Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the evaluation of late biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on management of post-liver transplant biliary strictures: summary and recommendations

This clinical practice guideline from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy provides an evidence-based approach for strategies to manage biliary strictures in liver transplant recipients. This document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. The guideline addresses the role of ERCP versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and covered self-expandable metal stents (cSEMSs) versus multiple plastic stents for therapy of post-transplant strictures, use of MRCP for diagnosing post-transplant biliary strictures, and administration of antibiotics versus no antibiotics during ERCP. In patients with post-transplant biliary strictures, we suggest ERCP as the initial intervention and cSEMSs as the preferred stent for extrahepatic strictures. In patients with unclear diagnoses or intermediate probability of a stricture, we suggest MRCP as the diagnostic modality. We suggest that antibiotics should be administered during ERCP when biliary drainage cannot be ensured.

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on management of post-liver transplant biliary strictures: methodology and review of evidence

This clinical practice guideline from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy provides an evidence-based approach for strategies to manage biliary strictures in liver transplant recipients. This document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. The guideline addresses the role of ERCP versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and covered self-expandable metal stents (cSEMSs) versus multiple plastic stents for therapy of strictures, use of MRCP for diagnosing post-transplant biliary strictures, and administration of antibiotics versus no antibiotics during ERCP. In patients with post-transplant biliary strictures, we suggest ERCP as the initial intervention and cSEMSs as the preferred stent. In patients with unclear diagnosis or intermediate probability of a stricture, we suggest MRCP as the diagnostic modality. We suggest that antibiotics should be administered during ERCP when biliary drainage cannot be assured.

Endoskopisches Management von Gallengangskomplikationen nach Leberchirurgie

Biliäre Komplikationen stellen häufige Komplikationen nach Leberchirurgie dar und tragen wesentlich zur postoperativen Morbidität und Mortalität bei. Den größten Anteil dieser machen Gallengangsleckagen und -strikturen aus, wobei die Leckagen nach Cholezystektomie und Leberresektion dominieren und die Strikturen ein wesentliches Problem nach Lebertransplantationen darstellen. Patienten nach orthotoper Lebertransplantation stellen besonders vulnerable Patienten dar, deren biliäre Komplikationen von denen nach Cholezystektomie und Leberresektion differieren und niederschwellig sowie mit größter Vorsicht behandelt werden müssen. Mit der endoskopischen retrograden Cholangiografie steht ein exzellentes Verfahren zur Behandlung dieser Komplikationen zur Verfügung. Die therapeutischen Möglichkeiten beinhalten die endoskopische Sphinkterotomie, die Anlage von Prothesen und Dilatationen. Mittels dieser Verfahren können Erfolgsraten in bis zu 90% der Fälle erreicht werden. Bei Hepatikojejunostomien bestehen alternative Interventionsmöglichkeiten wie die ballon- oder motorunterstützte antegrade Enteroskopie, die perkutan-transhepatische Cholangiodrainage oder mit zunehmendem Einsatz die endosonografisch gestützten Verfahren.

Post-transplant biliary complications: advances in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Liver transplantation (LT) is the only curative therapy in patients with end-stage liver disease. Long-term survival is excellent, yet LT recipients are at risk of significant complications. Biliary complications are an important source of morbidity after LT, with an estimated incidence of 5%-32%. Post-LT biliary complications include strictures (anastomotic and non-anastomotic), bile leaks, stones, and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Prompt recognition and management is critical as these complications are associated with mortality rates up to 20% and retransplantation rates up to 13%. This review aims to summarise our current understanding of risk factors, natural history, diagnostic testing, and treatment options for post-transplant biliary complications.

Do Biliary Complications after Proton Beam Therapy for Perihilar Hepatocellular Carcinoma Matter?

We aimed to evaluate the biliary complications and efficacy of proton beam therapy (PBT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We retrospectively analyzed 167 patients who received PBT with ≥ 75 GyRBE of biological effective dose with 𝛼/β = 10 for primary HCC. The perihilar region was defined as a 1-cm area extending from the right, left, and common hepatic ducts, including the gallbladder and cystic duct. PBT-related biliary complications were defined as follows: significant elevation in bilirubin level to > 3.0 mg/dL; elevation to more than twice of the baseline level after the completion of PBT; or newly developed radiological biliary abnormalities, which were not caused by HCC progression, comorbidities, or other treatments. Eighty (47.9%) had perihilar HCC. PBT-related events occurred in seven (4.2%), three of whom had perihilar HCC. Radiologic biliary abnormalities developed in 12 patients (7.2%); however, no events were PBT-related. All patients who experienced PBT-related biliary complications had underlying liver cirrhosis. The albumin-bilirubin grade was identified as an independent factor associated with PBT-related biliary complications. PBT at the current dose showed a low rate of PBT-related biliary complications even for patients with perihilar HCC. PBT for HCC patients with risk factors requires attention to reduce PBT-related biliary complications.

