Does the Russell Viper Venom time test provide a rapid estimation of the intensity of oral anticoagulation? A cohort study

Detection of direct oral anticoagulants with the diluted Russel's viper venom time

INTRODUCTION

The activity of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is important in acute clinical situations. Recent studies have suggested a strong influence of DOAC on the diluted Russel's Viper Venom Time (dRVVT). Therefore, it may be a suitable screening parameter for antithrombotic plasma activity of different DOAC. This prospective study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of dRVVT to detect residual DOAC activity at recommended plasma level thresholds.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients were recruited, with 20 each treated with one of the four approved DOAC (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban or dabigatran), respectively. Blood plasma was collected before (baseline), at plasma peak time, and 6 and 12 h after DOAC. DRVVT was measured using the screen (LA1) and confirm (LA2) assay for lupus anticoagulant and compared with DOAC plasma levels. A reference range was calculated based on the dRVVT values of 61 healthy blood donors.

RESULTS

All DOAC significantly prolonged the dRVVT especially at higher DOAC plasma levels. The LA1 time ≥41 s had a sensitivity ≥98% to detect edoxaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban plasma levels ≥30 ng/mL but it was only 87% for apixaban. Sensitivity was ≥98% for all DOAC with the LA2 assay ≥36 s. The negative predictive value of a DOAC plasma level <30 ng/mL and dRVVT LA2 <36 s was 99%.

CONCLUSIONS

The dRVVT confirm assay (LA2) reliably detects residual DOAC plasma levels ≥30 ng/mL and could be useful to rapidly rule out relevant DOAC activity in emergency situations and to guide treatment decisions.

A comparative in vitro study of the anticoagulant effect of branded versus generic rivaroxaban

BACKGROUND

Several generic formulations of rivaroxaban were recently marketed to be used interchangeably with their branded equivalent. However, there have been no previously published studies that directly compared the in vitro anticoagulant effect of branded vs. generic rivaroxaban. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effects of three raw rivaroxaban materials, obtained from the branded (Xarelto®) and two generic (Rivarolto® and Rivaroxaban Sandoz®) rivaroxaban formulations on an array of coagulation assays.

METHODS

A pool of normal plasma was spiked with several concentrations of the three rivaroxaban (range 50-750 ng/ml). The concentrations were assessed with a rivaroxaban calibrated anti-Xa assay and confirmed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). The following assays were performed: Prothrombin time (PT), activated Partial Thromboplastin time (aPTT), Diluted Russell's Viper Venom Test (dRVVT), Thrombin time (TT), Clauss Fibrinogen, Factor VII, VIII and IX assays, and thromboelastography.

RESULTS

The results obtained by the three rivaroxaban at similar concentrations were comparable. Increasing concentrations of the three rivaroxaban showed a strong positive correlation with the PT, aPTT and dRVVT assays (r > 0.95, p < 0.01 for all), and a strong negative correlation with the Factors assays (r < -0.95, p < 0.01 for all). TT and Clauss Fibrinogen were not affected by rivaroxaban. No significant difference was identified in the mean assays' results obtained by the three rivaroxaban.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the branded and generic rivaroxaban exert an identical in vitro anticoagulant effect across a wide range of concentrations.

Snake Venoms in Diagnostic Hemostasis and Thrombosis

Snake venoms have evolved primarily to immobilize and kill prey, and consequently, they contain some of the most potent natural toxins. Part of that armory is a range of hemotoxic components that affect every area of hemostasis, which we have harnessed to great effect in the study and diagnosis of hemostatic disorders. The most widely used are those that affect coagulation, such as thrombin-like enzymes unaffected by heparin and direct thrombin inhibitors, which can help confirm or dispute their presence in plasma. The liquid gold of coagulation activators is Russell's viper venom, since it contains activators of factor X and factor V. It is used in a range of clotting-based assays, such as assessment of factor X and factor V deficiencies, protein C and protein S deficiencies, activated protein C resistance, and probably the most important test for lupus anticoagulants, the dilute Russell's viper venom time. Activators of prothrombin, such as oscutarin C from Coastal Taipan venom and ecarin from saw-scaled viper venom, are employed in prothrombin activity assays and lupus anticoagulant detection, and ecarin has a valuable role in quantitative assays of direct thrombin inhibitors. Snake venoms affecting primary hemostasis include botrocetin from the jararaca, which can be used to assay von Willebrand factor activity, and convulxin from the cascavel, which can be used to detect deficiency of the platelet collagen receptor, glycoprotein VI. This article takes the reader to every area of the diagnostic hemostasis laboratory to appreciate the myriad applications of snake venoms available in diagnostic practice.

