Split for two adults: what is the real feasibility?

Full-left-full-right split liver transplantation for adult recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Full-left-full-right split liver transplantation (FSLT) for adult recipients, may increase the availability of liver grafts, reduce waitlist time, and benefit recipients with below-average body weight. However, FSLT may lead to impaired graft and patient survival. This study aims to assess outcomes after FSLT. Five databases were searched to identify studies concerning FSLT. Incidences of complications, graft- and patient survival were assessed. Discrete data were pooled with random-effect models. Graft and patient survival after FSLT were compared with whole liver transplantation (WLT) according to the inverse variance method. Vascular complications were reported in 25/273 patients after FSLT (Pooled proportion: 6.9%, 95%CI: 3.1-10.7%, I² : 36%). Biliary complications were reported in 84/308 patients after FSLT (Pooled proportion: 25.6%, 95%CI: 19-32%, I² : 44%). Pooled proportions of graft and patient survival after 3 years follow-up were 72.8% (95%CI: 67.2-78.5, n = 231) and 77.3% (95%CI: 66.7-85.8, n = 331), respectively. Compared with WLT, FSLT was associated with increased graft loss (pooled HR: 2.12, 95%CI: 1.24-3.61, P = 0.006, n = 189) and patient mortality (pooled HR: 1.81, 95%CI: 1.17-2.81, P = 0.008, n = 289). FSLT was associated with high incidences of vascular and biliary complications. Nevertheless, long-term patient and graft survival appear acceptable and justify transplant benefit in selected patients.

Adult left liver transplantation from split livers and living donors: a 14-year single-center experience

BACKGROUND

In an era of organ scarcity, the use of left liver grafts for adult recipients could increase the access to liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the results in a single-center series of adult left LT over a 14-yr period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 1996 and March 2010, 30 adult patients underwent LT with a left liver obtained from 16 split cadaveric livers and 14 living donors (LD). Portal vein inflow modulation was performed in selected cases.

RESULTS

A total of 19 (63.3%) grafts had early dysfunction leading to graft failure in six cases (20%). One third of the grafts developed small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). One-yr patient and graft survival was 80% and 76.7%, respectively. Regarding two successive periods, one-yr patient and graft survival dramatically increased from 62.5% to 100% (p = 0.01) and 56.2% to 100% (p = 0.002), respectively. Multivariate analysis disclosed that completion of a portosystemic shunt and the occurrence of post-operative ascites were significantly associated with graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support that improved surgical techniques and careful patient selection can lead to a safe use of left livers for transplantation in adult recipients. Inflow modulation could be performed in very selected cases.

Split-liver transplantation in 2 adults: significance of caudate lobe outflow reconstruction in left lobe recipient: case report

Split-liver transplantation is a well-known procedure for increasing the donor pool. The procedure is commonly used in 1 adult and 1 child, but is less commonly performed in 2 adults because of technical difficulty and poor outcome in left-lobe recipients. Preservation of caudate lobe function is important in recipients with borderline graft-recipient weight ratio to achieve better results. Herein, we report a case in which caudate lobe outflow was reconstructed in a left lobe with a caudate lobe graft in split-liver transplantation in 2 adults.