The impact of therapeutic hypothermia on on-treatment platelet reactivity and clinical outcome in cardiogenic shock patients undergoing primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction: Results from the ISAR-SHOCK registry

Antiplatelet therapy in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Coronary revascularization represents a cornerstone in the treatment of infarct-related cardiogenic shock (CS). Early and effective antithrombotic therapy is critical and has been shown to improve mortality in most patients with acute coronary syndrome. Achieving early effective platelet inhibition and anticoagulation, with minimal risk, is particularly important in those high-risk patients with CS as the mortality remains high at approximately 50%. However, patients with CS are at high risk for both early thrombotic as well as bleeding events and striking the right balance remains a challenge due to a multitude of factors related to drug administration, metabolism and mechanical issues related to therapeutic interventions such as increasing use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS). This review therefore aims to provide an overview of the current practice, the underlying challenges and existing evidence on safety, efficacy and outcomes of adjunctive antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by CS and discusses the use of parenteral platelet inhibitors.

Efficacy and Safety of Therapeutic Hypothermia as an Adjuvant Therapy for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The study aims to compare the use of hypothermia in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with control. We systematically searched four electronic databases until March 2022. The inclusion criteria were any study design that compared hypothermia in patients with MI undergoing PCI with control. The risk of bias assessment of the included randomized controlled trials was conducted through Cochrane Tool, while the quality of the included cohort studies was assessed by the NIH tool. The meta-analysis was performed on RevMan. A total of 19 studies were entered. Regarding the mortality, there were nonsignificant differences between hypothermia and control (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 to 1.50, p = 0.73). There was also no significant difference between the control and hypothermia in recurrent MI (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.30, p = 0.56). On the other hand, the analysis showed a significant favor for hypothermia over the control infarct size (mean difference = -1.76, 95% CI -3.04 to -0.47, p = 0.007), but a significant favor for the control over hypothermia in the overall bleeding complications (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.18, p = 0.02). Compared with the control, hypothermia reduced the infarct size of the heart, but this finding was not consistent across studies. However, the control had lower rates of bleeding problems. The other outcomes, such as death and the incidence of recurrent MI, were similar between the two groups.

Hypothermia as an Adjunctive Therapy in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

In the setting of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, therapeutic hypothermia (TH) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. However, trials showing the advantage of TH did not include patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjunctive TH compared with the standard of care (SOC) in patients with CS. The primary outcome was the mortality rate (in-hospital, short-, and mid-term). The secondary outcomes were the TH-related complications, duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV-days), and improvement in cardiac function. Relative risk (RR) or the standardized mean difference (SMD) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. A total of 7 clinical studies (3 RCTs included), and 712 patients (341 in the TH group and 371 in the SOC group) were included. As compared with the SOC, TH was not associated with a statistically significant improvement in the in-hospital (RR: 0.73%, 95% CI: 0.51-1.03; p = 0.08), short-term (RR: 0.90%, 95% CI: 0.75-1.06; p = 0.21), or mid-term (RR: 0.93%, 95% CI: 0.78-1.10; p = 0.38) mortality rates. Despite the improvement in the cardiac function in the TH group (SMD: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.02-2.1; p = 0.04), the TH strategy did not significantly shorten the MV days, or the ICU stay (p-values >0.05). Finally, there was a trend toward higher risks for infection, major bleeding, and the need for blood transfusion in the TH group. According to our meta-analysis of published clinical studies, TH is not beneficial in patients with CS and has a marginal safety profile. Larger-scale RCTs are needed to further clarify our results.

Hypothermia and its role in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest

Background

Patients suffering cardiac arrest resulting from ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are at very high risk of death. In addition to reperfusion strategies, therapeutic hypothermia is recommended for cardiac arrest patients who remain unconscious after resuscitation. However, data analysis of the impact of therapeutic hypothermia on survival showed inconsistent results. We aimed to investigate the benefits of therapeutic hypothermia in STEMI patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

Methods

Patients with STEMI who received CPR were identified after nationwide German inpatient data (2005-2019) were screened. These patients were stratified for therapeutic hypothermia. The impact of hypothermia on mortality and adverse in-hospital outcomes was analyzed.

