Testosterone replacement therapy and the risk of venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Male Sexual and Reproductive Health: 2025 Update on Male Hypogonadism, Erectile Dysfunction, Premature Ejaculation, and Peyronie's Disease

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to present a summary of the updated 2025 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on sexual and reproductive health (SRH), focusing on hypogonadism, erectile dysfunction (ED), premature ejaculation (PE), and Peyronie's disease (PD), providing practical recommendations on the clinical workup, with a focus on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The panel conducted an updated systematic review of new research published in 2021-2024 in Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Libraries. The guidelines' recommendations focused on key clinical decisions that would impact patient care most. Each recommendation's strength was evaluated based on three factors: the trade-offs between benefits and drawbacks of different treatment approaches, the quality and reliability of the available evidence, and the diverse preferences and values of patients.

KEY FINDINGS

Along with a detailed basic and advanced diagnostic approach for every condition, key recommendations emphasise the importance of appropriate indications and subsequent follow-up for testosterone therapy in patients with late-onset hypogonadism (LOH), a clinical condition in the ageing male combining low levels of circulating testosterone and specific symptoms associated with impaired hormone production and/or action. The decision-making algorithm for treating ED-defined as the persistent inability to attain and maintain an erection sufficient to permit satisfactory sexual performance-aims to support personalised treatment tailored to individual patients, according to the invasiveness, tolerability, and effectiveness of the different therapeutic options and patients' expectations. Hence, patients should be fully counselled with respect to all available treatment modalities. The EAU guidelines adopted the definition of PE, which has been developed by the International Society for Sexual Medicine. After the subtype of PE has been defined, patient's expectations should be discussed thoroughly, and pharmacotherapy must be considered as the first-line treatment for patients with lifelong PE, whereas treating the underlying cause must be the initial goal for patients with acquired PE. An accurate baseline assessment of patients with PD should differentiate between acute and stable phases of the disorder. Surgical treatment for PD should be offered to patients having a penile deformity with a negative impact on sexual function: patients with concomitant ED should be offered penile prosthesis implantation.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This overview of the 2025 EAU SRH guidelines offers valuable insights into the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of LOH, ED, PE, and PD.

Inclusivity in Epilepsy Care: Navigating the Complex Nature of Seizure Disorders in People Undergoing Gender-Affirming Care

There is a paucity of information to rely on when caring for transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals with epilepsy. Clinicians must be aware of the mechanisms of antiseizure medications, potential unique side effects, and medication interactions that require monitoring. This principle is central to the clinical care of the TGD population, specifically for those pursuing gender-affirming care via hormone treatment and/or surgical interventions. This resource aims to support the delivery of quality healthcare with a comprehensive approach for TGD individuals living with epilepsy. This article discusses diverse topics, including antiseizure medications, drug-drug interactions, surgical and neuromodulation techniques, as well as general considerations for managing complex cases of medication-resistant epilepsy in TGD individuals. It also aims to make neurologists familiar with the basics of medical and surgical care for the same population and highlight potential reciprocal effects between comprehensive gender-affirming and epilepsy care.

Perioperative Testosterone Supplementation Improves Outcomes of Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Systematic Review of Heterogeneous Studies

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of perioperative testosterone supplementation on orthopaedic surgical outcomes.

METHODS

Three online databases were searched from database inception until September 2024. Three reviewers independently screened all titles, abstracts, and full texts of articles investigating perioperative testosterone use in orthopaedic surgery. English-language studies, human studies, Level I or II randomized controlled trials, and studies examining testosterone supplementation given during the perioperative period of an orthopaedic surgery were included. Demographic data, surgical indications, details of testosterone use, and outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 1,895 records were screened and 5 randomized controlled trials (4 Level I, 1 Level II) were included. One study evaluated patients undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty. One study investigated patients undergoing elective anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Three studies evaluated the effects of testosterone on patients undergoing hip fracture fixation. In total, 189 patients were included, with 84 receiving perioperative testosterone and 105 receiving placebo or a control intervention. One study showed length of stay was lower and ability to stand significantly improved in the testosterone group; 1 study revealed significant improvement in body composition and bone mineral density (BMD); 1 study showed testosterone and protein supplementation improved lean body mass, functional scores, and health-related quality-of-life scores; 1 study revealed perioperative testosterone supplementation increased lean mass postoperatively; and 1 short-term and underpowered study did not show significant improvement in the measured outcomes. The 5 studies showed heterogeneity in patient populations, procedure type, dosage, duration, testosterone therapy protocol, clinical outcomes, and follow-up duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Although evidence regarding orthopaedic perioperative use of testosterone replacement therapy is heterogeneous, 4 randomized controlled trials reviewed here found that testosterone supplementation improved clinical outcomes, body composition, and BMD. All 4 studies showed significant improvements in functional independence, BMD, muscle volume in the operative and nonoperative leg, Harris hip score, gait speed, Katz score, lean body mass, and strength.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, systematic review of Level I and II studies.

