Spontaneous abdominal wall endometriosis: A Case Report and review of the literature

Caesarean scar endometriosis: how to make an accurate diagnosis

Caesarean scar endometriosis is a rare condition characterised by the presence of endometrial tissue within a surgical scar following a caesarean section. A woman in her late 30s presented with a painful lump beneath her caesarean section skin scar, worsening during menstruation. Despite a previous incision and drainage procedure for a 'scar abscess', the symptoms persisted. Ultrasound imaging revealed a cystic lesion beneath the scar. A diagnosis of scar endometriosis was made, and surgical excision was performed. The patient remained symptom-free at 2-year follow-up postsurgery. Histopathology confirmed the presence of endometrial glands and stroma within the scar tissue. This case demonstrates that a reliable diagnosis of caesarean section endometriosis could be made with a triad of symptoms of a cyclic painful mass at the site of a caesarean section scar. Imaging is helpful in excluding other differential diagnoses. Diagnosis can be confirmed with histopathology and treated with complete surgical excision.

Long-term outcomes after percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate the long-term outcomes after percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE).

METHOD

The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective observational review of 40 consecutive patients, of a median age of 37 years (interquartile range [IQR] 32-40 years), presenting with a total of 52 symptomatic AWE nodules. All patients underwent cryoablation between January 2013 and May 2022 with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Outcomes were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) that measured pain, as well as by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The pain-free survival rates were derived using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Adverse events were analyzed and graded using the classification system of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 40.5 months (IQR 26.5-47.2 months). The median VAS score before cryoablation was 8 (IQR 7-9). Complete relief of symptoms was documented in 80% (32/40) of patients at 3 months after initial cryoablation and correlated with the absence of residual endometriosis nodules on MRI. The median pain-free survival rates were 89.2% [95% CI, 70.1-96.4%] at 36 months and 76.8% [95% CI, 55.3-83.8%] after 60 months. No patient or lesion characteristics were found to be prognostic of failure. No major adverse events or side effects were reported in long term.

CONCLUSION

Cryoablation safely and effectively afforded long-term pain relief for patients with AWE nodules.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

AWE cryoablation was found to be safe and effective in the long-term.

KEY POINTS

• Cryoablation is highly effective with 80% of patients experiencing complete relief of AWE symptoms after a single procedure. • Cryoablation is safe without long-term adverse events or side effects. • The median pain-free survival rates are 89.2% at 36 months and 76.8% at 60 months.

Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: Early Diagnosis of a Rare Iatrogenic Complication Following Cesarean Section

Abdominal wall endometriosis is a rare form of extrapelvic endometriosis, frequently diagnosed with delay in most cases. It is typically iatrogenic and primarily associated with procedures such as cesarean sections or other gynecological surgeries. In our patient, endometriosis at the laparotomy scar was diagnosed relatively early, approximately two months after the onset of symptoms, which manifested 10 months after the last cesarean section. The patient, who had an obstetric history of three cesarean sections, presented at the Gynecology outpatient clinic of the General Hospital of Trikala, complaining of pain associated with menstruation located in the lower abdomen, near the surgical scar. Based on clinical and imaging findings, abdominal wall endometriosis was suspected, leading to a decision for wide excision of the endometriotic lesion. Histological examination of the surgical specimen confirmed the diagnosis. The postoperative course was uneventful, and three months after the surgery, the patient reported complete resolution of symptoms. This case report emphasizes the importance of integrating advanced diagnostic methods alongside classic clinical findings for the accurate diagnosis of abdominal wall endometriosis. It also highlights the contribution of surgical treatment through wide excision of the endometriotic lesion, in facilitating early diagnosis, achieving cure, and minimizing the risk of disease recurrence in the future.