Steroid Sparing in Renal Transplantation With Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil: Three-Year Results

The use of rituximab in newly diagnosed patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: long-term steroid saving capacity and clinical effectiveness

Background

Previous reports indicate that treating patients with lupus (SLE) at or close to the time of diagnosis successfully without using any, or minimal, corticosteroids by using B-cell depletion (BCD) is possible in the short-term. It is not however known whether using BCD is as effective or reduces corticosteroid use in the long-term. We report the long-term (up to 7 years) use of BCD with respect to its steroid-saving capacity and clinical effectiveness in newly diagnosed SLE.

Methods

Sixteen female patients with SLE were treated at, or shortly after diagnosis, with BCD therapy (BCDT) minimising the routine use of oral steroids. Post-treatment, most patients were given hydroxychloroquine (n=14) and azathioprine (n=10). The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) disease activity index was used for clinical assessment. Serum antidouble-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies, complement (C3), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), circulating B lymphocytes (CD19⁺) and total inmmunoglobulins were tested every 2–6 months (average of 4.5 years) (SD 2) post-treatment. Disease activity and steroid requirement were compared with three patients with SLE treated conventionally, each matched for ethnicity, sex, age, clinical features, disease duration at diagnosis and follow-up period.

Results

All patients given rituximab achieved BCD. The mean number of flares during follow-up (new BILAG A or B) was 2.63 (SD 3) in the BCDT group and 4 (SD 3.6) in the controls (NS, p=0.14). Post-BCDT, mean anti-dsDNA antibody level fell from 1114 U/mL (SD 1699.3) to 194 (SD 346.7) at 18 months (p=0.043), mean serum ESR fell by >70% at 6 months maintained during follow-up and serum C3 level normalised in 8 patients. The mean cumulative prednisolone dose at 60 months for the patients who underwent BCDT (n=11) was 4745.67 mg (SD 6090 mg) vs 12 553.92 mg (SD 12 672 mg) for the controls (p=0.01).

Conclusions

Early treatment of patients with SLE with BCDT is safe, effective and enables a reduction in steroid use.

Tacrolimus in transplant rejection

INTRODUCTION

Renal transplantation is the best therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease. To avoid graft rejection, adequate immunosuppressive therapy is crucial. Tacrolimus is approved for prophylaxis of transplant rejection in liver, kidney or heart allograft recipients and for the treatment of allograft rejection resistant to treatment with other immunosuppressive medicinal products.

AREAS COVERED

The objective of this review is to summarize the clinical efficacy of tacrolimus in renal transplantation with special emphasis on acute rejection, refractory rejection and nephrotoxicity and post-transplant diabetes mellitus as typical adverse effects of the drug.

EXPERT OPINION

Since its approval in 1994, tacrolimus has proven its efficacy as a cornerstone of modern immunosuppressive therapy not only in numerous randomized clinical trials but also in standard clinical care. Compared with cyclosporine, the use of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients is associated with a reduced risk for acute rejection, a reduction in the occurrence of steroid-resistant rejection and a better graft function. The avoidance of nephrotoxicity and especially post-transplant diabetes mellitus are of major interest in long-term care of renal transplant recipients.

Combination therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil: effects of early and late minimization of mycophenolate mofetil after renal transplant

The objectives of the study were: (i) to compare the efficacy and safety of minimizing mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) early (30 d) or late (90 d) after renal transplantation, when used in combination with tacrolimus; (ii) to retrospectively investigate factors associated with early, acute rejections and (iii) to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and diltiazem. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label study was conducted in 124 de novo kidney transplant recipients. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed for 180 d after transplantation and subjects were followed-up for a mean duration of 5.1 yr. The efficacy and safety outcomes were comparable whether the dose of MMF was minimized early or late. The incidence of early, acute rejection episodes was higher for recipients who were younger, received a graft from an unrelated donor or failed to achieve adequate tacrolimus concentrations (trough > 10 ng/mL) in the first seven d after transplant. Concomitant use of diltiazem had a tacrolimus-sparing effect in some subjects. Based on these results, we support the achievement of a high target tacrolimus concentration within the first week after renal transplant and suggest that early minimization of MMF can be achieved when used in combination with tacrolimus.