The acute effect of bull presence on plasma profiles of luteinizing hormone in postpartum, anoestrous dairy cows

Effect of biostimulation on growth rate and reproductive development of Bos indicus dairy heifers

The present study aimed to compare the growth rate, feeding behavior, reproductive development, and concentrations of GH and leptin in Sahiwal heifers exposed to direct bull contact, bull contact through a fenceline, or isolated from bulls. Overall, 24 heifers were allotted to three treatment groups (n = eight/group) based on birth weight, body weight, and age. Heifers from the non-exposed group (NBE) remained isolated from bulls; heifers stimulated by fenceline bull contact (FBE) remained continuously exposed to bulls through a fenceline, and heifers with direct bull contact (DBE+FBE) had direct contact with a bull during 6 h/day plus continuous fenceline bull exposure for the entire 24 h period. It was considered that heifers attained puberty when progesterone concentration was >1 ng/mL. Biostimulated heifers achieved puberty at both a lower age and body weight (P < 0.05) than NBE heifers. Overall, average daily gain (g/day) was greater in DBE+FBE (516.3 ± 4.5) and FBE (501.6 ± 4.3) than in NBE (441.8 ± 2.9, respectively; P < 0.01). Leptin and growth hormone concentrations were significantly greater in FBE and DBE+FBE than NBE heifers. Both groups of biostimulated heifers devoted more time eating than NBE heifers, P < 0.05). In conclusion, biostimulation of Sahiwal heifers, either by exposing them to bulls through a fenceline or by both fenceline exposure and direct contact, reduced the age of puberty and increased growth performance. Overall, fenceline bull exposure can be recommended as an easy handling management to stimulate reproductive precocity and growth rate in heifers.

Influence of bull biostimulation on age at puberty and reproductive performance of Sahiwal heifers

Present study was undertaken to compare the effect of biostimulation by exposing the heifers to fenceline bull contact and fenceline + direct contact on age at puberty and reproductive performance of Sahiwal heifers. Pre-pubertal heifers (24) were allotted to 3 groups (8 animals each), i.e. non-bull exposed (NBE), fenceline bull exposed (FBE) and FBE + direct bull exposed (DBE) on the basis of age and body weight. In NBE group, heifers were not exposed to bull; in FBE group, heifers were exposed to the bull through a fenceline contact (24 h) and in FBE+DBE group, heifers were housed in a fenceline contact (24 h) with bull along with direct contact for 6 h through another bull in the heifer shed. Heifers were considered to have attained puberty if progesterone concentration was >1 ng/ml. The mean age and body weight at puberty in FBE (19.33±0.36 months and 226.20±6.35 kg) and FBE+DBE (19.11±0.58 months and 224.19±4.54 kg) heifers were almost similar but significantly lower than NBE heifers (24.13±0.16 months and 262.50±8.50 kg). The average age at first service and first calving was similar in FBE (20.41±0.45 and 30.20±0.73 months) and FBE+DBE (20.78±0.36 and 29.90±0.44 months) heifers but significantly lower than NBE heifers (25.15±0.14 and 34.29±0.53 months). We conclude that biostimulation of heifers by fenceline contact with the bull is as effective as FBE + 6 h of daily direct bull contact in hastening the age at puberty and improving reproductive performance.

Effect of bull biostimulation on the oestrous behaviour of pubertal Sahiwal (Bos indicus) heifers

The study was conducted to determine effects of biostimulation of Sahiwal heifers through fenceline bull contact and fenceline combined with direct bull contact on oestrous behaviour when there was ovulation occurring in the absence of behavioural oestrus ("silent oestrus - SE) and overt behavioural oestrus (OBE). Prepubertal Sahiwal heifers were allotted to three treatments (T₀, T₁, T₂, n = 8 heifers/treatment). In the T₀ group, there was no bull exposure; in T₁, exposure to a bull through fenceline contact for 24 h and in T₂, exposure to a bull as in T₁ along with direct bull contact with another bull for a 6 -h period daily. The oestrous behaviours were recorded on day (d) -3, -2 and -1 (prior to oestrus), d 0 (day of oestrus) and d +3, +2 and +1 (post-estrus). With both SE and OBE, the mean frequency of sniffing, micturition, chin resting and standing to be mounted differed (P <  0.05) from d -2 to d +1 among treatment groups. The mean times devoted to eating, ruminating and lying during SE and OBE were less (P <  0.05) on d-1 and d 0 in heifers of all three groups than the respective values on reference days in both T₁ and T₂ groups. Biostimulation of Sahiwal heifers with bull exposure, therefore, resulted in greater expression of oestrous behaviour than in non-exposed heifers during the periods around when there was SE and OBE.

