Kyoto Islet Isolation Method: The Optimized One for Non-Heart-Beating Donors With Highly Efficient Islet Retrieval

Improvement of pancreatic islet cell isolation for transplantation

Pancreatic islet transplantation is a promising treatment for diabetes but still faces several challenges. Poor islet isolation efficiency and poor long-term insulin independence are currently two major issues, although donor shortage and the need for immunosuppressants also need to be addressed. We established the Kyoto islet isolation method (KIIM), which has enabled us to isolate and transplant islets even from non-heart-beating donors. KIIM involves 1) cooling the donor pancreas in situ, 2) preserving the ducts with modified Kyoto solution, 3) using a modified two-layer pancreas preservation method, and 4) adjusting the density of the density gradient centrifugation and using an iodixanol-based solution for purification. KIIM has enabled us to transplant 17 islet preparations out of 21 isolations (an 81% success rate). All transplanted islets functioned, and all transplanted patients had improved glycemic control without hypoglycemic unawareness. Recently, we used KIIM for islet isolation from a brain-dead donor at Baylor, which resulted in a very high islet yield (789,984 IE) with high viability (100% by fluorescein diacetate/propidium iodide staining and a stimulation index of 4.7). This preliminary evidence suggests that KIIM may also be promising for islet isolation from brain-dead donors. In addition, to assess engrafted islet mass, we developed a secretory unit of islet transplant objects (SUITO) index: fasting C-peptide (ng/dL) / [fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) - 63] x 1500. This simple index has enabled us to monitor the engrafted islet mass. This index should be useful when deciding whether to perform additional islet transplantations to maintain insulin independence. Poor islet isolation efficacy and poor long-term results could be resolved with ongoing research.

One hundred human pancreatic islet isolations at Baylor Research Institute

The effectiveness of pancreatic islet isolation must be maximized to make islet cell transplantation (ICT) a standard therapy. We have performed 100 human islet isolations at Baylor Research Institute including islet isolations for research, for clinical allogeneic transplantation, and for autologous islet transplantation. In this study, we analyzed the results of these isolations. First, we assessed 79 islet isolations using brain-dead donors to determine variables associated with successful islet isolation. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that seven variables influenced the success of islet isolation for allogeneic ICT: cause of death, mechanism of death, techniques for pancreas procurement and preservation, heavy fatty infiltration, collagenase type, dilution time, and islet purification method. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that only the current isolation protocol, the Baylor Islet Isolation Method (BIIM)-with its four required elements of pancreas procurement by the team, pancreatic ductal injection, the two-layer method with perfluorocarbon, and density-adjusted density gradient purification-had a significant positive impact on successful islet isolation (P = 0.02). Second, we compared allogeneic and autologous ICT using the BIIM. There were no significant differences in islet yields between allogeneic and autologous ICT using the BIIM; total islet yield after purification was 628 ± 84 × 10(3) IE in allogeneic ICT vs. 576 ± 49 × 10(3) IE in autologous ICT (P = 0.59). This retrospective study revealed that the BIIM provided favorable outcomes for both autologous and allogeneic ICT.

Variables associated with islet yield in autologous islet cell transplantation for chronic pancreatitis

The goal of total pancreatectomy followed by autologous islet cell transplantation is to manage pain and prevent surgical diabetes for patients with severe chronic pancreatitis. We performed this procedure in 17 patients from November 2006 to October 2009 at Baylor University Medical Center. All patients were included in this retrospective study and were divided into two groups based on islet yield in the final product based on patient body weight: a low-yield group (<5000 IE/kg) and a high-yield group (>/=5000 IE/kg). There were significant differences between the two groups in the rate of pancreatic findings on computed tomography (low vs high group, 88% vs 22%: P = 0.02), Cambridge classification score for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (3.8 +/- 0.2 vs 2.1 +/- 0.6: P = 0.03), number of positive endoscopic ultrasonography criteria (6.0 +/- 0.8 vs 3.5 +/- 0.4: P = 0.04), and distension score (1.9 +/- 0.4 vs 3.7 +/- 0.2: P = 0.006). A significant reduction in narcotics use after the operation was observed in both groups (P = 0.03 and P = 0.009 in the low and high groups, respectively, using a paired t test). Excellent graft function and glycemic control after the transplantation were also demonstrated in both groups. Patients in the high-yield group were in the early stage of chronic pancreatitis, which led to excellent pancreatic distention for islet isolation; however, the excellent clinical outcomes were observed in both low- and high-yield groups.

