Technical modifications of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy associated with improved graft quality and transplant outcome

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the experience of the Middle East in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), to discuss the associated advantages and salient problems, to examine the learning curve encountered compared with that of the pioneering centres in the West, and the contribution of the regional centres to the worldwide experience.

METHODS

We searched Medline and PubMed for all centres performing LDN in the Middle East. Questionnaires were e-mailed to the regional transplantation centres, and programme directors, and leading urological and transplant surgeons were contacted by telephone.

RESULTS

LDN in the Middle East was first introduced in 2000; this approach has been pioneered and practised at seven transplant centres within five countries in the region, and was restricted to only three Arab countries, i.e. Lebanon, Egypt and Kuwait. Data collection yielded a total of 888 procedures over one decade, representing only 2% of the total of ≈50,000 transplants during the same period. Despite variability of accurate reporting the overall outcomes were similar to those of open DN. The spectrum of complications was comparable to that from major centres in the USA during their learning curve.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of LDN in the Middle East has been gratifying. The relative hesitancy in introducing LDN in the rest of the Arab Middle East is multifaceted. The advantages conferred to the donor underscore the need for further expansion of this approach for kidney retrieval.

Technical Modifications of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Improved Results With Refinements in Technique That Mimic Open Nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

We have performed laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (lap Nx) since 2000. In June 2002, we modified the technique to minimize the known disadvantages of ATN and delayed graft function. We review our series of lap Nx before and after introduction of these modifications, respectively.

METHODS

Four technical modifications of lap Nx were introduced following the initial previously described 28 cases (Group I) and applied to the consecutive 42 cases described herein (Group II): (1) decreasing the intra-abdominal pressure from 15 mm Hg to 8 mm Hg; (2) early dissection of the ureter and gonadal vein followed by vascular dissection (sharp and blunt using hydrodissection); (3) leaving the left gonadal vein in continuity with the left renal vein; and (4) early introduction of the Endocatch bag.

RESULTS

Operative time was 276.6 +/- 67.1 min vs 210.0 +/- 38.0 min for groups I and II, respectively (P = .04). Warm ischemia was 4.9 +/- 1.9 min vs 1.5 +/- 0.9, min for groups I and II, respectively (P < .01). ATN occurred in 3/28 (10.7%) in group I vs 2/42 (4.8%) in-group II. There was one-vascular insult in the initial 5 Rt lap Nx, namely, transection of a segmental artery, that was reconstructed by bench repair without an impact on the outcome. Conversion was needed in 3/28 (10.7%) group I, but none of group II donors.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of lap Nx can be significantly improved by applying technical modifications that simulate open Nx.