Diagnostic performance of coagulation indices for direct oral anticoagulant concentration

INTRODUCTION

Different coagulation indices for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) exist in clinical practice, but limited data are available for the diagnostic power of these indices. This review and meta-analysis aims to explore the diagnostic value of coagulation indices for DOACs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Clinical Trials.gov, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception of each database to 15 February 2020. Studies reporting a relationship between coagulation indices and the gold standard (liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry) were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles from 9169 citations evaluating the performance of coagulation indices were included in this review. A total of 236, 273, 273 rivaroxaban samples were included to assess the diagnostic power of anti-Xa activity (AXA), prothrombin time (PT), combined PT and activated partial thromboplastin time, respectively. A total of 268 dabigatran samples were included to assess the diagnostic performance of diluted thromboplastin time (dTT). AXA calibrated by rivaroxaban showed a sensitivity of 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-0.99) and a specificity of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99) at the threshold of 30 ng/mL. For dabigatran, the combined sensitivity of dTT was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66-0.84) and combined specificity was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

DOAC-specific calibrated AXA was a good index to indicate concentration for rivaroxaban and apixaban. More studies on edoxaban and betrixaban are in need. Diluted TT, thrombin inhibitor assay, and ecarin-based assays were potential to measure dabigatran concentration. Due to the limited data, results should be validated in the future.

Concomitant assessment of rivaroxaban concentration and its impact on thrombin generation

BACKGROUND

Reliable assays to measure direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) levels and their activity in critical situations are needed. Drug levels alone are not representative of the effect of DOACs on an individual's coagulation. We developed a technique that provides direct assessment of the global effect of rivaroxaban on the individual's coagulation in addition to plasma concentrations.

METHODS

DOAC concentrations were determined in fifty patients using rivaroxaban, with the new assay, Xross-CAT. The effect of rivaroxaban on coagulation (activity) was measured with thrombin generation (TG) in platelet poor plasma using 5 pM tissue factor on the same device. The levels were validated with the Biophen DiXal assay. The prothrombin time (PT) and dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) were performed to estimate the effect on coagulation.

RESULTS

The variability of Xross-CAT was below 12%. Xross-CAT correlates well with Biophen DiXaI (r_s = 0.885). The bias, determined by Bland-Altman analysis, was 4.9% and the Passing-Bablok equation was y = 1.1x - 2.1. The correlation of plasma levels with TG was moderate (ETP r_s = -0.548; Peak r_s = -0.559), as for the PT (r_s = 0.739) and the dRVVT (r_s = 0.692).

CONCLUSIONS

Xross-CAT shows a good correlation with Biophen DiXaI that was previously confirmed to accurately assess rivaroxaban levels. Bleeding and thrombotic complications are not necessarily associated with drug levels and could be influenced by concomitant risk factors. The main benefit of Xross-CAT is that it can be performed simultaneously with thrombin generation, providing an overview of the global anticoagulation status of a patient in relation to circulating DOAC levels.

Evaluation of global laboratory methods and establishing on-therapy ranges for monitoring apixaban and rivaroxaban: Experience at a single institution

BACKGROUND

Apixaban and rivaroxaban are approved for the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and embolic stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. The aim of this study was to find appropriate methods of monitoring the anticoagulant effects of are direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and establish on-therapy ranges using conventional tests.

METHODS

A total of 184 samples were collected from 91 patients receiving DOACs. Concentrations of apixaban and rivaroxaban in plasma were accessed by an anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay. PT, APTT, antithrombin, D-dimer, dRVVT screen/confirm, FDP, and fibrinogen levels were measured. On-therapy ranges were calculated by substituting previously reported trough plasma concentrations of DOACs.

