Impact of ischemia/reperfusion on transplanted livers procured from elderly cadaveric donors

Implications of liver donor age on ischemia reperfusion injury and clinical outcomes

The aging process causes detrimental changes in a variety of organ systems. These changes include: lesser ability to cope with stress, impaired repair mechanisms and decreased cellular functional reserve capacity. Not surprisingly, aging has been associated with increased susceptibility of donor heart and kidneys grafts to ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI). In the context of liver transplantation, however, the effect of donor age seems to be less influential in predisposing the graft to IRI. In fact, a widely comprehensive understanding of IRI in the aged liver has yet to be agreed upon in the literature. Nevertheless, there have been many reported implications of increased liver donor age with poor clinical outcomes besides IRI. These other poor outcomes include: earlier HCV recurrence, increased rates of acute rejection and greater resistance to tolerance induction. While these other correlations have been identified, it is important to re-emphasize the fact that a unified consensus in regard to liver donor age and IRI has not yet been reached among researchers in this field. Many researchers have even demonstrated that the extent of IRI in aged livers can be ameliorated by careful donor selection, strict allocation or novel therapeutic modalities to decrease IRI. Thus, the goals of this review paper are twofold: 1) To delineate and summarize the conflicting data in regard to liver donor age and IRI. 2) Suggest that careful donor selection, appropriate allocation and strategic effort to minimize IRI can reduce the frequency of a variety of poor outcomes with aged liver donations.

Liver grafts from selected older donors do not have significantly more ischaemia reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND

There is a general concern that aged organs are more susceptible to ischaemia. In the light of recent proposals to change the liver allocation system by expanding regional sharing, it is feared that increased cold ischaemia time of grafts from older donors may reduce graft survival. The aim of this study was to correlate donor age and the patterns of ischaemia reperfusion injury and synthetic function early after liver transplantation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of first transplants using a single-centre electronic database. Patterns of liver injury (based on transaminases and post-reperfusion biopsy), synthetic function (international normalized ratio [INR]), and graft and patient survival in recipients receiving liver grafts from donors aged ≥ 65 years (group 1, n= 50) were compared with equivalent patterns in a matched cohort of recipients transplanted with grafts from donors aged <65 years (group 2, n= 50).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in transaminase levels from day 0 to day 6 after transplantation. When groups 1 and 2 were subdivided into two subgroups based on the duration of graft cold ischaemia time (<8 h and ≥ 8 h), there was no statistical difference in transaminase levels during the first 7 days. There were two cases (4%) of primary non-function in group 1 and one (2%) in group 2. Initial poor function did not differ significantly between the groups (26% vs. 24%; P= 0.81). In addition, there was no difference in histological changes in post-reperfusion biopsies (21% vs. 34%; P= 0.078) and rate of acute rejection episodes in the first year (30% vs. 32%; P= 0.99). There was no significant difference between groups 1 and 2 in 1-year patient and graft survivals (78% vs. 90% [P= 0.17]; 88% vs. 94% [P= 0.48], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Judiciously selected livers from aged donors are not associated with major increased susceptibility to ischaemia reperfusion injury.