Endoscopic Management of Biliary Issues in the Liver Transplant Patient

Biliary complications remain a common problem after liver transplantation (LT). The therapeutic endoscopist encounters a variety of situations in LT including strictures at the duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis, strictures elsewhere in the biliary tree caused by an ischemic injury, and bile leaks at the anastomosis or from the cut surface and stone disease. Biliary complications lead to significant morbidity and occasionally reduced graft and patient survival. Several factors increase the risk of strictures and leaks. Endoscopic intervention in experienced hands is successful in the management of biliary complications following LT and percutaneous or surgical correction should seldom be required.

Role of MRCP in Diagnosing Biliary Anastomotic Strictures After Liver Transplantation: A Single Tertiary Care Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Biliary strictures (BS) are common complication after liver transplantation. We aimed to determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance cholagiopancreatography (MRCP) in diagnosing BS in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) when compared to direct cholangiographic methods (endoscopic resonance cholagiopancreatography [ERCP] and/or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography [PTC]).

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 910 LTRs (July 2008 to April 2015) was performed, and a total of 39 patients with duct-to-duct anastomosis (22 males; 56.4%; mean age, 52.8 ± 8.3 years) were included who had an MRCP followed by either ERCP and/or PTC within 4 weeks. A cholangiographic narrowing (on ERCP and/or PTC) that required balloon dilation and/or stent placement was considered a BS and was considered clinically significant if the intervention resulted in at least 30% improvement of bilirubin within 2 weeks. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive values and negative predictive values of MRCP in diagnosing BS were calculated.

RESULTS

Magnetic resonance cholagiopancreatography showed anastomotic BS in 17 of 39 patients, and subsequent ERCP and/or PTC revealed a total of 25 BS (positive predictive value of 0.94). Nine BS on cholangiography (ERCP, 8; PTC, 1) were not detected on earlier MRCP (sensitivity, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.82); 2 were clinically significant BS and 6 of the remaining 7 had no improvement in their liver function test with biliary intervention. Thirteen LTRs had no BS on either modality (specificity, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-0.99). The negative predictive value of MRCP was 0.59 for cholangiographic BS. The overall accuracy of MRCP is 0.74 (exact 95% CI, 0.58-0.87). Inclusion of age, race, and alanine aminotransferase level improved the predictive value of MRCP (area under the curve = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance cholagiopancreatography has high specificity but low sensitivity in diagnosing cholangiographic BS in LTRs, although the predictive value further improved with inclusion of age, race, and alanine aminotransferase. Clinical significance of BS in LTRs not identified on MRCP is questionable because ERCP with intervention did not improve their liver function tests in the vast majority.

Evaluation of biliary complications on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and comparison with direct cholangiography after living-donor liver transplantation

AIM

To evaluate the imaging characteristics of biliary complications following liver transplantation on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and its diagnostic accuracy in comparison with direct cholangiography.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 34 patients being evaluated for possible biliary complications after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with abnormal MRCP findings were followed up for information regarding direct cholangiography either endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) within 7 days of MRCP. Twenty-nine patients underwent ERCP and five patients underwent PTC.

RESULTS

Compared to findings at direct cholangiography, MRCP presented 96.9% sensitivity, 96.9% positive predictive value, and 94.1% accuracy for the detection of biliary complications. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for detection of anastomotic strictures, biliary leak, and biliary stone or sludge on MRCP was found to be 100%, 84.6%, 91.3%, 100% and 94.1%; 72.7%, 95.7%, 88.9%, 88% and 88.2%; 80%, 100%, 100%, 96.7% and 97.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MRCP is a reliable non-invasive technique to evaluate the biliary complications following LDLT. MRCP should be the imaging method of choice for diagnosis in this setting and direct cholangiography should be reserved for cases that need therapeutic interventions.

