Encountering premature ovulation during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles

Normal and Abnormal Appearances of the Ovaries during Assisted Reproduction: Multimodality Imaging Review

Infertility is a common diagnosis that prompts many couples and individuals to seek assisted reproductive technology (ART) for assistance with conception. These technologies have become increasingly used in the United States in the past several decades, with 326 468 ART cycles performed in 2020, resulting in 75 023 live births. This ubiquity of ART also increases the likelihood that radiologists will encounter both normal and abnormal imaging findings associated with these treatments. Thus, radiologists of all subspecialties should be familiar with the multimodality appearance of the ovaries and pelvis in patients undergoing ART treatments. Furthermore, it is imperative that radiologists understand the appearance expected during different stages of the ART process. During stimulated ovulatory cycles, it is normal and expected for the ovaries to appear enlarged and to contain numerous cystic follicles, often with a small to moderate volume of pelvic free fluid. After oocyte retrieval, hemorrhagic ovarian follicles and a small to moderate volume of blood products in the cul-de-sac can be expected to be seen. Multiple nonemergency and emergency complications are related to ART, many of which can be seen at imaging. The most encountered emergency complications of ART include ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, ectopic pregnancy, heterotopic pregnancy, multiple gestations, ovarian torsion, and procedural complications related to oocyte retrieval. These complications have important clinical implications, thus necessitating accurate and timely detection by the radiologist and the clinical team. ©RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Clinical pregnancy resulting from intracytoplasmic sperm injection of prematurely ovulated oocytes retrieved from the posterior cul-de-sac

Objective

To report a clinical pregnancy resulting from intracytoplasmic sperm injection of prematurely ovulated oocytes retrieved from the posterior cul-de-sac.

Design

Case report.

Setting

Academic center.

Patient(s)

A 40-year-old nulligravid woman underwent ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Daily injections of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist were initiated on cycle day 8. A 10,000 IU dose of human chorionic gonadotropin was administered on cycle day 15 to trigger follicular maturation. The estradiol and luteinizing hormone levels on the trigger day were 1528 pg/mL and 2.4 mIU/mL, respectively. The patient underwent oocyte retrieval 35 hours after the trigger. Transvaginal sonography at the time of the retrieval revealed a large pocket of free fluid in the posterior cul-de-sac. Only 3 follicles measuring 10–12 mm were noted in both ovaries. No lead follicles were visualized.

Intervention(s)

Aspiration of free fluid from the posterior cul-de-sac.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Clinical pregnancy.

Result(s)

The fluid in the posterior cul-de-sac was aspirated, and 3 mature oocytes were retrieved. Aspiration of the smaller ovarian follicles measuring 10–12 mm did not yield oocytes. All mature oocytes retrieved from the posterior cul-de-sac were fertilized with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Three cleavage-stage embryos were transferred 3 days later. A single intrauterine pregnancy with cardiac activity was confirmed at a gestational age of 7 weeks.

Conclusion(s)

In the setting of premature ovulation, aspiration of free fluid from the posterior cul-de-sac can result in the retrieval of mature oocytes, which may result in clinical pregnancies.

Successful outcome of a pregnancy derived from premature ovulation in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol: A case report

In the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol, it is necessary to reinforce contraceptive guidance assuming that luteinizing hormone surge is not detected by measurement of serum level and ovulation is not suppressed by GnRH antagonist.

GnRH antagonist does not prevent premature luteinization and ovulation in stimulated cycles with gonadotropins for IVF: two case reports

The use of GnRH antagonists (GnRHant) is increasing in the ovarian stimulation protocol. Among several other benefits, GnRHant should prevent a premature luteinization and premature ovulation, the first described either as a 'reassuringly rare event' or 'frequent event', while the second as occurring more frequently in women with decreased ovarian reserve, advanced age and poor ovarian response. Two cases of associated premature luteinization and premature ovulation, during treatment with gonadotropins and GnRHant in IVF cycles, are here reported. In both cases, premature luteinization occurred and ovulation took place during ovarian stimulation protocols with exogenous gonadotropins and GnRHant, before reaching the criteria of hCG administration, regardless of the age of the patients and their ovarian reserve. Ovulation was documented by the disappearance of most of the developing follicles, by the transformation of endometrium from a triple line picture into a uniform hyper-echogenic image, by the presence of fluid in the pouch of Douglas, by the increase of progesterone plasma levels and the simultaneous reduction of estradiol plasma levels. This evidence can be important for a correct counseling with infertile patients in preparation for an IVF cycle.