RESULTS

Anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay-based DOACs levels were 26.0-279.5 (115.9 ± 56.5) ng/mL for apixaban at 2.5 mg BID, 19.9-565.1 (205.3 ± 162.4) ng/mL for apixaban at 5 mg BID, 2.3-395.3 (205.3 ± 162.4) ng/mL for rivaroxaban at 15 mg OD, 3.6-494.8 (119.6 ± 95.1) ng/mL for rivaroxaban at 20 mg OD, and 9.6-431.4 (140.8 ± 113.6) ng/mL for rivaroxaban at 15 mg BID. PT (%), antithrombin, and dRVVT confirm tests showed good correlation with plasma apixaban levels. Plasma rivaroxaban concentrations were correlated well with PT (sec), PT (%),and dRVVT confirm results. On-therapy ranges established for dRVVT confirm test by linear regression were as follows: 1.32-1.52 for apixaban 2.5 mg BID, 1.12-1.75 for apixaban 5 mg BID, 1.11-1.78 for rivaroxaban 15 mg OD, 1.09-1.64 for rivaroxaban 20 mg OD, and 1.22-1.81 for rivaroxaban 20 mg BID.

CONCLUSIONS

Apixaban concentrations were well correlated with PT (%), antithrombin, and dRVVT confirm test. Rivaroxaban concentrations showed good correlation with PT (sec), PT (%), and dRVVT confirm test.

Lupus-anticoagulant testing at NOAC trough levels

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC), including rivaroxaban, apixaban or dabigatran, regularly show relevant effects on coagulation tests, making the interpretation of results difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible interferences of NOACs in trough level concentrations in lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing. Citrate plasma specimens of 30 healthy volunteers were spiked with rivaroxaban, apixaban or dabigatran in four plasma concentration levels at or below trough NOAC levels. The NOAC concentration was measured using dedicated surrogate concentration tests and a stepwise diagnostic procedure for LA-testing was applied using screening, mixing and confirmatory testing. Results were compared to NOAC-free specimens. Starting with a plasma concentration of 12.5 ng/ml, dabigatran-spiked specimens showed significant prolongations in the lupus anticoagulant-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT-LA) as well as in the Dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT), leading to 43.3% false positives in confirmatory testing in the dRVVT. In contrast, rivaroxaban, beginning with 7.5 ng/ml, exclusively affected dRVVT-based tests. In confirmatory tests, 30.0% of rivaroxaban-spiked specimens showed false positive results. Starting with 18.75 ng/ml apixaban, a significant prolongation of the dRVVT and up to 20.7% false positives in confirmatory tests were found. In contrast to other NOACs tested, apixaban did not present with a dose-dependent increase of the dRVVT ratio. In conclusion, the rate of false positive results in LA-testing is unacceptably high at expected trough levels of NOACs. Even at plasma concentrations below the LLOQ of commercially available surrogate tests, LA testing is best avoided in patients with NOAC therapy.

Practical guidance on the use of laboratory testing in the management of bleeding in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have demonstrated a favorable benefit–risk profile in several thromboembolic disorders and are increasingly used in routine clinical practice. A number of real-world studies on DOACs are ongoing, and data published so far have shown broadly similar outcomes to those demonstrated in the respective phase III trials. Despite their beneficial attributes, bleeding risk (as with any other anticoagulants) is often a concern for physicians when prescribing DOACs, particularly in elderly patients, those with significant comorbidities, and other high-risk patient populations. Although the absence of routine coagulation monitoring is an advantage of the DOACs, measuring their anticoagulant effect and/or plasma drug levels may be helpful in certain clinical scenarios to help patient management and improve outcomes. In this paper, practical guidance and recommendations are provided for clinical situations in which the test results may aid clinical decision-making, including patients with life-threatening bleeding events, patients without bleeding but with test results indicating a risk of bleeding, for those patients with a suspected thromboembolism while receiving a DOAC, or prior to patients undergoing elective or urgent surgical procedures. Finally, appropriate monitoring of the DOACs could be of substantial benefit to patients, and there is a high potential for development in this area in the future.

