[Post-transfusion malaria: is the risk irreconciliable with biological silence?]

Transfusional Malaria and Associated Factors at the National Blood Transfusion Center of Niamey-Niger

SUMMARY

Problem. Transfusional malaria is an accidental transmission of Plasmodium via a blood transfusion. Its magnitude is underestimated and very little data on the assessment of this risk are available in Niger.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of plasmodial infection of blood bags at the National Blood Transfusion Center of Niamey (NBTC).

METHODOLOGY

A cross-sectional study to diagnose Plasmodium infection by microscopy and Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) was carried out during the rainy season (September to November 2015). Blood grouping was performed by the BETH-VINCENT technique.

RESULTS

One thousand three hundred and fifty-seven (1357) blood bags were collected. One hundred and fifty-seven (11.6%) of the donors were infected with Plasmodium by microscopy and 2.4% (9/369) by rapid diagnostic test. All infections were with P. falciparum (100%). The mean parasite density was 197 parasites/μL (SD=281; [80: 2000]). There were no significant differences in infection prevalence between the ABO blood groups (p = 0.3) or the rhesus positivity (p=08). There is also no significant difference in temporal (p = 0.1) and spatial (p = 0.6) distribution.

CONCLUSION

The transmission of transfusional malaria during the rainy season is a fact in Niger. Such risks were independent of the ABO blood type and positivity for the rhesus antigen. Pretransfusion diagnosis or posttransfusion therapy should be instituted to prevent it.

Sensitivity of nested-PCR for plasmodium detection in pooled whole blood samples and its usefulness to blood donor screening in endemic areas

Transfusion-transmitted malaria is a severe disease with high fatality rate. Most Brazilian blood banks in the Amazon region perform malaria screening using microscopic examination (thick smears). Since low parasite concentrations are expected in asymptomatic blood donors a high sensitivity test should be used for donor screening. This study determined the sensitivity of a nested-PCR for plasmodium detection in pooled samples. We performed a one-stage criterion validation study with 21 positive samples pooled with samples from ten negative volunteer until three different concentrations were reached (0.33; 0.25; 0.20 parasites/μL - p/μL). Nested PCR was performed as described by Snounou et al. (1993). Sensitivities (and confidence intervals) were determined by stratum of final parasite concentration on the pooled samples. All samples with parasitemia values of 0.33 and 0.25 p/μL had 100% sensitivity (95%CI=86.3-100). One negative result was obtained from a sample with 0.20 p/μL sensitivity=95.2% (95%CI=76.2-99.9). Compared to parasitemia detectable under ideal conditions of thick smear, this nested-PCR in pooled sample was able to detect 40 times more parasites per microliter. Nested-PCR in pooled samples should be considered as a high sensitive alternative to thick smear for donor screening in blood banks at endemic regions. Local authorities need to assess cost:benefit advantages of this method compared to alternatives.

Multicentric evaluation of the DiaMed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay malaria antibody test for screening of blood donors for malaria

BACKGROUND

The risk of malaria transmission by blood transfusion is critical due to extensive travel from endemic areas to non-endemic areas. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) malaria antibody test has been developed that is claimed to perform better than the immunofluorescence assay test (IFAT). The assay contains antigens to both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. A multicentre study was performed to evaluate the appropriateness of replacing the IFAT by the new ELISA test.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Nine French blood banks participated in this multicentre study. Two panels of samples were evaluated. The first included 4163 samples from healthy donors and was used to calculate clinical specificity of the assay. The second involved 10,995 samples, either collected retrospectively or prospectively from malaria-risk donors , was used to assess the comparative performance of the ELISA and IFAT. Discordant samples were further tested using an in-house IFAT and also tested for presence of Plasmodium DNA by polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

The ELISA showed a clinical specificity of 99.02%. In the malaria-risk blood donors groups, the retrospective group showed a concordance rate of 92.6% (k = 0.90), while the prospective group showed a concordance rate of 97% (k = 0.46). After confirming the discordant sample results by an in-house IFAT, the k index increased to 0.81. None of the discordant samples was shown to contain Plasmodium DNA.

CONCLUSION

The performance of the ELISA test in this study has confirmed its potential as a new screening test for use in blood banks, as an alternative to the IFAT in prevention of transfusion-transmitted malaria in non-endemic countries.

