1
|
González-Flores O, Garcia-Juárez M, Tecamachaltzi-Silvarán MB, Lucio RA, Ordoñez RD, Pfaus JG. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of ovarian steroid hormones. I: Regulation of central nervous system function. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2024; 167:105937. [PMID: 39510217 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2024] [Revised: 10/25/2024] [Accepted: 10/31/2024] [Indexed: 11/15/2024]
Abstract
The conventional way steroid hormones work through receptors inside cells is widely acknowledged. There are unanswered questions about what happens to the hormone in the end and why there isn't always a strong connection between how much tissue takes up and its biological effects through receptor binding. Steroid hormones can also have non-traditional effects that happen quickly but don't involve entering the cell. Several possible mechanisms for these non-traditional actions include (a) changes in membrane fluidity, (b) steroid hormones acting on receptors on the outer surface of cells, (c) steroid hormones regulating GABAA receptors on cell membranes, and (d) activation of steroid receptors by factors like EGF, IGF-1, and dopamine. Data also suggests that steroid hormones may be inserted into DNA through receptors, acting as transcription factors. These proposed new mechanisms of action should not be seen as challenging the conventional mechanism. Instead, they contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of how hormones work, allowing for rapid, short-term, and prolonged effects to meet the body's physiological needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar González-Flores
- Centro de Investigación en Reproducción Animal, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala-CINVESTAV, Tlaxcala, Mexico.
| | - Marcos Garcia-Juárez
- Centro de Investigación en Reproducción Animal, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala-CINVESTAV, Tlaxcala, Mexico
| | | | - Rosa Angélica Lucio
- Centro Tlaxcala de Biología de la Conducta, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Tlaxcala, Mexico
| | - Raymundo Domínguez Ordoñez
- Centro de Investigación en Reproducción Animal, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala-CINVESTAV, Tlaxcala, Mexico; Licenciatura en Ingeniería Agronómica y Zootecnia, Complejo Regional Centro, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
| | - James G Pfaus
- Center for Sexual Health and Intervention, Czech National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic; Department of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Green AG, Abdulai AR, Duncan E, Glaros A, Campbell M, Newell R, Quarshie P, KC KB, Newman L, Nost E, Fraser EDG. A scoping review of the digital agricultural revolution and ecosystem services: implications for Canadian policy and research agendas. Facets (Ott) 2021. [DOI: 10.1139/facets-2021-0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The application of technologies such as artificial intelligence, robotics, blockchain, cellular agriculture, and big data analytics to food systems has been described as a digital agricultural revolution with the potential to increase food security and reduce agriculture’s environmental footprint. Yet, the scientific evidence informing how these technologies may impact or enhance ecosystem services has not been comprehensively reviewed. In this scoping review, we examine how digital agricultural technologies may enhance agriculture’s support of ecosystem services. Keyword searches in academic databases resulted in 2337 records, of which 74 records met review criteria and were coded. We identify three clusters of digital agricultural technologies including those that make farm management more precise, increase connectivity, and create novel foods. We then examine modelling and empirical evidence gaps in research linking these technologies to ecosystem services. Finally, we overview barriers to implementing digital agricultural technologies for better ecosystem services management in the Canadian context including economic and political systems; lack of policies on data management, governance, and cybersecurity; and limited training and human resources that prevents producers from fully utilizing these technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur G. Green
- Department of Geography, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, Okanagan College, 1000 K.L.O Rd., Kelowna, BC V1Y 4X8, Canada
| | - Abdul-Rahim Abdulai
- Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Emily Duncan
- Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Alesandros Glaros
- Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Malcolm Campbell
- Office of the Vice-President, University of Guelph, University Centre Room 416, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Rob Newell
- Food and Agriculture Institute, University of the Fraser Valley, 33844 King Road, Abbotsford, BC V2S 7M8, Canada
| | - Philip Quarshie
- Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Krishna Bahadur KC
- Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Lenore Newman
