and tumors, as well as the tumor's versatility in avoiding therapies, therapy resistance is more difficult to treat. Therapy resistance has significantly restricted the clinical feasibility and efficacy of tumor therapy, despite the discovery of novel compounds and therapy combinations with increasing efficacy. In several tumors, lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) has been associated to metastatic recurrence and therapeutic resistance. For researchers to better comprehend how LSD1-mediated tumor therapy resistance occurs and how to overcome it in various tumors, this study focused on the role of LSD1 in tumor recurrence and therapeutic resistance. The importance of therapeutically targeted LSD1 was also discussed. Most gene pathway signatures are related to LSD1 inhibitor sensitivity. However, some gene pathway signatures, especially in AML, negatively correlate with LSD1 inhibitor sensitivity, but targeting LSD1 makes the therapy-resistant tumor sensitive to physiological doses of conventional therapy. We propose that combining LSD1 inhibitor with traditional tumor therapy can help patients attain a complete response and prevent cancer relapse.

A state-of-the-art review on LSD1 and its inhibitors in breast cancer: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic significance

Breast cancer (BC) is a kind of malignant cancer in women, and it has become the most diagnosed cancer worldwide since 2020. Histone methylation is a common biological epigenetic modification mediating varieties of physiological and pathological processes. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), a first identified histone demethylase, mediates the removal of methyl groups from histones H3K4me1/2 and H3K9me1/2 and plays a crucial role in varieties of cancer progression. It is also specifically amplified in breast cancer and contributes to BC tumorigenesis and drug resistance via both demethylase and non-demethylase manners. This review will provide insight into the overview structure of LSD1, summarize its action mechanisms in BC, describe the therapeutic potential of LSD1 inhibitors in BC, and prospect the current opportunities and challenges of targeting LSD1 for BC therapy.

LSD1 inhibitors for anticancer therapy: a patent review (2017-present)

INTRODUCTION

Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), which belongs to the demethylase of non-histone proteins, is believed to promote cancer cell proliferation and metastasis by modifying histones. LSD1 dysfunction may play a key role in a variety of cancers, such as acute myeloid leukemia and non-small cell lung cancer, indicating that LSD1 is a promising epigenetic target for cancer therapy. Many different types of small molecule LSD1 inhibitors have been developed and shown to inhibit tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, providing a new treatment strategy for solid tumors.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the progress of LSD1 inhibitor research in the last four years, including selected new patents and article publications, as well as the therapeutic potential of these compounds.

EXPERT OPINION

Natural products offer a promising prospect for developing novel potent LSD1 inhibitors, as structural design and activity of irreversible and reversible inhibitors have been continuously optimized since the discovery of the LSD1 target in 2004. The use of "microtubule-binding agents" and "dual-agent combination" has recently become a new anticancer technique, reducing the resistance and adverse reactions of traditional drugs. Several microtubule-binding drugs have been used successfully in clinical practice, providing structural scaffolds and new ideas for the development of safer drugs.

A comprehensive comparative study on LSD1 in different cancers and tumor specific LSD1 inhibitors

LSD1 was significantly over-expressed in several cancer types, and its aberrant overexpression was revealed to play a crucial role in the initiation and progression of cancer. Several LSD1 inhibitors that were discovered and developed so far were found to be effective in attenuating tumor growth in both in vivo and in vitro studies. However, the major challenge associated with the development of cancer therapies is personalized treatment. Therefore, it is essential to look in detail at how LSD1 plays its part in carcinogenesis and whether there are any different expression levels of LSD1 in different tumors. Here in this review, fresh insight into a list of function correlated LSD1 binding proteins are provided, and we tried to figure out the role of LSD1 in different cancer types, including hematological malignancies and solid tumors. A critical description of mutation preference for LSD1 in different tumors was also discussed. Recent research findings clearly showed that the abrogation of LSD1 demethylase activity via LSD1 inhibitors markedly reduced the growth of cancer cells. But there are still many ambiguities regarding the role of LSD1 in different cancers. Therefore, targeting LSD1 for treating different cancers is still reductionist, and many challenges need to be met to improve the therapeutic outcomes of LSD1 inhibitors.

Annual review of LSD1/KDM1A inhibitors in 2020

Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1/KDM1A) has emerged as a promising target for the discovery of specific inhibitors as antitumor drugs. Based on the source of compounds, all LSD1 inhibitors in this review are divided into two categories: natural LSD1 inhibitors and synthetic LSD1 inhibitors. This review highlights the research progress of LSD1 inhibitors with the potential to treat cancer covering articles published in 2020. Design strategies, structure-activity relationships, co-crystal structure analysis and action mechanisms are also highlighted.

