Machine-learning aided in situ drug sensitivity screening predicts treatment outcomes in ovarian PDX tumors

Emerging artificial intelligence-driven precision therapies in tumor drug resistance: recent advances, opportunities, and challenges

Drug resistance is one of the main reasons for cancer treatment failure, leading to a rapid recurrence/disease progression of the cancer. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has empowered physicians to use its powerful data processing and pattern recognition capabilities to extract and mine valuable drug resistance information from large amounts of clinical or omics data, to study drug resistance mechanisms, to evaluate and predict drug resistance, and to develop innovative therapeutic strategies to reduce drug resistance. In this review, we proposed a feasible workflow for incorporating AI into tumor drug resistance research, highlighted current AI-driven tumor drug resistance applications, and discussed the opportunities and challenges encountered in the process. Based on a comprehensive literature analysis, we systematically summarized the role of AI in tumor drug resistance research, including drug development, resistance mechanism elucidation, drug sensitivity prediction, combination therapy optimization, resistance phenotype identification, and clinical biomarker discovery. With the continuous advancement of AI technology and rigorous validation of clinical data, AI models are expected to fuel the development of precision oncology by improving efficacy, guiding therapeutic decisions, and optimizing patient prognosis. In summary, by leveraging clinical and omics data, AI models are expected to pioneer new therapy strategies to mitigate tumor drug resistance, improve efficacy and patient survival, and provide novel perspectives and tools for oncology treatment.

PDX models for functional precision oncology and discovery science

Precision oncology relies on detailed molecular analysis of how diverse tumours respond to various therapies, with the aim to optimize treatment outcomes for individual patients. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models have been key to preclinical validation of precision oncology approaches, enabling the analysis of each tumour's unique genomic landscape and testing therapies that are predicted to be effective based on specific mutations, gene expression patterns or signalling abnormalities. To extend these standard precision oncology approaches, the field has strived to complement the otherwise static and often descriptive measurements with functional assays, termed functional precision oncology (FPO). By utilizing diverse PDX and PDX-derived models, FPO has gained traction as an effective preclinical and clinical tool to more precisely recapitulate patient biology using in vivo and ex vivo functional assays. Here, we explore advances and limitations of PDX and PDX-derived models for precision oncology and FPO. We also examine the future of PDX models for precision oncology in the age of artificial intelligence. Integrating these two disciplines could be the key to fast, accurate and cost-effective treatment prediction, revolutionizing oncology and providing patients with cancer with the most effective, personalized treatments.

Leveraging preclinical models of metastatic breast cancer

Women that present to the clinic with established breast cancer metastases have limited treatment options. Yet, the majority of preclinical studies are actually not directed at developing treatment regimens for established metastatic disease. In this review we will discuss the current state of preclinical macro-metastatic breast cancer models, including, but not limited to syngeneic GEMM, PDX and xenografts. Challenges within these models which are often overlooked include fluorophore-immunogenic neoantigens, differences in experimental vs spontaneous metastasis and tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, due to cell plasticity in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of the metastatic landscape, the treatment efficacy of newly approved immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) may differ in metastatic sites as compared to primary localized tumors.

Harnessing machine learning potential for personalised drug design and overcoming drug resistance

Drug resistance in cancer treatment presents a significant challenge, necessitating innovative approaches to improve therapeutic efficacy. Integrating machine learning (ML) in cancer research is promising as ML algorithms outrival in analysing complex datasets, identifying patterns, and predicting treatment outcomes. Leveraging diverse data sources such as genomic profiles, clinical records, and drug response assays, ML uncovers molecular mechanisms of drug resistance, enabling personalised treatment, maximising efficacy and minimising adverse effects. Various ML algorithms contribute to the drug discovery process - Random Forest and Decision Trees predict drug-target interactions and aid in virtual screening, and SVM classify leads on bioactivity data. Neural Networks model QSAR to optimise lead compounds and K-means clustering group compounds with similar chemical properties aiding compound selection. Gaussian Processes predict drug responses, Bayesian Networks infer causal relationships, Autoencoders generate novel compounds, and Genetic Algorithms optimise molecular structures. These algorithms collectively enhance efficiency and success rates in drug design endeavours, from lead identification to optimisation and are cost-effective, empowering clinicians with real-time treatment monitoring and improving patient outcomes. This review highlights the immense potential of ML in revolutionising cancer care through effective drug design to reduce drug resistance, and we have also discussed various limitations and research gaps to understand better.