Use of prosthetic mesh in difficult abdominal wall closure after small bowel transplantation in adults

Using Radiographic Domain for Evaluating Indications in Abdominal Wall Transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is currently no description of abdominal domain changes in small bowel transplantation population or consensus of criteria regarding which patients are at high risk for immediate postoperative abdominal wall complications or would benefit from abdominal wall vascularized composite allotransplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on 14 adult patients receiving intestinal or multivisceral transplantation. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans were reviewed, and multiple variables were collected regarding abdominal domain and volume and analyzed comparing postoperative changes and abdominal wall complications.

RESULTS

Patients after intestinal or multivisceral transplantation had a mean reduction in overall intraperitoneal volume in the immediate postoperative period from 9031 cm3 to 7846 cm3 (P = 0.314). This intraperitoneal volume was further reduced to an average of 6261 cm3 upon radiographic evaluation greater than 1 year postoperatively (P = 0.024). Patients with preexisting abdominal wound (P = 0.002), radiation, or presence of ostomy (P = 0.047) were significantly associated with postoperative abdominal wall complications. No preoperative radiographic findings had a significant association with postoperative abdominal wall complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Computed tomography imaging demonstrates that intestinal and multivisceral transplant patients have significant reduction in intraperitoneal volume and domain after transplantation in the acute and delayed postoperative setting. Preoperative radiographic abdominal domain was not able to predict patients with postoperative abdominal wall complications. Patients with abdominal wounds, ostomies, and preoperative radiation therapy were associated with acute postoperative abdominal complications and may be considered for need of reconstructive techniques including abdominal wall transplantation.

Utilization of Vicryl Bridging Mesh in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation to Achieve Tension-Free Abdominal Wall Closure: A Case Series

Difficulty in primary fascial closure of the abdomen in transplant patients is a common challenge. Abdominal wall tension may have detrimental effects on the newly transplanted graft due to compression, and blood flow hindrance, potentially leading to ischemia or thrombosis and possibly graft failure. Furthermore, patients will be at risk of developing fascial ischemia and dehiscence. Myocutaneous flaps, temporary closure with silastic mesh, abdominal wall transplants, and even graft reduction, bowel resection, and splenectomies have been practiced with varying degrees of success. In this study, we present four cases of patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with bridging Vicryl knitted mesh (ETHICON VKML VICRYL-Polyglactin 910-30 × 30 cm) to relieve the tension during the closure. Our results show that these patients, despite having a high average Model End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of 25, had a good liver function at the time of discharge and continue to upon follow-up. They had a relatively short length of stay (LOS) in both the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the hospital, an average of 3.5 days and 9 days, respectively. Our case series successfully show that utilizing a bridging Vicryl knitted mesh is a reasonable approach to attain tension-free abdominal closure in OLT with satisfying results.

Role of “reduced-size” liver/bowel grafts in the “abdominal wall transplantation” era

The evolution of multi-visceral and isolated intestinal transplant techniques over the last 3 decades has highlighted the technical challenges related to the closure of the abdomen at the end of the procedure. Two key factors that contribute to this challenge include: (1) Volume/edema of donor graft; and (2) loss of abdominal domain in the recipient. Not being able to close the abdominal wall leads to a variety of complications and morbidity that range from complex ventral hernias to bowel perforation. At the end of the 90’s this challenge was overcome by graft reduction during the donor operation or bench table procedure (especially reducing liver and small intestine), as well as techniques to increase the volume of abdominal cavity by pre-operative expansion devices. Recent reports from a few groups have demonstrated the ability of transplanting a full-thickness, vascularized abdominal wall from the same donor. Thus, a spectrum of techniques have co-evolved with multi-visceral and intestinal transplantation, ranging from graft reduction to enlarging the volume of the abdominal cavity. None of these techniques are free from complications, however in large-volume centers the combinations of both (graft reduction and abdominal widening, sometimes used in the same patient) could decrease the adverse events related to recipient’s closure, allowing a faster recovery. The quest for a solution to this unique challenge has led to the proposal and implementation of innovative solutions to enlarge the abdominal cavity.

Delayed dynamic abdominal wall closure following multi-visceral transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Primary closure of the abdominal wall following intestinal transplantation or multivisceral transplantation could become a challenging problem in a significant number of patients.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 38-year-old woman with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) underwent a multi-visceral transplantation for short gut syndrome. She subsequently developed acute graft rejection that proved resistant to conventional treatment. She was relisted and underwent re-transplantation along with kidney transplantation. Abdominal wall closure could not be achieved because of the large size of the graft and bowel oedema. The wound was initially managed with laparostomy followed by insertion of the delayed dynamic abdominal closure (DDAC) device (Abdominal Retraction Anchor – ABRA^® system). Continuous dynamic traction to the wound edges resulted in gradual approximation and complete closure of the abdominal wound was achieved within 3 weeks.

DISCUSSION

Successful abdominal closure after multivisceral transplantation or isolated intestinal transplantation often requires biological mesh, vascularised flaps or abdominal wall transplantation. DDAC eliminated the need for a prosthetic mesh or skin graft and provided an excellent cosmetic result. Adjustment of the dynamic traction at the bedside minimised the need for multiple returns to the operating theatre. It resulted in a well-healed linear scar without a hernia.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic traction allows delayed closure of laparotomy resulting in strong and cosmetically sound wound healing with native tissue.

Technical refinements in small bowel transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the recently described or revised refinements or innovations in small bowel transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Changes in donor selection criteria; cadaveric procurement techniques; organ preservation solutions; management of the recipient abdominal wall; technical modifications, pitfalls and recommendations to be applied during the engraftment as well as intestinal living donation will be covered.

SUMMARY

Intestinal transplantation has evolved over time to become a clinically accepted therapy for patients with intestinal failure. Short- and long-term results have improved. The surgical procedures have been standardized and the applications broaden, but there have been recently published refinements that might affect the future results of clinical intestinal transplantation and guide research.

Abdominal wall transplantation with microsurgical technique

Many patients undergoing intestinal or multivisceral transplantation have a past history of complete midgut removal with the loss of the domain of the abdominal compartment or have severely damaged abdominal walls from repeated laparotomies, tumours or enterocutaneous fistulae. These patients may encounter severe abdominal wall closure problems at the end of transplantation, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. It is, therefore, of paramount importance to properly cover transplanted organs in order to reduce postoperative complications. Abdominal wall transplantation was recently proposed for closure of patients undergoing both small-bowel and multivisceral transplantation: the results are encouraging. However, the technical procedure proposed requires the procurement of long segments of iliac vessels as far as the vena cava and the aorta. Since donor multiorgan procurement involves many surgical teams, the removal of these vessels, with the abdominal graft, led to their unavailability for vascular surgeons. Here we present three consecutive cases of abdominal wall transplantation in which, by taking advantage of microsurgical experience, we were able to carry out a transplantation of the abdominal wall by direct anastomosis of the epigastric vessels, obtaining a very good outcome.