Target separation and antitumor metastasis activity of sesquiterpene-based lysine-specific demethylase 1 inhibitors from zedoary turmeric oil

Lysine-specific histone demethylase 1 (LSD1) was the first histone demethylase identified in epigenetics and has recently emerged as an attractive therapeutic target for treating tumors. To date, almost all reported LSD1 inhibitors have been chemosynthesized; however, natural products possess pharmacological and biological activity and can be sources for drug development. Here, we established a target separation countercurrent chromatography technique to isolate LSD1 inhibitors from zedoary turmeric oil. Four sesquiterpene-based LSD1 inhibitors were efficiently obtained with an inhibition ratio equal to or less than that of the positive control drug. Compound 2 showed the most potent inhibitory activity, with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration of 3.97 μM, and was further tested to determine its ability to inhibit LSD1 and its antitumor metastatic effects in MDA-MB-231 cells. These four compounds are the first sesquiterpene-based natural LSD1 inhibitors to be characterized. Our findings provide a new molecular framework for studying LSD1 inhibitors and offer a template for designing more sesquiterpene-based LSD1 inhibitors with potential antitumor activity.

Orthogonality in the selection of biphasic solvent systems for off-line two-dimensional countercurrent chromatography from Polygonum cuspidatum Sieb. et Zucc

Off-line two-dimensional countercurrent chromatography has been widely applied to the isolation of complex samples, but little research on the investigation of orthogonality in the selection of biphasic solvent systems is available. In the present work, the orthogonality in the selection of a biphasic solvent system for liquid-liquid chromatographic separation of aqueous extract and ether extract from the traditional Chinese medicinal plant Polygonum cuspidatum Sieb. et Zucc was evaluated by the correlation coefficient and space occupancy rate. In total, 25 different biphasic solvent systems were tested, and 313 system combinations were analysed. A convex hull methodology was used to determine the separation space and to optimize separation conditions. The correlation coefficient matrix was transformed into dendrograms and a colour map to visualize the dissimilarity between, and orthogonality for, all solvent systems. The aqueous extracts from Polygonum cuspidatum were separated using selected biphasic solvent systems with high orthogonality: ethyl acetate-ethanol-water (70:1:70, v/v) and petroleum ether-ethyl acetate-water (1:5:5, v/v). The ether extracts from Polygonum cuspidatum were also separated using selected biphasic solvent systems with high orthogonality: petroleum-ethyl acetate-methanol-aqueous 0.25 M NH₃•H₂O (5:5:5:5, v/v) and petroleum-ethyl acetate-methanol-water (5:5:5:5, v/v). Thirteen compounds were successfully obtained. The experimental results demonstrated that the evaluation of orthogonality provided an alternative strategy to select an applicable solvent system for the separation of complex samples using off-line two-dimensional countercurrent chromatography.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of tetrahydroquinoline-based reversible LSD1 inhibitors

The targeted regulation of LSD1, which is highly expressed in a variety of tumor cells, is a promising cancer therapy strategy. Several LSD1 inhibitors are currently under clinical evaluation, and most of these inhibitors are irreversible. Here, we report the design, synthesis and biochemical evaluation of novel tetrahydroquinoline-based reversible LSD1 inhibitors. Compounds 18s and 18x, which are selective to LSD1 over MAO-A/B, exhibit excellent LSD1 inhibition at the molecular levels with IC₅₀ = 55 nM and 540 nM, respectively. The classic Lineweaver-Burk plots revealed that compound 18s could reversibly bind the LSD1 enzyme in a noncompetitive manner. Molecular docking was used to reveal the potential binding-mode of the compounds and interpret the structure-activity relationships. Furthermore, compounds 18s and 18x significantly inhibited proliferation (IC₅₀ = 1.13 μM and 1.15 μM, respectively) and induced apoptosis in MGC-803 cells with high expression of LSD1. Compound 18x showed acceptable liver microsomal stability. Meanwhile, 18x did not appear to inhibit CYPs at 10 μM in vitro. Remarkably, the oral administration of compound 18x can inhibit the growth of MGC-803 xenograft tumors without significant side effects. Our findings suggest that tetrahydroquinoline-based LSD1 inhibitors deserve further investigation for the treatment of LSD1 overexpressing cancer.