Lymphocele After Renal Transplantation: The Influence of the Immunosuppressive Therapy

Factors Influencing Lymphocele Development After Kidney Transplant: Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

Lymphocele is a well-known postoperative surgical complication after kidney transplant. In this study, our aim was to analyze incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of posttransplant lymphocele in a large cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This observational study included 395 consecutive patients (219 males and 176 females) who underwent kidney transplant procedures from 183 living and 212 deceased donors in our center between January 2007 and 2014. A lymphocele was diagnosed with ultrasonography.

RESULTS

The incidence of lymphoceles in our cohort was 31.9% (n = 126). There were no significant dif-ferences with regard to body mass indexes, age of donors, deceased donor ratios, acute rejection episodes, and history of abdominal surgery between those with and without lymphoceles. The pre-transplant serum albumin levels (3.29 ± 0.67 vs 3.48 ± 0.69 g/dL; P = .009) in the lymphocele group and diabetes mellitus ratios (15.9% vs 4.5%; P < .001) in the nonlymphocele group were lower than levels shown in the other group. The lymphocele ratio in patients who received cyclosporine was higher than that shown in patients who did not received it (37.5% vs. 27.4%; P = .032). There was no difference in lymphocele incidence between patients who were taking and those who were not taking mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, or mycophenolate sodium. In regression analysis, presence of diabetes mellitus, transplant from deceased donors, older age of donors, and lower albumin levels were independent risk factors for posttransplant lymphocele occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttransplant lymphocele was a relatively common surgical complication in our cohort. We concluded that diabetes mellitus, use of kidneys from deceased donors, older donor age, and hypoalbuminemia were independent risk factors for lymphocele development.

Consensus on definition and severity grading of lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The incidence of lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation varies considerably in the literature. This is partly because a universally accepted definition has not been established. This study aimed to propose an acceptable definition and severity grading system for lymphatic complications based on their management strategy.

METHODS

Relevant literature published in MEDLINE and Web of Science was searched systematically. A consensus for definition and a severity grading was then sought between 20 high-volume transplant centres.

RESULTS

Lymphorrhoea/lymphocele was defined in 32 of 87 included studies. Sixty-three articles explained how lymphatic complications were managed, but none graded their severity. The proposed definition of lymphorrhoea was leakage of more than 50 ml fluid (not urine, blood or pus) per day from the drain, or the drain site after removal of the drain, for more than 1 week after kidney transplantation. The proposed definition of lymphocele was a fluid collection of any size near to the transplanted kidney, after urinoma, haematoma and abscess have been excluded. Grade A lymphatic complications have a minor and/or non-invasive impact on the clinical management of the patient; grade B complications require non-surgical intervention; and grade C complications require invasive surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

A clear definition and severity grading for lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation was agreed. The proposed definitions should allow better comparisons between studies.

Colloid Osmotic Pressure Participates on the Post-transplant Lymphocele Pathogenesis

The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of colloid osmotic pressure in post-transplant lymphocele pathogenesis. We have analyzed total plasmatic protein and albumin levels, and electrophoresis has been completed in blood samples before transplantation and in days 3 and 14 after transplantation in 50 patients with lymphocele (Lymphocele) and 198 patients without lymphocele (control), respectively. Colloid osmotic pressure (COP) was calculated according to the Hoefs formula. Statistically significant differences were confirmed in albumin levels (42.2 respectively 44.8 g/L) before transplantation (day 0); in total protein (52.5 resp. 55.5 g/L), in albumin (30.1 resp. 32.1 g/L), and COP (15.6 respectively 17.7 kPa) in day 3; and in total protein (52.8 resp. 58.9 g/L), in albumin (30.5 respectively 35.4 g/L), in COP (16.1 respectively 21.2 kPa) in day 14. A potentially critical albumin level was established in 44.1 g/L in the blood analyzed, but its sensitivity was only 62%. The main risk element for the lymphocele formation remains the surgeon's hand. We can proclaim the role of proteins and their COP in the post-transplant lymphocele formation as one of possible pathogenetic cofactors. It is responsible for the impaired mechanisms of the reabsorption the lymph back to the tissues. Better metabolic care could help to reduce incidence of this surgical complication.