Gender-affirming hormone therapy in the transgender patient: influence on thrombotic risk

Research regarding the hematologic sequelae of estrogen and testosterone therapy for transgender people is an emerging area. While estrogen therapy has been widely studied in cisgender women, studies in transgender individuals are limited, revealing variable adverse effects influenced by the dose and formulation of estrogen used. Thrombotic risk factors in transgender and gender-diverse individuals are multifactorial, involving both modifiable and nonmodifiable factors. Management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in individuals receiving gender-affirming estrogen entails standard anticoagulation therapy alongside shared decision-making regarding hormone continuation and risk factor modification. While data and guidance from cisgender women can offer a reference for managing thrombotic risk in transgender individuals on hormone therapy, fully applying these insights can be challenging. The benefits of gender-affirming hormone therapy include significantly reducing the risk of suicide and depression, highlighting the importance of a contemplative approach to the management of hormonal therapy after a VTE event. Although limited, the available data in the literature indicate a low thrombotic risk for transgender individuals undergoing gender-affirming testosterone therapy. However, polycythemia is a common adverse effect necessitating monitoring and, occasionally, adjustments to hormonal therapy. Additionally, iron deficiency may arise due to the physiological effects of testosterone or health care providers' use of phlebotomy, an aspect that remains unstudied in this population. In conclusion, while the set of clinical data is expanding, further research remains vital to refine management strategies and improve hematologic outcomes for transgender individuals undergoing gender-affirming hormone therapy.

Novel perspectives of testosterone therapy in men with functional hypogonadism: traversing the gaps of knowledge

INTRODUCTION

In the past decade, there has been a significant augmentation in the corpus of evidence pertaining to functional hypogonadism. Despite this, prevailing clinical guidelines continue to advise against the universal screening for hypogonadism in middle-aged and elderly males.

FINDINGS

Numerous randomized controlled trials have scrutinized the effects of testosterone therapy in males afflicted with type 2 diabetes and/or obesity. However, these guidelines uniformly assert that lifestyle modifications and weight reduction should be the primary intervention strategies in overweight and obese males, relegating testosterone therapy to a secondary, selective option. It is extensively documented that testosterone therapy can yield substantial improvements in various metabolic parameters as well as ameliorate symptoms of erectile dysfunction. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated the potential of testosterone therapy in reversing type 2 diabetes in males with low-normal testosterone levels who are at elevated risk for this condition, in comparison to the outcomes achievable through lifestyle modifications alone.

CONCLUSION

This focused review article aims to present a comprehensive update on the latest data concerning the innovative aspects of testosterone therapy in males with functional hypogonadism, particularly in the context of type 2 diabetes and/or obesity. Additionally, it will delve into the cardiovascular safety of such interventions within this high-risk demographic, with a special emphasis on insights gleaned from the TRAVERSE trial.

Testosterone Therapy Does Not Affect Coagulation in Male Hypogonadism: A Longitudinal Study Based on Thrombin Generation

CONTEXT

Testosterone therapy has been variably associated with increased thrombotic risk but investigations of global coagulation in this setting are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to compare global coagulation of hypogonadal men before (T0) and 6 months after (T1) starting testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), and healthy controls (HCs).

METHODS

An observational prospective cohort study was conducted at 2 tertiary endocrinological ambulatory care centers. Patients included 38 men with hypogonadism (mean age 55 years, SD 13) and 38 age-matched HCs. Thrombin generation assay (TGA) was performed at T0 and T1 in hypogonadal men and in HCs. TGA is an in vitro procedure based on the continuous registration of thrombin generation and decay under conditions mimicking the process that occurs in vivo. The following TGA parameters were recorded: lag time; thrombin-peak concentration; time-to-reach peak, velocity index, and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), the latter representing the total amount of thrombin generated under the driving forces of procoagulants opposed by the anticoagulants. Protein C, antithrombin, factor (F) VIII, and fibrinogen were assessed.

