Pregnancy outcome in women with type I adenomyosis undergoing adenomyomectomy

Possible risks and benefits of adenomyomectomy on pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Adenomyosis is associated with unfavorable perinatal outcomes; however, the effect of an adenomyomectomy on pregnancy outcomes remains unclear. Pregnancy following an adenomyomectomy has been reported to be associated with a high risk for uterine rupture; however, the actual incidence remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adenomyomectomy on pregnancy outcomes by retrospectively comparing the pregnancy outcomes of women who underwent an adenomyomectomy with those of women with adenomyosis.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-center retrospective study in which the pregnancy outcomes of women who underwent an adenomyomectomy and for whom complete resection of the affected tissue under laparotomy was achieved were compared with those of women with adenomyosis. The following pregnancy outcomes were examined: second-trimester miscarriage, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, preterm delivery, spontaneous preterm delivery, preeclampsia, rate of cesarean delivery, blood loss during cesarean delivery, incidence of placenta accreta spectrum, neonatal body weight, and small for gestational age infants.

RESULTS

A total of 18 pregnant women who underwent an adenomyomectomy and 105 pregnant women with adenomyosis were included in this study. All women who underwent an adenomyomectomy delivered via cesarean delivery, and among them, 1 had a uterine rupture at 30 weeks of gestation. Although there was no significant difference between pregnant women who underwent an adenomyomectomy and those with adenomyosis in the incidence of second-trimester miscarriage (0% [0/18] vs 7.6% [8/105], respectively; P=.22), preterm delivery (50% [9/18] vs 32% [34/105], respectively; P=.15), and spontaneous preterm delivery (6% [1/18] vs 15% [16/105], respectively; P=.26), a significant decrease in preterm prelabor rupture of membrane (0% [0/18] vs 12% [13/105], respectively; P<.05), preeclampsia (0% [0/18] vs 12% [13/105], respectively; P<.05), and small for gestational infants (0% [0/18] vs 15% [16/105], respectively; P<.05), as well as a significant increase in the incidence of placenta accreta spectrum (50% [9/18] vs 0% [0/105], respectively; P<.01) and blood loss during cesarean delivery (1748 mL vs 1330 mL, respectively; P<.05) were observed.

CONCLUSION

Uterine rupture following an adenomyomectomy may occur because of the high incidence of placenta accreta spectrum. However, an adenomyomectomy may reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with adenomyosis, such as preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, preeclampsia, and small for gestational age infants. An adenomyomectomy may be a viable option for women among whom the procedure is inevitable before conception.

Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Adenomyomectomy on Perinatal Outcomes

Objectives

The objective of this study was to observe the influence of laparoscopic adenomyomectomy on perinatal outcomes.

Materials and Methods

The retrospective cohort study included 43 pregnant cases with adenomyosis who did not undergo laparoscopic surgery before pregnancy (nonsurgery group; 26 cases) and did (surgery group; 17 cases). To evaluate the impact of surgery on perinatal outcomes, nine obstetric complications including preterm delivery, hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, placental malposition, oligohydramnios, gestational diabetes mellitus, uterine rupture, abruptio placentae, and postpartum hemorrhage were selected. One obstetric complication was counted as one point (Maximum 9 points for one person). The obstetrical morbidity was compared by adding up the number of relevant events (0-9) between the two groups. Apgar score, umbilical artery pH (UApH), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal death were also examined.

Results

The surgery group had a significantly lower prevalence of fetal growth restriction compared to the nonsurgery group (nonsurgery vs. surgery; 26.9%, 7/26 vs. 0%, 0/17: P = 0.031). No differences were found in the morbidity of the nine obstetric complications (19.2%, 45/234 vs. 13.7%, 21/153), gestational weeks (mean ± standard deviation, 37.2 ± 2.4 vs. 36.4 ± 3.2), birth weight (2573.6 ± 557.9 vs. 2555.4 ± 680.8 g), Apgar score (1, 5 min; 8.0 ± 0.7 vs. 7.7 ± 1.2, 8.9 ± 0.6 vs. 8.5 ± 1.8), UApH (7.28 ± 0.08 vs. 7.28 ± 0.06), NICU admission (26.9%, 7/26 vs. 41.2%, 7/17), and neonatal death (0%, 0%) between both groups.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy may not increase obstetric complications, although attention must be paid to uterine rupture during pregnancy.

Clinical efficacy of a novel method of fertility-preserving adenomyomectomy in infertile women with diffuse adenomyosis

Beneficial and detrimental effect of surgical adenomyomectomy is still controversial in infertile women with severely diffuse adenomyosis. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether a novel method of fertility-preserving adenomyomectomy could improve pregnancy rates. The secondary objective was to evaluate whether it could improve dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia symptoms in infertile patients with severe adenomyosis. A prospective clinical trial was conducted between December 2007 and September 2016. Fifty women with infertility due to adenomyosis were enrolled in this study after clinical assessments by infertility experts. A novel method of fertility-preserving adenomyomectomy was performed on 45 of 50 patients. The procedure included T- or transverse H-incision of the uterine serosa followed by preparation of the serosal flap, excision of the adenomyotic tissue using argon laser under ultrasonographic monitoring, and a novel technique of suturing between the residual myometrium and serosal flap. After the adenomyomectomy, the changes in the amount of menstrual blood, relief of dysmenorrhea, pregnancy outcomes, clinical characteristics, and surgical features were recorded and analyzed. All patients obtained dysmenorrhea relief 6 months postoperatively (numeric rating scale [NRS]; 7.28 ± 2.30 vs 1.56 ± 1.30, P < .001). The amount of menstrual blood decreased significantly (140.44 ± 91.68 vs 66.33 ± 65.85 mL, P < .05). Of the 33 patients who attempted pregnancy postoperatively, 18 (54.5%) conceived either by natural means, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET), or thawing embryo transfer. Miscarriage occurred in 8 patients, while 10 (30.3%) had viable pregnancies. This novel method of adenomyomectomy resulted in improved pregnancy rates, as well as relief of dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia. This operation is effective in preserving fertility potential in infertile women with diffuse adenomyosis.