1
|
Umaña Sedó S, Figueiredo C, Gonzalez T, Duarte G, Ugarte Marin M, Crawford C, Pohler K, Chebel R, Bilby T, Bisinotto R. Evaluation of luteolysis, follicle size, and time to ovulation in Holstein heifers treated with two different analogs and doses of prostaglandin-F2α. J Dairy Sci 2022; 105:5506-5518. [DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-21487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
2
|
Factors influencing embryo quantity and quality in donor cows from Latvian Blue, Latvian Brown, and Danish Red breeds at risk in Latvia. Livest Sci 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
3
|
Fernandes CAC, Pereira GHS, Siqueira LGB, Neri HLDH, Viana JHM, Palhao MP, Teodoro RAS. Short communication: Does previous superovulation affect fertility in dairy heifers? J Dairy Sci 2020; 103:10862-10866. [PMID: 32921453 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-18386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential negative effects of superovulation on subsequent fertility of dairy heifers. Holstein heifers (n = 1,783), 312 to 387 d of age, and 273 to 307 kg of body weight (BW) from 2 commercial farms were enrolled. These animals were first selected to be donors (446) or nondonors (CON, n = 1,327) according to their genomic values. Nondonor heifers (CON) were artificially inseminated (AI) according to standard procedures of each farm after reaching 320 kg of BW. Donor heifers were superovulated using a fixed FSH dose (180 mg NIH-FSH-P1; Folltropin-V, Vetoquinol Brasil, Mairiporã, SP, Brazil) and embryos were collected following standard procedures. Heifers that produced fewer than 8 viable embryos after first superovulation (SOV1, n = 337) were no longer used as donors, whereas the remaining heifers (SOV2, n = 109) were superovulated a second time within an interval of 48 to 54 d. Donor heifers (SOV1 and SOV2) were AI once they reached 320 kg of BW, at least 15 d after the last embryo collection. Data on age at first AI, at conception, and at parturition, as well as the number of services per conception, were analyzed by ANOVA, using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) procedure. Binomial variables (pregnancy per AI, overall pregnancy rate, open heifers at 500 d age, and late pregnancy loss) were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS. The heifers selected to undergo superovulation twice (SOV2) yielded more total (12.6 ± 5.3 vs. 6.8 ± 4.6; respectively) and viable embryos (8.5 ± 3.8 vs. 3.9 ± 2.8; respectively) than those superovulated only once (SOV1). Age at first AI, conception, and at parturition was greater in SOV2, but not in SOV1 compared with nondonor controls. In addition, pregnancy per first AI, overall pregnancy rate, services per conception, open heifers at 500 d of age, and occurrence of pregnancy losses after 60 d of gestation were similar among CON, SOV1, and SOV2 heifers. In summary, a single superovulation performed before heifers reach a minimum weight for breeding did not affect age at conception, calving or other indicators of reproductive efficiency. On the other hand, heifers superovulated twice were first inseminated at a later age than their birth cohorts, but had similar reproductive performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A C Fernandes
- Universidade José do Rosário Vellano, Alfenas, MG, Brazil 37130-000; Biotran Biotecnologia, Alfenas, MG, Brazil 37130-000.
| | - G H S Pereira
- Universidade José do Rosário Vellano, Alfenas, MG, Brazil 37130-000
| | - L G B Siqueira
- Embrapa Gado de Leite, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil 36038-330
| | - H L D H Neri
- Biotran Biotecnologia, Alfenas, MG, Brazil 37130-000
| | - J H M Viana
- Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, DF, Brazil 70770-917
| | - M P Palhao
- Universidade José do Rosário Vellano, Alfenas, MG, Brazil 37130-000
| | - R A S Teodoro
- Universidade José do Rosário Vellano, Alfenas, MG, Brazil 37130-000
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Siqueira LG, Silva MVG, Panetto JC, Viana JH. Consequences of assisted reproductive technologies for offspring function in cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev 2020; 32:82-97. [PMID: 32188560 DOI: 10.1071/rd19278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Abnormal fetuses, neonates and adult offspring derived by assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have been reported in humans, rodents and domestic animals. The use of ART has also been associated with an increased likelihood of certain adult diseases. These abnormalities may arise as a result of an excess of or missing maternally derived molecules during invitro culture, because the invitro environment is artificial and suboptimal for embryo development. Nonetheless, the success of ART in overcoming infertility or improving livestock genetics is undeniable. Limitations of invitro embryo production (IVEP) in cattle include lower rates of the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy and an increased incidence of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Moreover, recent studies demonstrated long-term effects of IVEP in cattle, including increased postnatal mortality, altered growth and a slight reduction in the performance of adult dairy cows. This review addresses the effects of an altered preimplantation environment on embryo and fetal programming and offspring development. We discuss cellular and molecular responses of the embryo to the maternal environment, how ART may disturb programming, the possible role of epigenetic effects as a mechanism for altered phenotypes and long-term effects of ART that manifest in postnatal life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiz G Siqueira
- Embrapa Gado de Leite, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil 36038-330; and Corresponding author.