RESULTS

No changes in TGA parameters were observed between T0 and T1. Hypogonadal men displayed significantly higher ETP, fibrinogen, and significantly lower antithrombin levels both at T0 and T1 compared to HCs. Thrombin peak of hypogonadal men was significantly higher than HCs at T0 but not at T1. ETP and antithrombin were correlated with testosterone levels.

CONCLUSION

Hypogonadal men display a procoagulant imbalance detected by increased thrombin generation. Short-term TRT does not worsen global coagulation, suggesting that the treatment can be safely prescribed to men diagnosed with hypogonadism.

Androgen Society Position Paper on Cardiovascular Risk With Testosterone Therapy

The Androgen Society is an international, multidisciplinary medical organization committed to advancing research and education in the field of testosterone deficiency and testosterone therapy (TTh). This position paper is written in response to results of the TRAVERSE study, published in June 2023, which reported no increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in men who received TTh compared with placebo. In 2013-2014, 2 observational studies reported increased cardiovascular (CV) risks with TTh and received wide media attention. Despite strong criticism of those 2 studies, in 2015, the Food and Drug Administration added a CV warning to testosterone product labels and required pharmaceutical companies to perform a CV safety study, which became the TRAVERSE trial. TRAVERSE enrolled 5246 men at high risk for MACE based on existing heart disease or multiple risk factors. Participants were randomized to daily testosterone gel or placebo gel, with a mean follow-up of 33 months. Results revealed no greater risk of MACE (myocardial infarction, stroke, or CV death) or venothrombotic events in men who received TTh compared with placebo. Review of the prior literature reveals near uniformity of studies reporting no increased MACE with TTh. This includes 2 additional large randomized controlled trials, multiple smaller randomized controlled trials, several large observational studies, and 19 meta-analyses. In view of these findings, it is the position of the Androgen Society that it has now been conclusively determined that TTh is not associated with increased risks of heart attack, stroke, or CV death.

Venous thromboembolism in transgender and gender non-binary youth is rare and occurs in the setting of secondary risk factors: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) in transgender and gender non-binary (TNB) youth is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the rate of VTE in a cohort of TNB youth followed in the transgender health clinic at Boston Children's Hospital, and to investigate the impact of congenital thrombophilia diagnosis on the use of GAHT.

METHODS

ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes were used to identify eligible individuals, defined as (i) having a diagnosis of gender dysphoria and (ii) venous thromboembolism (VTE). Data were abstracted from a review of medical records. A second data query assessed TNB individuals who had an associated thrombophilia diagnosis.

RESULTS

The primary analysis included 1860 individuals. Total 942 individuals (50.6%) had started GAHT at the time of data analysis. Mean age (±SD) at GAHT initiation was 16.8 (±1.9) years. Five thrombotic events were identified in three (0.13%) individuals, all in the setting of additional VTE risk factors. Only two of five thrombotic events occurred while receiving GAHT. The rate of VTE in the GAHT cohort did not statistically differ from the rate of VTE in the non-GAHT cohort (0.1% vs. 0.2%, p = .62). Of the 10 individuals diagnosed with a congenital thrombophilia, two transmasculine individuals received prophylactic anticoagulation prior to GAHT. No VTE has been reported to date in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, VTE was rare in the TNB youth and was not associated with GAHT use. TNB youth with congenital thrombophilia have not developed VTE in the setting of GAHT use to date.

Cardiovascular disease and testosterone therapy in male hypogonadism

This review assesses the evidence of the physiological effects of testosterone on cardiovascular health, the association between male hypogonadism and cardiovascular health, and the effects of testosterone therapy on cardiovascular health in male hypogonadism. Preclinical studies suggest complex effects of testosterone on cardiovascular risk by acting on skeletal muscle, cardiomyocytes, vasculature, adipocytes, insulin action, and erythropoiesis. Furthermore, low testosterone has a bi-directional association with cardiometabolic risk. Observational studies have reported worse metabolic profiles in men with organic hypogonadism. However, a consistent association between major cardiovascular events and male hypogonadism has not been established. Hematocrit increases with testosterone therapy; however, most studies do not report an increase in venous thromboembolism risk. Although some observational studies and a small randomized controlled study reported an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, recent data confirm the medium-term cardiovascular safety of testosterone therapy in middle-aged and older men with low testosterone.

