One Thousand Liver Transplants: The Hospital Clinic Experience

Usefulness of T-Tube in Liver Transplantation: Still Effective or Outmoded Strategy?

Introduction: T-tube placement during liver transplantation (LT) is still debated. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the usefulness of T-tube after LT in two cohorts differing in post-transplant risk. Methods: A total of 327 LTs performed between 2015 and 2018 were included in the analysis. LTs from donation after circulatory death and living donation, split-liver transplants, and LTs with hepaticojejunostomy were excluded. T-tube was reserved for marginal grafts, high-risk recipients, and bile duct size discrepancy. A balance of risk (BAR) score of ≤9 defined the low-risk cohort (232 patients, 68 with and 164 without T-tube), while a BAR score of >9 defined the high-risk cohort (95 patients, 43 with and 52 without T-tube). Postoperative complications were estimated with the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Postoperative biliary complications were classified in anastomotic stricture (AS), non-anastomotic stricture (NAS), and biliary leakage (BL). Results: In the low-risk cohort, LTs with and without T-tube had similar rates of NAS (0 vs. 2.9%, p = 0.36), AS (2.9 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.83), and BL (1.4 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.64). Analogous outcomes were found in the high-risk cohort: NAS (0 vs. 0), AS (0 vs. 5.7%, p = 0.11), and BL (0 vs. 1.3%, p = 0.27). There were more postoperative complications among patients with T-tube, in both the low-risk (CCI 29 vs. 21, p < 0.001) and high-risk (CCI 51 vs. 29, p < 0.001) cohort. No differences in primary non-function, hepatic artery thrombosis, and mortality were observed. Conclusions: T-tube placement did not influence postoperative biliary complications. Although the two cohorts were normalized for post-transplant risk, LT recipients with T-tube had a more complicated course.

A meta-analysis of complications following deceased donor liver transplant

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is a complex surgery associated with high rates of postoperative complications. While national outcomes data are available, national rates of most complications are unknown.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of the literature reporting rates of postoperative complications between 2002 and 2012 was performed. A cohort of 29,227 deceased donor liver transplant recipients from 74 studies was used to calculate pooled incidences for 17 major postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first comprehensive review of postoperative complications after liver transplantation and can serve as a guide for transplant and nontransplant clinicians. Efforts to collect national data on complications, such as through the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, would improve the ability to provide patients with informed consent, serve as a tool for individual center performance monitoring, and provide a central source against which to measure interventions aimed at improving patient care.

Liver transplantation in patients with atrial fibrillation

In this study we described survival and incidence of perioperative and postoperative complications in liver transplant recipients with known atrial fibrillation. A total number of 717 patients underwent liver transplantation between January 2005 and December 2008 at our institution. In this population, preoperative paroxysmal or chronic-persistent atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 32 patients (4.5%). Of these, 12 patients died during follow-up and 4 patients required liver retransplantation. Perioperative cardiac complications occurred in 10 patients (31%) resulting in 3 cardiac-related deaths. Median patient survival was 1613 days (range, 22-2492) and median graft survival was 1524 days (range, 10-2492). Twenty patients are still alive with a median survival of 1861 days (range, 1189-2492) after liver transplantation.

New endoscopic classification system for biliary stricture after liver transplantation

AIM

A new classification system for biliary stricture (BS) after liver transplantation (LT) is proposed, aiming to standardize endoscopic treatment for this condition.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from patients who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiography after LT, and who provided endoscopy images clear enough to reveal the biliary system. Images were classified separately by two endoscopists, who discussed and resolved any disputed findings. From these images, a new classification system is proposed (Ling classification): type A, normal biliary structure; type B, anastomotic stricture and normal intrahepatic biliary structure; type C, narrow and stiff intrahepatic biliary structure or beaded intrahepatic biliary structure or intrahepatic biliary cast without anastomotic stricture; type D, narrow and stiff intrahepatic biliary structure or beaded intrahepatic biliary structure or intrahepatic biliary cast with anastomotic stricture.