Body mass index reflects islet isolation outcome in islet autotransplantation for patients with chronic pancreatitis

Total pancreatectomy with autologous islet cell transplantation (TP with AIT) is an effective treatment for chronic pancreatitis patients with severe abdominal pain. Body mass index (BMI) of the pancreatic donor is proven to be a useful predictor for islet isolation and transplantation outcomes in allogenic islet transplantation. However, the association between BMI and islet isolation outcome and/or metabolism after AIT was previously unclear. Twelve patients who received TP with AIT at our hospital were included in this study. All pancreata were preserved with both pancreatic ductal injection and oxygen-charged static two-layer method using ET-Kyoto solution. The cohort was divided into two groups: low BMI group (BMI <23 kg/m(2), n=5) and high BMI group (BMI ≥23, n=7). The high BMI group had a significantly higher islet yield per gram than the low BMI group both in pancreas postdigestion and in final product (postdigestion: 7330 ± 539 vs. 3509 ± 563 IE/g; p<0.001; final product: 6555 ± 585 vs. 3476 ± 546 IE/g; p=0.004). For islet yield in final product per patient body weight, the high BMI group also had significantly higher islet yield than the low BMI group (7997 ± 779 vs. 4175 ± 750 IE/kg, p=0.007). Insulin independence rate in the high BMI group (71%) was also higher than that low BMI group (40%), but it did not reach statistical significance. Pancreata from patients with higher BMI could obtain higher islet yield in the setting of autologous islet cell transplantation for chronic pancreatitis.

Estimation of donor usability for islet transplantation in the United States with the kyoto islet isolation method

The quality of donor pancreata is important for successful islet isolation. However, in some countries like Japan, the number of donor pancreata is very low; therefore, marginal donors have been used with less restrictive donor criteria. In order to use marginal donor pancreata, we established the Kyoto islet isolation method (KIIM). According to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) in 2005, more than 6,000 pancreata were not clinically used in the US. In this study, we applied the KIIM for brain-dead donors and reevaluated donor usability based on the Japanese islet donor criteria. Islets were isolated with the Ricordi method using pancreata stored in University of Wisconsin (UW) solution (UW group) or by the two-layer method (TLM group) or the TLM combined with ductal injection (DI group). We implemented the KIIM (KIIM group) to confirm the effect of the KIIM on brain-dead donors. Donor charts in Texas from 2005 to 2006 were reviewed. If pancreata were not used clinically, the reason was reviewed and donors were reevaluated based on Japanese criteria. There were no significant differences of islet yield, viability, and purity between the UW and TLM groups. The DI group significantly improved islet yields and isolations were further improved in the KIIM group [UW: 251,663 +/- 60,217 islet equivalent (IE); TLM: 243,738 +/- 54,170 IE; DI: 498,639 +/- 28,853 IE; KIIM: 678,286 +/- 55,853]. The KIIM provided high-quality islets in high numbers from islet isolations from brain-dead donors. A total of 236 donor charts were reviewed and 194 pancreata (82%) were not used. Of these, 185 cases identified the reasons that the pancreata were not used. When we applied the Japanese criteria, an additional 82 cases out of 185 (44%) seem to be suitable for islet isolations. With the KIIM, more than 2,500 additional donor pancreata can be used for islet isolation in the US every year when the Japanese criteria are applied.

Quality control for clinical islet transplantation: organ procurement and preservation, the islet processing facility, isolation, and potency tests

Pancreatic islet transplantation has become one of the ideal treatments for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus due to improvements in isolation techniques and immunosuppression regimens. In order to ensure the safety and rights of patients, isolated islets need to meet the criteria for regulation as both a biological product and a drug product. For the constant success of transplantation, therefore, all investigators involved in clinical islet transplantation must strive to ensure the safety, purity, and potency of islets in all the phases of clinical islet isolation and transplantation. In this review, we summarize the quality control for clinical islet isolation and transplantation, and the latest topics of pre-transplant islet assessment.