Testosterone Replacement in Men with Sexual Dysfunction: An Abridged Version of the Cochrane Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) compared to placebo or other medical treatments in men with sexual dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search with no restrictions on publication language or status up to 29 August 2023. We only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

RESULTS

We identified 43 studies with 11,419 randomized participants. We found that TRT likely results in little to no difference in erectile function assessed with the IIEF-EF (mean difference [MD]: 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67 to 3.08; I²=0%; 6 RCTs, 2016 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. TRT likely results in little to no change in sexual quality of life assessed with the Aging Males' Symptoms scale (MD: -2.31, 95% CI: -3.63 to -1.00; I²=0%; 5 RCTs, 1,030 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. TRT also likely results in little to no difference in cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.21 to 3.26; I²=0%; 10 RCTs, 3,525 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. TRT also likely results in little to no difference in treatment withdrawal due to adverse events, prostate-related events, or lower urinary tract symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

TRT for men with sexual dysfunction showed no difference in erectile function, sexual quality of life, or cardiovascular mortality compared to placebo. Furthermore, it also appears to no difference in treatment withdrawals due to adverse events, prostate-related events, or lower urinary tract symptoms.

Gender affirming care for the minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Given the current political climate and the release of an updated version of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health's guidelines, this review assesses recent updates in the care of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients, specifically related to care provided by gynecologists.

RECENT FINDINGS

The number of people identifying as TGD and pursuing gender affirming care is increasing. Contraception for these patients is underdiscussed and high rates of pelvic pain and irregular bleeding were identified. Rates of regret are low following gender affirming surgeries, and studies have repeatedly shown their benefits for gender dysphoria. A minimally invasive approach is recommended for gender affirming hysterectomy, and the decision to proceed with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy should be based on shared decision making. Surgical techniques include ensuring an adequate margin when taking the infundibulopelvic ligament, and consideration for two-layer vaginal cuff closure.

SUMMARY

Gynecologists play a key role in the care of TGD patients. Recent reviews have found extensive gaps in our knowledge, including a lack of guidelines for cancer prevention, effects of testosterone on benign conditions, and the long-term effects of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on health outcomes for patients on testosterone.

Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Orthopaedic Surgery

Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is an indicated treatment of several medical conditions including late-onset hypogonadism, congenital syndromes, and gender affirmation hormonal therapy. Increasing population age, medical benefits, and public awareness of TRT have resulted in increased prevalence of its utilization. However, TRT is not without concern for adverse risks including venous thromboembolic complications, cardiovascular events, and prostate issues. In the field of orthopaedic surgery, research is beginning to delineate the complex relationship between TRT and the development of orthopaedic conditions and potential effects on surgical interventions and outcomes. In this review, we discuss current literature surrounding TRT and subsequent development of osteoarthritis, incidence of total joint arthroplasty, musculotendinous pathology, postoperative infection risk, improvements in postoperative rehabilitation metrics, enhancement of osseous healing, and increased bone-implant integration. The authors suggest future areas of investigation that may provide guidance on how surgeons can mitigate adverse risks while optimizing benefits of TRT in the orthopaedic patient.

Effects of 12 Months' Treatment with Testosterone Undecanoate on Markers for Erythropoietic Activity and Safety Aspects in Transgender and Cisgender Hypogonadal Men

BACKGROUND

To investigate the erythropoietic activity and safety aspects of testosterone undecanoate (TU) injections in transgender men, assigned female at birth.

METHODS

Twenty-three men (13 hypogonadal cisgender men and 10 transgender men) who initiated TU at the study start (naïve) and 15 men (10 hypogonadal cisgender men and 5 transgender men) on steady-state treatment with TU (non-naïve) were included in this prospective 1-year observational study. A control group of 32 eugonadal cisgender men was investigated once at baseline. Complete blood count, testosterone in serum and saliva, and plasma lipids, and liver enzymes were assessed.

RESULTS

For naïve transgender men, a significant increase in hemoglobin concentration was noted (mean (SD)), 141 (8) g/L to 151 (13) g/L, while no increase was seen in naïve hypogonadal cisgender men. At the end of the study, naïve transgender men exhibited comparable levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, and testosterone levels in serum and saliva to hypogonadal cisgender men, as well as to the eugonadal cisgender men. During the study, HDL-cholesterol decreased significantly in naïve transgender men, 1.4 (0.4) mmol/L to 1.2 (0.4) mmol/L, P = 0.03, whereas no significant change was noted in naïve hypogonadal cisgender men. Liver enzymes remained unchanged in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

After 12 months of treatment with TU in naïve transgender men, hemoglobin and hematocrit increased to levels within the cisgender male reference range. A slight decrease in HDL-cholesterol was seen in naïve transgender men but liver enzymes remained unchanged.