A new ELISA kit which uses a combination of Plasmodium falciparum extract and recombinant Plasmodium vivax antigens as an alternative to IFAT for detection of malaria antibodies

Background

The methods most commonly used to measure malarial antibody titres are the Indirect Fluorescence Antibody Test (IFAT), regarded as the gold standard, and the Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA). The objective here was to assess the diagnostic performance, i.e. the sensitivity and specificity, of a new malaria antibody ELISA kit in comparison to IFAT. This new ELISA kit, the ELISA malaria antibody test (DiaMed), uses a combination of crude soluble Plasmodium falciparum extract and recombinant Plasmodium vivax antigens.

Methods

Two groups were used: 95 samples from malaria patients to assess the clinical sensitivity and 2,152 samples from blood donors, who had not been exposed to malaria, to assess the clinical specificity.

Results

The DiaMed ELISA test kit had a clinical sensitivity of 84.2% and a clinical specificity of 99.6% as compared with 70.5% and 99.6% respectively, using the IFAT method. The ELISA method was more sensitive than the IFAT method for P. vivax infections (75% vs. 25%). However, in 923 malaria risk donors the analytical sensitivity of the ELISA test was 40% and its specificity 98.3%, performances impaired by large numbers of equivocal results non-concordant between ELISA and IFAT. When the overall analytical performances of ELISA was compared to IFAT, the ELISA efficiency J index was 0.84 versus 0.71 for IFAT. Overall analytical sensitivity was 93.1% and the analytical specificity 96.7%. Overall agreement between the two methods reached 0.97 with a reliability k index of 0.64.

Conclusion

The DiaMed ELISA test kit shows a good correlation with IFAT for analytical and clinical parameters. It may be an interesting method to replace the IFAT especially in blood banks, but further extensive investigations are needed to examine the analytical performance of the assay, especially in a blood bank setting.

Mechanisms of transfusion-linked parasite infection

Besides bacteriae and viruses, parasite infections can be transmitted by blood as a consequence of blood transfusion. To be transmitted by blood transfusion, parasites must: -i) circulate in the blood stream of donors, -ii) comprise of certain physical characteristics and resist processing steps leading to the preparation of labile blood products (packed red blood cells, therapeutic frozen plasma, or platelet concentrates), -iii) survive conservation; further, to generate infection in the blood receiver, such parasites must retain infectivity. In this Forum, the main characteristics of parasites-with respect to transmissibility by blood exposure-are recalled. This forum will further discuss each of these topics and try to make an issue with possible risks in transfusion, in countries that are either non-endemic for the given parasite or which can afford implementation of preventive measures.

[Transfusion-transmitted malaria, preventive measures]

Malaria is a blood parasitic disease in the first place among the most prevalent communicable infectious diseases over the world, which leads to an increased risk of transfusion transmitted malaria. Preventive measures have been undertaken to screen blood donors such as discarding red cell donations according to the medical history, travel history and detection of malarial antibodies. However, these measures may be not sufficient and reliable to avoid the risk of transmission. Preliminary data indicates that combination of travel history, detection of malarial antibodies and antigens by commercialized kits adapted to blood transfusion centres either in endemic or non endemic areas may improve malaria transfusion risk management.

Le risque parasitaire transfusionnel : quels contrôles au regard de la directive européenne ?

Blood transfusion has become extremely safe regarding the transmission of infectious pathogens, some of them having been responsible for mostly severe complications and a certain loss of confidence from practitioners and patients over the last decades. This may result from the strict observance of ethical principles, of a better medical selection of donors, of technical steps for preparing and qualifying blood components for therapeutic use. The transfusion systems--which vary in their constitution and missions depending on the countries or even regions--have imposed themselves strict security rules and guidelines in industrialized countries. Further, governmental sanitary authorities have set up additional surveillance systems to make the transfusion systems the safest as possible. In addition, the Council of Europe has edicted directives to redefine guidelines to the preparation, use and quality assurance of blood products, that are mandatory in countries of the European Community. Regarding the infectious risks, most recommendations have focused more on the bacterial (immediate) and the viral (mostly delayed) risks than on the parasitic risks because these risks are not only less frequent in industrialized countries, but also far less well known and even much more complex. However, because travel habits and immigrations are increasing fast, most transfusion systems or blood banks must revisit their practices and controls towards hemoparasite transmission by blood transfusion. This review aims at discussing the present controls set up in most industrialized countries and particularly in Europe regarding the risk of post-transfusion transmission of hemoparasites, and the robustness of such controls as well as how these controls may be secured by the European Directive.