Results

Overall, 133,070 inpatients with STEMI and CPR (53.3% aged ≥70 years; 34% females) were recorded in Germany between 2005 and 2019, of which 12.3% (16,386 patients) underwent therapeutic hypothermia. Females (23.8 vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001) and patients aged ≥70 years (34.9 vs. 55.9%, p < 0.001) were less frequently treated with therapeutic hypothermia. The in-hospital case fatality rate was lower for STEMI with CPR and subsequent therapeutic hypothermia than for treatment without therapeutic hypothermia (53.5 vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001). Therapeutic hypothermia was independently associated with a reduced in-hospital case fatality rate {OR 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.86], p < 0.001}. In addition, therapeutic hypothermia was associated with an increased risk for stroke (OR 1.37 [95% CI 1.25-1.49], p < 0.001), pneumonia (OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.68-1.82], p < 0.001), and acute kidney injury (OR 2.21 [95% CI 2.07-2.35], p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Therapeutic hypothermia is associated with a survival benefit for STEMI patients after cardiac arrest.

Mild Therapeutic Hypothermia Alters Hemostasis in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

Background and Rationale: Mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) is a concept to reduce infarct size and improve outcome after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In the STATIM trial, we investigated MTH as an additional therapy for STEMI patients. In the intention-to-treat set, 101 patients were included. No difference in primary and secondary endpoints measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was found. Platelet activation and plasmatic coagulation are key in the pathophysiology of STEMI. In the present study, we investigated the effect of MTH on primary and secondary hemostasis in STEMI patients.

Methods and Results: Platelet function and morphology were assessed by routine blood count, aggregometry testing, and flow cytometry. Soluble platelet markers were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing. Plasmatic coagulation was measured throughout the study. Platelet count remained unchanged, irrespective of treatment, whereas platelet size decreased in both patient groups. Platelet aggregometry indicated increased platelet reactivity in the MTH group. Furthermore, higher adenosine diphosphate (ADP) plasma levels were found in MTH patients. Expression of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa was increased on platelets of STEMI patients treated with MTH. Lower patient temperatures correlated with longer clotting times and resulted in reduced pH. Lower pH values were positively correlated with longer clotting times.

Conclusion: Present data indicate longer clotting times and higher platelet reactivity in STEMI patients treated with MTH. These changes did not correspond to clinical bleeding events or larger infarct size.

Clopidogrel vs. prasugrel vs. ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a pooled IABP-SHOCK II and CULPRIT-SHOCK trial sub-analysis

Aims

The aim of this pooled sub-analysis of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) and Culprit Lesion Only PCI versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock (CULPRIT-SHOCK) trial was to compare the clinical outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated either with clopidogrel or the newer, more potent ADP-receptor antagonists prasugrel or ticagrelor.

Methods and results

For the current analysis the primary endpoint was 1-year mortality and the secondary safety endpoint was moderate or severe bleedings until hospital discharge with respect to three different ADP-receptor antagonists. 856 patients were eligible for analysis. Of these, 507 patients (59.2%) received clopidogrel, 178 patients (20.8%) prasugrel and 171 patients (20.0%) ticagrelor as acute antiplatelet therapy. The adjusted rate of mortality after 1-year did not differ significantly between prasugrel and clopidogrel (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–1.09, p_adj = 0.17) or between ticagrelor and clopidogrel treated patients (HR: 0.86, 95% CI 0.65–1.15, p_adj = 0.31). In-hospital bleeding events were significantly less frequent in patients treated with ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel (HR: 0.37, 95% CI 0.20 -0.69, p_adj = 0.002) and not significantly different in patients treated with prasugrel vs. clopidogrel (HR: 0.73, 95% CI 0.43 -1.24, p_adj = 0.24).

Conclusion

This pooled sub-analysis is the largest analysis on safety and efficacy of three oral ADP-receptor antagonists and shows that acute therapy with either clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor is no independent predictor of 1-year mortality. Treatment with ticagrelor seems independently associated with less in-hospital moderate and severe bleeding events compared to clopidogrel. This finding might be due to selection bias and should be interpreted with caution.

Graphic abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-021-01866-3.