Management issues in post living donor liver transplant biliary strictures

Biliary complications are common after living donor liver transplant (LDLT) although with advancements in surgical understanding and techniques, the incidence is decreasing. Biliary strictures are more common than leaks. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the first line modality of treatment of post LDLT biliary strictures with a technical success rate of 75%-80%. Most of ERCP failures are successfully treated by percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and rendezvous technique. A minority of patients may require surgical correction. ERCP for these strictures is technically more challenging than routine as well post deceased donor strictures. Biliary strictures may increase the morbidity of a liver transplant recipient, but the mortality is similar to those with or without strictures. Post transplant strictures are short segment and soft, requiring only a few session of ERCP before complete dilatation. Long-term outcome of patients with biliary stricture is similar to those without stricture. With the introduction of new generation cholangioscopes, ERCP success rate may increase, obviating the need for PTBD and surgery in these patients.

Do Biliary Complications after Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Matter?

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after failure of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or in cases of refractory HCC, and to investigate biliary complications after hypofractionated RT.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively enrolled patients with unresectable, TACE-unresponsive, or refractory HCC treated with hypofractionated RT between July 2006 and December 2012. The perihilar region was defined as the 1-cm area surrounding the right, left, and the common hepatic duct, including the gallbladder and the cystic duct. Significant elevation of total bilirubin was defined as an increase of more than 3.0 mg/dL, and more than two times that of the previous level after completion of RT.

Results

Fifty patients received hypofractionated RT and 27 (54%) had a tumor located within the perihilar region. The median follow-up period was 24.7 months (range, 4.3 to 95.5 months). None of the patients developed classic radiation disease symptoms, but four patients (8%) showed significant elevation of total bilirubin within 1 year after RT. During follow-up, 12 patients (24%) developed radiologic biliary abnormalities, but only two patients had toxicities requiring intervention. Estimated local progression-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival of the patients at 3-year post-hypofractionated RT were 89.7%, 11.2%, and 57.4%, respectively.

Conclusion

Biliary complications associated with a higher dose exposure of hypofractionated RT were minimal, even in the perihilar region. Hypofractionated RT provided excellent local control and may be a valuable option for treatment of unresectable cases of TACE-unresponsive or refractory HCC.

Endoscopic management of biliary complications after liver transplantation: An evidence-based review

Biliary tract diseases are the most common complications following liver transplantation (LT) and usually include biliary leaks, strictures, and stone disease. Compared to deceased donor liver transplantation in adults, living donor liver transplantation is plagued by a higher rate of biliary complications. These may be promoted by multiple risk factors related to recipient, graft, operative factors and post-operative course. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is the first-choice examination when a biliary complication is suspected following LT, in order to diagnose and to plan the optimal therapy; its limitations include a low sensitivity for the detection of biliary sludge. For treating anastomotic strictures, balloon dilatation complemented with the temporary placement of multiple simultaneous plastic stents has become the standard of care and results in stricture resolution with no relapse in > 90% of cases. Temporary placement of fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMSs) has not been demonstrated to be superior (except in a pilot randomized controlled trial that used a special design of FCSEMSs), mostly because of the high migration rate of current FCSEMSs models. The endoscopic approach of non-anastomotic strictures is technically more difficult than that of anastomotic strictures due to the intrahepatic and/or hilar location of strictures, and the results are less satisfactory. For treating biliary leaks, biliary sphincterotomy and transpapillary stenting is the standard approach and results in leak resolution in more than 85% of patients. Deep enteroscopy is a rapidly evolving technique that has allowed successful treatment of patients who were not previously amenable to endoscopic therapy. As a result, the percutaneous and surgical approaches are currently required in a minority of patients.

Complications and mortality after adult to adult living donor liver transplantation: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is widely performed for patients to resolve the critical shortage of organs from cadavers. Despite rapid implementation of the procedure, both complications and mortality of LDLT are annoying problems. The aim of this study was to analyze complications and mortality of patients after adult to adult LDLT (A-ALDLT) in a single center.

METHODS

Between April 2003 and November 2013, 167 (A-ALDLT) recipients in National Liver Institute, Egypt were included. We retrospectively analyzed complications and mortality in them.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of complications was 86.2% (n = 144) and classified as biliary 43.7% (n = 73), vascular 21.6% (n = 36), Small for size syndrome (SFSS) 12.6% (n = 21), Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) 19.8% (n = 33), wound 12.6% (n = 21), chest 19.8% (n = 33), neurological 26.3% (n = 44), renal 21% (n = 35), intra abdominal collection 21.6% (n = 36), recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) 16.8% (n = 28), recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 2.4% (n = 4), acute rejection 19.2% (n = 32). 65 (45.1%) of 144 complicated patients died, while 10 (43.5%) of 23 non complicated died. The incidence of whole, in hospital and late mortalities were 44.9%, 28.7% and 16.2% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality was higher among complicated cases where vascular complications and SFSS had significant effect on it so prevention and treatment of them is required for improving outcome.