Testosterone replacement therapy and vascular thromboembolic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate the relationship between testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) and arterial and/or venous thrombosis in patients with pre-treatment total testosterone (TT) <12 nmol l -1 , we performed a meta-analysis following the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome model. Population: men with TT <12 nmol l -1 or clear mention of hypogonadism in the inclusion criteria of patients; intervention: TRT; comparison: placebo or no therapy; outcomes: arterial thrombotic events (stroke, myocardial infarction [MI], upper limbs, and lower limbs), VTE (deep vein thrombosis [DVT], portal vein thrombosis, splenic thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism), and mortality. A total of 2423 abstracts were assessed for eligibility. Twenty-four studies, including 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were finally included, with a total of 4027 and 310 288 hypotestosteronemic male patients, from RCTs and from observational studies, respectively. Based on RCT-derived data, TRT did not influence the risk of arterial thrombosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-3.43, P = 0.64), stroke (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.09-18.97, P = 0.83), MI (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.11-2.31, P = 0.39), VTE (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.22-9.03, P = 0.71), pulmonary embolism (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.27-7.04, P = 0.70), and mortality (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.20-2.38, P = 0.56). Meanwhile, when only observational studies are considered, a significant reduction in the risk of developing arterial thrombotic events, MI, venous thromboembolism, and mortality was observed. The risk for DVT remains uncertain, due to the paucity of RCT-based data. TRT in men with TT <12 nmol l -1 is safe from the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Further studies specifically assessing the risk of DVT in men on TRT are needed.

Testosterone replacement in men with sexual dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines recommend testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) for men with sexual dysfunction and testosterone deficiency. However, TRT is commonly promoted in men without testosterone deficiency and existing trials often do not clearly report participants' testosterone levels or testosterone-related symptoms. This review assesses the potential benefits and harms of TRT in men presenting with complaints of sexual dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of testosterone replacement therapy compared to placebo or other medical treatments in men with sexual dysfunction.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the trials registries ClinicalTrials.gov and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, with no restrictions on language of publication or publication status, up to 29 August 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in men (40 years or over) with sexual dysfunction. We excluded men with primary or secondary hypogonadism. We compared testosterone or testosterone with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDEI5I) to placebo or PDE5I alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the literature, assessed the risk of bias, extracted data, and rated the certainty of evidence (CoE) according to GRADE using a minimally contextualized approach. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and interpreted them according to standard Cochrane methodology. Predefined primary outcomes were self-reported erectile dysfunction assessed by a validated instrument, sexual quality of life assessed by a validated instrument, and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes were treatment withdrawal due to adverse events, prostate-related events, and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). We distinguished between short-term (up to 12 months) and long-term (> 12 months) outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 43 studies with 11,419 randomized participants across three comparisons: testosterone versus placebo, testosterone versus PDE5I, and testosterone with PDE5I versus PDE5I alone. This abstract focuses on the most relevant comparison of testosterone versus placebo. Testosterone versus placebo (up to 12 months) Based on a predefined sensitivity analysis of studies at low risk of bias, and an analysis combing data from the similar International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) and IIEF-5 instruments, TRT likely results in little to no difference in erectile function assessed with the IIEF-EF (mean difference (MD) 2.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67 to 3.08; I² = 0%; 6 RCTs, 2016 participants; moderate CoE) on a scale from 6 to 30 with larger values reflecting better erectile function. We assumed a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of greater than or equal to 4. TRT likely results in little to no change in sexual quality of life assessed with the Aging Males' Symptoms scale (MD -2.31, 95% CI -3.63 to -1.00; I² = 0%; 5 RCTs, 1030 participants; moderate CoE) on a scale from 17 to 85 with larger values reflecting worse sexual quality of life. We assumed a MCID of greater than or equal to 10. TRT also likely results in little to no difference in cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.83, 95% CI 0.21 to 3.26; I² = 0%; 10 RCTs, 3525 participants; moderate CoE). Based on two cardiovascular deaths in the placebo group and an assumed MCID of 3%, this would correspond to no additional deaths per 1000 men (95% CI 1 fewer to 4 more). TRT also likely results in little to no difference in treatment withdrawal due to adverse events, prostate-related events, or LUTS. Testosterone versus placebo (later than 12 months) We are very uncertain about the longer-term effects of TRT on erectile dysfunction assessed with the IIEF-EF (MD 4.20, 95% CI -2.03 to 10.43; 1 study, 42 participants; very low CoE). We did not find studies reporting on sexual quality of life or cardiovascular mortality. We are very uncertain about the effect of testosterone on treatment withdrawal due to adverse events. We found no studies reporting on prostate-related events or LUTS.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the short term, TRT probably has little to no effect on erectile function, sexual quality of life, or cardiovascular mortality compared to a placebo. It likely results in little to no difference in treatment withdrawals due to adverse events, prostate-related events, or LUTS. In the long term, we are very uncertain about the effects of TRT on erectile function when compared to placebo; we did not find data on its effects on sexual quality of life or cardiovascular mortality. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate (signaling that we are confident that the reported effect size is likely to be close to the true effect) to very low (indicating that the true effect is likely to be substantially different). The findings of this review should help to inform future guidelines and clinical decision-making at the point of care.