ADP-induced platelet reactivity and bleeding events in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

While previous reports showed ADP-induced platelet reactivity to be an independent predictor of bleeding after PCI in stable patients, this has never been investigated in patients with cardiogenic shock. The association of bleeding events with respect to ADP-induced platelet aggregation was investigated in patients undergoing primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and with available on-treatment ADP-induced platelet aggregation measurements. Out of 233 patients, 74 suffered from a severe BARC3 or higher bleed. ADP-induced platelet aggregation was significantly lower in patients with BARC≥3 bleedings (p < .001). Multivariate analysis identified on-treatment ADP-induced platelet aggregation as an independent risk factor for bleeding (HR = 0.968 per AU). An optimal cutoff value of <12 AU for ADP-induced platelet aggregation to predict BARC≥3 bleedings was identified via ROC analysis. Moreover, the use of VA-ECMO (HR 1.972) or coaxial left ventricular pump (HR 2.593), first lactate (HR 1.093 per mmol/l) and thrombocyte count (HR 0.994 per G/l) were independent predictors of BARC≥3 bleedings. In conclusion, lower on-treatment ADP-induced platelet aggregation was independently associated with severe bleeding events in patients with AMI-CS. The value of platelet function testing for bleeding risk prediction and guidance of anti-thrombotic treatment in cardiogenic shock warrants further investigation.

Response to antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing invasive treatment due to acute coronary syndrome complicated by cardiogenic shock

Introduction

There are limited data on platelet reactivity and response to antiplatelet drugs in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Aim

To assess platelet reactivity on dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and ticagrelor, a novel potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, in patients with cardiogenic shock in the course of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who received invasive treatment.

Material and methods

We enrolled 12 consecutive patients with ACS complicated by cardiogenic shock. To assess response to antiplatelet therapy during cardiogenic shock, only patients with symptoms persisting for at least 3 days and who completed a 5-day follow-up were included in the study. Patients received a loading dose of ASA (300 mg) and ticagrelor (180 mg), followed by a maintenance dose (ASA, 1 × 75 mg; ticagrelor, 2 × 90 mg). Blood samples for platelet function tests were collected. Platelet aggregation was assessed with a Multiplate whole-blood impedance aggregometer. Arachidonic acid (AA), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP) were used as aggregation agonists.

Results

Response to antiplatelet therapy assessed by aggregometry showed numerically higher on-ASA platelet reactivity on day one and statistically significant higher on-ticagrelor platelet reactivity on day one in comparison with following days. There were 2 patients with high on ASA platelet reactivity and 3 with high on ticagrelor platelet reactivity, but only on the day one.

Conclusions

Some patients with cardiogenic shock in the course of ACS treated invasively show a lower response to ASA and ticagrelor only on the first day after invasive treatment, with a good response on subsequent days.

Hypothermia in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

In patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the role of systemic therapeutic hypothermia remains controversial. We sought to investigate the role of systemic therapeutic hypothermia versus standard of care in patients with acute MI treated with PCI.

METHODS

This is a study-level meta-analysis of randomized trials. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The main secondary outcome was infarct size. Other secondary outcomes were recurrent MI, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), major adverse cardiovascular events, and bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 1012 patients with acute MI receiving a PCI in nine trials (503 randomly assigned to hypothermia and 509 to control) were available for the quantitative synthesis. The weighted median follow-up was 30 days. As compared to controls, patients assigned to hypothermia had similar risk of all-cause death (risk ratio, [95% confidence intervals], 1.25 [0.80; 1.95], p = 0.32), with a trend toward higher risk of ischemia-driven TVR (3.55 [0.80; 15.87], p = 0.09) mostly due to acute or subacute stent thrombosis. Although in the overall cohort, infarct size was comparable between groups (standardized mean difference [95% Confidence intervals], 0.06 [- 0.92; 1.04], p = 0.92), patients effectively achieving the protocol-defined target temperature in the hypothermia group had smaller infarct size as compared to controls (p for interaction = 0.016). Treatment strategies did not differ with respect to the other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared to standard of care, systemic therapeutic hypothermia in acute MI patients treated with PCI provided similar mortality with a signal toward more frequent repeat revascularization. Among patients assigned to hypothermia, those effectively achieving the protocol-defined target temperature displayed smaller infarct size.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42019138754.

