Changes in biochemical, hematological and immunological profiles after low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin administration in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia

[Treatments with immunoglobulin and thrombotic adverse events]

Treatments with intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (Ig) are used in a broad variety of disorders. Tolerance of Ig is usually good but adverse events, including some serious ones, have been reported and may differ among different Ig preparations. Thrombotic complications occur in 0.6 to 13% of cases and can involve arterial or venous circulation, rarely both. Deep venous thrombosis with or without pulmonary embolism, stroke or myocardial infarction remained the most frequent thrombotic complications. Some risk factors have been identified, mainly old age, multiple cardiovascular risk factors, and past history of thrombo-embolic manifestations. Several mechanisms are suggested to explain this increased risk of thrombotic complications. Indeed, Ig treatments increase the plasma viscosity, increase and activate platelets, can trigger the coagulation cascade through the presence of activated factor XI in some Ig preparations, and release vasoactive molecules responsible for vasospasm. Patients have to be carefully monitored and risk factors to be identified as soon as possible. The role of antiplatelets or anticoagulation is not well determined but should probably be proposed to patients with high risk.

In vivo modulation of the expressions of Fas and CD25 by intravenous immunoglobulin in common variable immunodeficiency

Although the presence of physiologic anti-CD95 (Fas, APO-1) autoantibodies in intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) preparations is known, the effects of these antibodies in patients with common variable immunodeficiency are unclear (CVID). The aim of the study was to assess the effects of IVIG in Fas expression, activation markers and the subsets of T cells in patients with CVID. We studied 15 cases with CVID and 10 healthy controls with no signs of immunodeficiency. The Fas expression of T cells, activation markers (CD25, CD69 and HLA-DR) and T-cell subsets were analyzed by four-color flow cytometry. We found that the Fas expression of CD3+ T cells in patients was significantly higher than in controls. In addition, there was a significant increase in the Fas expression of CD3+ T cells and CD4+ T cells, and the CD25 expression of CD3+ and CD4+ T cells after IVIG supplementation (P < 0.05). The CD69 and HLA-DR expressions of T cells and CD8+ T cells were not affected by IVIG infusion. Our observation showed that IVIG replacement causes an increase in the Fas and CD25 expressions in patients with CVID. These data suggest that the Fas protein may have an important role in the effects of IVIG for the control of autoimmunity in patients with CVID, as well as in the generation of autoimmune disease.

Analysis of thromboembolic risk related to high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin treatment: a preliminary clinical study of 10 patients with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases

BACKGROUND

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment is a well-known treatment that has been used successfully in a broad spectrum of autoimmune diseases. Currently no data are available in the literature about the role of IVIg in the pathogenesis of thromboembolic events in patients with autoimmune blistering diseases refractory to conventional immunosuppressive treatment.

AIM

To determine the relationship between IVIg and thromboembolism in patients with autoimmune blistering diseases and to establish a protocol to deal with the thromboembolic risk.

METHODS

In our preliminary clinical study, 10 patients with autoimmune blistering diseases underwent IVIg cycles to a total of 133 cycles in all (total number of infusions in the patient group: 399), at a standard dose of 2 g/kg/infusion accompanied by an accurate and a complete clinical and laboratory screening for thromboembolism. Preventive measures, such as hydration before and after IVIg, and administration of 100 mg of acetyl salicylic acid (aspirin) or 1000 IU of subcutaneous heparin calcium per day for 3 weeks, were introduced to reduce the thromboembolic risk.

RESULTS

Throughout the 2 years of IVIg treatment, no patient developed a superficial and/or deep venous or arterial thrombosis, even though some of the patients had underlying thromboembolic risk factors and had tested positive for some congenital and acquired thrombophilia markers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that thromboembolic events are uncommon, despite the presence of risk factors. However, as these disorders are very rare and the percentage of nonresponder patients is very low, further investigations are needed to better understand whether IVIg alone is able to trigger these fatal events in blistering disorders.

Variations in serum hemoglobin, albumin, and electrolytes in patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin therapy: a real clinical threat?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is a solution of globulins containing antibodies derived from pooled human plasma of donors and used in the treatment of a number of immune deficiencies and autoimmune diseases. However, several investigators have reported biochemical alterations with use of IVIg. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of IVIg therapy on selected biochemical and hematologic parameters in patients with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases (AMBDs).

METHODS

In this preliminary clinical study, ten patients with AMBDs (seven with pemphigus vulgaris and three with mucous membrane pemphigoid) received 133 cycles of IVIg for a total of 399 infusions. We evaluated the effects of IVIg therapy on serum hemoglobin (Hb), albumin, and electrolyte levels, including sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), chloride (Cl-) and calcium (Ca2+). Values of these parameters were measured 24 hours before, during, and 24 hours and 4 weeks after the 3-day infusion period.

RESULTS

The observed variations in serum electrolyte levels were physiologically and clinically negligible. Furthermore, 24 hours after the last infusion, mean electrolyte values had spontaneously returned to normal levels without the need for additional supplementation: Na+ 137.59+/-1.42 mmol/L (p=0.6091 vs baseline); K+ 3.97+/-0.5 mmol/L (p=0.2689); Cl- 103.4+/-2.69 mmol/L (p=0.0388); and Ca2+ 9.07+/-0.44 mg/dL (p=0.5332). Conversely, significant variations in mean Hb and albumin levels were observed. When measured 24 hours after the last infusion, mild/moderate decreases in Hb (11.62+/-2.12 g/dL; p=0.009 vs baseline) and/or albumin (mean 3.14+/-0.24 g/dL; p=0.0016 vs baseline) were evident. Such changes may, albeit very rarely, be of sufficient clinical significance in individual patients as to necessitate additional treatment.

CONCLUSION

In patients receiving intravenous IVIg for AMBDs, electrolyte values should be monitored but do not represent a real clinical threat. Hemoglobin and albumin values may be altered sufficiently to require additional treatment but this is a very rare occurrence. These findings confirm and extend previous reports of the safety of IVIg therapy.