Low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor are sufficient for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma

A phase 2 trial of VRD induction for transplant-eligible Japanese patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

This single-arm phase 2 trial investigated the efficacy and safety of bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRD) induction for transplant-eligible Japanese patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Treatment consisted of four cycles of VRD (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2, s.c., days 1, 4, 8, 11; lenalidomide 25 mg/body/day, days 1-14; dexamethasone 40 mg/day, p.o., days 1, 4, 8, 11), stem cell mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide (1 g/m2, day 1) and bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2, days 4, 7), and high-dose therapy with melphalan supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Primary endpoints were post-induction complete response (CR) and near CR (nCR) rates. Seven of the 23 enrolled patients discontinued induction therapy, including 5 due to grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities. Moreover, 8 of the 16 patients who completed induction therapy required dose reduction. Post-induction CR and nCR rates in the intent-to-treat population were 17.4% and 8.7%, respectively. Comparison of pre- and post-induction quality of life (QoL) indicators, such as QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20, revealed that VRD induction does not adversely affect QoL in patients who tolerate the treatment. Collectively, these findings indicate a need to optimize the dose and schedule of VRD induction, at least in Japanese patients.

Retrospective comparison of two different cell separators for autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection: Single center experience

INTRODUCTION

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation has become a standard treatment option for certain hematological malignancies. The collection of PBSCs for transplantation is a well-established process and the effectiveness can vary depending on the cell separator. We aimed to compare the effectivity of two devices, the Spectra Optia and the Amicus for autologous PBSC collection. We also evaluated the effect of the peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count on the CD34+ collection efficiency (CE2).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 262 apheresis procedures performed in patients between 2015 and 2021 at the Apheresis Unit of our transplantation center. The PBSCs were collected by the Spectra Optia cell separator with continuous Mononuclear Collection (cMNC) (128 procedures) or the Amicus (MNC) (134 procedures). In addition to the apheresis parameters and product characteristics, we also evaluated the effect of the pre-apheresis peripheral WBC count on the CE2.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the CD34+ CE2 between the Spectra Optia and Amicus devices (median 65.06% and 68.24%, respectively, p = 0.070). In the Amicus group, the CE2 ratio was found to be statistically significantly higher in patients with a pre-apheresis peripheral WBC count of 15 × 109/L (median 81.70%, 68.06%, 61.35% and 58.13%, respectively, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

While both devices collected autologous PBSC effectively and safely, the Amicus provided a higher rate of CE2 at low pre-apheresis WBC counts. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the CE2 in autologous PBSC collection devices based on pre-apheresis WBC counts.

Insight into the Prospects for Tumor Therapy Based on Photodynamic Immunotherapy

Malignancy is one of the common diseases with high mortality worldwide and the most important obstacle to improving the overall life expectancy of the population in the 21st century. Currently, single or combined treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, are still the mainstream regimens for tumor treatment, but they all present significant side effects on normal tissues and organs, such as organ hypofunction, energy metabolism disorders, and various concurrent diseases. Based on this, theranostic measures for the highly selective killing of tumor cells have always been a hot area in cancer-related fields, among which photodynamic therapy (PDT) is expected to be an ideal candidate for practical clinical application due to its precise targeting and excellent safety performance, so-called PDT refers to a therapeutic method mainly composed of photosensitizers (PSs), laser light, and reactive oxygen species (ROS). Photoimmunotherapy (PIT), a combination of PDT and immunotherapy, can induce systemic antitumor immune responses and inhibit continuing growth and distant metastasis of residual tumor cells, demonstrating a promising application prospect. This article reviews the types of immune responses that occur in the host after PDT treatment, including innate and adaptive immunity. To further help PIT-related drugs improve their pharmacokinetic properties and bioavailability, we highlight the potential improvement of photodynamic immunotherapy from three aspects: immunostimulatory agents, tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) as well as different immune cells. Finally, we focus on recent advances in various strategies and shed light on their corresponding mechanisms of immune activation and possible clinical applications such as cancer vaccines. Having discovered the inherent potential of PDT and the mechanisms that PDT triggers host immune responses, a variety of immunotherapeutic strategies have been investigated in parallel with approaches to improve PDT efficiency. However, it remains to be further elucidated under what conditions the immune effect induced by PDT can achieve tumor immunosuppression and to what extent PDT-induced antitumor immunity will lead to complete tumor rejection. Currently, PIT presents several outstanding intractable challenges, such as the aggregation ability of PSs locally in tumors, deep tissue penetration ability of laser light, immune escape, and biological toxicity, and it is hoped that these issues raised will help to point out the direction of preclinical research on PIT and accelerate its transition to clinical practice.

Role and Therapeutic Targeting of SDF-1α/CXCR4 Axis in Multiple Myeloma

Simple Summary

The SDF-1α/CXCR4 axis plays crucial roles in proliferation, survival, invasion, dissemination, and drug resistance in multiple myeloma. This review summarizes the pleiotropic role of the SDF-1α/CXCR4 axis in multiple myeloma and introduces the SDF-1α/CXCR4 axis-targeted therapies in multiple myeloma.

Abstract

The C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) is a pleiotropic chemokine receptor that is expressed in not only normal hematopoietic cells but also multiple myeloma cells. Its ligand, stromal cell-derived factor 1α (SDF-1α) is produced in the bone marrow microenvironment. The SDF-1α/CXCR4 axis plays a pivotal role in the major physiological processes associated with tumor proliferation, survival, invasion, dissemination, and drug resistance in myeloma cells. This review summarizes the pleiotropic role of the SDF-1α/CXCR4 axis in multiple myeloma and discusses the future perspective in the SDF-1α/CXCR4 axis-targeted therapies in multiple myeloma.