New insights into cardiogenic shock and coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction

Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction is challenging, and continues to be associated with high rates of in-hospital and long-term mortality. Coronary revascularization is critical for improving prognosis in CS. Thus, a systematic protocol-driven approach to cardiogenic shock, the development of specialized cardiac care centres, technical advances in interventional cardiology enabling treatment of more complex and severe lesions, the availability of recent antithrombotic therapies and the evolution of new haemodynamic support devices are important considerations in current management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute ischaemic heart disease. Despite these potentially meaningful developments, several substantial gaps in knowledge still exist regarding optimal coronary revascularization of patients with cardiogenic shock. This review will describe current principles in the revascularization of these patients, with a focus on: the time to transfer and revascularize; the choice of vascular access site; the need for complete revascularization or only a culprit lesion strategy; the optimal antithrombotic therapy; the type, place and timing of haemodynamic support; and the medical care system network.

Impact of mild therapeutic hypothermia on bioavailability of ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) frequently occurs in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Survivors require percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with concomitant dual antiplatelet therapy. Target temperature management, including mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH), should be applied in comatose patients after resuscitation. However, an increased risk of stent thrombosis in patients undergoing hypothermia is observed. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of MTH on pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor in cardiac arrest survivors with MI treated with MTH and PCI.

METHODS

In a prospective, observational, single-center study pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor were evaluated in 41 MI patients, including 11 patients after OHCA undergoing MTH (MTH group) and 30 MI patients without OHCA and MTH (no-MTH group). Blood samples were drawn before administration of a 180 mg ticagrelor loading dose, and 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after the loading dose.

RESULTS

In patients treated with MTH total exposure to ticagrelor during the first 12 h after the loading dose and maximal plasma concentration of ticagrelor were significantly lower than in the no-MTH group (AUC(0-12): 3403 ± 2879 vs. 8746 ± 5596 ng·h/mL, difference: 61%, p = 0.01; Cmax: 475 ± 353 vs. 1568 ± 784 ng/mL, p = 0.0002). Time to achieve maximal ticagrelor plasma concentration was also delayed in the MTH group (tmax for ticagrelor: 12 [6-24] vs. 4 [2-12] h, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Bioavailability of ticagrelor was substantially decreased and delayed in MI patients treated with MTH after OHCA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02611934.

Impaired aspirin-mediated platelet function inhibition in resuscitated patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with therapeutic hypothermia: a prospective, observational, non-randomized single-centre study

The majority of resuscitated patients present with underlying cardiac disease, and out of these myocardial infarction is most common. Immediate interventional treatment is recommended and routinely requires dual antiplatelet therapy including aspirin and a P2Y12-inhibitor. Therapeutic hypothermia or target temperature management is also recommended in these patients. Cardiogenic shock as well as reduced body temperature impacts platelet reactivity and its medical inhibition. The study aims to quantify aspirin- and P2Y12-mediated platelet inhibition in patients presenting with myocardial infarction and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Twenty-five resuscitated patients were enrolled in this prospective, observational, non-randomized single-centre study. These patients were compared to 77 matched controls from the ATLANTIS-ACS database of non-resuscitated patients with myocardial infarction. Platelet function testing was performed by light transmittance aggregometry. Aspirin reactivity was monitored by inducing platelet aggregation with collagen and arachidonic acid, respectively. P2Y12 inhibition was recorded by stimulation of platelet aggregation with adenosine diphosphate. To quantify the overall platelet response, thrombin receptor-activated peptide was used. Aspirin-mediated platelet reactivity decreased significantly in resuscitated patients during the first days and was significantly weaker on day 3 (collagen AUC 253.8 (122.7–352.2) vs. 109.0 (73.0–182.0); p = 0.022). P2Y12-mediated platelet inhibition was also impaired in resuscitated patients on day 3 (mean ADP AUC (IQR): CPR 172.1 (46.7−346.5) vs. control 43.9 (18.9–115.2); p < 0.05). Aspirin- and P2Y12-mediated platelet inhibition is impaired in resuscitated patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia. On day 3, we recorded lowest inhibitory effects of both drug types and patients might be at particular risk at that time. Potentially, intravenous aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors might still supply a more predictable and stable platelet inhibition.