Complications and mortality after adult to adult living donor liver transplantation: A retrospective cohort study

Background and aims

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is widely performed for patients to resolve the critical shortage of organs from cadavers. Despite rapid implementation of the procedure, both complications and mortality of LDLT are annoying problems. The aim of this study was to analyze complications and mortality of patients after adult to adult LDLT (A-ALDLT) in a single center. Methods: Between April 2003 and November 2013, 167 (A-ALDLT) recipients in National Liver Institute, Egypt were included. We retrospectively analyzed complications and mortality in them.

Results

The overall incidence of complications was 86.2% (n = 144) and classified as biliary 43.7% (n = 73), vascular 21.6% (n = 36), Small for size syndrome (SFSS) 12.6% (n = 21), Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) 19.8% (n = 33), wound 12.6% (n = 21), chest 19.8% (n = 33), neurological 26.3% (n = 44), renal 21% (n = 35), intra abdominal collection 21.6% (n = 36), recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) 16.8% (n = 28), recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) 2.4% (n = 4), acute rejection 19.2% (n = 32). 65 (45.1%) of 144 complicated patients died, while 10 (43.5%) of 23 non complicated died. The incidence of whole, in hospital and late mortalities were 44.9%, 28.7% and 16.2% respectively. Conclusions: Mortality was higher among complicated cases where vascular complications and SFSS had significant effect on it so prevention and treatment of them is required for improving outcome.

•

Mortality was higher among complicated cases.

•

Vascular complication was independent predictors of poor outcome.

•

Small for size syndrome was independent predictors of poor outcome.

•

Proper management of the previous complications improve outcome of LDLT.

Endoscopic ultrasound: valuable tool for diagnosis of biliary complications in liver transplant recipients?

BACKGROUND

Biliary complications after liver transplantation (LT) are still common and are an important cause of mortality and morbidity. Until now, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been considered the gold standard for diagnosing such complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the management of biliary complications after LT.

METHODS

Thirty-seven liver transplant patients who presented with clinical, biochemical, sonographic, and/or histological evidence of biliary complications, and who first received EUS followed by ERCP, were enrolled into this prospective observational study. Subsequently, we evaluated the value of EUS in detecting and classifying biliary complications after LT.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven biliary complications were detected in 32 patients. Endoscopic ultrasound showed an overall sensitivity and accuracy of 94.6 % each. In cases of biliary cast and ischemic cholangiopathy, EUS was found to be diagnostically superior to ERCP and has had, in these cases, a significant impact on clinical decision-making. However, EUS was less reliable when diagnosing anastomotic strictures.

CONCLUSION

EUS can complement ERCP to improve diagnosis of biliary complications after LT and help guide treatment strategies to address these complications.

Magnetic resonance cholangiography in the assessment and management of biliary complications after OLT

Despite advances in patient and graft management, biliary complications (BC) still represent a challenge both in the early and delayed period after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Because of unspecific clinical presentation, imaging is often mandatory in order to diagnose BC. Among imaging modalities, magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) has gained widespread acceptance as a tool to represent the reconstructed biliary tree noninvasively, using both the conventional technique (based on heavily T2-weighted sequences) and contrast-enhanced MRC (based on the acquisition of T1-weighted sequences after the administration of hepatobiliary contrast agents). On this basis, MRC is generally indicated to: (1) avoid unnecessary procedures of direct cholangiography in patients with a negative examination and/or identify alternative complications; and (2) provide a road map for interventional procedures or surgery. As illustrated in the review, MRC is accurate in the diagnosis of different types of biliary complications, including anastomotic strictures, non-anastomotic strictures, leakage and stones.

The efficiency of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography in living donor liver transplantation: a preliminary study

The aim of this study was to evaluate utility of gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) for the detection of biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A total of 18 patients with suspected biliary complications underwent MRC. T2-weighted MRC and contrast-enhanced MRC (CE-MRC) were used to identify the biliary complications. MRC included routine breath-hold T2-weighted MRC using half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) sequences and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRC T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequences. Before confirming the biliary complications, one observer reviewed the MRC images and the CE-MRC images separately. The verification procedures and MRC findings were compared, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of both techniques were calculated for the identification of biliary complications. The observer found six of seven biliary complications using CE-MRC. The sensitivity was 85.7% and the accuracy was 94.4%. Using MRC alone, sensitivity was 57.1% and accuracy was 55.5%. The accuracy of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRC was superior to MRC in locating biliary leaks (p < 0.05). The usage of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRC yields information that complements the MRC findings that improve the identification of biliary complications. We recommend the use of MRC in addition to Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRC to increase the preoperative accuracy when assessing the biliary complications after LDLT.

