Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus in patients with chronic renal allograft dysfunction

Cyclosporine A blocks autophagic flux in tubular epithelial cells by impairing TFEB-mediated lysosomal function

Cyclosporine A (CsA) is an immunosuppressor widely used for the prevention of acute rejection during solid organ transplantation. However, severe nephrotoxicity has substantially limited its long‐term usage. Recently, an impaired autophagy pathway was suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of chronic CsA nephrotoxicity. However, the underlying mechanisms of CsA‐induced autophagy blockade in tubular cells remain unclear. In the present study, we observed that CsA suppressed the activation and expression of transcription factor EB (TFEB) by increasing the activation of mTOR, in turn promoting lysosomal dysfunction and autophagy flux blockade in tubular epithelial cells (TECs) in vivo and in vitro. Restoration of TFEB activation by Torin1‐mediated mTOR inhibition significantly improved lysosomal function and rescued autophagy pathway activity, suppressing TEC injury. In summary, targeting TFEB‐mediated autophagy flux represents a potential therapeutic strategy for CsA‐induced nephrotoxicity.

Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies

Kidney transplantation improves quality of life and reduces the risk of mortality. A majority of the success of kidney transplantation is attributable to the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), cyclosporine and tacrolimus, and their ability to reduce acute rejection rates. However, long-term graft survival rates have not improved over time, and although controversial, evidence does suggest a role of chronic CNI toxicity in this failure to improve outcomes. Consequently, there is interest in reducing or removing CNIs from immunosuppressive regimens in an attempt to improve outcomes. Several strategies exist to spare calcineurin inhibitors, including use of agents such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mycophenolate sodium (MPS), sirolimus, everolimus or belatacept to facilitate late calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal, beyond 6 mo post-transplant; or using these agents to plan early withdrawal within 6 mo; or to avoid the CNIs all together using CNI-free regimens. Although numerous reviews have been written on this topic, practice varies significantly between centers. This review organizes the data based on patient characteristics (i.e., the baseline immunosuppressive regimen) as a means to aid the practicing clinician in caring for their patients, by matching up their situation with the relevant literature. The current review, the first in a series of two, examines the potential of immunosuppressive agents to facilitate late CNI withdrawal beyond 6 mo post-transplant, and has demonstrated that the strongest evidence resides with MMF/MPS. MMF or MPS can be successfully introduced/maintained to facilitate late CNI withdrawal and improve renal function in the setting of graft deterioration, albeit with an increased risk of acute rejection and infection. Additional benefits may include improved blood pressure, lipid profile and serum glucose. Sirolimus has less data directly comparing CNI withdrawal to an active CNI-containing regimen, but modest improvement in short-term renal function is possible, with an increased risk of proteinuria, especially in the setting of baseline renal dysfunction and/or proteinuria. Renal outcomes may be improved when sirolimus is used in combination with MMF. Although data with everolimus is less robust, results appear similar to those observed with sirolimus.

Conversion to sirolimus for chronic allograft nephropathy and calcineurin inhibitor toxicity and the adverse effects of sirolimus after conversion

BACKGROUND

Chronic allograft nephropathy and calcineurin inhibitor toxicity may cause graft loss. After kidney transplantation, especially among those patients with chronic allograft nephropathy, sirolimus may be a good alternative to calcineurin inhibitors. Unlike calcineurin inhibitors, sirolimus is devoid of significant nephrotoxicity, but approximately 30% to 50% of patients on sirolimus therapy display mild or severe adverse effects. We sought to report our experience with sirolimus conversion among patients with chronic allograft nephropathy as well as the mild versus severe adverse effects that limit the drug's use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the outcomes of 88 patients (64 men and 24 women) of overall mean age of 35.9 +/- 9.9 years (range, 21-59 years) who had undergone kidney transplantation. Immunosuppressive therapy had been converted from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus because of biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, or presence of malignancy. We excluded patients with prior acute rejection episodes. Subjects were divided into two groups with respect to their creatinine levels: Group A < 2 mg/dL and Group B >or= 2 mg/dL. After conversion to sirolimus, possible adverse effects of sirolimus were evaluated at the follow-up inset. Each patient underwent a physical examination, and estimation of serum lipid and electrolyte levels as well as hemoglobin concentration.