EMAS position statement: Testosterone replacement therapy in older men

INTRODUCTION

Late-onset hypogonadism is the clinical entity characterised by low testosterone concentrations associated with clinical symptoms in the absence of organic disease in ageing men. It has been associated with metabolic syndrome, reduced bone mineral density, and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality risk. Although testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) reverses most of these conditions in young hypogonadal men, the risk/benefit ratio of TRT in older men is debatable.

AIM

To update the 2015 EMAS statement on TRT in older men with new research on late-onset hypogonadism and TRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review and consensus of expert opinion.

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS

TRT should be offered only to symptomatic older men with confirmed low testosterone concentrations after explaining the uncertainties regarding the long-term safety of this treatment. TRT may be offered to men with severe hypogonadism and erectile dysfunction to improve sexual desire, erectile, and orgasmic function. It should also be considered in hypogonadal men with severe insulin resistance or pre-diabetes mellitus. TRT may also be considered, in combination with proven treatment strategies, for osteoporosis, or for selected patients with persistent mild depressive symptoms and/or low self-perceived quality of life, combined with standard medical care for each condition. TRT is contraindicated in hypogonadal men actively seeking fertility treatment. Due to a lack of data, TRT should not be routinely used in older men to improve exercise capacity/physical function, improve cognitive function, or prevent cognitive decline. TRT must be avoided in older, frail men with known breast cancer or untreated prostate cancer and all men who have had myocardial infarction or stroke within the last four months, and those with severe or decompensated heart failure. The quality of evidence regarding patients with previous prostate cancer or cardiovascular disease is too low to draw definitive conclusions. Any limits on duration of use are arbitrary, and treatment should continue for as long as the man feels the benefits outweigh the risks for him, and decisions must be made on an individual basis. Withdrawal should be considered when hypogonadism is reversed after the resolution of underlying disorder. Short-acting transdermal preparations should be preferred for TRT initiation in older men, but injectable forms may be considered subsequently. Older men on TRT should be monitored at 3, 6, and 12 months after initiation and at least yearly thereafter, or earlier and more frequently if indicated. Evaluation should include assessment of the clinical response, and measurement of total testosterone, haematocrit, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations. Bone density and/or quality should also be assessed. Obese and overweight patients should be encouraged to undergo lifestyle modifications, including exercise and weight loss, to increase endogenous testosterone.

Hemostatic considerations for gender affirming care

Gender dysphoria or gender incongruence is defined as "persons that are not satisfied with their designated gender" [1]. The awareness and evidence-based treatment options available to this population have grown immensely over the last two decades. Protocols now include an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline [1] as well as the World Professional Association of Transgender Health Standards of Care (WPATH SOC) [2]. Hematologic manifestations, most notably thrombosis, are one of the most recognized adverse reactions to the hormones used for gender-affirming care. Therefore, hematologists are frequently consulted prior to initiation of hormonal therapy to help guide safe treatment. This review will focus on the scientific evidence related to hemostatic considerations for various gender-affirming therapies and serve as a resource to assist in medical decision-making among providers and patients.