Comparison of different laboratory tests in the evaluation of hemorrhagic risk of patients using rivaroxaban in the critical care setting: diagnostic accuracy study

Background

Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant designed to dispense with the necessity of laboratory monitoring. However, monitoring rivaroxaban levels is necessary in certain clinical conditions, especially in the critical care setting.

Methods

This is a diagnostic accuracy study evaluating sensitivity and specificity of prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and Dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT), to evaluate the hemorrhagic risk in patients taking rivaroxaban. The study used a convenience sample of 40 clinically stable patients using rivaroxaban to treat deep vein thrombosis or atrial fibrillation admitted in a private hospital in Brazil, compared to a group of 60 healthy controls. The samples from patients were collected two hours after the use of the medication (peak) and two hours before the next dose (trough).

Results

The correlation with the plasmatic concentration measured by anti-FXa assay was higher for PT and dRVVTS. The PT and aPTT tests presented higher specificity, while dRVVT was 100% sensible.

Conclusions

There was a strong correlation between the tests and the plasma concentration of the drug. Additionally, our results demonstrated the potential use of dRVVT as a screening test in the emergency room and the need of a second test to improve specificity.

Clinical pearls: Laboratory assessments of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS)

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) are being used for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation as well as for prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Clinicians who treat, or may encounter, patients with DOAC exposure, should be aware of the limitations of coagulation testing in this setting, and seek counsel from their laboratory to understand the effects of DOACS on coagulation results. Generally, assays that employ clot based principles, or methods that require thrombin or Factor Xa activation or substrates may be affected by the presence of DOACS. The clinical laboratory should have an algorithmic testing plan for adequately assessing the presence of all DOACS and readily provide this information to clinicians. We describe Clinical Pearls for DOAC assessment using common and esoteric coagulation testing.

Perioperative management of patients on direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been licensed worldwide for several years for various indications. Each year, 10-15% of patients on oral anticoagulants will undergo an invasive procedure and expert groups have issued several guidelines on perioperative management in such situations. The perioperative guidelines have undergone numerous updates as clinical experience of emergency management has increased and perioperative studies including measurement of residual anticoagulant levels have been published. The high inter-patient variability of DOAC plasma levels has challenged the traditional recommendation that perioperative DOAC interruption should be based only on the elimination half-life of DOACs, especially before invasive procedures carrying a high risk of bleeding. Furthermore, recent publications have highlighted the potential danger of heparin bridging use when DOACs are stopped before an invasive procedure. As antidotes are progressively becoming available to manage severe bleeding or urgent procedures in patients on DOACs, accurate laboratory tests have become the standard to guide their administration and their actions need to be well understood by clinicians. This review aims to provide a systematic approach to managing patients on DOACs, based on recent updates of various perioperative guidance, and highlighting the advantages and limits of recommendations based on pharmacokinetic properties and laboratory tests.

Laboratory Assessment of the Anticoagulant Activity of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the treatment of choice for most patients with atrial fibrillation and/or noncancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease. Although routine monitoring of these agents is not required, assessment of anticoagulant effect may be desirable in special situations. The objective of this review was to summarize systematically evidence regarding laboratory assessment of the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting relationships between drug levels and coagulation assay results.

RESULTS

We identified 109 eligible studies: 35 for dabigatran, 50 for rivaroxaban, 11 for apixaban, and 13 for edoxaban. The performance of standard anticoagulation tests varied across DOACs and reagents; most assays, showed insufficient correlation to provide a reliable assessment of DOAC effects. Dilute thrombin time (TT) assays demonstrated linear correlation (r2 = 0.67-0.99) across a range of expected concentrations of dabigatran, as did ecarin-based assays. Calibrated anti-Xa assays demonstrated linear correlation (r2 = 0.78-1.00) across a wide range of concentrations for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban.

CONCLUSIONS

An ideal test, offering both accuracy and precision for measurement of any DOAC is not widely available. We recommend a dilute TT or ecarin-based assay for assessment of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran and anti-Xa assays with drug-specific calibrators for direct Xa inhibitors. In the absence of these tests, TT or APTT is recommended over PT/INR for assessment of dabigatran, and PT/INR is recommended over APTT for detection of factor Xa inhibitors. Time since last dose, the presence or absence of drug interactions, and renal and hepatic function should impact clinical estimates of anticoagulant effect in a patient for whom laboratory test results are not available.