Positive effects of biostimulation on luteinizing hormone concentration and follicular development in anestrous beef heifers

The objectives of this study were to characterize the LH secretion pattern and the follicular development of anestrous beef heifers during early exposure (first 30 d of exposure) to androgenized steers (AS) and to determine if exposure to AS for 80 d (includes the first 30 d and 50 d more) advances the onset of ovarian cyclic activity. Twenty-nine anestrous Hereford heifers (20.2 ± 4.1 mo old and 257.5 ± 32.5 kg of BW) were allocated to 2 homogeneous groups according to their age and BW: 1) heifers exposed to AS (group EH; = 15) for 80 d and 2) control heifers, isolated from AS and any other male during all the course of the study (group CH; = 14). On d 0, 3 AS were joined with the EH group, which were removed and replaced with other 3 AS on Day 14. On d -10, 1, 10, 20, and 30, 8 heifers per group were housed in individual stalls and blood samples for LH were collected at 15-min intervals for 6 h. From d -10 to 30, the maximum follicle diameter (MFD) and the presence of a corpus luteum (CL) was daily recorded by ultrasound scanning and estrous behavior was detected twice daily. The emergence of follicular waves (FW), defined as the day when the dominant follicle of a wave was first observed (3-4 mm diam.), was retrospectively determined. Afterward, ultrasound scannings were performed weekly from d 32 to 60 and on d 70 and 80 to determine the presence of CL. After 10 d of male exposure, LH concentrations, either mean (1.67 vs. 0.88 ng/mL [SEM 0.09]) or basal (1.53 vs. 0.74 ng/mL [SEM 0.09]), were greater ( < 0.05) in the EH group than in the CH group. There was a treatment effect in MFD, as it was greater in EH than in CH ( = 0.05; 8.00 ± 0.16 vs. 7.52 ± 0.17 mm, respectively), but none of those follicles ovulated during the 40-d period. The MFD of the second FW was greater in EH than in CH, in coincidence with the transient increase on LH concentrations, which probably induced the greater follicular growth. Cumulative proportions of heifers that started to cycle were greater ( = 0.01) in EH than in CH on d 60 (33.3 vs. 0%), 70 (47 vs. 0%; < 0.005), and 80 (53 vs. 0%; < 0.001) of the exposure period. In conclusion, exposure of anestrous beef heifers to AS resulted in a transient increase on LH secretion after 10 d of male exposure and increased follicular diameter attained during the second FW. In addition, ovarian cyclic activity was advanced in exposed heifers.

Effect of acute bull exposure around the time of artificial insemination on serum oxytocin and progesterone concentrations and pregnancy rates in dairy cows

