1
|
Yasmin F, Najeeb H, Naeem U, Moeed A, Koritala T, Surani S. Apheresis: A cell-based therapeutic tool for the inflammatory bowel disease. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:7195-7208. [PMID: 36158031 PMCID: PMC9353887 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a hallmark of leukocyte infiltration, followed by the release of cytokines and interleukins. Disease progression to Ulcerative Colitis (UC) or Crohn's Disease (CD) remained largely incurable. The genetic and environmental factors disrupt enteral bacteria in the gut, which hampers the intestinal repairing capability of damaged mucosa. Commonly practiced pharmacological therapies include 5-aminosalicylic acid with corticosteroids and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. New interventions such as CDP571 and TNF-blocking RDP58 report the loss of patient response. This review discusses the non-pharmacologic selective granulocyte-monocyte-apheresis (GMA) and leukocytapheresis (LCAP) that have been proposed as treatment modalities that reduce mortality. GMA, an extracorporeal vein-to-vein technique, presents a strong safety profile case for its use as a viable therapeutic option compared to GMA's conventional medication safety profile. GMA reported minimal to no side effects in the pediatric population and pregnant women. Numerous studies report the efficacious nature of GMA in UC patients, whereas data on CD patients is insufficient. Its benefits outweigh the risks and are emerging as a favored non-pharmacological treatment option. On the contrary, LCAP uses a general extracorporeal treatment that entraps leukocytes and suppresses cytokine release. It has been deemed more efficacious than conventional drug treatments, the former causing better disease remission, and maintenance. Patients with UC/CD secondary to complications have responded well to the treatment. Side effects of the procedure have remained mild to moderate, and there is little evidence of any severe adverse event occurring in most age groups. LCAP decreases the dependence on steroids and immunosuppressive therapies for IBD. The review will discuss the role of GMA and LCAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farah Yasmin
- Department of Medicine, DOW University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan
| | - Hala Najeeb
- Department of Medicine, DOW University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan
| | - Unaiza Naeem
- Department of Medicine, DOW University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Moeed
- Department of Medicine, DOW University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan
| | - Thoyaja Koritala
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, United States
| | - Salim Surani
- Department of Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Krznarić Ž, Markoš P, Golubić Ćepulić B, Čuković-Čavka S, Domislović V, Bojanić I, Barišić A, Kekez D. LEUKOCYTAPHERESIS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE STEROID-DEPENDENT ULCERATIVE COLITIS. Acta Clin Croat 2019; 58:529-534. [PMID: 31969767 PMCID: PMC6971812 DOI: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.03.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a multifactorial disease of unknown precise etiology and immunopathogenesis. Peripheral blood granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages are the major sources of cytokines, which regulate inflammation. Leukocytapheresis (LCAP) is a method where blood is processed by apheresis system that removes lymphocytes and plasma before being returned to the body. We report the first case in Croatia where we used LCAP in the treatment of a patient with severe steroid-dependent UC. After 12 LCAP procedures, good clinical response was obtained and there were no significant adverse side effects noticed. The patient remained in clinical remission over two years in which he underwent regular follow ups at outpatient clinic. Over a 10-year follow-up period after LCAP, the patient had only occasional clinical symptoms of disease activity. The clinical course was complicated with the development of metastatic colorectal carcinoma, which points to the importance of regular disease monitoring rather than the increased risk of malignant disease after LCAP. Patients with UC are a demanding group of patients that warrant the search for novel treatment strategies other than conventional pharmacological therapies. Although LCAP is still not a common treatment modality in our daily practice, data from recent studies suggest it to be an effective and safe procedure in the management of active UC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pave Markoš
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation Biology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 4Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Branka Golubić Ćepulić
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation Biology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 4Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Silvija Čuković-Čavka
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation Biology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 4Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Viktor Domislović
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation Biology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 4Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ines Bojanić
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation Biology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 4Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ana Barišić
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation Biology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 4Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Domina Kekez
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation Biology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 4Department of Oncology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|