Feasibility of the Von Willebrand disease PREVENT trial

The diagnosis, natural history, and management of von Willebrand disease in women in the age of guidelines

INTRODUCTION

Women and girls with bleeding disorders face multiple bleeding challenges throughout their life. The most significant morbidity and mortality are due to heavy menstrual bleeding and postpartum hemorrhage in their reproductive years. The ASH/ISTH/NHF/WFH 2021 guidelines on diagnosing and managing von Willebrand disease (VWD) provide several new updates.

AREAS COVERED

Women with VWD have a higher prevalence of heavy menstrual bleeding. The subpopulation of adolescents is particularly vulnerable, as the diagnosis is often delayed with increased comorbidity of iron deficiency anemia and associated symptoms. A detailed review is done on the prevalence of bleeding-related complications, especially heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) and post-partum hemorrhage (PPH). The management strategies are also reviewed in detail, with a specific focus on the target factor levels and the use of antifibrinolytics.

EXPERT OPINION

The 2021 ASH/ISTH/NHF/WFH diagnostic and management recommendations are reviewed with a specific focus on hormonal methods of HMB management and antifibrinolytics in this situation. The reviewed topics include neuraxial anesthesia, factor cutoff, and tranexamic acid use in the postpartum period.

Postpartum Hemorrhage in Patients with Type 1 von Willebrand Disease: A Systematic Review

Type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common subtype of VWD, comprising 75% of VWD patients. We provide a systematic review of type 1 VWD in pregnancy. Our objective was to evaluate the rate of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in patients with known type 1 VWD. The primary outcome was rate of PPH. Primary PPH was defined as a cumulative blood loss ≥1,000 mL, or blood loss accompanied by signs and symptoms of hypovolemia within 24 hours postpartum or requiring blood products. Secondary PPH was defined as significant bleeding 24 hours to 12 weeks postpartum. Relevant articles published in English pertaining to VWD and pregnancy were identified without any time or study limitations. Seven articles (n = 144 pregnancies) met inclusion criteria. The rate of primary PPH was 4/144 (2.8%). The secondary PPH rate was reported in four studies, and occurred in 7/48 pregnancies (14.6%), ranging from 2 to 19 days postpartum. In conclusion, according to this systematic review, the frequency of primary PPH in pregnancies with known type 1 VWD is 2.8%. This is similar to the overall PPH rates of 3% reported in the literature. Although the sample size was small, secondary PPH occurred in almost 15% of pregnancies, while in the overall obstetrical population this occurs in approximately 1% of cases. Patients with known type 1 VWD may not be at increased risk of primary PPH, though they appear to bear increased risk of secondary PPH.

How I manage pregnancy in carriers of hemophilia and patients with von Willebrand disease

Women with inherited bleeding disorders, including carriers of hemophilia A and B, or with von Willebrand disease, have an increased risk of bleeding during pregnancy and delivery. The unborn child may also be affected by the bleeding disorder for which specific measures have to be considered. This requires a multidisciplinary approach, with a team that includes a hematologist, a pediatric hematologist, a clinical geneticist, an obstetrician-perinatologist, and an anesthesiologist. An optimal approach includes prepregnancy genetic counseling, prenatal diagnostic procedures, and a treatment plan for delivery for both the mother and child. Recent retrospective studies show that even if strict guidelines are followed, these women are still at risk of postpartum bleeding. This occurs even if coagulation factor levels are normalized, either due to the pregnancy-induced rise of factor levels or by infusion of coagulation factor concentrates at the time of delivery. In this article, we describe our current diagnostic and clinical management of pregnancy and delivery in women with inherited bleeding disorders. We also briefly discuss possible interventions to improve the outcome of current strategies by increasing target factor levels during and after delivery.