RESULTS

Analysis involved 93 patients: 76 men and 17 women, median age 54 years (range, 12-69 years). Type B was the most commonly observed BS after LT, accounting for 44 cases (47.3%). Type A, the least commonly observed type, accounted for nine (9.7%), type C for 22 (23.7%) and type D for 18 (19.3%) cases.

CONCLUSION

A new endoscopic classification system for BS after LT is proposed, to help determine the most appropriate treatment for patients with each type of stricture.

[Cost analysis of liver transplantation in a community hospital: association with the Model for End-stage Liver Disease, a prognostic index to prioritize the most severe patients]

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) on transplantation costs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We included all patients who received a liver transplant for end-stage liver disease between 2006 and 2010. The study period encompassed the day of transplantation until hospital discharge. The patients were classified into two groups: those with a MELD score of 6-19 and those with a score of 20-40.

RESULTS

The mean MELD score at transplantation was 19.2±7.0 (mean±SD). The mean cost per procedure in the study period was USD 33,461 per patient (range 21,795-104,629). The cost of transplantation was USD 30,493±8,825 in patients with a MELD score of 6-19 and was USD 36,506±15,833 in those with a score of 20-40; this difference was statistically significant (P=.04). In a stepwise logistic regression analysis, the only independent predictor of high cost was having a MELD score of 20 (OR 11.8; CI 1.6-87). In the linear regression model, the most important predictor of cost was the length of hospital stay (r(2)=43%).

DISCUSSION

Our results demonstrate that the MELD score directly affects transplantation costs. We suggest that reimbursement systems compensate the distinct financing bodies according to the severity of the underlying disease, evaluated with the MELD.

Biliary leak in post-liver-transplant patients: is there any place for metal stent?

Objectives. Endoscopic management of bile leak after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) is widely accepted. Preliminary studies demonstrated encouraging results for covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMS) in complex bile leaks. Methods. Thirty-one patients with post-OLT bile leaks underwent endoscopic temporary placement of CSEMS (3 partially CSEMS , 18 fully CSEMS with fins and 10 fully CSEMS with flare ends) between December 2003 and December 2010. Long-term clinical success and safety were evaluated. Results. Median stent indwelling and follow-up were 89 and 1,353 days for PCSEMS, 102 and 849 for FCSEMS with fins and 98 and 203 for FCSEMS with flare ends. Clinical success was achieved in 100%, 77.8%, and 70%, respectively. Postplacement complications: cholangitis (1) and proximal migration (1), both in the FCSEMS with fins. Postremoval complications were biliary strictures requiring drainage: PCSEMS (1), FCSEMS with fins (6) and with flare ends (1). There was no significant differences in the FCSEMS groups regarding clinical success, age, gender, leak location, previous treatment, stent indwelling, and complications. Conclusion. Temporary placement of CSEMS is effective to treat post-OLT biliary leaks. However, a high number of post removal biliary strictures occurred especially in the FCSEMS with fins. CSEMS cannot be recommended in this patient population.

[The value of MELD in the allocation of priority for liver transplantation candidates]

Liver transplantation is the most effective treatment for many patients with chronic end-stage liver disease. The discrepancy between the number of donor organs and potential recipients causes marked pre-transplantation mortality and consequently optimal rationalization of organ allocation is essential. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) is an objective and easily reproducible prognostic index of mortality based on three simple analytical variables: bilirubin and serum creatinine and the prothrombin time/International Normalized Ratio (INR) of protrombine time. The implementation of MELD as an organ allocation system has reduced mortality on the waiting list without affecting post-transplantation survival. Nevertheless, this model has some limitations and consequently further investigations should be performed to improve the organ allocation policy in liver transplantation.

Profile of cadaveric liver donors of the OPO-UNICAMP From 2002 to 2006

INTRODUCTION

Four decades after the first successful liver transplantation, the organ donation shortage challenges the scientific community to create various new strategies.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to analyze the profile of registered cadaveric liver donors for an Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) during the period of 2002 through 2006.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of 122 deceased donors in the OPO-Unicamp corresponded to the period of 2002 through 2006.

