Renal transplants with delayed graft function show decreased renal function despite monitoring with postabsorptive levels

Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication of renal transplantation. The short-term consequences of DGF are well known, but the long-term relationship between DGF and patient and graft survival is controversial in the published literature. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to precisely estimate these relationships.

METHODS

We performed a literature search for original studies published through March 2007 pertaining to long-term (>6 months) outcomes of DGF. The primary outcome was graft survival. Secondary outcomes were patient survival, acute rejection and kidney function.

RESULTS

When compared to patients without DGF, patients with DGF had a 41% increased risk of graft loss (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.27-1.56) at 3.2 years of follow-up. There was no significant relationship between DGF and patient survival at 5 years (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.94-1.39). The mean creatinine in the non-DGF group was 1.6 mg/dl. Patients with DGF had a higher mean serum creatinine (0.66 mg/dl, 95% CI 0.57-0.74) compared to patients without DGF at 3.5 years of follow-up. DGF was associated with a 38% relative increase in the risk of acute rejection (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.29-1.47).

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis emphasize and quantify the long-term detrimental association between DGF and important graft outcomes like graft survival, acute rejection and renal function. Efforts to prevent and treat DGF should be aggressively investigated in order to improve graft survival given the deficit in the number of kidney donors.

Long-term renal outcomes after delayed graft function

Delayed graft function (DGF) describes dysfunction of the kidney allograft immediately after transplantation and is the most common complication in the immediate posttransplantation period. Although a standardized definition for DGF is lacking, it is most commonly defined as the need for dialysis within the first week after transplant. DGF is caused by a variety of factors related to the donor and recipient as well as organ procurement techniques. The occurrence of DGF affects both allograft and patient outcomes. In addition to prolonging hospital stay and increasing the costs associated with transplantation, DGF is associated with an increased incidence of acute rejection after transplantation and is associated with poorer long-term graft outcomes. Both immunologic and nonimmunologic mechanisms contribute to DGF. The risk factors for DGF that have been identified are reviewed as well as the impact of DGF on long-term outcomes.

Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The term delayed graft function (DGF) is commonly used to describe the need for dialysis after receiving a kidney transplant. DGF increases morbidity after transplantation, prolongs hospitalization and may lead to premature graft failure. Various definitions of DGF are used in the literature without a uniformly accepted technique to identify DGF.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify all of the different definitions and diagnostic techniques to identify DGF.

RESULTS

We identified 18 unique definitions for DGF and 10 diagnostic techniques to identify DGF.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of heterogeneous clinical criteria to define DGF has certain limitations. It will lead to delayed and sometimes inaccurate diagnosis of DGF. Hence a diagnostic test that identifies DGF reliably and early is necessary. Heterogeneity, in the definitions used for DGF, hinders the evolution of a diagnostic technique to identify DGF, which requires a gold standard definition. We are in need of a new definition that is uniformly accepted across the kidney transplant community. The new definition will be helpful in promoting better communication among transplant professionals and aids in comparing clinical studies of diagnostic techniques to identify DGF and thus may facilitate clinical trials of interventions for the treatment of DGF.

Renal function with delayed or immediate cyclosporine microemulsion in combination with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and steroids: results of follow up to 30 months post-transplant

BACKGROUND

In the multicenter, open-label Myriade study, renal transplant patients were randomized to early cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME, day 0) or delayed CsA-ME (day 6) with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), steroids and interleukin-2 receptor induction. One-yr results have been published previously. We now report the results of an extension study in which patients were followed up for a period of three yr post-transplant.

METHODS

All patients completing the one-yr core study on-treatment were eligible to enter the extension study.

RESULTS

Of the 203 patients, 153 completed the core trial on-treatment; 144 (94%) entered the extension study with a minimum follow-up of one yr (73 early CsA-ME, 71 delayed CsA-ME). In 75% of patients receiving EC-MPS during the extension, the recommended dose was administered (1440 mg/d). Median creatinine clearance remained constant (57 mL/min) at 12, 24 and 30 months post-transplant and was similar in the early and delayed CsA-ME groups as well as in subpopulations with or without delayed graft function. One patient in the early CsA-ME group died. No grafts were lost. The incidence of BPAR from time of transplant to the end of the extension study was 17% (24/139). Seven patients (5%) discontinued the extension study prematurely because of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that a regimen of CsA-ME, EC-MPS and steroids results in excellent survival rates with stable renal function over a mean follow-up of 30 months. Immediate introduction of CsA-ME has no deleterious effect on long-term renal function, even among patients with delayed graft function.

Importance of Early Adequate Exposure to Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Outcome: Study of 1-Year Creatinine

INTRODUCTION

One-year serum creatinine (SCr) level has been used as a surrogate marker for graft survival in kidney transplantation. We evaluated the importance of different factors on this parameter, emphasizing the importance of adequate exposure to Cyclosporine (CyA).

METHODS

Ninety-six consecutive renal transplant recipients who underwent transplantation between 1996 and 2002 were treated with CyA, steroids, and azathioprine. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed for 1-year SCr, acute rejection episodes (ARE), and duration of delayed graft function (DGF). We considered adequate CyA levels within 1 week to be >250 ng/mL trough levels (38%) or 3 hour postdose level (C3) >1100 ng/mL (62%).

RESULTS

Mean 1-year SCr was 1.52 +/- 0.5, ARE rate was 27%, and DGF rate was 31%. Overall, 53% of patients achieved adequate exposure to CyA at 1 week (68% on those monitored by C3). Univariate analysis identified female recipient gender, decreasing donor age, absence of ARE, and decreased DGF duration to yield lower 1-year SCr (P < .05). On multivariate analysis for donor age (lower), ARE rate, and duration of DGF (shorter) were the only factors considered to be significant for a lower 1-year SCr level. Multivariate analysis for ARE showed that adequate CyA exposure and lower HLA mismatch decreased ARE, whereas the ability to achieve adequate exposure to CyA and shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) correlated with a reduced incidence of DGF.

CONCLUSIONS

One-year SCr level is affected primarily by the incidence of ARE, by donor age, and by duration of DGF. Adequate CyA exposure is related to lower ARE; however, its relation to DGF may be influenced by the reluctance to increase exposure on patients with a nonfunctioning graft.