Advances in endoscopic management of biliary tract complications after liver transplantation

Biliary tract complications after liver transplantation (LT) most commonly include biliary leaks, strictures, and stone disease. Living donor recipients and donation after cardiac death recipients are at an increased risk of developing biliary complications. Biliary leaks usually occur early after transplantation, whereas strictures and stone disease occur later. The diagnosis of biliary complications relies on a combination of clinical presentation, laboratory abnormalities, and imaging modalities. Biliary leaks are usually diagnosed on the basis of bilious output from a surgical drain, fluid collections on imaging, or a cholescintigraphy scan demonstrating a leak. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is noninvasive, does not require the administration of an intravenous contrast agent, and provides detailed imaging of the entire biliary system both above and below the anastomosis. The latter not only helps in the diagnosis of biliary strictures and stones before patients undergo invasive procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) but also allows treating physicians to plan the optimal treatment approach. MRCP has, therefore, replaced invasive therapeutic modalities such as ERCP as the modality of choice for the diagnosis of biliary strictures and stones. There have been significant advances in endoscopic accessories, including biliary catheters, wires, and stents, as well as endoscopic technologies such as overtube-assisted endoscopy over the last decade. These developments have resulted in almost all patients, including those with difficult strictures or altered surgical anatomies (eg, Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy), being treated via an endoscopic approach with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, which is more invasive and associated with significant morbidity, with surgery being reserved for a small minority of patients. Advances in the diagnosis and endoscopic management of patients with biliary complications after LT are discussed in this review.

Diagnostic value of ultrasound in detection of biliary tract complications after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Biliary complications are significant source of morbidity after liver transplantation (LT). Cholangiography is the gold standard for diagnosis and specification of biliary complications.

OBJECTIVES

Detailed analyses of ultrasound (US) as a safe imaging method in this regard are still lacking. Therefore we analyzed systematically the diagnostic value of US in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospectively, 128 liver graft recipients and their clinical data were analyzed. All patients had a standardized US examination. The findings of US were compared to cholangiographic results in 42 patients. Following statistical analyses were performed: descriptive statistics, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV).

RESULTS

42 patients had 54 different biliary complications (Anastomotic stenosis (AS) n = 33, ischemic type biliary lesions (ITBL) n = 18 and leakage n = 3). US detected n = 22/42 (52%) patients with biliary complications. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of US were: 61%, 100%, 100%, 79% (95CI, 36-86%) for ITBL and 24%, 100, 100%, 31% (95CI, 9-46 %) for AS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

US examination had no false positive rate. Therefore, it may be helpful as a first screening modality. But for the direct diagnosis of the biliary complication US is not sensitive enough.

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are the principal cause of morbidity and graft dysfunction, ranging in incidence from 5.8% to 30% of cases. Biliary strictures are the most frequent type of late complication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) to detect biliary anastomotic strictures among patients undergone OLT with abnormal liver function tests.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-one of 300 patients who underwent OLT were evaluated by MRC for clinically suspected anastomotic biliary strictures. In all patients, we performed various precholangiographic sequences including T1- and T2-weighted and MRC (radial SE 2D and SS-TSE 3D). Magnetic resonance imaging findings were subdivided as absence or presence of an anastomotic stricture. Diagnostic confirmation was obtained by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (n=32), percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (n=21) or surgical treatment (n=18).

RESULTS

MRC detected 56 anastomotic biliary strictures, 53 of which were confirmed by other imaging modalities. MRC showed two false-negative cases and three false-positive cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of MRC to detect biliary strictures were 96%, 96%, 95%, 97%, and 96%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MRC proved to be a reliable noninvasive technique to visualize the biliary anastomosis and depict biliary strictures after OLT. MRC should be used when a biliary anastomotic stricture is suspected in an OLT patient.

The role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary stricture after liver transplantation

PURPOSE

To identify the diagnostic value of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in diagnosing biliary strictures after liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients with clinically suspected biliary strictures after liver transplantation were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent US and MRCP before the standard of reference (SOR) procedure: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Radiological images were analyzed for biliary dilatation and strictures.