RESULTS

At the time of conversion of the 88 renal transplant patients, their mean duration after grafting was 48 +/- 15 months (range, 4-296). The prior treatment consisted of a calcineurin inhibitor, prednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil. After conversion, the calcineurin inhibitor was stopped and sirolimus was begun. The 48 Group 2 patients (34 men, 14 women) of overall mean posttransplant time of 22.7 +/- 14.6 months who underwent conversion displayed a mean serum creatinine increase to 3.2 +/- 1.4 mg/dL, including 17 subjects who underwent rejection. The 40 Group 1 patients (30 men, 10 women) with a mean overall posttransplant period of 67.6 +/- 49.9 months showed an fall in serum creatinine level to 1.4 +/- 0.5 mg/dL among only 3 patients. While 5/88 patients showed no increase in proteinuria (5.6%); 83 (94.4%) did experience it. Proteinuria increased from a mean of 192 +/- 316 to 449 +/- 422 mg/d. Only three patients displayed heavy proteinuria (>3 g/d); sirolimus was discontinued for this reason. Proteinuria was well controlled in the other patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme and/or angiotensin II receptor inhibitor agents. After sirolimus conversion, serum cholesterol levels increased from 187 +/- 42 to 214 +/- 52 mg/dL, and serum triglyceride levels increased from 161 +/- 61 to 194 +/- 102 mg/dL. All but four patients responded to statin therapy, with serum lipid levels falling to acceptable levels. Another four patients developed unilateral lower extremity edema with sirolimus discontinued for this reason. One patient displayed generalized arthralgia.

CONCLUSION

Chronic allograft nephropathy or calcineurin inhibitor toxicity can lead to loss of graft kidney function. Calcineurin inhibitor toxicity can lead to chronic allograft nephropathy. Patients with a low baseline serum creatinine level who undergo sirolimus conversion showed stabilized kidney function. Late conversion of patients with a serum creatinine above 2 mg/dL face a risk of graft failure. Sirolimus displayed a limited incidence of serious adverse effects; mild or moderate adverse effects, such as hyperlipidemia and proteinuria, were easily controlled with countermeasure therapy.

Aging, stem cells, and mammalian target of rapamycin: a prospect of pharmacologic rejuvenation of aging stem cells

What is the relationship between stem cell aging and organismal aging? Does stem cell aging cause organismal aging or vice versa? Will stem cell aging aggravate age-related diseases? And what is stem cell aging? As suggested herein, hyperstimulation of signal transduction pathways can render cells compensatorily irresponsive. And the hallmark of stem cell aging is poor responsiveness to activating stimuli. On the basis of the hypothesis that insensitivity to stimuli is in part due to hyperactivation of the target of rapamycin (TOR), this article suggests a means of pharmacologic rejuvenation of stem cells and wound-healing cells.

Patient selection critical for calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal in pediatric kidney transplantation

CNI withdrawal may be employed as a "rescue" strategy for patients with established renal allograft injury and/or declining allograft function, with the aim at eliminating CNI-associated nephrotoxic effects. This analysis reviews outcomes in a pediatric population and identifies risk factors for adverse events post-CNI withdrawal. We performed a retrospective analysis of 17 pediatric renal transplants who underwent CNI withdrawal, with conversion to sirolimus and MMF. Mean CrCl decreased from 64.3 +/- 22 to 59.38 +/- 28.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.04) at six months and 57.46 +/- 31.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.02) at 12 months post-withdrawal. Forty-one percent of patients experienced AR. Increased risk for AR was associated with prior AR history, lower sirolimus trough levels, and lower CNIT biopsy scores. Graft loss (24%) was associated with worse CrCl, proteinuria, and histologic chronicity. Proteinuria (spot protein/creatinine ratio) increased from 0.75 +/- 1.0 to 1.71 +/- 2.0 (p = 0.03), unrelated to de novo sirolimus use. Four patients returned to CNI-based immunosuppression due to AR (n = 3) and gastrointestinal side effects (n = 1). Careful selection of pediatric candidates for CNI withdrawal is recommended. Worsening graft function and graft loss may be minimized by selecting patients with high CNIT scores and low biopsy chronicity and excluding patients with prior AR history.

Five-Year Follow-up After Late Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors to Sirolimus in Patients With Chronic Renal Allograft Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is, among others, caused by nephrotoxic side effects of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), which are to date still the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy. Sirolimus (SIR), an immunosuppressive compound without effects on glomerular perfusion, has been used in CNI-sparing immunosuppressive protocols. We report the 5-year follow-up of a prospective, controlled conversion study from CNI to SIR in patients with moderately to severely impaired renal function.

METHODS

Twelve renal transplant recipients with moderately to severely impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate of 17 to 35 mL/min according to the MDRD formula), enrolled in a prospective, controlled 1-year pilot study were followed for 5 years.

RESULTS

Three renal grafts (25%) were lost during the 5-year follow-up. Graft loss was due to noncompliance in one patient and to CAN in the other two patients. These two patients returned to dialysis 43 and 59 months after conversion, corresponding to 86 and 75 months after transplantation, respectively. Six of nine patients had a stable or even better renal function compared to the baseline. The lipid profile increased initially, but then remained stable over time.

CONCLUSION

Conversion of immunosuppressive therapy from CNI to SIR in patients with impaired renal function more than 1 year after transplantation is feasible and safe yielding improved renal function in the majority of patients, which was sustained at 5 years follow-up.