Hormone replacement therapy in women with history of thrombosis or a thrombophilia

Findings from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomised placebo-controlled trial (RCT) were published at the beginning of this century. They suggested that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use increased the risk of cardiovascular disease and venous thromboembolism including pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis The findings led to a decline in HRT prescriptions and negative publicity about the use of HRT for women with significant menopausal symptoms. Subsequent studies have shown that the risk of thrombosis with HRT relates to whether estrogen is combined with a progestogen and the route of administration of estrogen. In healthy women with no background medical problems, transdermal hormone replacement is not associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. However, much less is known about the safety of various HRT preparations in women with a high background risk of thrombosis. These cases can often be challenging for clinicians with uncertainties around testing for thrombophilia, use of anticoagulation and striking a balance between the risks and benefits of prescribing HRT. This article will review the mechanism of thrombosis with differing types of HRT and present the evidence from the relevant trials. The article will also present the evidence that specifically relates to women with a personal history of thrombosis or thrombophilia (heritable and acquired) to enable clinicians to better individualise the risk assessment for each woman requesting HRT and understand the role of thrombophilia screening or concomitant anticoagulation in such situations.

Why do patients with hypopituitarism still present an increased mortality?

Hypopituitarism is defined as a lack or decreased secretion of one or several pituitary hormones. It can result from diseases of the pituitary gland or from pathologies of the superior regulatory center, i.e. the hypothalamus, thereby decreasing hypothalamic releasing hormones and consequently the pituitary hormones. It is still a rare disease with an estimated prevalence of 30-45 patients/100,000 and an incidence of 4-5/100,000/year. This review summarizes the currently available data with a focus on etiologies of hypopituitarism, evidence on mortality rates in patients with hypopituitarism, temporal trends in mortality , and associated diseases, pathophysiological mechanisms and risk factors that affect mortality risk in these patients.

Perioperative Hormone Management in Gender-Affirming Mastectomy: Is Stopping Testosterone before Top Surgery Really Necessary?

BACKGROUND

Gender-affirming mastectomy, or "top surgery," has become one of the most frequently performed procedures for transgender and nonbinary patients. However, management of perioperative testosterone therapy remains controversial. Despite a lack of supporting evidence, many surgeons require cessation of testosterone before top surgery. This is the first study to compare complication rates in patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy with and without discontinuation of perioperative testosterone.

METHODS

This retrospective review included patients undergoing top surgery by the senior author between 2017 and 2020. Reflecting a change in the senior author's practice, before May of 2019, all patients were required to discontinue testosterone before surgery; all patients treated after this point continued their testosterone regimens throughout the perioperative period. Patients were stratified according to testosterone regimen and perioperative hormone management, with demographic characteristics and postoperative outcomes compared among groups.

RESULTS

A total of 490 patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy during the study period were included. Testosterone was held perioperatively in 175 patients and continued in 211 patients; 104 patients never received testosterone therapy. Demographic characteristics were similar among groups and there was no difference in rates of hematoma (2.9% versus 2.8% versus 2.9%, respectively; P = 0.99), seroma (1.1% versus 0% versus 1%, respectively; P = 0.31), venous thromboembolism (0% versus 0.5% versus 0%, respectively; P = 0.99), or overall complications (6.9% versus 4.3% versus 5.8%, respectively; P = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate no difference in postoperative complication rates among groups. Whereas further investigation is warranted, our data suggest that routine cessation of testosterone in the perioperative period is not necessary for patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Adult- and late-onset male hypogonadism: the clinical practice guidelines of the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) and the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE)

PURPOSE

To provide the evidence-based recommendations on the role of testosterone (T) on age-related symptoms and signs remains.

METHODS

The Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) and the and the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE) commissioned an expert task force to provide an updated guideline on adult-onset male hypogonadism. Derived recommendations were based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

Clinical diagnosis of adult-onset hypogonadism should be based on a combination of clinical and biochemical parameters. Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) should be offered to all symptomatic subjects with hypogonadism after the exclusion of possible contraindications. T gels and the long-acting injectable T are currently available preparations showing the best efficacy/safety profile. TRT can improve all aspects of sexual function, although its effect is limited in more complicated patients. Body composition (reducing fat mass and increasing lean mass) is improved after TRT, either in subjects with or without metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes. Conversely, the role of TRT in improving glycometabolic control is more conflicting. TRT can result in increasing bone mineral density, particularly at lumbar site, but no information on fracture risk is available. Limited data support the use of TRT for improving other outcomes, including mood frailty and mobility.