| | | | - João C Panetto
- Embrapa Gado de Leite, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil 36038-330
| | - João H Viana
- Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, DF, Brazil 70770-917
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Palhão MP, Ribeiro AC, Martins AB, Guimarães CRB, Alvarez RD, Seber MF, Fernandes CAC, Neves JP, Viana JHM. Early resynchronization of non-pregnant beef cows based in corpus luteum blood flow evaluation 21 days after Timed-AI. Theriogenology 2020; 146:26-30. [PMID: 32036057 DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Revised: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The study aimed to verify whether a hormone protocol started at Day 13 (D13) after Timed Artificial Insemination (TAI) influences the conception rate. Nelore cows (primiparous and multiparous) from two commercial beef farms (n = 1,431) were first TAI (D0). Timed AI was performed in lots (TAI Lots) ranging from 187 to 346 cows. On D13, regarding the TAI lot, cows were assigned for either receiving (Resynch group, n = 1,002) or not (Control group, a subset of approximately 30%, n = 429) another hormone protocol for resynchronization. The same hormone protocol was used for the first TAI and for the resynchronization, except for 1 mg instead of 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) at the begging of the protocol. Eight days later (D21), the Resynch group was checked for corpus luteum blood flow by color Doppler ultrasonography, and in those detected as non-pregnant, the protocol was completed and a 2nd TAI was performed at D23. Pregnancy diagnosis was later (D30) performed by B-mode ultrasonography in the control group and confirmed in the presumptive pregnant cows from the 1st TAI of the Resynch group. The remaining cows were checked for pregnancy 30 days after the 2nd TAI (experimental Day 53). The statistical model to explain conception rate considered the effects of Group (Control or Resynch), Farm, Parity (primiparous or multiparous), Sire, Technician (who perform AI), TAI Lot and pertinent interactions (Group*Parity, Group*Farm and Group*TAI Lot). The statistical analyses of the model were performed using the Proc Glimmix (SAS virtual University Edition). The conception rate for the 1st TAI was similar (P > 0.4) between Control (50.3%, 216/429) and Resynch group (52.6%, 527/1002). The positive predictive diagnostic on D21 showed high relation with PD30 (90.7%, 527/581). In Resynch group, non-pregnant cows (n = 421, 1002 minus 581) were re-inseminated. The conception rate of the 2nd TAI (42.8%, 180/421) was affected (P < 0.002) by side effects of the Farm (48.5 vs. 33.1%) and Parity (51.2 vs. 40.3%, for multiparous vs. primiparous, p < 0.001). Nevertheless, after the 2 TAIs of the Resynch group, the cumulative conception rate was 70.5% (707/1002). In conclusion, the early resynchronization of cows with a low (1 mg) EB dose and progesterone device at D13 after TAI can be used as a strategy to reduce conception interval in beef cattle, and thus to increase the number of pregnant cows from artificial insemination after the breeding season.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Palhão
- University José do Rosário Vellano - UNIFENAS, Alfenas, MG, 37130-000, Brazil.
| | - A C Ribeiro
- University José do Rosário Vellano - UNIFENAS, Alfenas, MG, 37130-000, Brazil
| | - A B Martins
- University José do Rosário Vellano - UNIFENAS, Alfenas, MG, 37130-000, Brazil
| | - C R B Guimarães
- University José do Rosário Vellano - UNIFENAS, Alfenas, MG, 37130-000, Brazil
| | - R D Alvarez
- Veterinary Practitioner, Porto Esperidião, MT, 78240-000, Brazil
| | - M F Seber
- University José do Rosário Vellano - UNIFENAS, Alfenas, MG, 37130-000, Brazil
| | - C A C Fernandes
- University José do Rosário Vellano - UNIFENAS, Alfenas, MG, 37130-000, Brazil
| | - J P Neves
- University José do Rosário Vellano - UNIFENAS, Alfenas, MG, 37130-000, Brazil
| | - J H M Viana
- University José do Rosário Vellano - UNIFENAS, Alfenas, MG, 37130-000, Brazil; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, DF, 70770-917, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|