Reversal Strategies for NOACs: State of Development, Possible Clinical Applications and Future Perspectives

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are used for thromboembolic prophylaxis of patients with atrial fibrillation and in the treatment as well as secondary prophylaxis of patients with venous thromboembolism. Even though NOACs have a better safety profile than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), there will still be bleeding complications on NOAC treatment. In some cases, stopping the NOAC and non-drug-related management such as manual compression and interventional endoscopy will be sufficient to stop the bleeding. In more serious bleeding events and before acute surgery, coagulation factor concentrates or NOAC-specific antidotes could be used. Coagulation factor concentrates can be used in patients with haemophilia and to reverse the effect of VKAs but, in NOAC-treated patients, results are inconsistent and these agents could potentially have pro-thrombotic effects. Specific antidotes for NOACs are expected to be on the market soon. Phase III clinical trials with a humanized antibody fragment directed against dabigatran (idarucizumab) and recombinant, modified factor Xa (andexanet alfa) are ongoing. A molecule (aripazine) with broad activity against various anticoagulants including NOACs is currently undergoing phase II trials. For use of these specific antidotes, it is desirable that measurements for coagulation activity with a short response delay are widely available for the different NOACs and further research in this field is needed. Furthermore, guidelines for antidote use, including general measures for the treatment of NOAC-related bleeding, should be available.

Measurement and reversal of the direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer noninferior efficacy and improved safety compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Unlike VKAs, DOACs do not require routine laboratory monitoring of anticoagulant effect and dose adjustment. In certain situations, however, laboratory assessment of anticoagulant effect may be desirable. Here we review the utility of currently available assays for assessment of DOAC effect and recommend an optimal assessment strategy for each drug, including calibrated dilute thrombin time or ecarin-based assays for dabigatran and calibrated anti-Xa activity assays for the factor Xa inhibitors. We also discuss reversal strategies, both specific and nonspecific, for each drug, including the preferential use of idarucizumab for the reversal of dabigatran and two agents, andexanet and ciraparantag, currently under development for the reversal of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban.

A single test to assay warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, unfractionated heparin, and enoxaparin in plasma

Essentials Simple and fast assaying of different anticoagulants (ACs) is useful in emergent situations. We used highly diluted prothrombin time (dPT) or highly diluted Fiix-PT (dFiix-PT) to assay ACs. Both tests could quantify target specific anticoagulants and warfarin anticoagulation. Improved results were consistently observed with the dFiix-PT compared with the dPT.

SUMMARY

Background Assaying anticoagulants is useful in emergency situations or before surgery. Different specific assays are currently needed depending on the anticoagulant. Objectives We hypothesized that levels of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and heparins could be measured with use of the diluted prothrombin time (dPT) and diluted Fiix-PT (dFiix-PT), using highly diluted thromboplastin (TP). The latter test is affected only by reduced levels of active factors II and X but corrects test plasma for other deficiencies Methods Increasing TP dilutions were used to identify suitable dilutions to measure dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, unfractionated heparin (UFH), and enoxaparin. Calibrators containing known amounts of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were used to make standard curves. Citrated plasma samples were obtained from patients taking warfarin or DOACs with known drug concentrations as determined by specific assays. Results The dFiix-PT at a TP dilution of 1:1156 could be used to measure all of the drugs tested at therapeutic concentrations except for fondaparinux. The dPT achieved the same but required two TP dilutions (1:750 and 1:300). The warfarin effect could be assessed by using dFiix-PT at 1:1156 with a PT ratio identical to the international normalized ratio. Six different TPs yielded similar results, but two were less sensitive. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban could be accurately measured in patient samples using both dilute PT assays, but a better correlation was consistently observed between the dFiix-PT and specific assays than with the dPT. Conclusion The dFiix-PT using a single dilution of TP may be suitable to assess the anticoagulant effects of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, heparin, and enoxaparin.