Venous thromboembolism after fast-track elective revision hip and knee arthroplasty - A multicentre cohort study of 2814 unselected consecutive procedures

Efficacy and safety of postoperative single-dose anticoagulant treatment in preventing venous thromboembolism after revision hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy and safety of postoperative single-dose anticoagulant treatment in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) after revision THA, in comparison with a multiple-dose chemoprophylaxis protocol.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared 295 patients undergoing revision THA who received multiple-dose chemoprophylaxis protocol (40 mg low-molecular-weight heparin once and oral rivaroxaban for 10 days) or single-dose chemoprophylaxis protocol (40 mg low-molecular-weight heparin once) for VTE. The patients in both groups performed active lower limb exercises. Each group was further stratified into subgroups based on the aetiology of revision. The incidence of VTE, wound complications within three months, hidden blood loss (HBL), transfusion rate, and surgical drainage duration were recorded.

RESULTS

The incidence rates of VTE (P = 0.870) did not differ between the two prophylaxis protocols. However, significant differences were observed in wound complications within three months (P = 0.002), HBL (P = 0.015), transfusion rate (P = 0.028). Surgical drainage duration was also shorter in the single-dose chemoprophylaxis group (P = 0.0023). In the subgroup analysis, the use of single-dose chemoprophylaxis protocol cannot significantly reduce HBL and transfusion rate after septic revision THA. The use of multiple-dose chemoprophylaxis protocol (OR = 2.89, P = 0.002) and high BMI (OR = 1.09, P = 0.037) were independent risk factors of wound complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose chemoprophylaxis protocol effectively and safely prevented VTE after revision THA compared with multiple-dose chemoprophylaxis protocol. The effect in reducing HBL and postoperative transfusion rate was limited in septic revision.

Key Components, Current Practice and Clinical Outcomes of ERAS Programs in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have led to improvements in outcomes in several surgical fields, through multimodal optimization of patient pathways, reductions in complications, improved patient experiences and reductions in the length of stay. However, their use has not been uniformly recognized in all orthopedic fields, and there is still no consensus on the best implementation process. Here, we evaluated pre-, peri-, and post-operative key elements and clinical evidence of ERAS protocols, measurements, and associated outcomes in patients undergoing different orthopedic surgical procedures. A systematic literature search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases was conducted to identify clinical studies, from 2012 to 2022. Out of the 1154 studies retrieved, 174 (25 on spine surgery, 4 on thorax surgery, 2 on elbow surgery and 143 on hip and/or knee surgery) were considered eligible for this review. Results showed that ERAS protocols improve the recovery from orthopedic surgery, decreasing the length of hospital stays (LOS) and the readmission rates. Comparative studies between ERAS and non-ERAS protocols also showed improvement in patient pain scores, satisfaction, and range of motion. Although ERAS protocols in orthopedic surgery are safe and effective, future studies focusing on specific ERAS elements, in particular for elbow, thorax and spine, are mandatory to optimize the protocols.

Multimodal Thromboprophylaxis in Patients With a History of Venous Thromboembolism Undergoing Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty

Background: Patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are at a high risk of postoperative VTE. Purpose: In this high-risk population, we sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of multimodal thromboprophylaxis. The regimen consisted of discontinuation of procoagulant medications, VTE risk stratification, regional anesthesia, rapid mobilization, perioperative use of pneumatic compression devices, vigorous ankle dorsiflexion during the recovery period, and chemoprophylaxis tailored to the patient's risk of VTE. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 141 consecutive patients with a history of VTE who underwent 177 elective TKA procedures between 2005 and 2019 by 2 arthroplasty surgeons at a single institution. The patients had a history of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (n = 127; 72%), pulmonary embolism (PE) (n = 20; 11%), or both (n = 30; 17%). Postoperative chemoprophylaxis included aspirin (n = 20; 11%), anticoagulation (n = 135; 77%), or a combination of aspirin and anticoagulation (n = 21; 12%). Complications within 120 days, including VTE events, wound complications, bleeding, and unplanned readmissions, were recorded, as was 1-year mortality. Results: Five patients (2.8%) developed symptomatic DVT (3 distal, 2 proximal), and 4 patients (2.3%) developed symptomatic PE. The most common postdischarge complications were wound infection (n = 6; 3.4%) and stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia (n = 5; 2.8%). There was 1 emergency room visit and 13 unplanned readmissions; 3 patients developed intra-articular hematomas or prolonged wound drainage and recovered uneventfully. All patients were alive 1 year after surgery. Conclusion: The findings of this retrospective study suggest that multimodal prophylaxis may be safe and effective in patients with a history of VTE undergoing primary and revision TKA. More rigorous study is warranted.

Fast-track revision knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on fast-track protocols in relation to revision knee arthroplasty. Hence, the aim of this study was to report length of stay (LOS), risk of LOS > 5 days and readmission ≤ 90 days after revision knee arthroplasty in centers with a well-established fast-track protocol in both primary and revision surgery.

METHODS

An observational cohort study from the Centre for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement and the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register. We included elective aseptic major component revision knee arthroplasties consecutively from 6 dedicated fast-track centers from 2010 to 2018.

RESULTS

1439 revision knee arthroplasties were analyzed, including 900 total revisions, 171 large partial revisions (revision of either femoral or tibia component) and 368 revisions of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mean age was 65 years (SD 10.9) and 66% were females. Mean LOS was 3.7 days (SD 3.9) in the study period, but decreased to 2.4 days (SD 1.3) in 2018. Risk factors for LOS > 5 days was ≥ 1 previous revision, use of walking aid, BMI > 35, ages < 50, 70-79 and ≥ 80 years, whereas revision of UKA to TKA and large partial revision were negatively associated. The 90-day readmission and mortality risk was 9.1% and 0.5%. Cardiac disease and use of walking aid were associated with increased risk of readmission ≤ 90 days.

CONCLUSION

Elective aseptic major component revision knee arthroplasty using similar fast-track protocols as in primary TKA is safe with short and decreasing LOS.

Anticoagulation Treatment in Venous Thromboembolism: Options and Optimal Duration

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), clinically presenting as deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), constitutes a major global healthcare concern with severe complications, long-term morbidity and mortality. Although several clinical, genetic and acquired risk factors for VTE have been identified, the molecular pathophysiology and mechanisms of disease progression remain poorly understood. Anticoagulation has been the cornerstone of therapy for decades, but there still are uncertainties regarding primary and secondary VTE prevention, as well as optimal therapy duration. In this review we discuss the role of factor Xa in coagulation cascade and the different choices of anticoagulation therapy based on patients' predisposing risk factors and risk of event recurrence. Further, we compare newer agents to traditional anticoagulation treatment, based on most recent studies and guidelines.