RESULTS

By SOR, biliary dilatation was present in 55 patients, stricture in 53 (44 anastomotic, 4 intrahepatic, 5 both), and dilatation and/or stricture in 58. Dilatation was diagnosed by US and MRCP in 39 and 45, respectively (sensitivity 71% vs. 82%, p=0.18). Stricture was diagnosed by US and MRCP in 0 and 42, respectively (sensitivity 0% vs. 79%, p<0.0001). False positive stricture was diagnosed by MRCP in 2. Dilatation and/or stricture was diagnosed by US in 39 and MRCP in 50 (sensitivity 67% vs. 86%, p=0.01); however, using both techniques, sensitivity increased to 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

MRCP is superior to US for diagnosing biliary strictures after liver transplantation primarily because MRCP can detect stricture. The combination of US and MRCP seems superior to either method alone. Our data suggest that in patients with normal US and MRCP, direct cholangiography could be avoided.

Impact of magnetic resonance cholangiography in managing liver-transplanted patients: preliminary results of a clinical decision-making study

PURPOSE

This study was performed to assess the role of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in the clinical decision-making process of referring physicians when managing liver-transplanted patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a 6-month period, 21 liver-transplanted patients with a suspected biliary complication were referred for MRC. Referring physicians were asked to prospectively state, before and after MRC, the leading diagnosis; the level of confidence (on a 0-100% scale); the most appropriate diagnostic/therapeutic plan. Data analysis assessed was the diagnostic yield of MRC; the proportion of change in the leading diagnosis; the therapeutic efficacy (i.e. proportion of change in the initial diagnostic/therapeutic plan); the diagnostic thinking efficacy (i.e., gain in diagnostic confidence). Statistical significance was assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test. MRC accuracy was also calculated.

RESULTS

Data analysis showed a diagnostic yield of 85.7%; a proportion of change in leading diagnosis of 19.0%; a therapeutic efficacy of 42.8%; a diagnostic thinking efficacy for concordant and discordant leading diagnoses of 18.8% and 78.7%, respectively (p<0.01). MRC accuracy was 92.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

MRC significantly increased the diagnostic confidence, irrespective of the concordance between pre- and posttest diagnoses. Moreover, MRC determined a change in patient management in a significant proportion of cases, leading to clinical benefits.

Is MRCP equivalent to ERCP for diagnosing biliary obstruction in orthotopic liver transplant recipients? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Biliary complications are the second leading cause of morbidity and mortality in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) is considered the diagnostic criterion standard for post-orthotopic liver transplantation biliary obstruction, but incurs significant risks.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of MRCP for biliary obstruction in OLT patients.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search identified studies primarily examining the utility of MRCP in detecting post-orthotopic liver transplantation biliary obstruction. A meta-analysis was then performed according to the Quality of Reporting Meta-Analyses statement.

SETTING

Meta-analysis of 9 studies originally performed at major transplantation centers.

PATIENTS

A total of 382 OLT patients with clinical suspicion of biliary obstruction.

INTERVENTIONS

MRCP and ERCP or clinical follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Sensitivity and specificity of MRCP for diagnosis of biliary obstruction.

RESULTS

The composite sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 17 (95% CI, 9.4-29.6) and 0.04 (95% CI, 0.02-0.08), respectively.

LIMITATIONS

All but 1 included study had significant design flaws that may have falsely increased the reported diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The high sensitivity and specificity demonstrated in this meta-analysis suggest that MRCP is a promising test for diagnosing biliary obstruction in patients who have undergone liver transplantation. However, given the significant design flaws in most of the component studies, additional high-quality data are necessary before unequivocally recommending MRCP in this setting.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the accurate diagnosis of biliary complications after liver transplantation: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography - long-term follow-up

Biliary complications after liver transplantation remain a serious cause of morbidity and mortality. Direct invasive cholangiographic techniques, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), have procedure-related complications. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is non-invasive, safe, and accurate. The aim of this study was to evaluate MRCP in detecting biliary complications following liver transplantation and comparing findings with ERCP and PTC. Twenty-seven consecutive liver transplant recipients who presented with clinical and biochemical, ultrasonographic, or histological evidence of biliary complications were evaluated with MRCP. Patients were followed up for a median period of 36 months. The presence of a biliary complication was confirmed in 18 patients (66.6%): anastomotic biliary stricture in 12 (66.6%); diffuse intrahepatic biliary stricture in 5 (27.7%): ischemic (n = 3), recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 2), and choledocholithiasis in one. In nine patients (33.3%), MRCP was normal. Six patients underwent ERCP, and eight PTC. There was a statistically significant correlation between the MRCP and both ERCP and PTC (p = 0.01) findings. The sensitivity and specificity of the MRCP were 94.4% and 88.9%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values, 94.4% and 89.9%, respectively. MRCP is an accurate imaging tool for the assessment of biliary complications after liver transplantation. We recommend that MRCP be the diagnostic imaging modality of choice in this setting, reserving direct cholangiography for therapeutic procedures.