Clopidogrel in Critically Ill Patients

Only limited data are available regarding the treatment of critically ill patients with clopidogrel. This trial investigated the effects and the drug concentrations of the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) activated prodrug clopidogrel (n = 43) and the half‐life of the similarly metabolized pantoprazole (n = 16) in critically ill patients. ADP‐induced aggregometry in whole blood classified 74% (95% confidence intervals 59–87%) of critically ill patients as poor responders (n = 43), and 65% (49–79%) responded poorly according to the vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP‐P) assay. Although the plasma levels of clopidogrel active metabolite normally exceed the inactive prodrug ∼30‐fold, the parent drug levels even exceeded those of the metabolite 2‐fold in critically ill patients. The half‐life of pantoprazole was several‐fold longer in these patients compared with reference populations. The inverse ratio of prodrug/active metabolite indicates insufficient metabolization of clopidogrel, which is independently confirmed by the ∼5‐fold increase in half‐life of pantoprazole. Thus, high‐risk patients may benefit from treatment with alternative platelet inhibitors.

Therapeutic Hypothermia and Stent Thrombosis: A Nationwide Analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether "real-world" data supported the hypothesis that therapeutic hypothermia (TH) led to increased rates of stent thrombosis.

BACKGROUND

TH, which is often instituted after cardiac arrest (CA) to improve neurologic outcomes, alters pharmacokinetics of antiplatelet medications, leading to a theoretical risk of stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

CA patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing PCI were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2006 to 2011, with a defined primary outcome of stent thrombosis. The incidence of stent thrombosis in patients undergoing TH versus those not undergoing TH was compared using both logistic regression and propensity score matching.

RESULTS

In this dataset, 49,109 CA patients underwent PCI for acute myocardial infarction from 2006 to 2011, of whom 1,193 (2.4%) underwent TH. The incidence of stent thrombosis in the TH group was 3.9% (43 of 1,193), compared to 4.7% (2,271 of 47,916) in the no TH group (p = 0.61). Logistic regression showed that TH was not a significant predictor of stent thrombosis with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.28 to 1.76; p = 0.46). Propensity matching was performed to adjust for baseline differences between the TH and no TH groups, matching 1,155 patients in the TH group with 3,399 patients in the no TH group. No difference was observed in the incidence of stent thrombosis in the TH and the no TH groups after propensity matching (3.5% vs. 6.1%; p = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

TH does not increase the incidence of stent thrombosis after primary PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting as CA.

GPIIb-IIIa Receptor Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Presenting With Cardiogenic Shock and/or After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Data on the use of GPIIb-IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients presenting with cardiogenic shock and/or after cardiopulmonary resuscitation is sparse. The aim of the study was to establish the possible influence of the adjunctive use of GPI on 30-day and 1-year mortality in these high-risk patients.

METHODS

Acute coronary syndrome patients (261), who presented with cardiogenic shock and/or were cardiopulmonary resuscitated on admission, were analysed. Groups receiving (170 patients) and not receiving (91 patients) GPI were compared regarding 30-day and 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

The unadjusted all-cause 30-day and 1-year mortality were similar in patients receiving GPI and those not receiving GPI [79 patients (46.5%) vs 50 patients (54.9%) at 30 days; ns, 91 patients (53.5%) vs. 55 (61.1%) at 1 year; ns]. After the adjustment for baseline and clinical characteristics, the adjunctive usage of GPI was identified as an independent prognostic factor in lower 30-day mortality (adjusted OR: 0.41; 95%CI: 0.20 to 0.84; p=0.015) and 1-year mortality (HR 0.62; 95%CI 0.39-0.97; p=0.037). Age, left main PCI and major bleeding_, were also identified as independent prognostic factors in worse 30-day and 1-year mortality. In addition, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow 0/1 pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) predicted a worse 1-year outcome. Novel oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists predicted better 30-day and 1-year survival.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the adjunctive usage of GPI may be beneficial in this high-risk group of patients in whom a delayed onset of action of oral antiplatelet therapy would be expected.