CONCLUSIONS

TRT can improve sexual function and body composition particularly in less complicated adult and in aging subjects with hypogonadism. When hypogonadism is adequately diagnosed, T appropriately prescribed and subjects correctly followed up, no short-term increased risk of adverse events is observed. Longer and larger studies are advisable to better clarify TRT long-term efficacy/safety profile.

Relationships between endogenous and exogenous testosterone and cardiovascular disease in men

In this narrative review, we discuss the evidence about the controversy about the cardiovascular effects of endogenous and exogenous testosterone in men. Prospective cohort studies with follow-up of ~5-15 years generally indicate no association or a possible inverse relationship between serum endogenous testosterone concentrations and composite major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular deaths and overall mortality. Pharmacoepidemiological studies of large databases generally show no association between testosterone therapy and incident major cardiovascular events, and some pharmacoepidemiological studies demonstrate an association with decreased overall mortality. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials indicate that there is no increased incidence of overall major cardiovascular events with 1-3 years of testosterone therapy. These placebo-controlled trials have major limitations including small numbers of participants, short duration of testosterone therapy and follow-up, and lack of systematic adjudication of cardiovascular events. Overall, the evidence indicates that endogenous testosterone concentrations and testosterone therapy at physiological dosages confer no or minimal effects on the incidence of cardiovascular outcomes. There is insufficient evidence to make conclusions about testosterone therapy for patients at high risk of cardiovascular events (e.g., men with recent myocardial infarctions or stroke and men with recurrent idiopathic deep venous thromboses). In general, clinicians should avoid prescribing supraphysiological testosterone therapy to hypogonadal men or men with slightly low to low-normal serum testosterone concentrations and no identified disorder of the hypothalamus-pituitary-testicular axis because of the uncertain cardiovascular risks and the lack of proven health benefits. For most men with bona fide hypogonadism, benefits of testosterone therapy exceed the potential risk of adverse cardiovascular effects.

Acute Portal and Superior Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis with Topical Testosterone Therapy: An Adverse Drug Event Case Report

This is a case report of a 55-year-old Caucasian male prescribed topical testosterone therapy for 12 months prior to admission, when he was diagnosed with acute thrombosis in the portal vein (PVT) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV). The patient had a negative thrombophilia workup, including Factor V Leiden, Prothrombin G20210A, and JAK2 V617F mutations. There were no other pertinent laboratory markers that raised concern for the cause of thrombus. No strong familial history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was reported during the patient's initial workup. With this in mind, the patient's use of topical testosterone therapy was considered the most likely risk factor for the PVT and SMV thrombus. During hospitalization, the patient was initiated on therapeutic anticoagulation with a heparin drip and discharged to home on apixaban for 3 months with extended therapy to be determined by outpatient hematologist. With no other identified VTE risk factors, probability that this patient's VTE was attributed to testosterone was evaluated using the Naranjo scale with a calculated score of 6, which classifies the adverse reaction as "likely." Clinicians should be aware of the possibility that topical testosterone therapy may be a risk factor for venous thrombosis in unusual sites.

An Interesting Presentation of Testosterone-Induced Arterial Thrombosis

Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is an industry on the rise in large part due to an increase in direct-to-customer advertising targeting middle-aged men with non-specific symptoms. The biggest problem with unnecessary prescribing is that testosterone therapy is not without side effects. One of the more common adverse effects is erythrocytosis with subsequent thrombosis. It was originally postulated that thrombosis seen in patients on TRT was solely related to increasing in hemoglobin however, new studies demonstrate increasing episodes of thrombosis unrelated to hemoglobin or hematocrit.

We report the case of a 38-year-old white male presenting to the clinic with infarction of bilateral feet and digits due to testosterone-induced thrombosis of dermal and epidermal arteries. Laboratory workup including vasculitis panel was negative and complete blood count (CBC) was within appropriate parameters. He was treated with anticoagulation, pain control, and vasodilatory therapy with subsequent improvement of symptoms.

There have been many reported cases of testosterone-induced thrombosis of the venous system with occasional involvement of the renal arteries. However, cases involving thrombosis of dermal or epidermal arteries due to testosterone supplementation have never been reported. It could be beneficial to screen potential patients requiring TRT for hypercoagulable states such as Factor V Leiden and lupus anticoagulant.