RESULTS

Men were identified as 57.14% of donors and the overall average age was 32.88 years with 16.53% over 50 years of age. Analyzing the causes of brain death, cerebral trauma (CET) was responsible for 46.22% and cerebral vascular accidents, 33.61%. The percentage of use of vasoactive drugs was 88.43%. Observing the donors' backgrounds, we observed that 11.90% had alcoholism, 1.23% drug addiction and 27.78% infection. We verified cardiac arrest in 9.43%. In accordance with the expanded criteria of donation, 89.26% of donors fulfilled some of the criteria: 73.55%, one criterion; 14.05%, two; 1.65%, three; and no donor fulfilled 4 or 5.

CONCLUSION

The donor profile in our unit is a young man with CET and who fulfills at least one expanded donation criterion. Finally, to increase the number of donors, the use of vasoactive drugs (89.26%), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (9.43%), and infection (27.78%) were not considered reasons to discard the liver.

Long-term results after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (OLT) has become a successful surgical therapy for terminal liver failure. We here report about long-term results of OLT in a single center over a period of 15 years. Between 1988 and 2002, 1365 adult OLTs were performed. Mean follow-up was 103 +/- 56 months. Main indications for OLT were viral-induced cirrhosis (27.1%), alcoholic liver disease (21%), tumors (15.7%) and cholestatic liver disease (14.6%). Retransplantation was necessary in 120 (9.6%) patients because of initial nonfunction (26.9%), recurrence of underlying disease (20.2%), acute and chronic rejection (16.8%) or thrombosis of the hepatic artery (16.8%). 275 patients (22.1%) died. Causes of death included recurrence of disease (32.1%), infections (21.8%), de novo malignancies (13.5%) and cardiovascular disease (11.6%). Patient survival after OLT was 91.4%, 82.5%, 74.7% and 68.2% after 1, 5, 10 and 15 years, and graft survival was 85.8%, 75.3%, 67.3% and 61.7% after 1, 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Patient survival after retransplantation was 81.6%, 68.8% and 57.1% and 48.0% after 1, 5, 10 and 15 years. This analysis reveals excellent long-term results after OLT achieved in a single center.

Clinical trial on the cost-effectiveness of T-tube use in an established deceased donor liver transplantation program

The aim of our study was to assess the advantages and disadvantages of T-tube use in liver transplantation, with also paying attention to the economic costs derived from its use. Patients were prospectively randomized to T tube or no T tube. One hundred and seven patients, 53 with T tube and 54 without T tube, were analyzed. Minimum follow-up was three months. Nine patients (8.4%) had bile leak: six in the T-tube group (11.3%) and three in the group without T tube (5.5%), p = ns. Four patients (3.5%) had anastomotic biliary stenosis: one in the T-tube group (1.8%) and three in the group without T tube, p = ns. Twenty of the 53 patients (37.7%) with T tube had T-tube-related complication. The number of diagnostic and therapeutic resources were higher in the T-tube group compared with non-T tube (81 and 17 vs. 18 and 10, respectively, p <0.05). The costs of therapeutic procedures required for the treatment of complications were 28 232 euro in the T-tube group vs. 16 088 euro in the no T-tube group, p <0.05. In conclusion, the systematic use of the T tube in biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation cannot be justified.

Liver Transplantation: Experience With Our First 100 Cases

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to evaluate the results of the first 100 liver transplants performed in our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the first 100 liver transplants undertaken in adults from November 2001 to August 2005.

RESULTS

The mean age of the recipients was 50 years (20 to 69) and 73% were men. The mean waiting time was 35 days. The mean age of the donors was 60 years (15 to 87), and 60% were men. One-year patient and graft survival rates were 93% and 90%, respectively. Three-year patient and graft survival rates were 85% and 82%, respectively. The need for retransplantation was 3%. Surgical complications included hepatic artery stenoses, 2%; hepatic artery thromboses, 2%; biliary leaks, 6%; and biliary stenoses, 14%.

CONCLUSIONS

These results are no different from the overall results for liver transplantation in Spain during the same period.