Editor's Choice- Inside the cold heart: A review of therapeutic hypothermia cardioprotection

Targeted temperature management has been originally used to reduce neurological injury and improve outcome in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Myocardial infarction remains a major cause of death in the world and several investigators are studying the effect of mild therapeutic hypothermia during an acute cardiac ischemic injury. A search on MEDLINE, Scopus and EMBASE databases was conducted to obtain data regarding the cardioprotective properties of therapeutic hypothermia. Preclinical studies have shown that therapeutic hypothermia provides a cardioprotective effect in animals. The proposed pathways for the cardioprotective effects of therapeutic hypothermia include stabilization of mitochondrial permeability, production of nitric oxide, equilibration of reactive oxygen species, and calcium channels homeostasis. Clinical trials in humans have yielded controversial results. Current trials are therefore seeking to combine therapeutic hypothermia with other treatment modalities in order to improve the outcomes of patients with acute ischemic injury. This article provides a review of the hypothermia effects on the cardiovascular system, from the basic science of physiological changes in the human body and molecular mechanisms of cardioprotection to the bench of clinical trials with therapeutic hypothermia in patients with acute ischemic injury.

Impaired biological response to aspirin in therapeutic hypothermia comatose patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

AIM OF THE STUDY

Acute coronary syndrome is one of the main causes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). OHCA patients are particularly exposed to high platelet reactivity (HPR) under aspirin (ASA) treatment. The aim was to evaluate HPR-ASA in therapeutic hypothermia comatose patients resuscitated from OHCA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-two consecutive patients with OHCA of cardiac origin were prospectively included after therapeutic hypothermia and randomized to receive ASA 100mg per day, either intravenously (n=13) or orally via a gastric tube (n=9). ADP inhibitors (prasugrel or, if contra-indicated, clopidogrel) were administered in the event of angioplasty. HPR-ASA was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) with arachidonic acid (AA) and by the PFA-100(®) system with collagen/epinephrine. Clinical, biological and angiographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Using LTA-AA, maximum aggregation intensity was significantly lower in the intravenous group compared to the oral group (15% vs. 29%, respectively; p=0.04). Overall, 10 patients (45%) had HPR-ASA (38% intravenously vs 56% orally; p=0.7). Similarly, closure time was significantly increased in the IV group (277s vs. 155s, respectively; p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that impaired response to both intravenous and oral aspirin is frequent in comatose patients resuscitated from OHCA.

Platelet inhibition with prasugrel in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing therapeutic hypothermia after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Therapeutic hypothermia improves neurological outcome in combination with early revascularisation, but seems to affect clopidogrel responsiveness. The more potent thienopyridine prasugrel has not yet been sufficiently evaluated during therapeutic hypothermia. We investigated 23 consecutive AMI patients (61 ± 11 years) following out-of-hospital resuscitation undergoing revascularisation and therapeutic hypothermia. Prasugrel efficacy was assessed by the platelet-reactivity-index (PRI) before and 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours (h) following a loading dose of 60 mg via a gastric tube. Mean PRI (± SD) was 70 ± 12 % prior to loading and 60 ± 16 % (2 h, ns), 52 ± 21 % (4 h, p< 0.01), 42 ± 26 % (6 h, p< 0.01), 37 ± 21 % (12 h, p< 0.01), 27 ± 23 % (24 h, p< 0.01), 18 ± 14 % (48 h, p< 0.01), and 13 ± 10 % (72 h, p< 0.01) after loading. Sufficient platelet inhibition occurred later compared to stable AMI patients (6 h vs 2 h); however, high on-treatment platelet reactivity significantly decreased over time and was non-existent after 72 h (PRI> 50 %: 2 h: 72 %, 4 h: 52 %, 6 h: 43 %, 12 h: 29 %, 24 h: 17 %, 48 h: 5 %, 72 h: 0 %). There was no relation between 30-day mortality rate (26 %) and PRI values. Prasugrel significantly reduced platelet reactivity even during vasopressor use, analgosedation and therapeutic hypothermia. Despite a significant delay compared to stable AMI patients, sufficient platelet inhibition was reached in 83 % of patients within 24 h. Therefore, prasugrel administration via gastric tube might be a useful therapeutic strategy in these patients at high risk, providing potent and effective P2Y12 inhibition.