- Food and Agriculture Institute, University of the Fraser Valley, 33844 King Road, Abbotsford, BC V2S 7M8, Canada
| | - Eric Nost
- Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Evan D. G. Fraser
- Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pork Production with Entire Males: Directions for Control of Boar Taint. Animals (Basel) 2020; 10:ani10091665. [PMID: 32947846 PMCID: PMC7552340 DOI: 10.3390/ani10091665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Castration of male piglets has traditionally been carried out to control boar taint, but animal welfare concerns about surgical castration has brought this practice under scrutiny. In addition, castration decreases growth performance and increases the environmental impact of pork production, so alternatives to castration are needed to control boar taint. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on boar taint metabolism and outline some key areas that require further study. We also describe some opportunities for controlling the boar taint problem and propose that by defining the differences in metabolic processes and the genetic variations that can lead to boar taint in individual pigs, we can design effective custom solutions for boar taint. Abstract Boar taint is caused by the accumulation of androstenone and skatole and other indoles in the fat; this is regulated by the balance between synthesis and degradation of these compounds and can be affected by a number of factors, including environment and management practices, sexual maturity, nutrition, and genetics. Boar taint can be controlled by immunocastration, but this practice has not been accepted in some countries. Genetics offers a long-term solution to the boar taint problem via selective breeding or genome editing. A number of short-term strategies to control boar taint have been proposed, but these can have inconsistent effects and there is too much variability between breeds and individuals to implement a blanket solution for boar taint. Therefore, we propose a precision livestock management approach to developing solutions for controlling taint. This involves determining the differences in metabolic processes and the genetic variations that cause boar taint in specific groups of pigs and using this information to design custom treatments based on the cause of boar taint. Genetic, proteomic or metabolomic profiling can then be used to identify and implement effective solutions for boar taint for specific populations of animals.
Collapse
|
4
|
Leem JW, Kim MS, Choi SH, Kim SR, Kim SW, Song YM, Young RJ, Kim YL. Edible unclonable functions. Nat Commun 2020; 11:328. [PMID: 31949156 PMCID: PMC6965141 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-14066-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Counterfeit medicines are a fundamental security problem. Counterfeiting medication poses a tremendous threat to patient safety, public health, and the economy in developed and less developed countries. Current solutions are often vulnerable due to the limited security levels. We propose that the highest protection against counterfeit medicines would be a combination of a physically unclonable function (PUF) with on-dose authentication. A PUF can provide a digital fingerprint with multiple pairs of input challenges and output responses. On-dose authentication can verify every individual pill without removing the identification tag. Here, we report on-dose PUFs that can be directly attached onto the surface of medicines, be swallowed, and digested. Fluorescent proteins and silk proteins serve as edible photonic biomaterials and the photoluminescent properties provide parametric support of challenge-response pairs. Such edible cryptographic primitives can play an important role in pharmaceutical anti-counterfeiting and other security applications requiring immediate destruction or vanishing features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Woo Leem
- Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907, USA
| | - Min Seok Kim
- School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science Technology, Gwangju, 61005, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Ho Choi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yonsei University, Wonju, 26493, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong-Ryul Kim
- Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Wanju, 55365, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong-Wan Kim
- Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Wanju, 55365, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Min Song
- School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science Technology, Gwangju, 61005, Republic of Korea
| | - Robert J Young
- Department of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YB, UK
| | - Young L Kim
- Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907, USA.
- Purdue University Center for Cancer Research, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907, USA.
- Regenstrief Center for Healthcare Engineering, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907, USA.
- Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Egolf A, Hartmann C, Siegrist M. When Evolution Works Against the Future: Disgust's Contributions to the Acceptance of New Food Technologies. RISK ANALYSIS : AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE SOCIETY FOR RISK ANALYSIS 2019; 39:1546-1559. [PMID: 30759314 PMCID: PMC6850642 DOI: 10.1111/risa.13279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
New food technologies have a high potential to transform the current resource-consuming food system to a more efficient and sustainable one, but public acceptance of new food technologies is rather low. Such an avoidance might be maintained by a deeply preserved risk avoidance system called disgust. In an online survey, participants (N = 313) received information about a variety of new food technology applications (i.e., genetically modified meat/fish, edible nanotechnology coating film, nanotechnology food box, artificial meat/milk, and a synthetic food additive). Every new food technology application was rated according to the respondent's willingness to eat (WTE) it (i.e., acceptance), risk, benefit, and disgust perceptions. Furthermore, food disgust sensitivity was measured using the Food Disgust Scale. Overall, the WTE both gene-technology applications and meat coated with an edible nanotechnology film were low and disgust responses toward all three applications were high. In full mediation models, food disgust sensitivity predicted the disgust response toward each new food technology application, which in turn influenced WTE them. Effects of disgust responses on the WTE a synthetic food additive were highest for and lowest for the edible nanotechnology coating film compared to the other technologies. Results indicate that direct disgust responses influence acceptance and risk and benefit perceptions of new food technologies. Beyond the discussion of this study, implications for future research and strategies to increase acceptance of new food technologies are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisha Egolf
- Institute for Environmental DecisionsConsumer BehaviourETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Christina Hartmann
- Institute for Environmental DecisionsConsumer BehaviourETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Michael Siegrist
- Institute for Environmental DecisionsConsumer BehaviourETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Debode F, Janssen E, Marien A, Devlin RH, Lieske K, Mankertz J, Berben G. Detection of Transgenic Atlantic and Coho Salmon by Real-time PCR. FOOD ANAL METHOD 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s12161-018-1214-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
8
|
Fleming A, Abdalla EA, Maltecca C, Baes CF. Invited review: Reproductive and genomic technologies to optimize breeding strategies for genetic progress in dairy cattle. Arch Anim Breed 2018. [DOI: 10.5194/aab-61-43-2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract. Dairy cattle breeders have exploited technological advances that have emerged in the past in regards to reproduction and genomics. The implementation of such technologies in routine breeding programs has permitted genetic gains in traditional milk production traits as well as, more recently, in low-heritability traits like health and fertility. As demand for dairy products increases, it is important for dairy breeders to optimize the use of available technologies and to consider the many emerging technologies that are currently being investigated in various fields. Here we review a number of technologies that have helped shape dairy breeding programs in the past and present, along with those potentially forthcoming. These tools have materialized in the areas of reproduction, genotyping and sequencing, genetic modification, and epigenetics. Although many of these technologies bring encouraging opportunities for genetic improvement of dairy cattle populations, their applications and benefits need to be weighed with their impacts on economics, genetic diversity, and society.
Collapse
|
9
|
Implementing Traceability Systems in Specific Supply Chain Management (SCM) through Critical Success Factors (CSFs). SUSTAINABILITY 2018. [DOI: 10.3390/su10010204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
10
|
Castro C, Amorim M, Moreira F, Pereira F. A method to assemble DNA fragments mimicking junctions of transgenic elements: Application to the AquAdvantage salmon. Food Control 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.06.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
11
|
Eriksson S, Jonas E, Rydhmer L, Röcklinsberg H. Invited review: Breeding and ethical perspectives on genetically modified and genome edited cattle. J Dairy Sci 2017; 101:1-17. [PMID: 29102147 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-12962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Accepted: 08/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The hot topic of genetic modification and genome editing is sometimes presented as a rapid solution to various problems in the field of animal breeding and genetics. These technologies hold potential for future use in agriculture but we need to be aware of difficulties in large-scale application and integration in breeding schemes. In this review, we discuss applications of both classical genetic modifications (GM) using vectors and genome editing in dairy cattle breeding. We use an interdisciplinary approach considering both ethical and animal breeding perspectives. Decisions on how to make use of these techniques need to be made based not only on what is possible, but on what is reasonable to do. Principles of animal integrity, naturalness, risk perception, and animal welfare issues are examples of ethically relevant factors to consider. These factors also influence public perception and decisions about regulations by authorities. We need to acknowledge that we lack complete understanding of the genetic background of complex traits. It may be difficult, therefore, to predict the full effect of certain modifications in large-scale breeding programs. We present 2 potential applications: genome editing to dispense with dehorning, and insertion of human genes in bovine genomes to improve udder health as an example of classical GM. Both of these cases could be seen as beneficial for animal welfare but they differ in other aspects. In the former case, a genetic variant already present within the species is introduced, whereas in the latter case, transgenic animals are generated-this difference may influence how society regards the applications. We underline that the use of GM, as well as genome editing, of farm animals such as cattle is not independent of the context, and should be considered as part of an entire process, including, for example, the assisted reproduction technology that needs to be used. We propose that breeding organizations and breeding companies should take an active role in ethical discussions about the use of these techniques and thereby signal to society that these questions are being responsibly addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Eriksson
- Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - E Jonas
- Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - L Rydhmer
- Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - H Röcklinsberg
- Department of Animal Environment and Health, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Van Eenennaam AL. Genetic modification of food animals. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2017; 44:27-34. [DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2016] [Accepted: 10/22/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|