Comparison of Long-Term Actual Renal Allograft Survival in Mycophenolate Mofetil and Azathioprine-Based Triple Drug Immunosuppression Protocols

Characteristics of long-term immunosuppressive therapy in Chinese pediatric renal transplant patients: a single-center experience

We performed this study to investigate the trend and characteristics of various immunosuppressive regimens as well as their efficacy and safety for long-term survival of Chinese pediatric renal allograft recipients.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 1985 and July 2002 had >/=5 years follow up. We retrospectively reviewed the baseline characteristics, patient and kidney survival rates, renal function, immunosuppressive regimens, drug levels, and adverse effects of immunosuppressive medications.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recipient versus graft survival rates were 100% and 97.1%; 91.2% and 88.2%; 85.3% and 82.4%, respectively. The proportions of patients treated with cyclosporine- or tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen at these times were 48.5%/51.5%; 60.0%/40.0%; and 53.6/46.4%. There were no significant differences in the dosages and drug levels after 1 year (P > .05). The proportions of azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil adjunctive therapy were 21.3/78.8%; 23.3%/70%; and 32.1%/60.7%, respectively. Forty percent of the surviving recipients developed complications, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, gingival hyperplasia, hirsutism, liver dysfunction, herpes zoster, diabetes mellitus or cataracts.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclosporine or tacrolimus, plus mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine, and prednisone triple therapies showed promising long-term results with similar efficacy and safety in pediatric renal recipients. Periodic drug level monitoring is required to facilitate individualization of immunosuppressive regimens. Drug doses and levels differed markedly from non-Chinese patients because of the ethnic discrepancy.

Optimization of immunosuppression by switching from azathioprine to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in stable kidney transplant patients

The aim of our retrospective, observational, single center study was to analyze renal function changes among stable kidney transplant patients treated with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) + azathioprine (AZA), in whom immunosuppression was optimized by a switch from AZA to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) with a view to protecting long-term renal function. Between April 2005 and June 2008, 36 renal transplant patients on previous treatment with a CNI and AZA for a period of 86.94 +/- 66.9 months were switched to EC-MPS. After the change, there were no cases of acute rejection episodes. Six patients (16.6%) developed gastrointestinal secondary effects and 5 had to discontinue EC-MPS treatment: 4 due to severe diarrhea 1 due to thrombocytopenia. Among the remaining patients, it was possible to gradually increase the EC-MPS dose (starting at 376 +/- 122 mg/d vs current at 533.5 +/- 210 mg/d; P < .002), maintaining through levels at 2.1 +/- 1.9 ng/mL. Although 11 patients (30.5%) displayed chronic allograft nephropathy upon the preconversion biopsy, at a follow-up of 29.2 +/- 9.4 months they showed significantly improved renal function (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD4] at change 49.5 +/- 19.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs current MDRD4 55.6 +/- 23.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P = .02), with no increase in proteinuria (proteinuria at change 0.4 +/- 0.4 g/d vs current proteinuria 0.4 +/- 0.5 g/d; P = NS). This improvement was evident without changes in CNI levels: cyclosporine at change 133.1 +/- 30.2 ng/mL vs current 122 +/- 28 ng/mL (P = NS) and tacrolimus at change 7.7 +/- 2.2 ng/mL vs current 8.2 +/- 2.4 ng/mL (P = NS). In conclusion, conversion from AZA to EC-MPA to optimize immunosuppression seemed to be safe, with no complications in 85% of cases, as well as effective, achieving improved long-term renal function protection. These results suggested a greater protective immunological effect by switching from AZA to EC-MPA.

Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in renal allograft [corrected] patients within the first month posttransplantation

This retrospective study evaluated the safety of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to azathioprine (Aza) within the first month posttransplantation in 117 renal allograft patients concomittantly treated with cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone. In 52 Conversion from MMF to Aza was conducted at 2 to 4 weeks posttransplantation in 52 patients (conversion group). Thirty-six patients received MMF (MMF group) and 29 patients were treated with Aza (Aza group). Patients were monitored for allograft function, acute rejection episodes, and CsA levels. The demographics were comparable between groups with respect to age, as well as warm and cold ischemic times of allografts. The cumulative allograft survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 98% +/- 2%, 96% +/- 3%, 90% +/- 4%, 90% +/- 4% in the conversion (n = 52) group versus 79% +/- 7%, 79% +/- 7%, 79% +/- 7%, and 75% +/- 8% in the MMF group (n = 36) versus 93% +/- 5%, 93% +/- 5%, 82% +/- 7%, and 78% +/- 8% in the Aza group (n = 29). The CsA trough levels at 1 year posttransplantation were 208.39 +/- 93.79 ng/mL in the conversion group; 159.30 +/- 52.99 ng/mL in the MMF group; and 241.82 +/- 112.76 ng/mL in the Aza group. The acute rejection rates during a 5-year follow-up were 28.85% in the conversion group; 27.78% in the MMF group; and 24.14% in the Aza group. The rejection-free allograft survival between the conversion group and the MMF group was identical (P < .921). However, allograft survival in the conversion group with acute rejection was significantly higher than the MMF group (P < .024). In conclusion, early conversion from MMF to Aza among renal allograft patients was safe without increased acute allograft rejection during a 5-year follow-up. The overall allograft survival in the conversion group was comparable to patients treated with MMF or Aza therapies.

Changing treatment protocol from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil: decrease in renal dysfunction, increase in infections

INTRODUCTION

Immunosuppression for renal transplantation has shifted from azathioprine (AZA) regimens to those containing mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). This study investigated the impact of this change on the causes for rehospitalization as well as on graft and patient survival.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed long-term patient and graft survivals as well as the causes of posttransplant admissions for 893 kidney recipients. Data on survival and readmissions were available for 811 subjects, who were divided to into the AZA cohort (n=289, transplantation between 1998 and 1999) and the MMF cohort (n=567, transplantation between 2000 and 2001). Survival, the cause for readmission, time interval between transplantation and readmission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mortality, and graft loss were compared between the two cohorts.

RESULTS

Five-year patient and graft survival rates were 85% and 67% for the AZA cohort and 91% and 68% for the MMF cohort (P=.013). There were 202 (71%) and 371 (72%) readmissions registered for the AZA and MMF groups, respectively. In comparison with the AZA cohort, while readmissions secondary to graft rejection showed a significant decrease in the MMF cohort (62% vs 35%, P=.000), readmissions secondary to infections exhibited a significant increase (37% vs 50%, P=.002). A marginally significant increased mortality rate (2% vs 5%, P=.087) and ICU admission rate (3% vs 6%, P=.062) were also observed in the MMF cohort by comparison with the AZA cohort.

CONCLUSION

The shift in the immunosuppression protocol from AZA to MMF, albeit advantageous in many instances, can sometimes undermine the outcome by giving rise to such complications as high infection rates.