Challenges in the management of anticoagulated patients with focal spasticity

Peri-procedural management and incidence of bleeding events following musculoskeletal injections or aspirations in people on oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid injections and aspirations are common interventions for managing musculoskeletal and inflammatory conditions. However, there remains limited safety evidence to support injection decisions and peri-procedural management in people on anti-thrombotics, particularly for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate peri-procedural management and bleeding complications following musculoskeletal injections or aspirations with anti-thrombotic medication use.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study was undertaken (October 2018-December 2020) in Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Radiology specialities in two large UK healthcare providers. Data collection involved weekly identification of musculoskeletal procedures, emergency attendance or admission within 30 days and follow-up questionnaires sent within 2 weeks post-procedure. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse anticoagulant/anti-platelet use, peri-procedural management and bleeding complications.

RESULTS

Of 5080 procedures, 237 of 1338 responses reported antithrombotic use: warfarin (n = 36), DOACs (n = 75) and antiplatelets (n = 126). There were no self-report or electronic identification of clinically significant bleeding events/complications. Only local bruising was reported (8.6% vs. 0.2% with non-use), and only with medication continuation or international normalised ratio (INR) levels ≥3.8 or unknown. Only 3/72 DOAC use was interrupted.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, no clinically significant bleeding events or complications were reported or identified following musculoskeletal injections or aspirations, with only localised bruising reported. It was not universal practice to check INR levels and DOAC interruption was uncommon. Findings add evidence that musculoskeletal procedures appear to be low risk procedures for bleeding complications with antithrombotic continuation and when INR levels within lower target range. Research on intra-articular or soft tissue iatrogenic consequences would add to risk/benefit evaluations.

Botulinum Toxin Injection and Electromyography in Patients Receiving Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To identify the different practice patterns of botulinum toxin injection (BTX) and electromyography (EMG) in patients receiving anticoagulation and to evaluate the incidence, reporting, and management of bleeding complications and compartment syndrome from BTX and EMG.

LITERATURE SURVEY

Systematic review of relevant clinical studies in PubMed/Medline and Embase databases using key terms from inception to 31 May 2020. All publications in the English language were included without demographic limits.

METHODOLOGY

A comprehensive search was performed to identify all studies addressing BTX and EMG in patients receiving anticoagulants. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted data based on a set of predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. All studies that met the inclusion criteria were assigned their respective levels of evidence using the Joanne Briggs Institute (JBI) Level of Evidence for Effectiveness.

SYNTHESIS

Eighteen studies were included in this review of which there were nine studies each on BTX and EMG. The results indicated heterogeneity in the practice patterns of BTX and EMG in patients taking anticoagulants. These included the decision for continuation of anticoagulant, international normalized ratio (INR) results acceptable to practitioners, the modality for procedure guidance, and surveillance of bleeding complications. In addition, there were variations in the description of targeted muscles and description of needle sizes. The overall incidence of bleeding complications and compartment syndrome rates were low.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the varied practice in anticoagulated patients undergoing BTX or EMG, practitioners should allow periprocedural continuation of anticoagulants, targeting an INR of 2 to 3 while using the smallest needle (25 gauge or smaller) of appropriate length. Some of the evidence on procedural guidance and complication surveillance were weak and more research in these areas is required.