Case-based discussion on the implications of exogenous estrogens in hemostasis and thrombosis: the hematologist's view

In the childbearing years, hormonal therapy or hormonal changes in the menstrual cycle or the puerperium may be complicated by bleeding or thrombosis; however, among women with congenital disorders of hemostasis and thrombosis, the risk of bleeding or thrombosis may be increased. In women with congenital bleeding disorders, heavy menstrual bleeding is the most common bleeding symptom, and postpartum hemorrhage occurs despite treatment. Given the limitations of current therapy and the associated medical and psychological burden in women with bleeding disorders, better treatment approaches are needed to improve health outcomes and quality of life. In women with congenital thrombotic disorders, thromboembolism may complicate exogenous hormonal therapy and endogenous hormonal change during pregnancy and procedures, but risk differs by type of thrombophilia, procedure, time at risk, and thrombosis risk factors, all of which affect management. In this article, I shall consider a case-based discussion of current issues in women with congenital bleeding and clotting disorders, including heavy menstrual bleeding in a woman with VWD, postpartum hemorrhage risk in VWD, and thrombosis risk with oocyte retrieval in a woman with factor V Leiden and past thromboembolism. The goals are to review bleeding or thrombosis risk in these cases, current data, limitations of current treatment guidelines, and areas for future study.

Fundamentals for a Systematic Approach to Mild and Moderate Inherited Bleeding Disorders: An EHA Consensus Report

Healthy subjects frequently report minor bleedings that are frequently ‘background noise’ of normality rather than a true disorder. Nevertheless, unexpected or unusual bleeding may be alarming. Thus, the distinction between normal and pathologic bleeding is critical. Understanding the underlying pathologic mechanism in patients with an excessive bleeding is essential for their counseling and treatment. Most of these patients with significant bleeding will result affected by non-severe inherited bleeding disorders (BD), collectively denominated mild or moderate BD for their relatively benign course. Unfortunately, practical recommendations for the management of these disorders are still lacking due to the current state of fragmented knowledge of pathophysiology and lack of a systematic diagnostic approach. To address this gap, an International Working Group (IWG) was established by the European Hematology Association (EHA) to develop consensus-based guidelines on these disorders. The IWG agreed that grouping these disorders by their clinical phenotype under the single category of mild-to-moderate bleeding disorders (MBD) reflects current clinical practice and will facilitate a systematic diagnostic approach. Based on standardized and harmonized definitions a conceptual unified framework is proposed to distinguish normal subjects from affected patients. The IWG proposes a provisional comprehensive patient-centered initial diagnostic approach that will result in classification of MBD into distinct clinical-pathological entities under the overarching principle of clinical utility for the individual patient. While we will present here a general overview of the global management of patients with MBD, this conceptual framework will be adopted and validated in the evidence-based, disease-specific guidelines under development by the IWG.

How I manage severe von Willebrand disease

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Most patients with mild and moderate VWD can be treated effectively with desmopressin. The management of severe VWD patients, mostly affected by type 2 and type 3 disease, can be challenging. In this article we review the current diagnosis and treatment of severe VWD patients. We will also discuss the management of severe VWD patients in specific situations, such as pregnancy, delivery, patients developing alloantibodies against von Willebrand factor and VWD patients with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding. Moreover, we review emerging treatments that may be applied in future management of patients with severe VWD.

Significant gynecological bleeding in women with low von Willebrand factor levels

Gynecological bleeding is frequently reported in women with von Willebrand disease (VWD). Low von Willebrand factor (VWF) may be associated with significant bleeding phenotype despite only mild plasma VWF reductions. The contribution of gynecological bleeding to this phenotype has yet to be described. The optimal clinical bleeding assessment tool (BAT) to evaluate bleeding remains unclear. Using a standardized approach to phenotypic assessment, we evaluated gynecological bleeding and directly compared the Condensed Molecular and Clinical Markers for the Diagnosis and Management of type 1 VWD (Condensed MCMDM-1 VWD) and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) BAT scores in 120 women enrolled in the Low von Willebrand in Ireland Cohort study. Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) was reported in 89% of female participants; 45.8% developed iron deficiency. Using identical data, Condensed MCMDM-1 VWD menorrhagia domain scores were significantly lower than ISTH BAT scores (2 vs 3; P < .0001), the discrepant results related to 40% of women not seeking medical consultation for HMB, reducing the sensitivity of the Condensed score. For those who reported HMB to physicians, the low VWF diagnosis was not expedited (age at diagnosis 34.2 vs 33.4 years in women failing to present; P = .7). Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) was self-reported in 63.5% of parous women (n = 74); 21.6% required transfusion, critical care, radiological, or surgical intervention. Our data demonstrate that gynecological bleeding is frequently reported in women with low VWF; despite pregnancy-related increases in plasma VWF levels, these women may experience PPH. Defining the optimal management approach for these patients requires further research. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03167320.