This study examined the effect of acute bull exposure around the time of artificial insemination (AI) on oxytocin and progesterone concentrations, and pregnancy rates in dairy cows. Ninety six dairy cows, stratified according to parity into primiparous and pluriparous, were divided into three groups; short bull exposure (SBE; 10 min, n = 32), long bull exposure (LBE; 4 h, n = 32) or no bull exposure (NBE; n = 32). On day 45 post-partum, all cows were treated with PGF2α on three occasions 11-14 days apart to synchronize oestrus. They were submitted to fixed time AI 80 h after the third PGF2α injection. Cows in the SBE and LBE groups were artificially inseminated 5 min after the introduction of the bull. From a subset of cows (n = 6 per group; three primiparous and three pluriparous), blood samples were collected once every 5 min starting 15 min before AI until 15 min after AI and analysed for oxytocin concentrations. Additional blood samples were collected for measurements of progesterone (P4) concentrations once daily for 4 days starting on the day of AI and once every 3 days thereafter until day 22. The effects of bull exposure, time, parity, difficulty of AI, and pregnancy on oxytocin and P4 concentrations were analysed using the mixed linear model procedure. Mean oxytocin concentrations or change in oxytocin concentrations after bull exposure or AI were not different among groups. Pregnancy rates for the NBE, SBE and LBE groups were 55.5%, 33.3% and 44.4%, respectively, and were not different among groups. In conclusion, acute bull exposure around the time of AI did not affect oxytocin and progesterone concentrations and did not improve pregnancy rates in dairy cattle under these farms conditions.

Characteristics of temporal patterns of cortisol and luteinizing hormone in primiparous, postpartum, anovular, suckled, beef cows exposed acutely to bulls

BACKGROUND

The physiological mechanism by which bulls stimulate resumption of ovarian cycling activity in postpartum, anovular, suckled cows after calving may involve the concurrent activation of the hypothalamic-hypophyseal-ovarian (HPO) axis and hypothalamic-hypophyseal-adrenal (HPA) axis. Thus, the objectives of this experiment were to determine if characteristics of temporal patterns of cortisol and luteinizing hormone (LH) in postpartum, anovular, beef cows are influenced by acute exposure to bulls. The null hypotheses were that daily, temporal characteristics of cortisol and LH concentration patterns do not differ between cows exposed acutely to bulls or steers.

METHODS

Sixteen cows were assigned randomly 67 +/- 4 (+/- SE) after calving to be exposed to bulls (EB, n = 8) or steers (ES, n = 8) 5 h daily for 9 d (D 0 to 8). Blood samples were collected daily from each cow via jugular catheters at 15-min intervals for 6 h from 1000 to 1600 h each day. The 5-h exposure period began 1 h after the start of the intensive bleeding period. Characteristics of cortisol and LH concentration patterns (mean, baseline, pulse frequency, pulse amplitude, and pulse duration) were identified by PULSAR analyses.

RESULTS

Mean cortisol concentrations decreased (P < 0.05) in cows in both treatments from D 0 to D 2. Thereafter, mean cortisol concentrations stabilized and did not differ (P > 0.10) between EB and ES cows. The decrease in mean cortisol concentrations in EB and ES cows from D 0 to D 2 was attributed to cows acclimatizing to intensive blood sampling and handling procedures. Consequently, analyses for characteristics of cortisol and LH concentration patterns included D 2 through 8 only. Cortisol mean and baseline concentrations, and pulse amplitude did not differ (P > 0.10) between EB and ES cows. However, cortisol pulse duration tended to be longer (P = 0.09) and pulse frequency was lower (P = 0.05) in EB than ES cows. LH pulse frequency was greater (P = 0.06) in EB than ES cows. All other characteristics of LH concentration patterns did not differ (P > 0.10) between EB and ES cows. Characteristics of cortisol concentration patterns were not related to characteristics of LH concentration patterns for ES cows (P > 0.10). However, as cortisol pulse amplitude increased, LH pulse amplitude decreased (b1 = -0.04; P < 0.05) for EB cows.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, exposing primiparous, postpartum, anovular, suckled cows to bulls for 5-h daily over a 9-d period did not alter mean concentrations of cortisol or LH compared to mean concentrations of cortisol and LH in cows exposed to steers. However, exposing cows to bull in this manner altered characteristics of temporal patterns of both LH and cortisol by increasing LH pulse frequency and decreasing cortisol pulse frequency. Interestingly, in cows exposed to bulls, as amplitude and frequency of cortisol pulses decreased, amplitudes of LH pulses increased and frequency of LH pulses tended to increase. Thus, the physiological mechanism of the biostimulatory effect of bulls may initially involve modification of the HPA axis and these changes may facilitate activation of the HPO axis and resumption of ovulatory cycles in postpartum, anovular, suckled cows.