Islet cell transplantation for the treatment of type 1 diabetes in the USA

Islet cell transplantation (ICTx) is one of the most effective treatments for type 1 diabetes and is less invasive compared to whole organ transplantation. The US has been the leader in the research and clinical applications of ICTx for the last 40 years. ICTx requires complex procedures, including pancreas procurement and preservation; pancreas digestion; islet purification; and transplantation. Even with the dramatic progresses in each of the procedures listed above, there are still challenges to make ICTx the standard therapy. These challenges are: (1) obtaining enough islets from a single donor and (2) preventing graft loss due to allogenic rejection and recurrence of autoimmune islet destruction. A new preservation strategy for pancreata and pancreatic ducts using ET-Kyoto solution as well as a new islet purification method using iodixanol has substantially improved islet yields. Continuous research to improve the efficacy of islet isolation will solve the issue of obtaining enough islets from a single donor. Immunological tolerance is an ideal solution for the issue of rejection and autoimmune recurrence and a regulatory T cell strategy seems promising. Moreover, the SUITO index is a simple and powerful tool to assess engrafted islet mass and is, therefore, useful for evaluating the efficacy of new immunosuppressant strategies. Once ICTx becomes a standard treatment, the donor shortage will become the next challenge. Marginal or living donor islet transplantations could help alleviate this issue; however, bio-artificial islet transplantation with animal islets could be the ultimate solution.

The current status of islet transplantation and its perspectives

Transplantation of human pancreatic isolated islets can restore beta-cell function but it requires chronic immunosuppression. The outcome of islet transplantation mainly depends on both the quality of islet preparations, and the survival of the graft. The quality of islet preparations can be evaluated by the results of isolation, which determines the chance to achieve insulin independence. The survival of islet grafts is reflected by the amount of engrafted functional tissue that maintains metabolic control. Immunosuppressive therapy prevents the immunological rejection of grafts, but impairs their function and impedes their regenerative capacity. Therefore, the selection of high quality islet preparations and the reduction of toxic effects of immunosuppressive regimens might dramatically improve the outcomes. The application of stem cell therapy in islet transplantation may contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for tissue homeostasis and immune tolerance. Xenogeneic islets may serve as an unlimited source if immune tolerance can be achieved. This may be a strategy to enable a substantial improvement in function while overcoming potentially deleterious risks.

Analysis of donor- and isolation-related variables from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) using the Kyoto islet isolation method

Recently, we demonstrated that islet transplantation from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) using the Kyoto islet isolation method (KIIM) successfully reversed patients' diabetes state. In this study, we evaluated the effects of donor- and isolation-related variables on islet isolation results from NHBDs by KIIM. Twenty-one islet preparations from the pancreata of NHBDs were isolated by KIIM. Islet preparations that met transplantation criteria and achieved improved patient diabetes control after transplantation were defined as successful isolations. Potential risk factors deemed to affect islet isolation results, such as age, gender, body mass index, hospital stay, donors' blood biochemical tests, a modified pancreata procurement method, and isolation and purification procedure-related variables, were analyzed. Seventeen out of 21 islet isolations (81%) were successful isolations. Postpurification islet yield was 447,639 +/- 39,902 islet equivalents (IE) in the successful isolation group and 108,007 +/- 31,532 IE in the failure group. Donor age was significantly younger in the success group (41.9 +/- 4.0 years old in the success group vs. 57.5 +/- 2.2 years old in the failure group, p = 0.003). Chronic pancreatitis significantly decreased islet yields (p = 0.006). Phase I time was significantly shorter (p = 0.010) and undigested tissue volume was significantly smaller (p = 0.020) in the success group. Purity was in positive correlation to postpurification islet yield, while donor age was in reverse correlation to postpurification islet yield. KIIM enables us to perform islet transplantation from NHBDs; however, the decision to use pancreata from older donors or those with chronic pancreatitis requires careful consideration.

Pancreatic islet transplantation for treating diabetes

Pancreatic islet transplantation is one of the options for treating diabetes and has been shown to improve the quality of life of severe diabetic patients. Since the Edmonton protocol was announced, islet transplantation have advanced considerably, including islet after kidney transplantation, utilisation of non-heart-beating donors, single-donor islet transplantation and living-donor islet transplantation. These advances were based on revised immunosuppression protocols, improved pancreas procurement and islet isolation methods, and enhanced islet engraftment. Further improvements are necessary to make islet transplantation a routine clinical treatment. To synergise efforts towards a cure for type 1 diabetes, a Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) Federation is currently being established to include leading diabetes research centres worldwide, including DRIs in Miami, Edmonton and Kyoto among others.