Symptomatic lymphocele developing soon after acute renal allograft rejection: coincidental or causal connection?

A renal transplant patient developed a lymphocele soon after an episode of acute rejection (AR). The lymphocele rapidly increased in size causing transplant ureteric and venous obstruction, leading to acute graft dysfunction and swelling of the ipsilateral leg. We appraise the complex relationship that exists between AR, lymphangiogenesis and lymphocele formation to determine whether a case for a causal connection between AR and development of lymphocele can be made in our patient.

Does ultrasonic energy for surgical dissection reduce the incidence of renal transplant lymphocele?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the difference in post-renal transplant lymphocele rate based on the surgical dissection technique for control of lymphatics by examining the historical case group under the direction of a single, university-based surgeon in a retrospective, cohort study.

PATIENTS

Five hundred thirty-two consecutive renal transplant patients from January 1994 to December 2009.

FINDINGS

Of the 532 cases studied, 259 (48.7%) had suture ligation and 273 (51.3%) employed ultrasonic dissection (UD) for control of lymphatics during renal transplantation. There was no difference found in the rate of lymphocele formation, requiring either percutaneous or surgical drainage, when surgical ties (8.9%) were compared to UD (9.2%; P=.999). Logistic regression analysis showed that the odds ratio for developing a lymphocele was independent of surgical dissection technique. Within the logistic analysis, the prediction for lymphocele was increased 3.29 times for pediatric patients (P=.002) and increased 2.97 times for those who received a living donor graft (P=.001), and there was a trend for those with a history of more than one renal transplant of 2.01 times (P=.079).

SUMMARY

Surgical dissection technique was not a factor in the development of post-renal transplant lymphocele. Younger age, living donor transplant, and repeat transplant status were found to be predictive variables for symptomatic lymphoceles requiring drainage, which may be considered when patients present for posttransplant evaluations for laboratory alterations.

Management of primary symptomatic lymphocele after kidney transplantation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Management of lymphoceles after kidney transplantation is highly variable. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the different approaches of lymphocele management among kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for case studies published between 1954 and 2010. Inclusion criteria were symptomatic lymphoceles developing in recipients of deceased or living donor kidneys with specified intervention and outcome. Primary outcome was the rate of recurrence. Secondary outcomes were the rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery, hospital stay, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Fifty-two retrospective case series with 1113 cases of primary lymphocele were selected for review. No randomized controlled trials or prospective cohort studies were located. Primary treatment modalities included were as follows: aspiration (n=218), sclerotherapy (n=155), drainage (n=219), laparoscopic surgery (n=333), and open surgery (n=188). Of the 218 cases of lymphocele managed with aspiration alone, 141 recurred with a recurrence rate of 59% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52-67). Among those who received laparoscopic and open surgery, the recurrence rates were 8% (95% CI: 6-12) and 16% (95% CI: 10-24), respectively. The conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery was 12% (95% CI: 8-16).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic fenestration of a symptomatic lymphocele is associated with the lowest risk of lymphocele recurrence. However, the evidence base to support a recommendation for laparoscopic surgery as first line treatment is weak and highlights the need for a multicenter prospective cohort study to examine the benefits of incorporating initial simple aspiration into the management of lymphocele after kidney transplantation.

