Sequential liver–kidney transplantation

Fatigue After Liver Transplant and Combined Liver and Kidney Transplant

OBJECTIVES

To date, fatigue is still poorly understood in recipients of orthotopic liver transplant and simultaneous/sequential liver and kidney transplant procedures. The present study examined the appearance of fatigue in patients who received orthotopic liver and sequential liver and kidney transplant procedures compared with the general population and the influence of various clinical and socioeconomic factors on fatigue levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory survey was sent to all patients with a history of orthotopic liver and simultaneous/sequential liver and kidney transplant. The results were compared to data from a reference population.

RESULTS

Our survey included 276 eligible patients: 256 recipients (92.7%) of orthotopic liver transplant and 20 recipients (7.3%) of simultaneous/sequential liver and kidney transplant. Significantly lower fatigue scores were found in the general population compared with both transplant groups (P < .001). There were also no significant differences between the transplant groups. Among the clinical and socioeconomic factors, history of hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic kidney disease, age, family status, and education had a significant impact on fatigue levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to compare fatigue in recipients of orthotopic liver and simultaneous/sequential liver and kidney transplant. We found that fatigue is an important but still poorly understood outcome after transplant.

Renal Function and Transplantation in Liver Disease

Kidney injury is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients. Since the introduction of the model for end-stage liver disease for the allocation of organs for liver transplantation in 2002, the heavy weighting of serum creatinine in the model for end-stage liver disease score has significantly increased the incidence of renal dysfunction seen among patients undergoing liver transplantation. As a result, the frequency of simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplantation compared to liver transplantation alone (LTA) has also increased. The decision to perform SLK rather than LTA is an important one because the benefits to the liver transplant recipient receiving a kidney transplant must be balanced with the benefits of using that organ for a patient with end-stage renal disease. However, predicting whether or not a patient with liver failure has reversible kidney disease, and therefore does not also need a kidney transplant, is difficult. The severity and duration of pretransplant renal dysfunction, hepatitis c, diabetes, and other risk factors for kidney disease are associated with an increased risk of posttransplant end-stage renal disease. However, there are currently no clinical findings that accurately predict renal recovery post liver transplant. As a result, the rate of SLK versus LTA differs significantly between transplant centers. To increase consistency across centers, multiple guidelines have been proposed to guide the decision between SLK and LTA, but their poor predictive value has limited their uniform adoption. Nevertheless, adoption of uniform rules for the allocation of kidneys would reduce the variability between centers in rates of SLK transplant.

[Renal graft outcome in patients with associated liver transplant]

INTRODUCTION

Nearly 50% of liver transplant recipients have some degree of renal failure; patients in haemodialysis treatment have a higher risk of suffering hepatic diseases related to viral infections or concomitant pathologies. Improvement in surgical and organ preservation techniques and immunosuppressive therapy has permitted multiorganic transplants in patients needing both liver and kidney organs.

OBJECTIVES

To review our results in renal transplants in those patients with liver and kidney transplants.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Retrospective study of the 15 patients with liver and kidney transplants performed in our Hospital. We have reviewed patients main characteristics, liver and renal failure causes, renal graft and patient outcome and complications relate to renal transplant.

RESULTS

Between 1975 and December 2006 we performed 1483 kidney transplants and between 1991 and December 2006, 409 liver transplants. We performed multiorganic liver and kidney transplants to 15 patients (4 women and 11 men). The average for liver transplant recipients was 52.5+/-9.3 years (range 37-61) and for kidney transplant recipients was 51+/-12.5 years (35-66). Cold ischemia was 6.4+/-5.4 hours (6-8) in simultaneous liver-kidney transplant and 20.5+/-5.4 (8-27 hours) in non-simultaneous ones. Three patients had a renal transplant before the liver one (two functioning which had no changes after hepatic transplant but the other was lost due to IgA glomeruloneprhitis relapse and received a simultaneous kidney-liver transplant). Six patients received a simultaneous kidney-liver transplant and eight patients a renal transplant between 16 and 83 months (x=50.5+/-25.9 months) after the liver transplant. A renal graft was lost due to renal vein thrombosis and two due to IgA relapse; the others were functioning between 6 and 264 months of follow-up (x=92.5+/-66.7) with creatinine levels of 1.86+/-mg/100, (range 1-4.5). Four patients died due to hepatic failure between 8 months and 21 years after renal transplant and another died of oesophagus cancer 14 years after the kidney transplant, in all cases with functioning renal graft. There were no cases of kidney graft acute rejection in simultaneous transplants but there were five in non-simultaneous ones. Immunotherapy was based on steroids and tacrolimus.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver-kidney transplants are worthy options in patients with hepatic and renal end failure. Acute rejection seems to have fewer incidences in simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation.

Comparison of renal allograft outcomes in combined liver-kidney transplantation versus subsequent kidney transplantation in liver transplant recipients: Analysis of UNOS Database

BACKGROUND

There may be an allograft-enhancing effect by the liver on the renal allograft in the setting of simultaneous combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) from the same donor. This study was performed to investigate whether an existing liver allograft could protect a kidney allograft from immunologic injury due to histoincompatibility in liver transplant recipients who received sequential kidney transplantation (KALT).

METHODS

Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database covering January 1996 to December 2003, outcomes of 352 KALT were compared to 1,136 CLKT. Incidence of acute and chronic rejection and rejection-free renal graft survival was compared between two groups.

RESULTS

Renal half-life of KALT allografts was shorter than CLKT group (6.6+/-0.9 vs. 11.7+/-1.3 years, P < 0.001). Incidence of chronic rejection in KALT group was higher than CLKT group (4.6 vs. 1.2%, P < 0.001). One and three-year rejection-free renal graft survival of KALT and CLKT groups were different (77% and 67% KALT vs. 85% and 78% CLKT, respectively; P < 0.001). Among human leukocyte antigen mismatched and sensitized patients, rejection-free renal graft survival of KALT group was inferior to the CLKT group (75% at 1 year and 61% 3 years vs. 86% at 1 year and 79% 3 years, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Liver allograft provided renal graft immunoprotection if both organs are transplanted simultaneously (immunogenetic identity), but not for kidneys transplanted subsequently.