Current management of biliary complications after liver transplantation: emphasis on endoscopic therapy

Biliary complications occur in 5-25% of patients after liver transplantation and represent a major source of morbidity in this group of individuals. The major risk factor for most of these complications is ischemia of the bile tree usually due to obstruction or vascular insufficiency of the hepatic artery. The most common complications include biliary strictures (anastomostic and nonanastomotic), bile leaks, and biliary filling defects. The initial diagnostic approach starts with a high index of suspicion along with an abdominal ultrasound and Doppler exam. Magnetic resonance imaging is highly sensitive and is usually reserved for confirmation. The vast majority of these complications can be successfully treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, however if this procedure cannot be performed a percutaneous approach or surgery is recommended. Nonanastomotic strictures and living donor recipients present a less favorable response to endoscopic management. This review focuses on the current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for the management of biliary complications after liver transplantation.

Role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in biliary complications of orthotopic liver transplantation

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in the detection of biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight transplant patients with clinically suspected biliary complications were evaluated with 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a surface coil. All patients were imaged with the following sequences: axial T1-weighted and axial and coronal T2-weighted, 2D spin echo (SE) breath-hold radial cholangiography, and coronal 3D single-shot turbo spin echo (SS-TSE) with respiratory triggering. Patients with negative MRI underwent clinical and sonographic followup. When biliary complications were present, diagnostic confirmation was obtained by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (n=13), percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) (n=20), ultrasonography (n=10) or computed tomography (CT) (n=2). In 11 cases, surgical confirmation was also obtained.

RESULTS

MRC detected biliary complications in 44/78 patients, in particular, 42 biliary strictures (37 anastomotic and five intrahepatic), 40 of which were confirmed by other imaging modalities. In 25/37 cases of anastomotic stricture, preanastomotic dilatation of the biliary tract was also demonstrated. Other MRC-detected biliary complications were biliary sludge (n=4), biloma (n=5), and biliary stones (n=3). In four cases, PTC revealed biliary complications that had not been detected with MRC (false negative results). In two cases, MRC showed unconfirmed strictures of the intrahepatic ducts and biliodigestive anastomosis (false positive results). The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values and diagnostic accuracy of MRC were 93.5%, 94.4%, 96.7%, 89.5% and 93.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm that MRC is a reliable technique for depicting biliary anastomoses and detecting biliary complications after OLT. The high diagnostic accuracy of MRC indicates that this examination should be routinely employed in all OLT patients with clinically suspected biliary complications.

Biliary complications following liver transplantation

The aphorism that reconstruction of the biliary anastomosis is the "Achilles heel" of liver transplantation remains valid as biliary complications following liver transplantation remain a major source of morbidity with an incidence of 5-32%. Biliary complications include biliary strictures, biliary leaks, and stones. Biliary strictures can be divided into anastomotic and non-anastomotic. The management of biliary complications previously relied on surgical intervention. However, advances in endoscopic and radiological interventions have resulted in less-invasive options. The management of biliary complications post-liver transplantation requires a multidisciplinary approach and continues to evolve. Biliary complications also reflect the continued expansion of the donor pool with extended, live, and non-heart beating donors.

Endoscopic management of biliary complications after liver transplantation

Complications of the biliary tract are an important cause of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. The most frequent complications are anastomotic biliary tract strictures, bile leaks, and bile duct stones. The estimated incidence of these complications ranges between 5% and 25%, although rates have been decreasing in recent years. Most complications can be managed successfully with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. This article reviews the various biliary complications after liver transplantation (both deceased donor and living-related donor) and their endoscopic management.

Biliary tract complications after liver transplantation

Biliary tract complications are an important source of morbidity after liver transplantation, and present a challenge to all involved in their care. With increasing options for transplantation, including living donor and split liver transplants, the complexity of these problems is increasing. However, diagnosis is greatly facilitated by modern noninvasive imaging techniques. A team approach, including transplant hepatology and surgery, interventional endoscopy and interventional radiology, results in effective solutions in most cases, such that operative reintervention or retransplantation is rarely required.

Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: MRCP findings

Orthotopic liver transplantation is a widely accepted treatment for end-stage liver disease and selected cases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite surgical progresses, biliary complications after transplantation remain a serious cause of morbidity, mortality, and graft dysfunction or failure in recipients. Early complications occur within a few weeks after transplantation and are mainly represented by bile leakage. Late complications, which become evident from 3 months to years, include strictures, stones, intraductal debris or sludge formation, kinking and ampullary dysfunction. Donor-to-recipient common bile duct disproportion has been reported as a borderline condition. Diagnosis is challenging because of the low specificity of clinical and biologic findings. Sonography does not provide projectional images of the biliary tract or direct evaluation of the anastomoses. Moreover, direct cholangiographic procedures have an unacceptable rate of complications to be used in patients with low clinical suspicion. Magnetic resonance cholangiography is a safe and accurate tool, playing an increasing role in the diagnosis and management of biliary complications. Heavily T2-weighted images provide panoramic, detailed evaluation of the biliary tract, showing biliary complications as a variable combination of bile duct dilatation, strictures, filling defects, fluid collections and peculiar morphologic changes, as described in this paper.

Management of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: The role of endoscopy

Biliary complications are significant causes of morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The estimated incidence of biliary complications after OLT ranges between 10%-25%, however, these numbers continue to decline due to improvement in surgical techniques. The most common biliary complications are strictures (both anastomotic and non-anastomotic) and bile leaks. Most of these problems can be appropriately managed with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). Other complications such as bile duct stones, bile casts, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and hemobilia, are less frequent and also can be managed with ERC. This article will review the risk factors, diagnosis, and endoscopic management of the most common biliary complications after OLT.

Assessment of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation with magnetic resonance imaging

AIM: To analyze the MR findings of early and late biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and to evaluate the clinical value of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) combined with MR cross-sectional images in diagnosing biliary complications after OLT.

METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of biliary complications after receiving OLT were evaluated on the basis of MRCP and MR cross-sectional images, the latter including T1W axial unenhanced and Gadolinum-enhanced sequences, Gadolinum-enhanced VIBE sequences, unenhanced T2W axial images and coronal True-FISP sequences. The diagnostic accuracy rates were compared between MRCP and MRCP combined with MR cross-sectional images.

RESULTS: The incidence of biliary complications after OLT was 64.9% (37/57). The final diagnoses were as follows anastomotic stricture (n = 14), nonanastomotic stricture (n = 8), solitary biliary stone or sludge (n = 5), cholangitis and periangiocholitis (n = 3), biloma (n = 3), donor-to-recipient common bile duct disproportion (n = 3), and elongation of extrahepatic biliary duct (n = 1). In 37 cases of biliary complications, the accuracies of MRCP and MRCP combined with MR cross-sectional images were 75.7% (28/37) and 94.6% (35/37), respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: MRCP combined with MR cross-sectional images can improve the diagnostic accuracy of biliary complications, especially the diagnosis of biloma, cholangitis and periangiocholitis.

Complications of liver transplantation: multimodality imaging approach

Liver transplantation is currently an accepted first-line treatment for patients with end-stage acute or chronic liver disease, but postoperative complications may limit the long-term success of transplantation. The most common and most clinically significant complications are arterial and venous thrombosis and stenosis, biliary disorders, fluid collections, neoplasms, and graft rejection. Early diagnosis is crucial to the successful management of all these complications, and imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis of all but graft rejection. A multimodality approach including ultrasonography and cross-sectional imaging studies often is most effective for diagnosis. Each imaging modality has specific strengths and weaknesses, and the diagnostic usefulness of a modality depends mainly on the patient's characteristics, the clinical purpose of the imaging evaluation, and the expertise of imaging professionals.

Post-transplant hepatic complications: Imaging findings

Transplantation is considered definitive therapy for acute or chronic irreversible pathologies of the liver, and the increased survival rates are mainly due to improved immunosuppressive therapies and surgical techniques. However, early diagnosis of possible graft dysfunction is crucial to liver graft survival. Diagnostic imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of the liver before and after transplant and in the detection of complications such as vascular and biliary diseases, acute and chronic rejection and neoplastic recurrence. Integrated imaging using color-Doppler, CT, MRI and traditional x-ray reach a high level of sensitivity and specificity in the management of transplanted patients.