Post-kidney transplantation lymphocele due to a lymphatic filariasis

Lymphocele is a well-known complication of renal transplantation. Presenting symptoms are nonspecific; most patients are entirely asymptomatic. Herein, we have reported a case of lymphocele due to an asymptomatic lymphatic Wuchereria bancrofti filariasis with deterioration of graft function. A 53-year-old man with end-stage renal disease secondary to vascular disease was admitted 40 days after transplantation with vague, isolated abdominal pain. An abdomen and pelvis ultrasound examination demonstrated a cystic structure in the renal hilus. Graft function deteriorated, so the patient underwent puncture of the lymphocele followed by povidone iodine sclerotherapy. In the percutaneous drainage, we noted a fine whitish strand 4-mm thick similar to the shape of the stent, a part of which seemed to go into the transplantation fossa. Parasitological examination showed an adult female worm of W bancrofti measuring 6 cm. The test for microfilaremia was negative. The patient was treated for 10 days with a combination of Ivermectin and Albendazole associated with Doxycycline. The collection rapidly decreased after worm treatment. This case describes a post-renal transplantation lymphocele due to asymptomatic lymphatic filariasis.

Did volume of lymphocele after kidney transplantation determine the choice of treatment modality?

INTRODUCTION

Lymphocele is a lymph collection that forms after surgery following injury to lymph nodes and vessels. The aim of the study was to perform a retrospective analysis of different treatment modalities of lymphocele in patients after kidney transplantation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A lymphocele located in renal graft area was observed in 25 of 386 transplanted patients (6.5%). Mean patient age was 45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 40 to 50) years. Mean observation time was 35 (95% CI, 27 to 43) months.

RESULTS

Mean time from transplantation to diagnosis of lymphocele was 29 days (range, 4 to 127). In 13 patients (54.2%), the lymphocele was symptomatic, requiring initial treatment by repeated needle aspirations or percutaneous drainage. Among 7 patients with persistence of the lesion treatment by sclerotherapy with doxycycline, povidone-iodine, and/or ethanol was successful in 4 cases who showed maximal lymphocele volume of 500 mL. Three other patients, namely, volumes of 120, 874, and 2298 mL were referred for surgery; in two cases, internal marsupialization was performed and in one case external drainage was necessary due to abscess formation. Mean time from the diagnosis to recovery in patients requiring surgical treatment was 15 (range, 8 to 24) weeks. Eleven patients with asymptomatic lymphoceles (mean volume 45 mL; range, 8 to 140) were monitored to resolution after a mean of 4 (range, 1 to 11) weeks.

CONCLUSION

All lymphoceles with the maximal volume exceeding 140 mL were clinically symptomatic. Initial percutaneous drainage with or without sclerotherapy was an effective method of treatment. Punctures, drainage, and sclerotherapy were not effective in patients with lymphoceles (>500 mL).

Risk Factors for Wound Healing Complications in Sirolimus-Treated Renal Transplant Recipients

Impaired surgical site healing occurs in 20% to 50% of sirolimus (SRL)-treated renal transplant (RT) recipients, with most patients having received concomitant corticosteroids. We determined the incidence of surgical site complications among RT recipients receiving SRL with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), with most patients on a steroid-avoidance protocol. SRL/MMF patients with complications within 3 months of transplantation were compared with 1) SRL/MMF patients without them and 2) matched RT recipients receiving tacrolimus (FK)/MMF. Between January 2002 and March 2005, 44 of 300 (15%) RT recipients received SRL within 6 weeks of transplantation. Fourteen (31.8%) developed lymphocele, bladder leak, wound dehiscence, cellulitis, or an abscess. Obesity (BMI > or =30 kg/m2) was significantly associated with problems: the mean BMI of SRL cases with complications was 29.9 kg/m2 vs 25.4 kg/m2 for SRL patients without them (P = .047). Seventy-one percent of obese SRL patients experienced complications compared with 24.3% (P = .025) of non-obese SRL patients. Surgical treatment was required in 29% of patients. Rates of maintenance steroid use were similar in SRL complicated cases compared with SRL patients without them. The FK control group showed a lower rate of complications (14.3%; P = .163) despite similar BMI, rejection rates, and chronic steroid use as the SRL group. Obesity and graft rejection were independent predictors of complications. Thus, among a group of predominantly steroid-free recipients on SRL, the rates of wound complications were similar to those seen previously, but the highest risk for them was observed in obese recipients and in those with acute rejection episodes. Wound complications were associated with significant morbidity.