Fibrinogen Replacement in Haemostatic Resuscitation: Dose, Laboratory Targets and Product Choice

Are all fibrinogen concentrates the same? The effects of two fibrinogen therapies in an afibrinogenemic patient and in a fibrinogen deficient plasma model. A clinical and laboratory case report

The choice of treatments for inherited, or acquired, fibrinogen deficient states is expanding and there are now several fibrinogen concentrate therapies commercially available. Patients with the rare inherited bleeding disorder, afibrinogenemia, commonly require life-long replacement therapy with fibrinogen concentrate to prevent hemorrhagic complications. Recent reports in the setting of acquired bleeding, namely trauma hemorrhage, have highlighted the potential importance of the different compositions of fibrinogen supplements, including cryoprecipitate and the various plasma- derived concentrates. Clot strength and the subsequent susceptibility of a clot to lysis is highly dependent on the amount of fibrinogen as well as its structural composition, the concentration of pro- and anti-coagulant factors, as well as fibrinolytic regulators, such as factor XIII (FXIII). This report details the effects of two commercially available fibrinogen concentrates (Riastap®, CSL Behring and Fibryga®, Octapharma) on important functional measures of clot formation and lysis in a patient with afibrinogenemia. Our report offers insights into the differential effects of these concentrates, at the clot level, according to the variable constituents of each product, thereby emphasizing that the choice of fibrinogen concentrate can influence the stability of a clot in vivo. Whether this alters clinical efficacy is yet to be understood.

The CRYOSTAT2 trial: The rationale and study protocol for a multi-Centre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effects of early high-dose cryoprecipitate in adult patients with major trauma haemorrhage requiring major haemorrhage protocol activation

OBJECTIVES

To describe the protocol for a multinational randomised, parallel, superiority trial, in which patients were randomised to receive early high-dose cryoprecipitate in addition to standard major haemorrhage protocol (MHP), or Standard MHP alone.

BACKGROUND

Blood transfusion support for trauma-related major bleeding includes red cells, plasma and platelets. The role of concentrated sources of fibrinogen is less clear and has not been evaluated in large clinical trials. Fibrinogen is a key pro-coagulant factor that is essential for stable clot formation. A pilot trial had demonstrated that it was feasible to deliver cryoprecipitate as a source of fibrinogen within 90 min of admission.

METHODS

Randomisation was via opaque sealed envelopes held securely in participating Emergency Departments or transfusion laboratories. Early cryoprecipitate, provided as 3 pools (equivalent to 15 single units of cryoprecipitate or 6 g fibrinogen supplementation), was transfused as rapidly as possible, and started within 90 min of admission. Participants in both arms received standard treatment defined in the receiving hospital MHP. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality at 28 days. Symptomatic thrombotic events including venous thromboembolism and arterial thrombotic events (myocardial infarction, stroke) were collected from randomisation up to day 28 or discharge from hospital. EQ5D-5Land Glasgow Outcome Score were completed at discharge and 6 months. All analyses will be performed on an intention to treat basis, with per protocol sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

The trial opened for recruitment in June 2017 and the final patient completed follow-up in May 2022.

DISCUSSION

This trial will provide firmer evidence to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of early high-dose cryoprecipitate alongside the standard MHP in major traumatic haemorrhage.

In Vivo Effects of Balanced Crystalloid or Gelatine Infusions on Functional Parameters of Coagulation and Fibrinolysis: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study

Prudent administration of fluids helps restore or maintain hemodynamic stability in the setting of perioperative blood loss. However, fluids may arguably exacerbate the existing coagulopathy. We sought to investigate the influence of balanced crystalloid and synthetic gelatine infusions on coagulation and fibrinolysis in healthy volunteers. This prospective randomized crossover study included 25 males aged 18–30 years. Infusions performed included 20 mL/kg of a balanced crystalloid solution (Optilyte^®) or 20 mL/kg of gelatine 26.500 Da (Geloplasma^®) in a random order over a period of 2 weeks. Laboratory analysis included conventional coagulation parameters and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) assays. We confirmed a decrease in fibrinogen concentration and the number of platelets, and prolongation of PT after infusions. Compared to baseline values, differences in the ROTEM assays’ results after infusions signified the decrease in coagulation factors and fibrinogen concentration, causing impaired fibrin polymerization and clot structure. The ROTEM indicator of clot lysis remained unaffected. In the case of both Optilyte^® and Geloplasma^®, the results suggested relevant dilution. Gelatine disrupted the process of clot formation more than balanced crystalloid. Infusions of both crystalloid and saline-free colloid solutions causing up to 30% blood dilution cause significant dilution of the coagulation factors, platelets, and fibrinogen. However, balanced crystalloid infusion provides less infusion-induced coagulopathy compared to gelatine.